Total Fix - here's how...

[frigid_slag]

It could have been engineered to make it that bea was not up and other people who had 2 noms beofre hand were. however, they wanted to make sure Bea was up so they fixed it to be so...


They didn't have to decide the way Siavash and Sophie were going to nominate people, until half and hour of so later or whenever they felt like it, which could have been after Siavash was touched by Bea etc, then just said it in the highlights show whenever the liked. For example, they could have decided, even though Bea touched siavash, that it was the first person siavash spoke to instead of first person he touched, then it would have been rodrigo and sophie, then an hour later or whatever, told siavash that was how he nominated. We could never prove otherwise, same with Sophie.

See actually this was very unfair the more i think about it. I mean for example, if BB put up on their site the day before noms, "if any of the housemates choose not to nominate, it will be the first 2 people each of them say the word "yes" to". We would all know that it was fair, as they had said before noms. And, if those people happened to be Marcus and David, plus two others and not Bea, then Bea would not be up, as Marcus and Siavsh would get two more noms, bringing their total to 4 each and beas to only 3. As it happens, they changed it both times to make sure it was Marcus, David and Bea.

What do you reckon, was this unfair? I hate Bea, but i don't like to think of big Bro manipulating things like that.

[Benjamin]

Please don't just post random threads which are meaningless, especially in the BB section.

[frigid_slag]

Originally posted by ukturtle
Please don't just post random threads which are meaningless, especially in the BB section.

I pressed return by mistake, or something, i don't know how it happened, anyway have edited it to how it should have been. Sorry

[frigid_slag]

It could have been engineered to make it that bea was not up and other people who had 2 noms beofre hand were. however, they wanted to make sure Bea was up so they fixed it to be so...


They didn't have to decide the way Siavash and Sophie were going to nominate people, until half and hour of so later or whenever they felt like it, which could have been after Siavash was touched by Bea etc, then just said it in the highlights show whenever the liked. For example, they could have decided, even though Bea touched siavash, that it was the first person siavash spoke to instead of first person he touched, then it would have been rodrigo and sophie, then an hour later or whatever, told siavash that was how he nominated. We could never prove otherwise, same with Sophie.

See actually this was very unfair the more i think about it. I mean for example, if BB put up on their site the day before noms, "if any of the housemates choose not to nominate, it will be the first 2 people each of them say the word "yes" to". We would all know that it was fair, as they had said before noms. And, if those people happened to be Marcus and David, plus two others and not Bea, then Bea would not be up, as Marcus and Siavsh would get two more noms, bringing their total to 4 each and beas to only 3. As it happens, they changed it both times to make sure it was Marcus, David and Bea.

What do you reckon, was this unfair? I hate Bea, but i don't like to think of big Bro manipulating things like that.

[BlackOrWhite]

:sleep:

[Jordan.]

Yeah I agree they could of decided after Bea touched him just to get her up but then no one can prove that

[Chuckyegg]

Big Brother manipulating people???

Nah!!!

[Patricia4]

Im just glad Bea is up :thumbs:

[BBmassive]

I agree in some ways ,They SHOULD have put Siavash and Sophie themselves up ,but they CHOSE to do it the way they did ,not fair on the others

[Staceee]

Yep.
I made this topic earlier but I think that is what they did

[frigid_slag]

Originally posted by BBmassive
I agree in some ways ,They SHOULD have put Siavash and Sophie themselves up ,but they CHOSE to do it the way they did ,not fair on the others

I honestly think they should have just booted Siavash out. If a housemate had done that a few years back they would have. Siavash has broken the rules loads now. I bet if they told him, he had 3 minutes to give his first nomination or he had to leave through the door on his right as he was going to be ejected, he would have nominated. He no way wants to go and even if a part of him does, not like that he wouldn't. Then told the house what had happened, Sophie wouldn't have not nominated. It p*sses me off the fact that people go into that house, knowing full well what is expected of them, and behave like that. Siavash has really p*ssed me off now.

[GoldHeart]

Originally posted by frigid_slag
It could have been engineered to make it that bea was not up and other people who had 2 noms beofre hand were. however, they wanted to make sure Bea was up so they fixed it to be so...


They didn't have to decide the way Siavash and Sophie were going to nominate people, until half and hour of so later or whenever they felt like it, which could have been after Siavash was touched by Bea etc, then just said it in the highlights show whenever the liked. For example, they could have decided, even though Bea touched siavash, that it was the first person siavash spoke to instead of first person he touched, then it would have been rodrigo and sophie, then an hour later or whatever, told siavash that was how he nominated. We could never prove otherwise, same with Sophie.

See actually this was very unfair the more i think about it. I mean for example, if BB put up on their site the day before noms, "if any of the housemates choose not to nominate, it will be the first 2 people each of them say the word "yes" to". We would all know that it was fair, as they had said before noms. And, if those people happened to be Marcus and David, plus two others and not Bea, then Bea would not be up, as Marcus and Siavsh would get two more noms, bringing their total to 4 each and beas to only 3. As it happens, they changed it both times to make sure it was Marcus, David and Bea.

What do you reckon, was this unfair? I hate Bea, but i don't like to think of big Bro manipulating things like that. considering the fact that bb let her get awy with alot of sh*t i doubt it was a FIX!!!!! :rolleyes: but BB like all of us is PROB SICK OF WATCHING BEA ANYWAY!!!!!!! :laugh3:

[cookiemonster]

think they done the right thing, don't wanna see or hear anymore of Bea's whiny voice.

[LoadOfDross]

Who cares!!! Bea is up!!! YAY!!! :banana:

[ElProximo]

Originally posted by frigid_slag
It could have been engineered to make it that bea was not up and other people who had 2 noms beofre hand were. however, they wanted to make sure Bea was up so they fixed it to be so...


They didn't have to decide the way Siavash and Sophie were going to nominate people, until half and hour of so later or whenever they felt like it, which could have been after Siavash was touched by Bea etc, then just said it in the highlights show whenever the liked. For example, they could have decided, even though Bea touched siavash, that it was the first person siavash spoke to instead of first person he touched, then it would have been rodrigo and sophie, then an hour later or whatever, told siavash that was how he nominated. We could never prove otherwise, same with Sophie.

See actually this was very unfair the more i think about it. I mean for example, if BB put up on their site the day before noms, "if any of the housemates choose not to nominate, it will be the first 2 people each of them say the word "yes" to". We would all know that it was fair, as they had said before noms. And, if those people happened to be Marcus and David, plus two others and not Bea, then Bea would not be up, as Marcus and Siavsh would get two more noms, bringing their total to 4 each and beas to only 3. As it happens, they changed it both times to make sure it was Marcus, David and Bea.

What do you reckon, was this unfair? I hate Bea, but i don't like to think of big Bro manipulating things like that.


Going by your scenario and now I see exactly how that can be fixed to have gone any way they liked.

People who want Bea out and want to save Marcus are acting as if this is nothing and who should care,
but,
They could have just as easily 'retro-fitted' the rule to be "Whoever said Yes',
or
"whoever Siavash initiated words with"
or
"The first two names Siavash said"
and,
Just as easily had it so that Marcus and David would be up alone or at least so that Bea was NOT nominated.

IF they 'retro-fitted' a scenario that saved Bea then I wonder if there wouldn't be outraged topics, cries of 'foul', calls to OfCom and Petitions all over the place here?

The most dangerous thinking in the world?
The type of mentality that sees genocide even?
Its the thinking that says "Well.. so what.. it doesn't matter because it affected the person we all hate and who deserves it anyways!"
Right. Then eventually it happens to YOU.

[BBmassive]

Originally posted by frigid_slag
Originally posted by BBmassive
I agree in some ways ,They SHOULD have put Siavash and Sophie themselves up ,but they CHOSE to do it the way they did ,not fair on the others

I honestly think they should have just booted Siavash out. If a housemate had done that a few years back they would have. Siavash has broken the rules loads now. I bet if they told him, he had 3 minutes to give his first nomination or he had to leave through the door on his right as he was going to be ejected, he would have nominated. He no way wants to go and even if a part of him does, not like that he wouldn't. Then told the house what had happened, Sophie wouldn't have not nominated. It p*sses me off the fact that people go into that house, knowing full well what is expected of them, and behave like that. Siavash has really p*ssed me off now. Agree 100% ,he should have been removed last time he didi it ,and the ONLY reason he is doing it is to save his own scrawny neck ,open the door ,no interview ,OUT

[ILoveFreddie]

I agree with OP but I don't care because it means Bea is up.

on BBLB George said it was the first people Siavash came in to contact with, and then it changed... :rolleyes:

[dogfacetowin]

spot on:thumbs:

[santaa]

I agree its a fix but what can be done about it. BB team needs an overhaul or the programme is sunk for the future

[Jords]

No way is it a fix, god you lot are bores!

BB trys to do a twist and yall yell FIX!

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

[Stankleberry]

It is a game show. The whole thing is fixed other than the people's voting. If it weren't, it would be far less interesting.

[Jords]

Altho in some cases it is a fix, but not this one.

Examples:
Vote to evict changed to vote to save > to get lovely Hira out

Able to discuss noms > bigger group can split up the smaller group - Freddie & Marcus up > Freddie, Marcus, Siavash were a trio

[Kore]

not a fix! Bea deserved to go up!

GET HER OUT!!

[Jezzy]

Was totally fixed BECAUSE Bea was to go up.

Cmon. Should it have been Sophie / Siavash for rule-breaking? :rolleyes:

[SurferJay]

she would have been up anyway as she already had 3 nom's.

the extra 2 didnt make a difference

[eezamana]

How on earth was it a fix??????

I dont believe it was at all, & anyway Siavash would have voted for her if he'd been made to vote because, when he found out it was Bea & Sophie who were up, he said could they please not make it Bea & anyone else.
I reckon it would have been the same with Sophie. Couldnt see her putting anyone but Bea & Marcus up

So no, I don't think it was fixed & I do think she'd still have beeen up anyway.

I think housemates should be made to nominate & the first time they refuse they automatically get 3 noms for themselves. The second time they refuse they should be evicted, no interview, no bblb, nothing.

I think they'd nominate soon enough under those circumstances

[squinky]

she was already up,they all had 3 votes each,who gives a **** anyway.

[Twiggy]

So who cares if BB fixed it. If HMs can mess around with the rules, then why shouldn't BB.