[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by parmnion

How much do people pay for these houses??? With no soundproof...!!!


I know he looks like a bumbling idiot but he is farming stock...no way will he have a house that doesn't have thick enough walls that the neighbour don't hear

Its a rented flat.
The second ex wife got the house.
Maybe he preferred to rent knowing hed be moving to Downing Street

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

Its a rented flat.
The second ex wife got the house.
Maybe he preferred to rent knowing hed be moving to Downing Street

It's sound proof....don't be silly.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It's sound proof....don't be silly.

Yeah you know better than the police and the neighbours

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

Yeah you know better than the police and the neighbours

You actually think there are police and bieghbours involved. ....


Omg.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It's sound proof....don't be silly.

A flat in London? Doubt it. Loud noises like dogs barking, stereos, shouting matches etc will get picked up

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Withano

A flat in London? Doubt it. Loud noises like dogs barking, stereos, shouting matches etc will get picked up

Do we know where the flat is, cause I'm all over the property in london and it's style, look and privacy capacity....


Is it in Westminster?

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by parmnion

You actually think there are police and bieghbours involved. ....


Omg.

Stop trolling.
It's all over the news including right wing papers. Go and read about it, including the police statement.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Do we know where the flat is, cause I'm all over the property in london and it's style, look and privacy capacity....


Is it in Westminster?

In south London.
If you bothered to read the news you would see the house too, a Victorian house converted to a few flats so the internal walls are modern.

[Kazanne]

Who really cares? His house he can do what he wants ,the press are just leeches

[Ammi]

...he can’t really do what he wants though without gaining interest from the media and the public as he’s hoping to be..(..and probably will be..)...the next PM of this country.....it all goes with the territory, of course a police reported altercation at his home will be of public interest...

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...he can’t really do what he wants though without gaining interest from the media and the public as he’s hoping to be..(..and probably will be..)...the next PM of this country.....it all goes with the territory, of course a police reported altercation at his home will be of public interest...

Absolutely right.

He's a Conservative however so he can do anything he likes.
Make what it seems as at least near racist comments, make offensive comments, insult other citizens of the UK namely in Scotland.
Can help make worse a British subjects plight in Iran.
Can annoy his neighbours so much they call the Police.

He can however do and say all he likes because he fits the Conservative hard liners.

If this was Corbyn.
The comments would be on the lines of 'no smoke without fire',
He should tell people what was really going on.
Especially aspiring to take on the highest elected job in the Country.

Yet he will get support..
Totally and utterly unbelievable.

As PM you have next to no privacy.
Any other leader not pressed as to how many children etc, and not being open, would be thought devious.

Farron pressed on his religious stance etc.

Yet Johnson is being cocooned at present in case anything more unpleasant surfaces.
Or he says or does his usual offensive self styled buffoonery.

Once other people can essily hear altercations, to the point they are loud enough to even be recorded it seems, then tthose altercations become public anyway, no longer private.

Never the less, the hardline brigade will March in to support and cover for such as Johnson.
While demanding every detail of most negative reporting about other political figures of a Party that brigade hates.

Honestly it's near despairing.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Who really cares? His house he can do what he wants ,the press are just leeches

Do you say that when its Corbyn?
When the Daily Mail spouted its lies on Miliband's Father and now on Corbyn for instance.
Especially when the bandwagon starts rolling.

Do you jump in to discount that reporting too?

Or does the press being termed undesirables only apply to negative reporting of Conservatives.
Such as Mark Field and now Johnson.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Do you say that when its Corbyn?
When the Daily Mail spouted its lies on Miliband's Father and now on Corbyn for instance.
Especially when the bandwagon starts rolling.

Do you jump in to discount that reporting too?

Or does the press being termed undesirables only apply to negative reporting of Conservatives.
Such as Mark Field and now Johnson.

If Corbyn or anyone else was in their own home and this happened Joey I wouldn't care a jot, surely they are allowed SOME privacy whoever it is but it all seems quite dodgy now that he is one of the contenders for PM, I don't even care how many children he has or Corbyn come to that, its none of my business,I was hopng for Rory Stewart but we cant always get what we want so have to make the best of what we are given,I don't trust the press (any of it) I have said previously mark Field handled that affair wrong but can see where he may have been coming from,there are always two sides, as for Boris but I justdon't find it that interesting that he spilled wine on his sofa,if indeed that is true. All I want is for someone to run the country in a good way and from what I've seen we are fooked.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Who really cares? His house he can do what he wants ,the press are just leeches

His Left Wing Neighbor
sold it to the Guardian Paper.

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

If Corbyn or anyone else was in their own home and this happened Joey I wouldn't care a jot, surely they are allowed SOME privacy whoever it is but it all seems quite dodgy now that he is one of the contenders for PM, I don't even care how many children he has or Corbyn come to that, its none of my business,I was hopng for Rory Stewart but we cant always get what we want so have to make the best of what we are given,I don't trust the press (any of it) I have said previously mark Field handled that affair wrong but can see where he may have been coming from,there are always two sides, as for Boris but I justdon't find it that interesting that he spilled wine on his sofa,if indeed that is true. All I want is for someone to run the country in a good way and from what I've seen we are fooked.

The issue isn't that he "spilled red wine" ffs it's that he was aggressive, intimidating and abusive towards his partner, shouted and swore at her, and refused to get away from her when she was screaming at him to get out.

She might be OK with being in a relationship like that and maybe you think relationships like that are fine but for gods sake surely we should have SOME sort of standards when it comes to choosing the next leader of our country, and NOT pick a loud, xenophobic, misogynistic bully-clown?

The excuses that are being made on social media for this giant scruffy haired lump of sh**, and the other Tory MP who took it upon himself to physically assault a protester, are beyond a joke. It's terrifying.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

The issue isn't that he "spilled red wine" ffs it's that he was aggressive, intimidating and abusive towards his partner, shouted and swore at her, and refused to get away from her when she was screaming at him to get out.

She might be OK with being in a relationship like that and maybe you think relationships like that are fine but for gods sake surely we should have SOME sort of standards when it comes to choosing the next leader of our country, and NOT pick a loud, xenophobic, misogynistic bully-clown?

The excuses that are being made on social media for this giant scruffy haired lump of sh**, and the other Tory MP who took it upon himself to physically assault a protester, are beyond a joke. It's terrifying.

Tbf we don't know the full story here, she could have been accusing him of being unfaithful which is why she was on his laptop....she was screaming, not crying, he was shouting...so looks like 50/50 unless we are saying the man is always in the wrong in these situations, its not a good look for either of them and at a crucial time like this, Teresa May and Philip would never

Honestly I think at this point I would rather Bojo as PM than Hunt...its between a rock and a hard place though

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

The issue isn't that he "spilled red wine" ffs it's that he was aggressive, intimidating and abusive towards his partner, shouted and swore at her, and refused to get away from her when she was screaming at him to get out.

She might be OK with being in a relationship like that and maybe you think relationships like that are fine but for gods sake surely we should have SOME sort of standards when it comes to choosing the next leader of our country, and NOT pick a loud, xenophobic, misogynistic bully-clown?

The excuses that are being made on social media for this giant scruffy haired lump of sh**, and the other Tory MP who took it upon himself to physically assault a protester, are beyond a joke. It's terrifying.

You dont like him then TS?

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by arista

His Left Wing Neighbor
sold it to the Guardian Paper.

let's be fair, this is potentially the next PM, it is news

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

let's be fair, this is potentially the next PM, it is news

Yes but Police visited them
No Crime Committed.




It sounds worse than it is

[bitontheslide]

we don't know if any crime was committed or not, just that the police saw no evidence of it and a story doesn't need to be a crime for it to be news

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Tbf we don't know the full story here, she could have been accusing him of being unfaithful which is why she was on his laptop....she was screaming, not crying, he was shouting...so looks like 50/50 unless we are saying the man is always in the wrong in these situations

No one male or female who can't control their temper and aggression should even be being considered for the position of leader of an entire country, and as she isn't in the running to be prime minister, its not really relevant if it's 50/50 or not. Only his actions are relevant in the context of being appropriate for office. Someone who shouts and bawls at their partner and, from the sounds of it (banging noises followed by her suggesting that he doesn't care for anything because he's spoiled) likes to smash up inanimate objects in a temper tantrum is not suitable for prime minister. It's appalling that people think that kind of behaviour is OK in an adult... He's not a silly angry teenage boy, no matter how much he likes to act like one.

[Vicky.]

I don't really think its unreasonable that we would hold the potential future PM of the country to a higher standard that we would Bob next door tbh. I have seen this being explained as basically 'at least he is showing he is human, will be nice to have a 'normal' PM' as if..such rages are the only thing that make someone normal

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I don't really think its unreasonable that we would hold the potential future PM of the country to a higher standard that we would Bob next door tbh. I have seen this being explained as basically 'at least he is showing he is human, will be nice to have a 'normal' PM' as if..such rages are the only thing that make someone normal

It just shows that people are willing to accept the lowest aspects of human behaviour, like outright unapologetic aggression, as normal. Like having a screeching argument with a partner is a desirable part of being a "normal relatable person".

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

No one male or female who can't control their temper and aggression should even be being considered for the position of leader of an entire country, and as she isn't in the running to be prime minister, its not really relevant if it's 50/50 or not. Only his actions are relevant in the context of being appropriate for office. Someone who shouts and bawls at their partner and, from the sounds of it (banging noises followed by her suggesting that he doesn't care for anything because he's spoiled) likes to smash up inanimate objects in a temper tantrum is not suitable for prime minister. It's appalling that people think that kind of behaviour is OK in an adult... He's not a silly angry teenage boy, no matter how much he likes to act like one.

Not saying that at all, we have a version given to us by the press and the neighbour, no crime was committed as far as we know? You can't really win can you, May was called the Maybot due to lack of emotion, its funny how the papers are immediately quoting gospel when its someone we dont like, so many people defended Abbott when she was clearly breaking the law and calling her human, are now wading in and saying Boris is a a wife beater basically, Im so sick of the whole he said, she said...people applauding politicians being covered in milkshakes because they dont agree with their politics, while lauding Abbott for breaking the law while being a serving MP, I have never voted Tory, I have voted Labour but won't now, I am politically in the wilderness so maybe it easier for me to see both sides, this territorial ..my party and its members can do no wrong is frankly laughable, do people actually believe what they post, I doubt it, just last week people were trying to spin that Melania was wearing Gucci to make a political point...lmfao.. Yes Boris should be be snowy white, but he is not, neither is Hunt, neither is Corbyn, neither is St Nicky ....sick of the lot of them and I will be spoiling my vote for the foreseeable I think

[Toy Soldier]

I think we're in a pretty dire situation if our criteria for leader of the nation is "he hasn't broken any laws per se".