Log in

View Full Version : It's Not So Bad


Evanescence
11-08-2009, 05:47 PM
Okay, so Freddie vs Marcus this week and one must go.

NOT an ideal situation for many as these two have big followings.
But generally any fans of Freddie are also fans of Siavash and Marcus and vice versa for the other two.

So whoever goes this week, their votes will go to the person who survived.
That means twice as many votes for the survivor. Then, if it's the two remaining of the three up next week, one must go again.

Then the survivor of the three will have three times as many votes than they would normally have as the votes are split between three.

That survivor is then almost certain to win surely?

Vicky.
11-08-2009, 05:48 PM
Yea, the problem people have though is that neither of them should be going...as sophie and bea should also be up.,

loomy
11-08-2009, 05:50 PM
Wish Siavash had been up too. Hope he's up next week vs. survivor of this weeks eviction

Evanescence
11-08-2009, 05:51 PM
Originally posted by VickyJ
Yea, the problem people have though is that neither of them should be going...as sophie and bea should also be up.,

Oh yes, I know that's the problem, I was trying to think of a positive to the situation.

Sophie blantantly talked nominations before rules were changed.
Just as bad as what Marcus did, she should be up too.

I hate Bea but can't comment on whether she should be up
Because personally I haven't heard her mention Noms.

bananarama
11-08-2009, 05:54 PM
Originally posted by VickyJ
Yea, the problem people have though is that neither of them should be going...as sophie and bea should also be up.,


Sophie and Bea broke rules. Marcus and Siavash and Halfwit broke rules.......The house was punished en mass for constant rule breaking done with food taken.......No neither Bea or Dogface should be up.

The fools that should be up are the fools that provoked other housemates to nominate them...

They got nominated directly as a result of their own behavour..........To put others at risk to try and save either of those would be interfering with the outcome....

Evanescence
11-08-2009, 05:59 PM
Originally posted by bananarama
Originally posted by VickyJ
Yea, the problem people have though is that neither of them should be going...as sophie and bea should also be up.,


Sophie and Bea broke rules. Marcus and Siavash and Halfwit broke rules.......The house was punished en mass for constant rule breaking done with food taken.......No neither Bea or Dogface should be up.

The fools that should be up are the fools that provoked other housemates to nominate them...

They got nominated directly as a result of their own behavour..........To put others at risk to try and save either of those would be interfering with the outcome....

Sophie and Bea's punishment was actually letting everyone talk about nominations to
"give everyone a level playing field" when in fact it's just allowed Lisa's Team to Block vote Marcus and Freddie.

The food being taken away was Marcus, Siavash and Freddie's punishment