[Cherie]

Originally Posted by jet

During an interview to mark his 21st birthday in September 2005, Harry said he and William 'loved her to bits'.
He went on: 'She's a wonderful woman and she's made our father very, very happy, which is the most important thing.'

'Look at the position she's come into. Don't always feel sorry for me and William, feel sorry for her. We are grateful for her . . . we're very happy to have her around.'
Should there have been any lingering doubts about the brothers' feelings for the duchess, who had married their father five months earlier, Harry emphasised: 'To be honest, she's always been very close to me and William. But no, she's not the wicked stepmother, I'll say that right now.'



When it suits him he does a complete u - turn, which is why anything Harry (or Meghan) comes off with is suspect - it may not be REAL - but for effect to suit their latest narrative.

[bitontheslide]

this is the way life is these days. It doesn't matter that someone completely contradicts themselves. It doesn't matter if what they are saying is complete lies. If it gets them some attention then they have achieved their aim

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by jet

During an interview to mark his 21st birthday in September 2005, Harry said he and William 'loved her to bits'.
He went on: 'She's a wonderful woman and she's made our father very, very happy, which is the most important thing.'

'Look at the position she's come into. Don't always feel sorry for me and William, feel sorry for her. We are grateful for her . . . we're very happy to have her around.'
Should there have been any lingering doubts about the brothers' feelings for the duchess, who had married their father five months earlier, Harry emphasised: 'To be honest, she's always been very close to me and William. But no, she's not the wicked stepmother, I'll say that right now.'



When it suits him he does a complete u - turn (if he does in this instance) which is why anything Harry (or Meghan) comes off with is suspect - it may not be REAL - but for effect to suit their latest narrative.

I bet this doesnt get quoted much in this thread.

[Glenn.]

Well considering no one has even read the book and have no idea of the contents of the book, No one can really comment. That’s common sense no?

Sitting here talking as though you all know what the book says is hilarious and typical of your tabloid fuelled opinions

[jet]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Well considering no one has even read the book and have no idea of the contents of the book, No one can really comment. That’s common sense no?

Sitting here talking as though you all know what the book says is hilarious and typical of your tabloid fuelled opinions

That's why I said:
When it suits him he does a complete u - turn (if he does in this instance).

But I hope you are right and he talks of his love and closeness to Camilla in his book. LOL.

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by jet

During an interview to mark his 21st birthday in September 2005, Harry said he and William 'loved her to bits'.
He went on: 'She's a wonderful woman and she's made our father very, very happy, which is the most important thing.'

'Look at the position she's come into. Don't always feel sorry for me and William, feel sorry for her. We are grateful for her . . . we're very happy to have her around.'
Should there have been any lingering doubts about the brothers' feelings for the duchess, who had married their father five months earlier, Harry emphasised: 'To be honest, she's always been very close to me and William. But no, she's not the wicked stepmother, I'll say that right now.'



When it suits him he does a complete u - turn (if he does in this instance) which is why anything Harry (or Meghan) comes off with is suspect - it may not be REAL - but for effect to suit their latest narrative.

Gotcha

and of course its Meghan who has made him do all this, beggars belief it really does

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

During an interview to mark his 21st birthday in September 2005, Harry said he and William 'loved her to bits'.
He went on: 'She's a wonderful woman and she's made our father very, very happy, which is the most important thing.'

'Look at the position she's come into. Don't always feel sorry for me and William, feel sorry for her. We are grateful for her . . . we're very happy to have her around.'
Should there have been any lingering doubts about the brothers' feelings for the duchess, who had married their father five months earlier, Harry emphasised: 'To be honest, she's always been very close to me and William. But no, she's not the wicked stepmother, I'll say that right now.'



When it suits him he does a complete u - turn (if he does in this instance) which is why anything Harry (or Meghan) comes off with is suspect - it may not be REAL - but for effect to suit their latest narrative.

Oh the influence of Meghan over fickle Harry....lets wait and see

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Well considering no one has even read the book and have no idea of the contents of the book, No one can really comment. That’s common sense no?

Sitting here talking as though you all know what the book says is hilarious and typical of your tabloid fuelled opinions

Lets speculate and have some fun....

[parmnion]

Whaaaa, whaaaaa...my big bwovver shouted at me.


Whaaaaaa, whaaaaaaaa..I'm a big adult baby..

[bitontheslide]

i thinks its obvious that the rift between harry and the rest of the royal family is much bigger/permanent than originally thought

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by SantaslettertoMeghan

i thinks its obvious that the rift between harry and the rest of the royal family is much bigger/permanent than originally thought

He claims in the latest netsh1t episode that Meghan was out shining William and doing a better job than his brother who was born into the role

Harry you are delusional.

[GoldHeart]

Merry Christmas I guess

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by SantaslettertoMeghan

i thinks its obvious that the rift between harry and the rest of the royal family is much bigger/permanent than originally thought

What if their version of events is true !!!?

After all … the ‘family’ haven’t been exactly squeaky clean or honest / transparent about events over the decades .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by Zizu

What if their version of events is true !!!?

After all … the ‘family’ haven’t been exactly squeaky clean or honest / transparent about events over the decades .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

i didn't say anything about who was right or wrong, i just thinks its a much bigger rift between them than certainly I originally thought

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by SantaslettertoMeghan

i didn't say anything about who was right or wrong, i just thinks its a much bigger rift between them than certainly I originally thought

Oh yeah I realise … I was adding to your point


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Kazanne]

It sounds like Harry is quite jealous of William ,which is a shame.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by The Nutcracker

It sounds like Harry is quite jealous of William ,which is a shame.

Is this the txt msg meghan went WOW at?

[rusticgal]

Im not being funny....but I dont recall seeing much footage of their Australian tour....let alone it supposidly being a 'huge' success.
So I dont get the jealousy thing...
Too much of them trying to draw similarities to Diana and her popularity is starting to be a bit embarrassing.

[Soldier Boy]

Originally Posted by The Nutcracker

It sounds like Harry is quite jealous of William ,which is a shame.

If it's true, it is a shame, and it can only be the fault of Charles & the rest of the family because sibling jealousy doesn't just spring up out of thin air.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

If it's true, it is a shame, and it can only be the fault of Charles & the rest of the family because sibling jealousy doesn't just spring up out of thin air.

Well it was a dysfunctional family overall.

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

If it's true, it is a shame, and it can only be the fault of Charles & the rest of the family because sibling jealousy doesn't just spring up out of thin air.

we just need to look back at how Margaret was treated to know that it's more than likely to be true

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

If it's true, it is a shame, and it can only be the fault of Charles & the rest of the family because sibling jealousy doesn't just spring up out of thin air.

That rivalry from harry was going on when Diana was alive basically harry was jealous of his brother

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

That rivalry from harry was going on when Diana was alive basically harry was jealous of his brother

When most of your family favour your sibling because a family firm hierarchy....it is human nature to develop deep rooted resentment. It is very hard to live in the shadow of someone and treated differently just because of the order of your birth. I feel for Harry.....I don't think its William's fault but I can empathise with Harry too

[Cherie]

Just watching clips of how close they were on the news, what a shame, its not what Diana would have wanted at all

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

When most of your family favour your sibling because a family firm hierarchy....it is human nature to develop deep rooted resentment. It is very hard to live in the shadow of someone and treated differently just because of the order of your birth. I feel for Harry.....I don't think its William's fault but I can empathise with Harry too

Where is the evidence of that