Bea is ignorant about the Apollo Moon Landings

[Sticks]

Bea has said the Moon landings were faked (http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/bigbrother/a168906/bea-nasa-faked-the-moon-landings.html) and buying in to conspiracy theories that do not hold water.

She has therefore showed she is ignorant of the actual science involved

From the article

1) Why radiation was not the issue she said it was (http://www.clavius.org/envrad.html)

2) The flag was waving because of the motion given to it, not fluttering because of wind (http://www.clavius.org/envflutter.html)

In fact the Mythbusters tested this and here is the result


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMBCfuKs9i8

As for the Russians, they along with other countries were tracking the Apollo craft and if there had been any faking, they would have exposed it as they were enemies with of America at the time due to the cold war.


For further reading see this site (http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html)

So Bea is totally ignorant when she makes such statements.

[Hedgie]

You're right. She has an opinion she is not a thousand million percent read up on. Damn her for having a long and interesting conversation with anyone about the possibilities of government conspiricy. (and there should have been a grin smiley here to show i wasn't being arsey. curses. oh well, here it is) :bigsmile:

[BB22]

This "there were no moon landings" nonsense has been debunked so many times it is laughable. The fact that Bea buys into this rubbish merely indicates that even otherwise intelligent and educated individuals can acquire utterly ridiculous sets of beliefs through sheer gullibility.

[InOne]

Bea is a wannabe hippy toff who thinks the world revolves around her.

[BigDuncsBestMate]

She is ignorant about most things. She is a partonising cow and has a far far to big opinion about herself !!!!

[IsleOfWeather]

She was saying it to impress Marcus

all she was doing was illustrating her ignorance of space, American politics and basic human nature.

so not too much then:tongue:

[poejoe]

i'd like to know how they got the moon on power equal to a calculator?
next you'll be saying lee harvey oswald actually shot jfk and that terrorists actually flew planes into twin towers:rolleyes:

[IsleOfWeather]

Originally posted by poejoe
i'd like to know how they got the moon on power equal to a calculator?
next you'll be saying lee harvey oswald actually shot jfk and that terrorists actually flew planes into twin towers:rolleyes:

haha

good one








:elephant::elephant::elephant:dream world

[BlackOrWhite]

Bea's an idiot.

[Sticks]

Originally posted by poejoe
i'd like to know how they got the moon on power equal to a calculator?

Your question answered here (http://www.clavius.org/techcomp.html)

[bigbrother10uk]

it was fake.

[Sticks]

Originally posted by bigbrother10uk
it was fake.

Based on what

[SocietyIsRuined]

Originally posted by poejoe
i'd like to know how they got the moon on power equal to a calculator?
next you'll be saying lee harvey oswald actually shot jfk and that terrorists actually flew planes into twin towers:rolleyes:

Actually I will never ever believe that Oswald shot Kennedy. The other two I believe but never in my wildest dreams will I ever believe Oswald shot and killed him.

[MissKittyFantastico]

This is my problem with Bea, while I enjoyed her conversation with Marcus last night greatly, she is very misinformed on a lot of the topics she chooses to preach about, the moon landings being just one of them.

It's also very ironic that most of her information comes from internet sites and TV programmes, not first hand knowledge of any situation, yet last night she was preaching about how people watching too much TV and spending all their time online and not actually 'doing things' contributes to all that is wrong with society today.

So while she appears intelligent, and without question she puts herself across much better than a lot of people in the house, she actually makes herself look like a total hypocrite.

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally posted by Sticks
Originally posted by bigbrother10uk
it was fake.

Based on what

Yess, I'd like to see some proof that it never happened too. :conf: Everything else that the 'non-believers' have said has been proven wrong so how exactly were they fake?

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico

It's also very ironic that most of her information comes from internet sites and TV programmes,

And she's on a TV show!

[TheOfficialAdam]

She is just trying to be 'unique' and have a different opionion to everyone else

[spitfire]

Why haven't they been back?

[philmurph]

People she is right and were wrong

[bigbrother10uk]

Originally posted by Sticks
Originally posted by bigbrother10uk
it was fake.

Based on what

based on the fact that almost everything the american government does is deceptive to the public.

such as:

New World Order
Area 51
9/11
Global Warming

[bigbrother10uk]

here's the proof
:joker:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mouUUWpEec0

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally posted by bigbrother10uk
Originally posted by Sticks
Originally posted by bigbrother10uk
it was fake.

Based on what

based on the fact that almost everything the american government does is deceptive to the public.

such as:

New World Order
Area 51
9/11
Global Warming

New World Order - Kinda in the name it means global not just america

Area 51 - What about it?

9/11 - Yes, because America control Al-Qaeda :rolleyes:

Global Warming - America's responsible for again what's in the name, GLOBAL?

:bored:

[BB22]

Originally posted by bigbrother10uk
here's the proof
:joker:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mouUUWpEec0

ROFL!

[Sticks]

Originally posted by spitfire
Why haven't they been back?

That was to do with politics more than anything else. The problem was the Moon race was considered just that.

After the Soviets were beaten they decided they wanted to spend the money on other things and so Apollo was cancelled They then decided to build the shuttle as a cheap way into space, and it proved exactly the opposite. Also in terms of safety, Apollo was far safer. Three dead in a simulator on a ground test compared with 14 dead on Challenger (O ring Failure) and Columbia (Insulation tiles knocked off by falling foam from the External Tank)

This also meant a lot of people left NASA and went onto other things so a lot of the know how was lost.

Incidentally the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has now imaged the Apollo landing sites (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/17/apollo-landing-sites-imaged-by-lro/)

In Your face conspiracy theorists - Tori Bulechi (Mythbusters)

[spitfire]

Originally posted by Sticks
Originally posted by spitfire
Why haven't they been back?

That was to do with politics more than anything else. The problem was the Moon race was considered just that.

After the Soviets were beaten they decided they wanted to spend the money on other things and so Apollo was cancelled They then decided to build the shuttle as a cheap way into space, and it proved exactly the opposite. Also in terms of safety, Apollo was far safer. Three dead in a simulator on a ground test compared with 14 dead on Challenger (O ring Failure) and Columbia (Insulation tiles knocked off by falling foam from the External Tank)

This also meant a lot of people left NASA and went onto other things so a lot of the know how was lost.

Incidentally the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has now imaged the Apollo landing sites (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/17/apollo-landing-sites-imaged-by-lro/)

In Your face conspiracy theorists - Tori Bulechi (Mythbusters)
Knowing the Americans as we do.If they did land on the moon forty years ago,they would have a theme park up there by now!

[BlackOrWhite]

There are very stereotypical views of Americans here.

[bigbrother10uk]

Originally posted by BlackOrWhite
There are very stereotypical views of Americans here.

besides the government, america is a great place. and im proud to be american. :thumbs:

[Sticks]

Originally posted by bigbrother10uk
here's the proof
:joker:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mouUUWpEec0

And here is the Snopes article (http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/moonhoax.asp) detailing how this was filmed in 2002. It was designed to pull the legs of conspiracy theorists. The original person who conceived this film has since died and not at the hands of some American conspiracy

[Sticks]

Originally posted by spitfire

Knowing the Americans as we do.If they did land on the moon forty years ago,they would have a theme park up there by now!

It still costs a lot to just into Low Earth Orbit and only very wealthy Tycoons have gone up privately, and going via the Soyuz space craft, not the shuttle.

Space travel is not cheap, so setting up a theme park was way beyond anyone's financial ability.

In fact after Apollo 12 people were questioning going to the moon since we had done that.

Look at all the bad press and angry letters people wrote about the cost of the Mars rovers saying the money should be spent on feeding the hungry.

Space is political, and if a politician can make him or herself look good by getting funds for his pork barrel projects and taking it from NASA, what do you expect will happen?

[spitfire]

Originally posted by Sticks
Originally posted by spitfire

Knowing the Americans as we do.If they did land on the moon forty years ago,they would have a theme park up there by now!

It still costs a lot to just into Low Earth Orbit and only very wealthy Tycoons have gone up privately, and going via the Soyuz space craft, not the shuttle.

Space travel is not cheap, so setting up a theme park was way beyond anyone's financial ability.

In fact after Apollo 12 people were questioning going to the moon since we had done that.

Look at all the bad press and angry letters people wrote about the cost of the Mars rovers saying the money should be spent on feeding the hungry.

Space is political, and if a politician can make him or herself look good by getting funds for his pork barrel projects and taking it from NASA, what do you expect will happen?
Ahh the old 'we can't afford it' chestnut.Despite being the most richest and powerful nation on the earth.
If they had landed on the moon,why didn't they bring a soup dragon home?

[Speedy]

Im not really into the moon debate however I find it a little suspicious as to why there hasnt been a more recent landing? But I couldnt care less.

That being said I believe 911 was definitely organised by the US government. WTC 7 imploded on its self and fell at free fall. Not to mention why the most guarded building in the US, being the pentagon, hasnt realised footage of what actually hit it.

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally posted by Speedy
Im not really into the moon debate however I find it a little suspicious as to why there hasnt been a more recent landing? But I couldnt care less.

That being said I believe 911 was definitely organised by the US government. WTC 7 imploded on its self and fell at free fall. Not to mention why the most guarded building in the US, being the pentagon, hasnt realised footage of what actually hit it.

Oh, you know everything that goes on in the US government and exactly what they plan and do? There's a difference between fact and opinion.

[TT]

just because you have little knowledge of the moon landings doesn't mean you're an ignorant two-faced back-stabbing ugly annoying sh*t stirring bitch

[gunrunner911]

Originally posted by SocietyIsRuined
Originally posted by poejoe
i'd like to know how they got the moon on power equal to a calculator?
next you'll be saying lee harvey oswald actually shot jfk and that terrorists actually flew planes into twin towers:rolleyes:

Actually I will never ever believe that Oswald shot Kennedy. The other two I believe but never in my wildest dreams will I ever believe Oswald shot and killed him.

[off topic]
fyi

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/samboy20/wtc-7.gif
http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/samboy20/expose-banner2006.jpg

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally posted by TT
just because you have little knowledge of the moon landings doesn't mean you're an ignorant two-faced back-stabbing ugly annoying sh*t stirring bitch

Nobody said that. She still is though.

[Speedy]

Originally posted by BlackOrWhite
Originally posted by Speedy
Im not really into the moon debate however I find it a little suspicious as to why there hasnt been a more recent landing? But I couldnt care less.

That being said I believe 911 was definitely organised by the US government. WTC 7 imploded on its self and fell at free fall. Not to mention why the most guarded building in the US, being the pentagon, hasnt realised footage of what actually hit it.

Oh, you know everything that goes on in the US government and exactly what they plan and do? There's a difference between fact and opinion.

OK here are some facts for you. Research the Gulf of Tonkin incident, USS Liberty incident and Operation Northwoods, all declassified CIA documents now.

Seriously this is one argument you dont want to pick. But one question for you, what brought down WTC 7 on 911?

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally posted by Speedy
Originally posted by BlackOrWhite
Originally posted by Speedy
Im not really into the moon debate however I find it a little suspicious as to why there hasnt been a more recent landing? But I couldnt care less.

That being said I believe 911 was definitely organised by the US government. WTC 7 imploded on its self and fell at free fall. Not to mention why the most guarded building in the US, being the pentagon, hasnt realised footage of what actually hit it.

Oh, you know everything that goes on in the US government and exactly what they plan and do? There's a difference between fact and opinion.

OK here are some facts for you. Research the Gulf of Tonkin incident, USS Liberty incident and Operation Northwoods, all declassified CIA documents now.

Seriously this is one argument you dont want to pick. But one question for you, what brought down WTC 7 on 911?

Seriously this is an argument I want to pick but suggest it be done via U2U.

[gunrunner911]

just another FYI for the fag assed fagotrys in here...



http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/samboy20/CR3-huge-back.jpg

[Sticks]

Originally posted by spitfire

Ahh the old 'we can't afford it' chestnut.Despite being the most richest and powerful nation on the earth.
If they had landed on the moon,why didn't they bring a soup dragon home?

They were engaged in a long and costly unpopular war at that time and the budget was cut presumably to fund that.

Now why does that sound familiar

[spitfire]

Originally posted by Sticks
Originally posted by spitfire

Ahh the old 'we can't afford it' chestnut.Despite being the most richest and powerful nation on the earth.
If they had landed on the moon,why didn't they bring a soup dragon home?

They were engaged in a long and costly unpopular war at that time and the budget was cut presumably to fund that.

Now why does that sound familiar
Oh come on,they would of found the cash.I've read all the info on did they,didn't they and i side with the later.So i guess we will have to agree to disagree.:thumbs:

[BigBummer]

There is as much evidence proving the moon landings happened as there is dis-proving evidence.

There are equal amounts. Someone who believes they happened should call someone stupid becasue they don't believe... and vice versa.

Before anyone says there is not equal amounts... there is, you just need to stay away from mainstream media and look at more proffesional, unbiased news sources.

[Speedy]

Originally posted by BigBummer
There is as much evidence proving the moon landings happened as there is dis-proving evidence.

There are equal amounts. Someone who believes they happened should call someone stupid becasue they don't believe... and vice versa.

Before anyone says there is not equal amounts... there is, you just need to stay away from mainstream media and look at more proffesional, unbiased news sources.

Yea like this one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuwyY2DzO2I :hello::thumbs2::whistle:

[BB22]

I am not sure what the big controversy is about not having been back to the Moon. The reasons why are quite obvious, openly discussed by the relevant community and widely known. There is not much of a scientific imperative, it costs a bloody lot of money and nobody has yet worked out how to make a profit out of doing it.

If you will pardon the pun, this is not rocket science.

[Shasown]

Originally posted by Speedy

But one question for you, what brought down WTC 7 on 911?

http://www.nce.co.uk/thermal-turmoil-why-wtc7-collapsed/1884773.article

[BB22]

Originally posted by BigBummer
There is as much evidence proving the moon landings happened as there is dis-proving evidence.

There are equal amounts. Someone who believes they happened should call someone stupid becasue they don't believe... and vice versa.

Before anyone says there is not equal amounts... there is, you just need to stay away from mainstream media and look at more proffesional, unbiased news sources.

To be honest, there really isn't any evidence to indicate that the moon landings did not take place in line with the generally accepted history. I mean, the conspiracy theorists make a load of noise but they never offer anything that hasn't been comprehensively debunked over and over again.

[Speedy]

Originally posted by BB22
I am not sure what the big controversy is about not having been back to the Moon. The reasons why are quite obvious, openly discussed by the relevant community and widely known. There is not much of a scientific imperative, it costs a bloody lot of money and nobody has yet worked out how to make a profit out of doing it.

If you will pardon the pun, this is not rocket science.

Its not about making money. Those who rule space can rule the earth and thats why the US shat themselves when China shot down a weather satellite.

As for the cost wouldnt it be cheaper as technology has advanced?

[BB22]

Originally posted by Speedy
Originally posted by BB22
I am not sure what the big controversy is about not having been back to the Moon. The reasons why are quite obvious, openly discussed by the relevant community and widely known. There is not much of a scientific imperative, it costs a bloody lot of money and nobody has yet worked out how to make a profit out of doing it.

If you will pardon the pun, this is not rocket science.

Its not about making money. Those who rule space can rule the earth and thats why the US shat themselves when China shot down a weather satellite.

As for the cost wouldnt it be cheaper as technology has advanced?

We are not talking about space exploration or the weaponisation of space here. The US is still investing gigantic amounts of money in that, as should be obvious. We are talking about repeatedly sending people to the Moon. And as I have stated, the reasons why this does not happen are well-known, openly discussed and entirely plausible.

As for the cost/technology issue, not particularly.

[Speedy]

Originally posted by Shasown
Originally posted by Speedy

But one question for you, what brought down WTC 7 on 911?

http://www.nce.co.uk/thermal-turmoil-why-wtc7-collapsed/1884773.article

And Santa Clause will bring me presents on Dec 25th, for you he will be arriving on April 1st.

[Cybele]

You know, I came in here to say something about Bea, but it seems the thread has been hijacked by people spouting nonsense. I guess some people really do believe that everything on the internet is true. :rolleyes: Though I don't really think anyone could believe such utter nonsense, so I will assume they are just common trolls and ignore them.

[Shasown]

Originally posted by Speedy

And Santa Clause will bring me presents on Dec 25th, for you he will be arriving on April 1st.

I really do hate to be the bearer of bad news, my old mate, but just like any sort of truth in all those conspiracy theories you so obviously believe in, Santa Claus does Not exist.

[Sticks]

With regards to WTC7

As pointed out in an earlier link by shasown, it was uncontrolled fire that did for WTC7


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8

Now can we get away from 9/11 conspiracy theories or at least go to another thread, as this was about Bea making pronouncements about Apollo with no knowledge

[bigbrother10uk]

Originally posted by Sticks
With regards to WTC7

As pointed out in an earlier link by shasown, it was uncontrolled fire that did for WTC7


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8

Now can we get away from 9/11 conspiracy theories or at least go to another thread, as this was about Bea making pronouncements about Apollo with no knowledge

that is bullsh#t, fire does not make buildings suddenly implode.

[Shasown]

Originally posted by bigbrother10uk
that is bullsh#t, fire does not make buildings suddenly implode.

Explosions do? funny all the demolitions I have done i always thought things exploded outwards, thank you for putting me, the British Army and the whole of the scientific community straight on that.

[bluehill]

i have consperices about the moon landings and 9/11

why havent they landed on the moon after the cold war. its becuse they cant and they faked the moon landing to show american superioty.
9/11 towers that big cant fall in a staright line it would have been controled.

[Speedy]

Originally posted by Shasown
Originally posted by bigbrother10uk
that is bullsh#t, fire does not make buildings suddenly implode.

Explosions do? funny all the demolitions I have done i always thought things exploded outwards, thank you for putting me, the British Army and the whole of the scientific community straight on that.

Insult deleted. Seriously I cant be bothered arguing with you anymore, its a waste of time. But you may want to look up what conspiracy theory means. 19 terrorist with box cutters hijacking plans and flying them into buildings is a conspiracy theory.

BTW you better inform the US govt you have solves the WTC7 mystery as it couldn't be explained in the 911 report. Good work!

Edit PS I saw and interview with the most experienced demolitions expert on the planet. After being shown WTC7 he said there is no doubt in his mind it was a controlled demolition.

[bigbrother10uk]

Originally posted by Shasown
Originally posted by bigbrother10uk
that is bullsh#t, fire does not make buildings suddenly implode.

Explosions do? funny all the demolitions I have done i always thought things exploded outwards, thank you for putting me, the British Army and the whole of the scientific community straight on that.

wtf are you talking about.
you can clearly see that the towers were controlled implosioins.

watch the following video, and tell me it does not look familiar to what happened on 9/11

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79sJ1bMR6VQ

[Shasown]

Originally posted by Speedy


Aaah your in the army, no wonder you have limited education and brain washed. Seriously I cant be bothered arguing with you anymore, its a waste of time. But you may want to look up what conspiracy theory means. 19 terrorist with box cutters hijacking plans and flying them into buildings is a conspiracy theory.

BTW you better inform the US govt you have solves the WTC7 mystery as it couldn't be explained in the 911 report. Good work!

Wow all that vitriol and drivel simply because I mentioned the Army, I am not have never been nor will ever work for the British Army, I have however worked with them. Far from a limited education I am quite well qualified in my humble opinion.

Now If I was you I would apply the lesson you have hopefully just learned. Do not pick one minor piece of information and base your whole thesis on it, like the rest of the conspuracy buffs, when more information is revealed you look like a tw@t.( a complete and utter idiot, if you think it shows lack of vocabularic knowledge.)

Its not often you are right but you were wrong again.

[Sticks]

Those are controlled explosions in a sequence that you can hear.

Compare that video of a demolition with this footage of the collapse from a local tv news crew

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2oAsgzXXdw

Note absence of any initial charges that you need to demolish a building

WTC7 like the twin towers used trusses and once they start going it produces a cascade failure. The fire burned the supports and weakened the structure. To weaken a metal you do not need to get near a melting point as it will accelerate a process we call Creep.

As I said before, Bea did not mention 9/11 so if you must discuss 9/11 can you take this to another thread?

[thenewguy]

Wow, some sad ****in conspricy twats on this forum

[James]

Conspiracy theories :yuk:

Firstly, they just aren't true and they involve a lot of misinformation.

For example on the subject of the moon landings it is obvious that they were real just from listening or reading the astronauts testimonies of their experiences. And from all the photos and film/TV footage taken.

Also, I don't like how these theories always have it that there are supposedly these shady organisations continually working against the public interest. It doesn't matter if it is the US government or reality TV show votes being fixed :D ... seems to me people don't want to face up to things they are in fact sometimes responsible for.

[Jackie]

I'd be over the moon if she went this week:bigsmile:

[luminoussun]

people will believe anything they are told..by the goverment

[NadiasWilly]

Many many intelligent people think the moon landing was faked. There have been numerous books, articles and documentaries giving strong reasons to back up this theory.

I personally don't believe it was faked. But it doesn't mean Bea is an idiot. Just sceptical that's all.

Let's face it, she's Einstein compared to the typical BB fodder.

[luminoussun]

these buildings are designed to colapse inside themselfs.
I see a program about it and it was before the planes hit too..after the bombing.

[BitterFruit]

far too many conspiracy theorists airing their views......please put on your baco-foil helmets and go and sit in a dark room for a while...THEY can't see you there..

[tramp-stamp]

looking at the problems and the number of people killed in simply trying to place satellites in low orbit today

I find it questionable that we were able to get to the moon, land, get out, walk around, take off and return to earth, without mishap , 40 years ago!!

also at a time when America was at the height of a game of brinkmanship with the soviet union

[johnx]

Originally posted by BitterFruit
far too many conspiracy theorists airing their views......please put on your baco-foil helmets and go and sit in a dark room for a while...THEY can't see you there.. Tough sh*t pal-conspiracy theory is the new rock n roll.They'res millions of us and more joining the ranks everyday.

[BitterFruit]

Originally posted by johnx
Originally posted by BitterFruit
far too many conspiracy theorists airing their views......please put on your baco-foil helmets and go and sit in a dark room for a while...THEY can't see you there.. Tough sh*t pal-conspiracy theory is the new rock n roll.They'res millions of us and more joining the ranks everyday.


thats just a conspiracy theory about conspiracy theorists believing conspiracy theories ............:puzzled::conf2::puzzled:

[johnx]

Your confusing yourself now-just sayin if you dont like hearing conspiracy theories,tough.Cos your gonna hear alot of them in the future.

[BitterFruit]

Originally posted by johnx
Your confusing yourself now-just sayin if you dont like hearing conspiracy theories,tough.Cos your gonna hear alot of them in the future.

but if your a conspiracy theorist defending conspiracy theories put out by conspiracy theorists, how do I know its not a conspiracy theory about conspiracy theorists?

i need my pills..............

[Shasown]

Originally posted by tramp-stamp

also at a time when America was at the height of a game of brinkmanship with the soviet union

Its that brinkmanship that gives the biggest piece of evidence to the moon landings being true.

If the US hadnt put someone on the Moon, and announced they had to the world by live televised feed, wouldnt the Soviet Union have just announced that they were lying?

US: The Eagle has landed

USSR: What on a stage set in.....?

They both had radar trackers to track objects in space, the soviets were able to track the lunar missions both the US and themselves undertook, or have people conveniently overlooked it was a space race between two super powers who were both determined to show they were the better.

Oh let me guess conspiracy nuts, they were in it together, the Cold War didnt exist either, it was all a ploy for the two governments to work together and fool all us idiots who bought their stories?

Am so glad we have you to tell us the truth, even if those foil hats you want us all to wear dont really go with the rest of our clothes.

[Sticks]

Remember this site re the moon landings (http://www.clavius.org) answers all your questions by someone not connected with NASA but knows what they are talking about/

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally posted by thenewguy
Wow, some sad ****** conspricy twats on this forum

Sad because people have something they believe in and are willing to stand up for what they feel is right? Oh yes, those people are purely sad because they're interested in something you're not. Tunnel vision.

[Prole]

Originally posted by Speedy

Aaah your in the army, no wonder you have limited education and brain washed....

Ignore list. What a plonker....

[dudeMAN]

The moon landings are a hoax..

[letmein]

This thread should be moved to Serious Debates.

[ange7]

Originally posted by bigbrother10uk
here's the proof
:joker:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mouUUWpEec0
lol well done.
re Bea
she's not an idiot Apollo conspiracy theorist is she. ffs

[Stankleberry]

Poorly educated people believe in ridiculous conspiracy theories. It's not their fault.

[ange7]

Originally posted by Stankleberry
Poorly educated people believe in ridiculous conspiracy theories. It's not their fault.

yeah maybe but I don't think a poor education is an excuse. It's a person's responsibility to know all the facts before making a judgement. The facts about the moon landing aren't hard to find. This fake moon landing thing has been disproved over and over again but it keeps popping it's head up from people who are either lazy are who want to believe dark forces are trying to hide the truth from them.

[oopaloompa]

I dont think its the poorly educated, more people with an open mind and willing to listen and read all view.

But if you want some good conspiricies theories go to David Ikes site. It will have you in stiches. Especially how the royal family are reptilians:colour::colour:

[mangasatsuma]

How about this alternative? NASA did make it to the moon, and found the aliens who drove it here, and those aliens told them to **** off, or cut some deal for minerals, psychic farming etc.

The moon has more craters on the side facing the earth than the side facing outer space, it has an orbit unlike any other planetary satellite. Someone parked it.

The term "conspiracy theory" causes a lot of trouble because some dullards will instantly put all those theories in one category, which they choose to dismiss out of hand. Just as they already put official versions in another category which they choose to accept as true. Also some dullards, like perhaps Bea, like to say they believe all the "conspiracy theories" because it makes them look cool. Or causes arguments.