View Full Version : Twist tonight
reece(:
07-08-2009, 05:10 PM
I hope there will be one, although I doubt it.
Jayson
07-08-2009, 05:11 PM
It will be a double I reckon.
ManicWolf
07-08-2009, 05:13 PM
I don't think there's going to be enough time for adouble eviction or anything like that, since the show's not extended or anything tonight.
Lucass.
07-08-2009, 05:17 PM
The could be 2 people evicted at the same time and interviewed at the same time, how cool would it be if it was Bea and Lisa LOL!
reece(:
07-08-2009, 05:18 PM
Lisa + david they could have a smoke will they are being interviewed
Originally posted by Lucass.
The could be 2 people evicted at the same time and interviewed at the same time, how cool would it be if it was Bea and Lisa LOL!
That would be cool.
Brad.
07-08-2009, 05:19 PM
no, there wont be a twist tonight.
Mutteroo
07-08-2009, 05:52 PM
Strong likelihood that two of the more interesting HMs will be at the bottom of the pile. Why woUld BB want to boot out any more entertaining people than they have too?
Of course if the bottom two are David and Lisa, then there may be scope for a double last minute eviction. David hasn't said anything of value since he joined the house so I doubt his interview would last longer than 30 seconds. Lisa would just sulk and moan about Freddie so again not a long interview.
Yes I do live in cloud cuckoo land, but I can always dream?!...
chris1232
07-08-2009, 05:54 PM
nope, It wont be a double due to the amount of people that have left the house :D
Claymores
07-08-2009, 05:58 PM
Originally posted by Jayson
It will be a double I reckon.
FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME:
They NEVER do double evictions without announcing it prior to phone lines opening. It is only EVER a surprise to HMs, not to viewers/voters.
Not to make a clear announcement in advance would be tantemount to obtaining money by deception as voters would be misled about what their vote is for.
As an example, people are voting to save Lisa/David/Hira to get rid of Bea. If it had been a double eviction, they might have been less inclined to do so as the chances of saving one of those would be greatly reduced.
It would be taking money under false pretences.
Originally posted by The_Long_Run
Here you go:
Vote Terms & Conditions
Voting closes during Friday's results show on Channel 4. The Housemate with the least votes will be evicted from the Big Brother House on Friday.
http://www.channel4.com/bigbrother/voting/
XxShortyxX
07-08-2009, 05:59 PM
I heard it's a double eviction tonight.
RtooDee2
07-08-2009, 06:02 PM
The only way a twist will happen is Bea haters will be voting for Lisa, David and Hira and
Lisa haters will be doing Bea, David and Hira and BB will think god they are popular.
Everyone forgot to vote for Halfwit and HE gets evicted.
Could happen if this forum is to believed. They the only names that come up.
Claymores
07-08-2009, 06:06 PM
Originally posted by XxShortyxX
I heard it's a double eviction tonight.
The premium phone line regulator would have them in court before you could say "obtaining money by deception"
shyannedianne
07-08-2009, 06:06 PM
Passes claymore a wall to bang ur head on because it doesn't seem anyones listening :bouncy:
hello peeps please read and understand claymore - there wont be a double eviction :eureka:
Claymores
07-08-2009, 06:07 PM
Originally posted by shyannedianne
Passes claymore a wall to bang ur head on because it doesn't seem anyones listening :bouncy:
hello peeps please read and understand claymore - there wont be a double eviction :eureka:
:hugesmile:
J-Rock
07-08-2009, 06:50 PM
Rtoodee2 - I never thought of that!!! Sh*t!!!! You never know..I really would choke on my popcorn if that happened
Jordan.
07-08-2009, 06:51 PM
I doubt any twists :bored:
Tenantry
07-08-2009, 06:54 PM
Originally posted by Claymores
Originally posted by shyannedianne
Passes claymore a wall to bang ur head on because it doesn't seem anyones listening :bouncy:
hello peeps please read and understand claymore - there wont be a double eviction :eureka:
:hugesmile:
They really need to add this smiley for you http://www.northstandchat.biz/images/smilies/brick-wall-017.gif
Claymores
07-08-2009, 06:56 PM
Originally posted by Tenantry
Originally posted by Claymores
Originally posted by shyannedianne
Passes claymore a wall to bang ur head on because it doesn't seem anyones listening :bouncy:
hello peeps please read and understand claymore - there wont be a double eviction :eureka:
:hugesmile:
They really need to add this smiley for you http://www.northstandchat.biz/images/smilies/brick-wall-017.gif
Heehee - I love that one :laugh2:
ElProximo
07-08-2009, 07:15 PM
Originally posted by Claymores
Originally posted by Jayson
It will be a double I reckon.
FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME:
They NEVER do double evictions without announcing it prior to phone lines opening. It is only EVER a surprise to HMs, not to viewers/voters.
Not to make a clear announcement in advance would be tantemount to obtaining money by deception as voters would be misled about what their vote is for.
As an example, people are voting to save Lisa/David/Hira to get rid of Bea. If it had been a double eviction, they might have been less inclined to do so as the chances of saving one of those would be greatly reduced.
It would be taking money under false pretences.
Originally posted by The_Long_Run
Here you go:
Vote Terms & Conditions
Voting closes during Friday's results show on Channel 4. The Housemate with the least votes will be evicted from the Big Brother House on Friday.
http://www.channel4.com/bigbrother/voting/
I think that is correct but it just smells like a double-eviction.
But,
You are right that they can't surprise the voting public because it would amount to 'false pretenses' and would surely get into legal issues with both voters and the Betting people.
I suppose they could do a surprise 'instant eviction vote' but then that doesn't make a lot of financial sense.
My Twist idea (unlikely but I hold out hope)
The Evictee is announced but we are then reminded the reason they are going is a result of Marcus and Siavash claiming they no longer wanted to participate.
So,
Marcus and Siavash are now given 2 minutes to 'put up or shut up'. They can choose to replace the soon-to-be-evicted HM with themselves.
They will go in their place.
One reason WHY people are not paying that much attention to the rules you posted is actually because BB isn't really regarding its own rules this year.
This week is a prime example:
Marcus (who was all but certain to go) and who has already been 'saved' by BB interference at least twice before has somehow just broken rules and been rewarded with a 'vote to save' scheme that really just punished everyone else and saved Marcus.
Huh?
Siavash has 'kinda sorta' been 'punished' but not really and again at the expense of everyone else getting equal 'punishment.
So who the hell cares what rules BB used to have as they don't really enforce them or just make-up new ratings/vote money schemes seemingly out of nowhere.
So nobody else is following or expecting rules here either.
Could be as someone mentioned on another thread
Davina says "the votes have been counted and the 2 HMs with the least votes are ......&..... . The person evicted is .....
Whoever stayed would know they were second least popular although they stayed. Would wind them up a bit
Was shown on BBLB tonight when this happened to Vanessa and Makosi. Why would they have shown it?
Claymores
07-08-2009, 07:34 PM
You are right EL PROXIMO - after the scheduled eviction is done, they could do anything else they wanted like a snap eviction.
But as the show times do not allow for this, and it would be financial suicide not to leak a twist to the press/public (to attract a higher rating) it just ain't gonna happen.
You're maybe crediting the idiots at Endemol with too much imagination than they're due!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bananarama
07-08-2009, 07:35 PM
Sorry...NO twist........
Yorkyboy
07-08-2009, 07:41 PM
Why do People post threads like this:conf:
The title infers that something is going to happen when in fact it is asking whether something is going to happen:whistle:
Why not put a question mark at the end of the post so that we can ignore idle speculation instead of reading it believing its going to inform of of something happening.:yuk:
Claymores
07-08-2009, 07:46 PM
Originally posted by Yorkyboy
Why do People post threads like this:conf:
The title infers that something is going to happen when in fact it is asking whether something is going to happen:whistle:
Why not put a question mark at the end of the post so that we can ignore idle speculation instead of reading it believing its going to inform of of something happening.:yuk:
Cos you'd have bypassed the thread otherwise as idle guessing otherwise Yorky!
Every Friday people enjoy writing nonesense it seems!!!!!!!
reece(:
07-08-2009, 07:48 PM
sorry for wasting so much of your time.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.