FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
View Poll Results: public services or nuclear weapons? | ||||||
Public Services | 12 | 92.31% | ||||
|
||||||
Nuclear Weapons | 1 | 7.69% | ||||
|
||||||
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
29-11-2015, 12:52 AM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
'A Cabinet minister has appeared to question whether Britain could continue to afford well-equipped schools and hospitals if it spends money on new nuclear weapons.
Matthew Hancock, the cabinet office minister, was appearing on BBC One’s Question Time programme.' Which would you rather have?.... http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a6751206.html
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 08:09 AM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
When and if the darkness comes, it will be the world and not just half of it. When and if we are nuked, the initial bombs will be triggered by a nation committing suicide and it will happen regardless of our defence.
__________________
No longer on this site. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 08:19 AM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
BoTh. No need for either either.
Thankfully with this government we appear to have them both. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 08:29 AM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Public services are being destroyed from all they were ever since this PM took office in the coalition and worse still now.
Even though public services were not perfect before. I have a view that we should look for a cheaper nuclear deterrent and also have one that is not under the rule of the USA either. On balance if it was a straight choice between public services and the nuclear issue then I would go for public services. |
||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 08:44 AM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
"Our Matthew needs putting back in the Cabinet in his Office - and the ruddy door locking.This question is daft. In this violent bloody world - without one, we soon won't have to worry about the other."
__________________
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts". Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003) .................................................. .. Press The Spoiler Button to See All My Songs Spoiler: Last edited by kirklancaster; 29-11-2015 at 08:45 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 09:24 AM | #6 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Both |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 09:34 AM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Can't see why we can't have both.
__________________
RIP Pyramid, Andyman ,Kerry and Lex xx https://www.facebook.com/JamesBulgerMT/?fref=photo "If slaughterhouses had glass walls, most people would be vegetarian" |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 09:39 AM | #8 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
its not an either or dilemma. Both is just fine
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 09:40 AM | #9 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Obviously both but the question asked for one or the other, if the choice was on a referendum say of do we keep public services or nuclear weapons,which would I choose. Then no doubt, I would take the chance/risk and choose public services.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 09:57 AM | #10 | |||
|
||||
.
|
If we didn't have nuclear weapons though, would one of the countries that hates us and has them, not just fire one our way and destroy us all? If this would be the outcome of not having nuclear weapons then I can't choose public services, because what would be the point in having them if there's no public?
__________________
BBCAN: Erica | Will | Veronica | Johnny | Alejandra | Ryan | Paras |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 11:47 AM | #11 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
There is no both option.
'A Cabinet minister has appeared to question whether Britain could continue to afford well-equipped schools and hospitals if it spends money on new nuclear weapons. Please try pick one or the other.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 11:48 AM | #12 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Indeed, this is how I see it. If a nuclear war DOES start, everyone is ****ed regardless of how big their own nukes are
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 11:50 AM | #13 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
but its not a realistic option. The cabinet minister is, not to put to fine a point on it, being a simplistic prick
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 11:53 AM | #14 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Maybe the question should have been worded, which do you prefer 'even more cuts to public services in order to build more nukes' or 'public services left alone and our nukes are fine'. Would this have been better and stopped the it will never happen answers?
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 11:55 AM | #15 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
“We have to reduce our debt but we’re still the fifth richest nation in the world and this week while we’re been told we can’t afford this, we can’t afford that – Cameron’s telling us those four nuclear submarines will cost Ł40bn,” the veteran Labour politician had argued.
“It’s a question of the choices you make. I’d rather our kids had a better education and that we had more hospital beds than four nuclear submarines.” Another panellist, comedian Matt Forde, told Mr Livingstone: “I want schools, hospitals, and nuclear submarines.” But Mr Hancock, who has responsibility for the government's efficiency drives, questioned whether all three priorities would be affordable at once.' These were the comments that led to the 'either/or' question, he inferred that both were not an option simultaneously.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 11:55 AM | #16 | |||
|
||||
You know my methods
|
Imagine you could not pay for your dog to get cured because your partner had spunked all the money on another new burglar alarm?
Yes you could get robbed but really... |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 11:59 AM | #17 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Brilliant analogy..
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 12:01 PM | #18 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 12:08 PM | #19 | |||
|
||||
You know my methods
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 12:09 PM | #20 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 12:12 PM | #21 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
You are complicating the issue, he suggests all three are not a viable option... so what gives? schools, hospitals, or WMDs?
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 12:19 PM | #22 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
Quote:
I could equally say, we can afford to pay for cancer treatment or old age pensions. Pick one ..... Its not realistic. He is taking 2 elements and connecting them together when there is no direct either or choice. Only within his simplistic mind |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 12:42 PM | #23 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
“Maybe that’s why we ran up so many debts under Labour,” he told the audience.' It is simple, he scoffs at Labour for borrowing to achieve all three, suggesting that if 40 billion is spent on defence then other elements will suffer. It's more brutally honest than anything,without further borrowing they can't achieve all three either so what will they do?
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 05:08 PM | #24 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts". Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003) .................................................. .. Press The Spoiler Button to See All My Songs Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-11-2015, 05:09 PM | #25 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
__________________
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts". Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003) .................................................. .. Press The Spoiler Button to See All My Songs Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|