Voting figures revealed.

[karezza]

These are last night's voting percentages:

Siavash 14%
Sophie 13.5%
Rodrigo 12.5%
Marcus 12%
Freddie 12%
Charlie 9%
David 7.5
Bea 7%
Lisa 6.5%
Hira 6%

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by karezza
These are last night's voting percentages:

Siavash 14%
Sophie 13.5%
Rodrigo 12.5%
Marcus 12%
Freddie 12%
Charlie 9%
David 7.5
Bea 7%
Lisa 6.5%
Hira 6%

Source? Since hira actually got 5.65% :rolleyes:

[Libra]

So, if that's right, all the fools who gave multiple votes for Lisa to get rid of Bea were directly responsible for Hira's demise and still failed in their ultimate goal.
Who would have guessed that that would happen...oh wait, everybody with a brain guessed that that would happen.

Plus, Lisa is far more unpopular than Bea.

Sweet.

[Libra]

ps, Plus it would also mean Siavash is the most popular...even sweeter.

[BBmassive]

Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by karezza
These are last night's voting percentages:

Siavash 14%
Sophie 13.5%
Rodrigo 12.5%
Marcus 12%
Freddie 12%
Charlie 9%
David 7.5
Bea 7%
Lisa 6.5%
Hira 6%

Source? Since hira actually got 5.65% :rolleyes: Youve got to love em havent you ? it is them thinking we are stupid that annoys me :shrug:

[BB22]

I feel I should point out that karezza was the poster who started a thread yesterday morning claiming that Marcus (!?) and Bea were bottom two in the voting.

I am going to remain dubious about this latest list unless I see the source.

[BBmassive]

Originally posted by BB22
I feel I should point out that karezza was the poster who started a thread yesterday morning claiming that Marcus (!?) and Bea were bottom two in the voting.

I am going to remain dubious about this latest list unless I see the source. Me too :thumbs:

[Libra]

Originally posted by BB22
I feel I should point out that karezza was the poster who started a thread yesterday morning claiming that Marcus (!?) and Bea were bottom two in the voting.

I am going to remain dubious about this latest list unless I see the source.

Yep, me too, which is why I said IF it's right.

[Jordan.]

Them percentages seem quite accurate :)
Wooo Sophie was 2nd :bigsmile:

[karezza]

What order were the names read out in last night?:cheer:

[ElProximo]

Someone keeps crowing about how they 'knew it all along' and thinks they are now giving a "See.. I told ya so!" but I really do not recall many or even anybody disagreeing this was the likely outcome.
Someone else here did call it right about how tight the bottom would be and I think several Hira fans all but explained she would ultimately be 'pushed down' to the lowest rank.
I don't remember anyone predicting otherwise and not that I read every post but I don't remember many or any to give this 'haha told you so' thing to?

[BBmassive]

Originally posted by karezza
What order were the names read out in last night?:cheer: To quote Davina" In NO PARTICULAR ORDER"

[ILoveTRW]

Originally posted by karezza
What order were the names read out in last night?:cheer:

They were read out in no particular order plus hiras percentage is totally wrong pmsl you really are stupid

[karezza]

Originally posted by BBmassive
Originally posted by karezza
What order were the names read out in last night?:cheer: To quote Davina" In NO PARTICULAR ORDER"

Did she say "no particular order" ?

[Claymores]

Originally posted by BBmassive
Originally posted by karezza
What order were the names read out in last night?:cheer: To quote Davina" In NO PARTICULAR ORDER"

SUPERB retort massive :laugh2::laugh2::thumbs::thumbs:

[Claymores]

Originally posted by karezza
Originally posted by BBmassive
Originally posted by karezza
What order were the names read out in last night?:cheer: To quote Davina" In NO PARTICULAR ORDER"

Did she say "no particular order" ?

She said precisely that

[WOMBAI]

5.65% = 6% same as - called rounding up!

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by karezza
Originally posted by BBmassive
Originally posted by karezza
What order were the names read out in last night?:cheer: To quote Davina" In NO PARTICULAR ORDER"

Did she say "no particular order" ?

Yes...quite clearly.

[Captain.Remy]

LMAO karezza pwned himself on his own !

[Chels]

stop guessing.
rodrigo would have never had third highest.

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by COMMONSENSE
5.65% = 6% same as - called rounding up!

If the voting figures had been released...they would be correct.

Not rounded.

[BB22]

Originally posted by Claymores
Originally posted by karezza
Originally posted by BBmassive
Originally posted by karezza
What order were the names read out in last night?:cheer: To quote Davina" In NO PARTICULAR ORDER"

Did she say "no particular order" ?

She said precisely that

True.

[=-Incognito-=]

I don't believe those results at all.

[BB22]

Originally posted by COMMONSENSE
5.65% = 6% same as - called rounding up!

You mean like Lisa and David's percentages are not rounded up in the very same list?

[ILoveTRW]

Originally posted by COMMONSENSE
5.65% = 6% same as - called rounding up!

then why didn't he round up lisas 6.5

[BBmassive]

Originally posted by Claymores
Originally posted by BBmassive
Originally posted by karezza
What order were the names read out in last night?:cheer: To quote Davina" In NO PARTICULAR ORDER"

SUPERB retort massive :laugh2::laugh2::thumbs::thumbs: Some folk claymore ? if they dont know something instead of keeping stum make it up as they go along

[Showstopper]

Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by karezza
These are last night's voting percentages:

Siavash 14%
Sophie 13.5%
Rodrigo 12.5%
Marcus 12%
Freddie 12%
Charlie 9%
David 7.5
Bea 7%
Lisa 6.5%
Hira 6%

Source? Since hira actually got 5.65% :rolleyes:

rounded to one decimal place maybe ?

Would have thought there would be a bigger gap between top and bottom though

[=-Incognito-=]

Originally posted by BB22
Originally posted by Claymores
Originally posted by karezza
Originally posted by BBmassive
Originally posted by karezza
What order were the names read out in last night?:cheer: To quote Davina" In NO PARTICULAR ORDER"

Did she say "no particular order" ?

She said precisely that

True.

They did the same thing last year when the whole house was up for eviction. Last two were Rex and Luke for dramatic effect only, when the results came out Rex was way up the list. How much did you lose last night Claymore?

[karezza]

1% = 100 votes.

[camertone]

since hira is out, i am supporting sophie now!

[Claymores]

Originally posted by =-Incognito-=
How much did you lose last night Claymore?

The £10 I'd placed on David on the Tuesday evening as soon as the markets opened.

Harfarse's smug attack on David and Lisa saved them and made that bet redundant regretfully.

If you'd read my posts yesterday, I was advising people to avoid this one like the plague.

[Claymores]

Originally posted by karezza
1% = 100 votes.

Your posts get even dafter.

I believe all your percentages = utter bullshit :rolleyes:

[Libra]

Originally posted by ILoveMoney
Originally posted by COMMONSENSE
5.65% = 6% same as - called rounding up!

then why didn't he round up lisas 6.5

Because then the figures wouldn't have added up to 100 presumably?

I don't know whether these figures are right or not, but to get to 100 they would have to be rounded up to the nearest half percent.

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by Claymores
Originally posted by karezza
1% = 100 votes.

Your posts get even dafter.

I believe all your percentages = utter bullshit :rolleyes:

I was trying to say that in a nicer way.

But since it appears not to have gotten through...your way is better.

They cannot quote the source, only make stupid little comments like that. So its bullshine.

Though we knew that already.

[BBmassive]

Originally posted by Claymores
Originally posted by karezza
1% = 100 votes.

Your posts get even dafter.

I believe all your percentages = utter bullshit :rolleyes: :joker::joker::joker:

[BB22]

Originally posted by karezza
1% = 100 votes.

ROFL!

What a remarkable coincidence.

[WOMBAI]

Originally posted by ILoveMoney
Originally posted by COMMONSENSE
5.65% = 6% same as - called rounding up!

then why didn't he round up lisas 6.5

.65 closer to next whole number than .5 - don't know how else to explain it!

[BBmassive]

Originally posted by BB22
Originally posted by karezza
1% = 100 votes.

ROFL!

What a remarkable coincidence. You couldnt make it up could you ?:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

[Claymores]

Originally posted by BBmassive
Originally posted by BB22
Originally posted by karezza
1% = 100 votes.

ROFL!

What a remarkable coincidence. You couldnt make it up could you ?:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

Except OP obviously did :laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by karezza
1% = 100 votes.

If this is the case then AhmedFan is nearly 100% to blame for hira going. As he voted lisa over 70 times...apparently :laugh2:

Flame him :devil:

(Joking, as i know ahmed can take a joke :laugh:)

[BB22]

Originally posted by COMMONSENSE
Originally posted by ILoveMoney
Originally posted by COMMONSENSE
5.65% = 6% same as - called rounding up!

then why didn't he round up lisas 6.5

.65 closer to next whole number than .5 - don't know how else to explain it!

Oh, I think I have a better idea of how to explain it...

[BBmassive]

Originally posted by Claymores
Originally posted by BBmassive
Originally posted by BB22
Originally posted by karezza
1% = 100 votes.

ROFL!

What a remarkable coincidence. You couldnt make it up could you ?:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

Except OP obviously did :laugh2::laugh2::laugh2: Too daft to laugh at !! Im not exactly Carol Vorderman ,but even I can add up !!

[Brad.]

Originally posted by Captain.Remy
LMAO karezza pwned himself on his own !

damn right he did, what a tool.

[ILoveTRW]

Originally posted by COMMONSENSE
Originally posted by ILoveMoney
Originally posted by COMMONSENSE
5.65% = 6% same as - called rounding up!

then why didn't he round up lisas 6.5

.65 closer to next whole number than .5 - don't know how else to explain it!

are you having a laugh :conf2: 5.65 is 0.15 away from 5.5 whereas it is 0.35 away from 6 :pat:

[Brad.]

Originally posted by karezza
1% = 100 votes.

what a bellend

[=-Incognito-=]

Originally posted by Claymores
Originally posted by =-Incognito-=
How much did you lose last night Claymore?

The £10 I'd placed on David on the Tuesday evening as soon as the markets opened.

Harfarse's smug attack on David and Lisa saved them and made that bet redundant regretfully.

If you'd read my posts yesterday, I was advising people to avoid this one like the plague.

I know.

David was a very good bet until the anti-halfwit forum explosion (which you took part in) There was far too much focus on trying to get Bea out with David and in particular Lisa :yuk: votes but not enough focus on the sensible pro-Hira propaganda.

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by ILoveMoney
Originally posted by COMMONSENSE
Originally posted by ILoveMoney
Originally posted by COMMONSENSE
5.65% = 6% same as - called rounding up!

then why didn't he round up lisas 6.5

.65 closer to next whole number than .5 - don't know how else to explain it!

are you having a laugh :conf2: 5.65 is 0.15 away from 5.5 whereas it is 0.35 away from 6 :pat:

Commonsense...as usual, makes no sense.

[prkp12]

isnt that the order the names were read out? :conf:
are these real?

[Brad.]

Originally posted by prkp12
isnt that the order the names were read out? :conf:
are these real?

no they definitely are NOT real.

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by Bradley.
Originally posted by prkp12
isnt that the order the names were read out? :conf:
are these real?

no they definitely are NOT real.

Not the order they were read out either, david was before charlie.

[BB22]

Sorry, I am still chuckling over the "1% = 100 votes" claim. :tongue:

[Brad.]

Originally posted by BB22
Sorry, I am still chuckling over the "1% = 100 votes" claim. :tongue:

karezza has stooped to a new level of stupidity

[karezza]

Originally posted by BB22
Sorry, I am still chuckling over the "1% = 100 votes" claim. :tongue:

Ok, I made that bit up.:whistle: