Complain about Sophie not getting punished!!

[soffolknclose]

Link (http://help.channel4.com/SRVS/CGI-BIN/WEBCGI.EXE/,/?St=292,E=0000000000193041135,K=3611,Sxi=0,USETEMP LATE=contact_ve.tem)

[reallynow]

Did you complain when Hira got the boot for Siavash's and Marcus's rule break?

[soffolknclose]

There was no need! The rule breakers were punished, which isn't the case this time!

[reallynow]

Originally posted by soffolknclose
There was no need! The rule breakers were punished, which isn't the case this time!


Yeah right punished to the point they got cocky with what happened.

The punishment by BB was lettiing housemates discuss nominations. I guess the manipulating bitch saw Marcus and Halfwit off!

[google]

I agree Sophie should be punished big time! :mad:

[wilful_woodpecker]

it wasn't just Sophie rule breaking tho; yes she WAS doing it, but so were a few others

[google]

Sophie is getting away with it

[*teddybear*]

The punishment for all the nomination talk (including Dogfaces) was the freedom to discuss the nominations, so Dogface has been punished alongside all other guilty parties (and innocent ones too).
The fact that it will probably be Marcus and Freddie up for eviction is due to the housemates vote and is quite fair, in fact it is karma, all the rule breaking they have done recently.

[serensilver]

BEA spoke about noms too! so she should be punished too then? :bored:

ITS NOT JUST SOPHIE!!!

[Blink_Me]

Originally posted by serensilver
BEA spoke about noms too! so she should be punished too then? :bored:

ITS NOT JUST SOPHIE!!!

You're right. Bea should also be punished.

[muchadoaboutnothing]

How can the fact that they were allowed to discuss nominations, before, present and future be a punishment for Dogface? She mentioned nominations five times and gets away with it.

[bananarama]

Originally posted by soffolknclose
Link (http://help.channel4.com/SRVS/CGI-BIN/WEBCGI.EXE/,/?St=292,E=0000000000193041135,K=3611,Sxi=0,USETEMP LATE=contact_ve.tem)


Rubbish........Dogface has been punished for rule breaking........along with the rest of the house........

Listen to what the punishment was for goodness sake.......The punishment was for constant rule breaking........No specific rule just general constant rule breaking.......Therfore all rule breakers including dogface have recieved their punishment......

It's not bloody rocket science is it!!!!!!!!!

Marcus and Freddie only have themselves to blame ...

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by *teddybear*
The punishment for all the nomination talk (including Dogfaces) was the freedom to discuss the nominations, so Dogface has been punished alongside all other guilty parties (and innocent ones too).
The fact that it will probably be Marcus and Freddie up for eviction is due to the housemates vote and is quite fair, in fact it is karma, all the rule breaking they have done recently.

Every other punishment for speaking about nominations though(except siavashs first one, but they are always more lenient in the first few weeks), has resulted in the guilty party being up, wether as part of the whole house or seperate. This week is a blatant fix.

It is not 'punishment' to be able to speak freely of nominations, especially when this only allows you to get 2 other people up.

[IndigoJo]

DONE.

My complaint:

I am very disappointed at the way this week's nominations have been handled. I think that all of the rulebreakers should be punished, either by putting them all up for eviction or better yet, putting up the ones who broke the rules. More of them should be up for eviction, such as Dogface and Bea. Both of them tried to influence nominations, I feel that they should be up with Marcus and anyone else who influenced nominations this week (before they were allowed to speak about it).

There was no real punishment this week, giving them free reign to discuss nominations is not punishment.

I will not be voting this week for anyone, and I doubt I will now vote the rest of the series. I feel that BB is being manipulative and by changing the rules to fit each week's storyline isn't fair on the housemates or the public.

:spin:

[luminoussun]

done and sent one to everyone on my contacts who like bb

[stickydatepudding]

The punishment by BB was lettiing housemates discuss nominations.

That's not a punishment though, it's a reward. They let her keep doing exactly what she was doing. It's like someone being caught robbing a bank, and as a punishment they're told they can keep robbing more banks.

[prkp12]

No

[Patricia4]

Bea and Dogface should have been up with both these guy's.

[stickydatepudding]

Originally posted by soffolknclose
Link (http://help.channel4.com/SRVS/CGI-BIN/WEBCGI.EXE/,/?St=292,E=0000000000193041135,K=3611,Sxi=0,USETEMP LATE=contact_ve.tem)

Done. Thanks for that.

[bananarama]

Originally posted by Patricia4
Bea and Dogface should have been up with both these guy's.


No they should not........The house recieved a collective rule breaking punishment covering all rules broken including nominations talk.....

What some people want is for Dogface to be singled out for extra punishment.......Utterly ridiculous....

The two guys up got themselves in that pickle.......Blaming BB or Dogface is a diversion from reality......

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by stickydatepudding
The punishment by BB was lettiing housemates discuss nominations.

That's not a punishment though, it's a reward. They let her keep doing exactly what she was doing. It's like someone being caught robbing a bank, and as a punishment they're told they can keep robbing more banks.


Very good and very true comparrison.

[MaratSafinForever]

I complained, damn ridiculous.

[garrisker]

:joker:

[garrisker]

I think Sophie should be punished as she as said numerous times she wants to be put up, so let it be, I think on her own she is quite spineless, can you remember the first few weeks said nothing she knows that Lisa is watching her back. I don't dislike her she just bores me.

[terryecosse]

Done

Your Channel 4 enquiry [Ref 818913]

[charmingmissc]

my comlaint has been sent.

:sad:

[blinkin]

carcas and halftit deserve to be up sirvash should be as well,,,,just for the embarressment factor of grown men acting the pleb .The Gang of Three. three 12 yr olds

[bigmalky]

Mine has been sent too. Remember to complain that you've spent money on voting... they're in breach of the consumer rights act by intentionally rigging a nomination after knowing who would be up.

[TurtleSoup]

I did but I didn't click the "reply" box as it may well just be an automated response.

[garrisker]

done we all have to remember this is a game show we need to have characters to stay in, I like that they just dont sit there all day doing nothing, remember cameron everyone thought that was a boring year. I would like to see Bea go she has seen the show i think she is now controlling Lisa.

[bigmalky]

Originally posted by no1Joeno1
Is there any thing on Ofcom etc that they are breaching to link them to?

Consumer rights act... people have paid through live voting and the noms were rigged therefore you are paying for a faulty service due to BB's decision this week not to punish nomination rulebreakers fairly.

[atieah2009]

me to im complaining

[bananarama]

Originally posted by bigmalky
Originally posted by no1Joeno1
Is there any thing on Ofcom etc that they are breaching to link them to?

Consumer rights act... people have paid through live voting and the noms were rigged therefore you are paying for a faulty service due to BB's decision this week not to punish nomination rulebreakers fairly.


:bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile::bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile: You will never make it in the world of law...........:bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile:

[peacemaker]

sophie's been talking about nominations all week & is the only housemate who genuinly wants to leave the house so why isn't she up for eviction the boring old cow?

[Becker]

done

[Striptease]

Complain sent.

[bigmalky]

Originally posted by bananarama
Originally posted by bigmalky
Originally posted by no1Joeno1
Is there any thing on Ofcom etc that they are breaching to link them to?

Consumer rights act... people have paid through live voting and the noms were rigged therefore you are paying for a faulty service due to BB's decision this week not to punish nomination rulebreakers fairly.


:bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile::bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile: You will never make it in the world of law...........:bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile:

Oh I've already looked it up. I'm quite interested in consumer rights. Look what happened to all the shows with dodgy phone-ins :wink:

[halfacrown]

My complaint:

I am disgusted at the ‘punishment’ you have given for the housemates discussing nominations. At least two housemates, Bea and Sophie, have not had to face any consequences for their actions and your decision has resulted in an utterly predictable choice being made. As both Marcus and Freddie are part of a group, as your expert discussed on BBLM today, you will leave the house unbalanced. Your decision has also stopped the pubic deciding if they support the rebellious actions of the two nominees. Furthermore, I am convinced that your decision will further reduce the already dwindling viewing figures of the programme. I would ask you to make changes to the eviction process this week, in order to restore interest in the show. I look forward to your reply.

[charmingmissc]

Originally posted by halfacrown
My complaint:

I am disgusted at the ‘punishment’ you have given for the housemates discussing nominations. At least two housemates, Bea and Sophie, have not had to face any consequences for their actions and your decision has resulted in an utterly predictable choice being made. As both Marcus and Freddie are part of a group, as your expert discussed on BBLM today, you will leave the house unbalanced. Your decision has also stopped the pubic deciding if they support the rebellious actions of the two nominees. Furthermore, I am convinced that your decision will further reduce the already dwindling viewing figures of the programme. I would ask you to make changes to the eviction process this week, in order to restore interest in the show. I look forward to your reply.


:thumbs:

[bigmalky]

Originally posted by charmingmissc
Originally posted by halfacrown
My complaint:

I am disgusted at the ‘punishment’ you have given for the housemates discussing nominations. At least two housemates, Bea and Sophie, have not had to face any consequences for their actions and your decision has resulted in an utterly predictable choice being made. As both Marcus and Freddie are part of a group, as your expert discussed on BBLM today, you will leave the house unbalanced. Your decision has also stopped the pubic deciding if they support the rebellious actions of the two nominees. Furthermore, I am convinced that your decision will further reduce the already dwindling viewing figures of the programme. I would ask you to make changes to the eviction process this week, in order to restore interest in the show. I look forward to your reply.

Mine was more of a n observed rant. But seemed to be acceptable :thumbs:

:thumbs:

[tictac]

what did it achieve being able to discuss nominations -nothing really
they might as well choose the winner between them and discuss who they want up next week as well :mad:-whats the point

[MJBFAN]

Sorted.
I told BB I thought their hypocrisy was out of order.

(In a nice but firm way...mind you)

[danda012]

Anybody remember the 2-3 weeks+ in BB8 where BB almost ensured Charley would stay in using various tactics?

[fredrica]

I will send an email and will also log a phone complaint too.

[Jordan.]

Oh for god sake im fed up of these threads about sophie not been punished is it really that bad you have to complain about it get a life its a tv show

[lukebartram]

ummmmmmmmm bea is getting away with it as well as sophie

[shaz20]

:joker::joker::joker: