FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
22-09-2019, 08:49 AM | #1826 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Quote:
Levaes campaign was almost entirely lies, from memory.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 09:03 AM | #1827 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...it’s democratic to have a referendum vote based on lies...but un-democratic to have a re-vote based on truths...
...and that will help make ‘Britain Great Again...’... |
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 09:12 AM | #1828 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
people are obsessed with having another ref or a GE. The whole thing is completely pointless
Don't people understand that our future relationship with the EU is never going to go away. Why would a new ref be accepted as more accurate and legitimate than the previous one. If there was a GE and one side won a majority, they would force through an outcome that 50% of the population disagreed with, that's not a solution. Even if Boris forces a no deal brexit, we still have to get a deal with the EU at some point and that could easily mean joining the customs union. Our relationship with the EU will reflect the political majority at the time and that will vary over the coming decades The bottom line is that a new ref, a new GE won't solve anything. Politicians know this, and it never ceases to amaze me that people swallow what politicians are telling them so easily |
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 09:17 AM | #1829 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Quote:
For a while now I have thought a second ref is the only way out of it. Options, no deal or revoke. Only thing that makes any sense. I know why the most ardent leavers would not want that though, given so many have changed their minds now that they know a deal is NOT infact easy to reach as they were told...
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 09:26 AM | #1830 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Darragh makes some good points particularly with regard to immigration, I don't agree with his sweeping generalisations about NI though, there will still be plenty who remember bombings 'on the mainland' and would not want to return to those dark days
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 09:37 AM | #1831 | |||
|
||||
Sod orf
|
One thing the leave campaign was absolutely adamant on was that if they won, the opposing side wouldn't accept it and try and make us keep voting until they get the result they want. That was something that was regularly said. Did the leave campaign lie about that?
Last edited by Alf; 22-09-2019 at 09:38 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 09:48 AM | #1832 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
But didn't Farage say the same thing? If remain won by a small majority, he would continue campaigning to get a second ref?
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 09:50 AM | #1833 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 09:51 AM | #1834 | |||
|
||||
Sod orf
|
Quote:
Once our decision is implemented, leavers are free to campaign to re-join. But let's do what the country decided first, that would be a start, wouldn't it? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:10 AM | #1835 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Quote:
Edit to add Farage: In a 52-48 referendum this would be unfinished business by a long way. If the Remain campaign win two-thirds to one-third that ends it Ha, edited yet again to say, my page had not refreshed so I didnt realise I was basically parroting annie
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Vicky.; 22-09-2019 at 10:14 AM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:18 AM | #1836 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
I might be being thick here, but..whats the difference? Campaigning would be pointless if they weren't wanting another vote. Another ref was quite obviously what was meant by it
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Vicky.; 22-09-2019 at 10:19 AM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:22 AM | #1837 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...I guess if the majority of Brexiters are anti-re-vote...then that would indicate that any knowledge or talks of the Irish borders../...potential jeopardising if the GFA, would have made no difference....which I guess also, makes me think of Dara’s words again...
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:27 AM | #1838 | ||
|
|||
-
|
I wonder, once we actively leave the EU, are Brexiteers going to be peeved when people start campaigning for re-entry? Will that still be "undemocratic"?
|
||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:29 AM | #1839 | |||
|
||||
Sod orf
|
No, it will be fine for a Political party to put in their manifesto a new referendum. Then it will be down to the people to vote them into power.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:30 AM | #1840 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...everyone is going to be too busy hating on Scotland for going for their independence ...you’re the next target, me dear...
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:41 AM | #1841 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
In the words of Stephen Gethins:
The charlatans and chancers who led the Leave campaign did not even have the decency to set out their plans before the vote, which has led directly to the uncertainty and damage that we face today. The council president has hit the nail on the head with his remarks. Before any election or referendum, it is a basic part of democracy that those seeking office or a change set out their proposals in a manifesto or white paper and can then be held to account based on what was said before a vote. Yet those who campaigned for leave, including senior UK government ministers, failed even in this basic democratic requirement. Their action stands in stark contrast to the Scottish government that rightly opened up its plans to full scrutiny by producing a 650-page white paper and other position papers ahead of Scotland’s independence referendum. Providing a blueprint for future plans as well as means of accountability is responsible politics. Instead, with Brexit, we are faced with a situation where even the UK government itself is warning of food and medicine shortages and the loss hundreds of thousands of jobs and a massive economic hit. We are facing the worst crisis in peace-time because of senior government figures failing to hold themselves to account for their actions or have a plan for what comes next other than holding the Tory party together. All the while the Labour party acts as a willing accomplice in inflicting this economic devastation. The rest of Europe can clearly see that it is all of us in the UK who are paying the price for their continued failure. |
||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:41 AM | #1842 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:43 AM | #1843 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
Quote:
So stop framing it as a decision |
||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:44 AM | #1844 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
It was an ill-informed advice
|
||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:46 AM | #1845 | |||
|
||||
Sod orf
|
Quote:
Check it out, listen to someone who knows their history and facts. Last edited by Alf; 22-09-2019 at 10:48 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:50 AM | #1846 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
Quote:
The ref was advisory, non binding Last edited by Twosugars; 22-09-2019 at 10:50 AM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:54 AM | #1847 | |||
|
||||
Sod orf
|
David Starkey agrees with what you're saying, he admits it's advisory, but gives you another angle.
Last edited by Alf; 22-09-2019 at 10:55 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:55 AM | #1848 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 10:57 AM | #1849 | |||
|
||||
Sod orf
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-09-2019, 11:00 AM | #1850 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|