[elliebrew]

Twitter once again proving why I now find this show unwatchable

An unusual peasant housemate goes in

Causes chaos and is awful to a lot of people

Other HM finally have enough and either bite back or try to ignore them and Twitter idiots start throwing 'bullying' around

It happened with Perez in January

REALLY

Marc now likely to win

The second time a vile person has won

It's not the content of the show putting me off it now it's the voting public and social media and forums

I just can't be bothered with other people's 'opinions' anymore

I just think some people shouldn't be allowed them if they're gonna use it champion chaos and disorder and vulgarity and nastiness

Game over guys

[Josy]

Didn't you make a thread a few days ago saying this series was amazing?

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Josy

Didn't you make a thread a few days ago saying this series was amazing?

[MB.]

Erm you supported Katie Hopkins

[elliebrew]

Originally Posted by Josy

Didn't you make a thread a few days ago saying this series was amazing?

The content is amazing

Social media and voting not so much

So read my threads properly before trying to embarrass me on my own thread

[elliebrew]

Originally Posted by MB.

Erm you supported Katie Hopkins

I supported Michelle visage actually

[Black Dagger]

Marc has never been homophobic so I automatically champion him over Danny who is a massive wanker

[BB4fan]

Let's have another old bore win again like Sam Evans or another sympathy vote.

[MB.]

Originally Posted by elliebrew

I supported Michelle visage actually

You also supported Katie Hopkins.

[Videostar]

Marc isn't a villain...still no examples of this nastiness to Belo I notice.

[elliebrew]

Originally Posted by MB.

You also supported Katie Hopkins.

Wrong, i agreed with a lot of what she said and did IN THE HOUSE. Because i was savvy enough to not judge her for her outside misdemeanours. Something the average joe and a lot on here couldn't see past.

Her conduct in the house was fun, funny, strong, articulate and championed the underdog.

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by elliebrew

I supported Michelle visage actually

Michelle was your main favourite but you also supported Katie Hopkins, who's entire persona is based around being outrageously nasty.

[elliebrew]

Originally Posted by Videostar

Marc isn't a villain...still no examples of this nastiness to Belo I notice.

Hes an antagonist. He antagonises the other housemates and, makes them uncomforatable, winds them up.

Which is supposedly what people like and want to see. Until someone calls him out for being an antagonist and then he's suddenly none of the above.

[elliebrew]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

Michelle was your main favourite but you also supported Katie Hopkins, who's entire persona is based around being outrageously nasty.

Yet she was nothing but lovely in the house

[Black Dagger]

HAHAHAHA

[nonstop]

Ever since Helens win, BB fans back the villains. It's mind-numbing.

[elliebrew]

Originally Posted by _LucasMichael_

HAHAHAHA

There we go. Antagonistic, insulting and dismissive. Such a rude response

[MB.]

Originally Posted by elliebrew

Wrong, i agreed with a lot of what she said and did IN THE HOUSE. Because i was savvy enough to not judge her for her outside misdemeanours. Something the average joe and a lot on here couldn't see past.

Her conduct in the house was fun, funny, strong, articulate and championed the underdog.

...by forming a clique against the underdogs?

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by elliebrew

There we go. Antagonistic, insulting and dismissive. Such a rude response

I laughed at a ridiculous claim. That's all.

[elliebrew]

Originally Posted by MB.

...by forming a clique against the underdogs?

A man walks up to you. Constantly hounds you and your friends. Is rude, loud and disrespectful constantly. And you cannot get away from them.

What would you do?

Challenge them? Argue it out?

fine

What if that didn't work. What if doing that made that person worse.

You would tire quickly and your only option would be to block it out.

Unless of course one of your friends got that wound up they had to voluntarily leave. Then you would take issue.

It was Survival

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by elliebrew

Yet she was nothing but lovely in the house

I don't agree that she was nothing but lovely, but I'll assume she was for a moment: So if a horrible person goes into BB and behaves like a strongly-censored version of themselves, they're automatically decent?

And before you say that she should be judged purely on what she did in the house, her controversial reputation is the entire reason she was even there, so when does that stop being relevant?

[elliebrew]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

I don't agree that she was nothing but lovely, but I'll assume she was for a moment: So if a horrible person goes into BB and behaves like a strongly-censored version of themselves, they're automatically decent?

And before you say that she should be judged purely on what she did in the house, her controversial reputation is the entire reason she was even there, so when does that stop being relevant?

A lot of people are judged on their reputations.

A lot have changed opinion.

Why should tKatie be the exception?

She was firm and gave Perez a taste of his own medicine. How does that prove her public persona is more real than what we saw in the house?

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by elliebrew

A lot of people are judged on their reputations.

A lot have changed opinion.

Why should tKatie be the exception?

She was firm and gave Perez a taste of his own medicine. How does that prove her public persona is more real than what we saw in the house?

Whether her public persona is real or an exaggeration is irrelevant. Regardless, she chooses to hurt people on a regular basis, the hurt and offence caused doesn't become any less real.

What she does is malicious, and that's a fact. A few weeks of biting her tongue while she's taking part in a popularity contest doesn't change that.

[elliebrew]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

Whether her public persona is real or an exaggeration is irrelevant. Regardless, she chooses to hurt people on a regular basis, the hurt and offence caused doesn't become any less real.

What she does is malicious, and that's a fact. A few weeks of biting her tongue while she's taking part in a popularity contest doesn't change that.

Well i disagree. I saw a deeply flawed, self deprecating and defensive woman with deep rooted self confidence issues.

I found her entirely endearing.

[MB.]

Originally Posted by elliebrew

A man walks up to you. Constantly hounds you and your friends. Is rude, loud and disrespectful constantly. And you cannot get away from them.

What would you do?

Challenge them? Argue it out?

fine

What if that didn't work. What if doing that made that person worse.

You would tire quickly and your only option would be to block it out.

Unless of course one of your friends got that wound up they had to voluntarily leave. Then you would take issue.

It was Survival

Perez's actions didn't mean that Hopkins and her crew had to act as they did towards Katie P, Alicia and Keith. But, hey, I'm glad she did - it lost her the win.