View Full Version : Nominations Spoilers [Merged]
SHE WILL DEFINATLY HAVE HER TITS UP FOR EVICTION THEN CAUSE THATS ALL SHE FOOKIN LOOKS AT.
sorry for the caps if you want to be a moaning **** about it !
SurferJay
17-08-2009, 07:48 PM
wheres the proof?
bettiepage
17-08-2009, 07:48 PM
Ok....
Jezzy
17-08-2009, 07:49 PM
As far as I'm concerned then, they should all be up. And the same while they can still discuss noms. Not long, I know...but nominations is ruined now, BB twist it to get whoever THEY want to be up, up.
mrs-big
17-08-2009, 07:50 PM
how do you know?
Originally posted by BigBrotherFan01
wheres the proof?
sitting blubbing to bea probably.
Patrick
17-08-2009, 07:53 PM
Boring OP
http://www.bigbrotheronline.co.uk/bigbrother10/uk_news/news_index.htm
yeah yeah yeah...you boring twats, here you go.
Mickey2009
17-08-2009, 08:03 PM
A number of Housemates have failed to nominate.
bigbrother10uk
17-08-2009, 08:04 PM
yay!
put the whole house up
and lets have a double eviction.
Mickey2009
17-08-2009, 08:04 PM
STOP PRESS
http://www.bigbrotheronline.co.uk/bigbrother10/uk_news/news_index.htm
CaPPa
17-08-2009, 08:04 PM
Sophie breaking nominations rules again?
No doubt her 'punishment' will be exemption from being nominated until the finals. That'd teach her! :rolleyes:
BB have really been pathetic with punishing the rule breaking this year, having no consistancy what so ever. Kris & Dogface dicuss noms - they're up, Siavash discusses noms - everyones up, Dogface & Bea discuss noms - everyone can.
Rather than let them all discuss the noms so that 'team bore' can pick off anyone slightly entertaining, they should have just put them all up every week. Then we would have got rid of the dullards and the bitches and been left with decent housemates.
bettiepage
17-08-2009, 08:05 PM
Why would they just single Siavash out then?
He is one of Big Brothers pet's after all...
bettiepage
17-08-2009, 08:06 PM
Big Brother online said that Marcus was at 62% in the lead just before the actuall eviction..
Mickey2009
17-08-2009, 08:09 PM
Originally posted by Rice_square
Big Brother online said that Marcus was at 62% in the lead just before the actuall eviction..
huh? That was a FREE poll ..How can a free poll be accurate... I went for Marcus to be evicted 50 times but when it came to paying hard cash....I never had a vote :)
BGT-FAN!
17-08-2009, 08:09 PM
It is not a number of housemates it is 2
On BBLB George Lamb said Siavash was refusing to nominate
He is before Sophie and she refused to nominate
George Lamb would have said who else refused to nominate
bettiepage
17-08-2009, 08:09 PM
Originally posted by Mickey2009
Originally posted by Rice_square
Big Brother online said that Marcus was at 62% in the lead just before the actuall eviction..
huh? That was a FREE poll ..How can a free poll be accurate... I went for Marcus to be evicted 50 times but when it came to paying hard cash....I never had a vote :)
No, not the poll. They actually said that marcus was 62% in the lead.
*mazedsalv**
17-08-2009, 08:10 PM
Originally posted by CaPPa
Sophie breaking nominations rules again?
No doubt her 'punishment' will be exemption from being nominated until the finals. That'd teach her! :rolleyes:
BB have really been pathetic with punishing the rule breaking this year, having no consistancy what so ever. Kris & Dogface dicuss noms - they're up, Siavash discusses noms - everyones up, Dogface & Bea discuss noms - everyone can.
Rather than let them all discuss the noms so that 'team bore' can pick off anyone slightly entertaining, they should have just put them all up every week. Then we would have got rid of the dullards and the bitches and been left with decent housemates.
But what else can they do? Putting the HMs up for eviction is the worst punishment they can do, so they havnt gotten away with it at all.
What punishment would you give out, and dont say ejection because that wont happen.
InOne
17-08-2009, 08:12 PM
Sophie V Siavash now that would be good.
bettiepage
17-08-2009, 08:12 PM
Originally posted by beso
http://www.bigbrotheronline.co.uk/bigbrother10/uk_news/news_index.htm
yeah yeah yeah...you boring twats, here you go.
Where does it say Sophie?
BORING.
minx36
17-08-2009, 08:12 PM
Originally posted by *mazedsalv**
Originally posted by CaPPa
Sophie breaking nominations rules again?
No doubt her 'punishment' will be exemption from being nominated until the finals. That'd teach her! :rolleyes:
BB have really been pathetic with punishing the rule breaking this year, having no consistancy what so ever. Kris & Dogface dicuss noms - they're up, Siavash discusses noms - everyones up, Dogface & Bea discuss noms - everyone can.
Rather than let them all discuss the noms so that 'team bore' can pick off anyone slightly entertaining, they should have just put them all up every week. Then we would have got rid of the dullards and the bitches and been left with decent housemates.
But what else can they do? Putting the HMs up for eviction is the worst punishment they can do, so they havnt gotten away with it at all.
What punishment would you give out, and dont say ejection because that wont happen.
I would tell them that the first 2 HM's they speak to will be their noms!
MaratSafinForever
17-08-2009, 08:13 PM
Sophie is just a sheep and Siavash is just a dumb arse who think's he is being smart. Just nominate you mug!
sg160187
17-08-2009, 08:15 PM
hopefully a siavash vs sophie eviction :laugh: Bea out the week after :wink:
*mazedsalv**
17-08-2009, 08:15 PM
Originally posted by minx36
Originally posted by *mazedsalv**
Originally posted by CaPPa
Sophie breaking nominations rules again?
No doubt her 'punishment' will be exemption from being nominated until the finals. That'd teach her! :rolleyes:
BB have really been pathetic with punishing the rule breaking this year, having no consistancy what so ever. Kris & Dogface dicuss noms - they're up, Siavash discusses noms - everyones up, Dogface & Bea discuss noms - everyone can.
Rather than let them all discuss the noms so that 'team bore' can pick off anyone slightly entertaining, they should have just put them all up every week. Then we would have got rid of the dullards and the bitches and been left with decent housemates.
But what else can they do? Putting the HMs up for eviction is the worst punishment they can do, so they havnt gotten away with it at all.
What punishment would you give out, and dont say ejection because that wont happen.
I would tell them that the first 2 HM's they speak to will be their noms!
Thats exactly what they did to Siavash. Whoever he made contact with was his 2 nominations.
Jezzy
17-08-2009, 08:16 PM
While they can discuss nominations, they should all be up.
bettiepage
17-08-2009, 08:17 PM
Originally posted by sg160187
hopefully a siavash vs sophie eviction :laugh: Bea out the week after :wink:
Yeah!
GET SIAVASH OUT!!!!
NolasGirl
17-08-2009, 08:21 PM
I don't know what Siavash thinks he's doing, but he must know that there can't be a positive outcome out of it. He's not gonna get what he wants (ie. Everyone up for eviction)..and it means one less vote for Bea. What's the problem with simply nominating her? and maybe Lisa. Not that hard really.
santaa
17-08-2009, 08:21 PM
They should put up those who refuse to nominate.
Actually they should throw them out but its gone too far now.
all HMs up every week would completely change the game. Avoiding nomination is a abig part of BB and reactions to being nominated good to watch
bigbrothermad123
17-08-2009, 08:22 PM
You retarded idiot !
JTM45
17-08-2009, 08:22 PM
It's not going to be Siavash vs. Sophie!!!!
They already sorted Siavash's noms by making it so that the first two people who he made contact with were his nomination choices.
If they were just going to put two people up there would be no point in what they did with Siavash.
If Bea is saved because of this i'll be furious!!!!!!!!!!!!!:mad::mad::mad:
sg160187
17-08-2009, 08:26 PM
I think as its been Siavash on numerous occasions playing the martyr card they should make him a martyr. Chuck him out no eviction this week hopefully send the message out that you HAVE to nominate.
BGT-FAN!
17-08-2009, 08:29 PM
Bea and Marcus are up for eviction
who are you going to evict?
jadore212
17-08-2009, 08:29 PM
they should all go up
offelia
17-08-2009, 08:29 PM
marcus
greysky
17-08-2009, 08:30 PM
if sophie didn't vote then rodrigo probably didn't either.... it's BB fault for rewarding rule breaking instead of punishing them ...so i'm not surprise some has decided not to vote ...none of them wants to be up against marcus ...so if they're all up then they'll stand a better chance of staying.
poejoe
17-08-2009, 08:30 PM
How do you know?
poejoe
17-08-2009, 08:31 PM
If it's true Bea will defo go!:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
King Gizzard
17-08-2009, 08:31 PM
If this true I think we could have the biggest percentage eviction
Unless the cow walks
Jords
17-08-2009, 08:32 PM
2 people didnt vote, that is cheating!
Vladimir
17-08-2009, 08:32 PM
Bea.
Jords
17-08-2009, 08:32 PM
..However dotn care as long as Bea is up! Marcus shouldnt be up again
Chels
17-08-2009, 08:32 PM
Source???????
minx36
17-08-2009, 08:33 PM
Bea st
poejoe
17-08-2009, 08:33 PM
Source please..:bored:
bananarama
17-08-2009, 08:33 PM
Originally posted by BGT-FAN!
Bea and Marcus are up for eviction
who are you going to evict?
Source please.......
King Gizzard
17-08-2009, 08:34 PM
LOL already a big percentage for Bea
poejoe
17-08-2009, 08:34 PM
?????????
I'd say Rodders did...eees de roooooles
shams79
17-08-2009, 08:38 PM
But what about Charlie he told Bea when she was saying that all the HMs will put her up anyways because of her drama about not getting a message from her mother and Charlie said I won't be nominating you so Charlie as to be punished too!
shams79
17-08-2009, 08:40 PM
I think they all should be up we know tht Rods, Lisa and David would'nt break the rules so they would have nominated, everyone should be up apart from those three
Originally posted by Rice_square
Originally posted by beso
http://www.bigbrotheronline.co.uk/bigbrother10/uk_news/news_index.htm
yeah yeah yeah...you boring twats, here you go.
Where does it say Sophie?
BORING.
considering she noms after siavash and nothing had been said about any other hm's on bblb (they just said about siavash ) then even a complete ****ing moron like yourself shopuld be able to figure it out..
but just for yo....s for siavash and sophie....
i comes before o..so therefore sophie is last to nominate, just after siavash unless lisa has cghanged her name to slothmuncher...
Please don't insult other members.
bettiepage
17-08-2009, 08:43 PM
It's quite obvious this ain't a spoiler.
TROLL.
Originally posted by Rice_square
It's quite obvious this ain't a spoiler.
TROLL.
It's like witch hunting in the oldd days when they burn the witches. BURN THE TROLL.
it's all over the other forums people...
siavash has refused to nominate so bb told him the first 2 people he comes into contact with are his nominations...this was reported on bblb...as siavash had just refused as they went on air..it was then reported after bblb that more hm's had been unable to nominate..which leaves me to deduce that it could only be sophie as she was the only one left to nominate.
if it had been say charlie..then bblb would have reported that along with siavash's news.
rice square..calling someone boring is also troll like behaviour eh !!!
so grow a pair and suck it up like a man you freekin idiot.
mike888
17-08-2009, 08:54 PM
IF it's true I for one won't be wasting my money voting that bitch out, everyone else can do that..... with any luck if everyone else thinks like that Marcus will go..... Wishful thinking!!!.... :whistle:
boomoo
17-08-2009, 08:59 PM
Bea spent the whole night saying she would be up for eviction and everyone should nom her so she should be up.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.