FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
02-06-2009, 10:08 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
V.I.P
|
Wouldnt it be good if Big Brother 1 launched a year later?
In 2001? That would mean BB2 Would be on 2002 and so on... Instead of being 1 year behind. If this did happen it would mean that we would only be discussing about the Big Brother 9 house and acting all excited for that lol Does anyone else think BB Should of waited till 2001 because it would of been much better.. For example Davina could say... "Hello and welcome to the launch of Big Brother 2007!!" And then we would know it was series 7 instead of having to count forward to it Being BB8... |
|||
Reply With Quote |
02-06-2009, 10:09 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
good idea.. but what is done is done! the year 2000 sounds a good year to start!! a new millenium!!! and low and behold!! welcome to big brother
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
02-06-2009, 10:11 PM | #3 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
haha yeah I think that sometimes, I guess they didn't think it was going to do this well at the time though
|
||
Reply With Quote |
02-06-2009, 10:13 PM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
It wouldn't have been the same series' in a different year though ...
|
||
Reply With Quote |
02-06-2009, 11:10 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I've often thought about that but I don't think they should have delayed the series by a year just so it could match the date. It would be easier to keep track of though. It would be nice if they could just pick either a year or number (for example, either ALWAYS call it Big Brother 10 or always call it Big Brother 2009) instead of switching between them.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
02-06-2009, 11:21 PM | #6 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
yeah woulda been better
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|