The Difference Between Sophie Not Nominating And Siavash Not Nominating

[Staceee]

This isn't the first time Siavash hasn't nominated and he has also said that he doesn't want to nominate because he doesn't want to play the game.

In case he hasn't realised he is in there as a contestant and if he isn't going to play the game why the hell is he in there? For a free ride to the final when he isn't even playing?? If he isn't going to play he shouldn't be eligable to win. In fact he shouldn't even be in there! In my opinion he is being ungreatful because I like many people would be happy to be on Big Brother playing the actual game!

Sophie on the other hand couldn't think of anyone to nominate on this occasion. She is still playing she isn't refusing to be a part of everything.

[LoadOfDross]

Seriously. Its like he doesn't understand hes on a game show.

[eezamana]

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

What a load of cobblers,:nono::nono::nono:

Siavash didnt nominate.

Sophie didnt nominate.

What's the difference?:puzzled::puzzled::puzzled:

They both did exactly the same thing.

[Staceee]

Originally posted by eezamana
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

What a load of cobblers,:nono::nono::nono:

Siavash didnt nominate.

Sophie didnt nominate.

What's the difference?:puzzled::puzzled::puzzled:

They both did exactly the same thing.

Siavash didn't nominate because he isn't playing the game.

Sophie didn't because she couldn't think of any reasons on this occasion.

[Jords]

Originally posted by eezamana
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

What a load of cobblers,:nono::nono::nono:

Siavash didnt nominate.

Sophie didnt nominate.

What's the difference?:puzzled::puzzled::puzzled:

They both did exactly the same thing.

AGREED.

[Slothy]

Couldn't think of anyone to nominate? Thats bullshit, you can just randomly pick two names if thats the case. She didn't want to nominate anyone, she said that. Its identical to Siavash. People see it as a negative for him if they don't like him much. Thats how it goes I guess.

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Slothy
Couldn't think of anyone to nominate? Thats bullshit, you can just randomly pick two names if thats the case. She didn't want to nominate anyone, she said that. Its identical to Siavash. People see it as a negative for him if they don't like him much. Thats how it goes I guess.

Siavash doesn't want to play, Sophie does.

If he doesn't want to play why is he still there???

[Jordan.]

I agree hes "taken himself out of the game" so why doesnt he piss of then. I still think Sophie should of nominated but she genuinely didnt know who as she gets on with every one but Siavash had no reason not to this week and its getting annoying now

[Staceee]

Originally posted by SPIDERPIG!
I agree hes "taken himself out of the game" so why doesnt he p**s of then. I still think Sophie should of nominated but she genuinely didnt know who as she gets on with every one but Siavash had no reason not to this week and its getting annoying now

Yeah there is a certain arrogance that goes with Siavash not nominating too.

[Caroline592]

Sophie is a liar. She said she does not have any reasons for nominating anyone. Funnily enough, not so long ago she was going around the house and complaining to everyone that David is not doing any washing up, leaves the cups everywhere etc. If this is not a reason I do not know what is.

Siavash thinks he is above Big Brother's law. Why the hell is he in there when he does not want to play the game properly and keeps messing up with nominations?

[dogfacetowin]

WHo wants to join the hating Siavash fan club

[Celeb_Rehab]

Dogflaps is as guilty as The Vash...end of!!

[Slothy]

Ok so he took himself out of the game. He said that. In that case everyone else can nominate him and get him put up. Thus far they haven't. His argument is; he doesn't want people getting a free ride by dodging nomination he wants the public to decide who they want to be in the final. What he said about Bea earlier was very true - she is the same person as last week, just last week 'that' group had decided it was freddie or Marcus' time. Siavash is very astute as it happens.

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Slothy
Ok so he took himself out of the game. He said that. In that case everyone else can nominate him and get him put up. Thus far they haven't. His argument is; he doesn't want people getting a free ride by dodging nomination he wants the public to decide who they want to be in the final. What he said about Bea earlier was very true - she is the same person as last week, just last week 'that' group had decided it was freddie or Marcus' time. Siavash is very astute as it happens.

But he doesn't make the rules!!!!

Big Brother does! That is the game, who is he to change it?

You have to be liked in the house as well as on the outside to win!

[Slothy]

Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Ok so he took himself out of the game. He said that. In that case everyone else can nominate him and get him put up. Thus far they haven't. His argument is; he doesn't want people getting a free ride by dodging nomination he wants the public to decide who they want to be in the final. What he said about Bea earlier was very true - she is the same person as last week, just last week 'that' group had decided it was freddie or Marcus' time. Siavash is very astute as it happens.

But he doesn't make the rules!!!!

Big Brother does! That is the game, who is he to change it?

You have to be liked in the house as well as on the outside to win!

People break the rules in there all the time, dear. Thats why they were always sent to jail, or get other punishments. He isn't a bad character like many of the others, he says what he thinks and doesnt stab people in the back. Morally, theres 3 -4 much worse than him in there. You just equate this rule break to be worse than others.

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Slothy
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Ok so he took himself out of the game. He said that. In that case everyone else can nominate him and get him put up. Thus far they haven't. His argument is; he doesn't want people getting a free ride by dodging nomination he wants the public to decide who they want to be in the final. What he said about Bea earlier was very true - she is the same person as last week, just last week 'that' group had decided it was freddie or Marcus' time. Siavash is very astute as it happens.

But he doesn't make the rules!!!!

Big Brother does! That is the game, who is he to change it?

You have to be liked in the house as well as on the outside to win!

People break the rules in there all the time, dear. Thats why they were always sent to jail, or get other punishments. He isn't a bad character like many of the others, he says what he thinks and doesnt stab people in the back. Morally, theres 3 -4 much worse than him in there. You just equate this rule break to be worse than others.

Not playing the game is the worst rule break.

Also I think he is fake and playing Mr nice guy to win the show.
Just my opinion :shrug:

[BONNEIP]

Both guilty as charged.....they 2 should have been up for eviction, might have changed who ever survived this weeks mind. I'm disappointed with BB :cloud:

[Slothy]

Yes, and what a tainted view you have. When you dislike someone you can even make their positives seem like a negative. You go girlfriend (this was to stacee, I forgot to quote, whoops)

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Slothy
Yes, and what a tainted view you have. When you dislike someone you can even make their positives seem like a negative. You go girlfriend (this was to stacee, I forgot to quote, whoops)

He does have his positives and I know this.

As a HOUSEMATE in the GAME, I dislike him.

[oh.really]

Sophie's never had a problem nominating Marcus in the past. She's bullshitting. I think Siavash does this no nominating crap to save himself. He knows BB aren't going to keep putting him up

[Becker]

Originally posted by Staceee
This isn't the first time Siavash hasn't nominated and he has also said that he doesn't want to nominate because he doesn't want to play the game.

In case he hasn't realised he is in there as a contestant and if he isn't going to play the game why the hell is he in there? For a free ride to the final when he isn't even playing?? If he isn't going to play he shouldn't be eligable to win. In fact he shouldn't even be in there! In my opinion he is being ungreatful because I like many people would be happy to be on Big Brother playing the actual game!

Sophie on the other hand couldn't think of anyone to nominate on this occasion. She is still playing she isn't refusing to be a part of everything.

You ARE having a laugh with this one ...

"Sophie on the other hand couldn't think of anyone ... oh come off it roflmao

you are definitely way off the mark if you think any sane person is going to buy that.

[Staceee]

- Siavash doesn't want to take part in the game.

- Sophie does.

There is a Difference in their reasons for not nominating.

[Slothy]

Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Yes, and what a tainted view you have. When you dislike someone you can even make their positives seem like a negative. You go girlfriend (this was to stacee, I forgot to quote, whoops)

He does have his positives and I know this.

As a HOUSEMATE in the GAME, I dislike him.

So if he had just randomly picked two names, say Bea & Sophie you'd have been fine with that? Just like the two he chose anyway, albeit with the help of BB. In fact he did nominate, just in unconventional means. As did Sophie. Its easy to see it how you want in the end...all based on how high that person is on your favs list.

But by not nominating as you put it, sophie isn't participating in the game...as you put it. You contradict yourself.

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Slothy
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Yes, and what a tainted view you have. When you dislike someone you can even make their positives seem like a negative. You go girlfriend (this was to stacee, I forgot to quote, whoops)

He does have his positives and I know this.

As a HOUSEMATE in the GAME, I dislike him.

So if he had just randomly picked two names, say Bea & Sophie you'd have been fine with that? Just like the two he chose anyway, albeit with the help of BB. In fact he did nominate, just in unconventional means. As did Sophie. Its easy to see it how you want in the end...all based on how high that person is on your favs list.

But by not nominating as you put it, sophie isn't participating in the game...as you put it. You contradict yourself.

Siavash doesn't WANT to participate in the game what so ever.

[Becker]

Originally posted by Staceee
- Siavash doesn't want to take part in the game.

- Sophie does.

There is a Difference in their reasons for not nominating.

yeah right I agree with your logic totally ... :laugh2:

[Slothy]

Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Yes, and what a tainted view you have. When you dislike someone you can even make their positives seem like a negative. You go girlfriend (this was to stacee, I forgot to quote, whoops)

He does have his positives and I know this.

As a HOUSEMATE in the GAME, I dislike him.

So if he had just randomly picked two names, say Bea & Sophie you'd have been fine with that? Just like the two he chose anyway, albeit with the help of BB. In fact he did nominate, just in unconventional means. As did Sophie. Its easy to see it how you want in the end...all based on how high that person is on your favs list.

But by not nominating as you put it, sophie isn't participating in the game...as you put it. You contradict yourself.

Siavash doesn't WANT to participate in the game what so ever.

Wrong, he doesn't want to participate in nominating. Thats not 'what so ever', if that was the case he would've left completely. He just wants to be there because the public decide to keep him there, he has already said this. He said he wanted to be up each week and have the public decide - no free rides, his exact words. Its not like he never nominated.

[santaa]

iF siavash doesnt want to take part in the game he wont be wanting to win the money then

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Becker
Originally posted by Staceee
- Siavash doesn't want to take part in the game.

- Sophie does.

There is a Difference in their reasons for not nominating.

yeah right I agree with your logic totally ... :laugh2:

'Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.'

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Slothy
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Yes, and what a tainted view you have. When you dislike someone you can even make their positives seem like a negative. You go girlfriend (this was to stacee, I forgot to quote, whoops)

He does have his positives and I know this.

As a HOUSEMATE in the GAME, I dislike him.

So if he had just randomly picked two names, say Bea & Sophie you'd have been fine with that? Just like the two he chose anyway, albeit with the help of BB. In fact he did nominate, just in unconventional means. As did Sophie. Its easy to see it how you want in the end...all based on how high that person is on your favs list.

But by not nominating as you put it, sophie isn't participating in the game...as you put it. You contradict yourself.

Siavash doesn't WANT to participate in the game what so ever.

Wrong, he doesn't want to participate in nominating. Thats not 'what so ever', if that was the case he would've left completely. He just wants to be there because the public decide to keep him there, he has already said this. He said he wanted to be up each week and have the public decide - no free rides, his exact words. Its not like he never nominated.

Actually you are wrong. If you have been watching the past episodes he has said that he doesn't want to play THE GAME! Which is why he isn't nominating.

I feel I am going round and round in circles here.

[Becker]

Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Becker
Originally posted by Staceee
- Siavash doesn't want to take part in the game.

- Sophie does.

There is a Difference in their reasons for not nominating.

yeah right I agree with your logic totally ... :laugh2:

'Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.'

And ridiculous arguements such as yours are the lowest form of logic ... Do us a favour and grow up

[squinky]

Originally posted by eezamana
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

What a load of cobblers,:nono::nono::nono:

Siavash didnt nominate.

Sophie didnt nominate.

What's the difference?:puzzled::puzzled::puzzled:

They both did exactly the same thing.


exactly!i like both siavash and sophie,dont give a **** what reasons they gave,same thing either way.its only a game show.:rolleyes:

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Becker
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Becker
Originally posted by Staceee
- Siavash doesn't want to take part in the game.

- Sophie does.

There is a Difference in their reasons for not nominating.

yeah right I agree with your logic totally ... :laugh2:

'Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.'

And ridiculous arguements such as yours are the lowest form of logic ... Do us a favour and grow up

Because I have a different opinion to you means I need to grow up?

[Slothy]

Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Yes, and what a tainted view you have. When you dislike someone you can even make their positives seem like a negative. You go girlfriend (this was to stacee, I forgot to quote, whoops)

He does have his positives and I know this.

As a HOUSEMATE in the GAME, I dislike him.

So if he had just randomly picked two names, say Bea & Sophie you'd have been fine with that? Just like the two he chose anyway, albeit with the help of BB. In fact he did nominate, just in unconventional means. As did Sophie. Its easy to see it how you want in the end...all based on how high that person is on your favs list.

But by not nominating as you put it, sophie isn't participating in the game...as you put it. You contradict yourself.

Siavash doesn't WANT to participate in the game what so ever.

Wrong, he doesn't want to participate in nominating. Thats not 'what so ever', if that was the case he would've left completely. He just wants to be there because the public decide to keep him there, he has already said this. He said he wanted to be up each week and have the public decide - no free rides, his exact words. Its not like he never nominated.

Actually you are wrong. If you have been watching the past episodes he has said that he doesn't want to play THE GAME! Which is why he isn't nominating.

I feel I am going round and round in circles here.

Watch back, he said he doesn't want to participate in 'that' part of the game. I feel its your ignorance thats making this go round in circles. Its obvious you don't like siavash lets try and be objective instead of sticking up for one rule break and not another. In the end a rule break is a rule break, as simple as.

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Slothy
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Yes, and what a tainted view you have. When you dislike someone you can even make their positives seem like a negative. You go girlfriend (this was to stacee, I forgot to quote, whoops)

He does have his positives and I know this.

As a HOUSEMATE in the GAME, I dislike him.

So if he had just randomly picked two names, say Bea & Sophie you'd have been fine with that? Just like the two he chose anyway, albeit with the help of BB. In fact he did nominate, just in unconventional means. As did Sophie. Its easy to see it how you want in the end...all based on how high that person is on your favs list.

But by not nominating as you put it, sophie isn't participating in the game...as you put it. You contradict yourself.

Siavash doesn't WANT to participate in the game what so ever.

Wrong, he doesn't want to participate in nominating. Thats not 'what so ever', if that was the case he would've left completely. He just wants to be there because the public decide to keep him there, he has already said this. He said he wanted to be up each week and have the public decide - no free rides, his exact words. Its not like he never nominated.

Actually you are wrong. If you have been watching the past episodes he has said that he doesn't want to play THE GAME! Which is why he isn't nominating.

I feel I am going round and round in circles here.

Watch back, he said he doesn't want to participate in 'that' part of the game. I feel its your ignorance thats making this go round in circles. Its obvious you don't like siavash lets try and be objective instead of sticking up for one rule break and not another. In the end a rule break is a rule break, as simple as.

But this isn't about the rule break. I think that they should both be punished equally (or not in this case) for breaking the rules.

This is about the difference in their reasons. I really am getting tired of this now

[Becker]

Well give in on your fail arguement then because it really is. If you want to promote Sophie fine no worries go right ahead ... just don't think you will get away with being biased because you won't.

Be fair or be prepared to be fought at every turn.

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Becker
Well give in on your fail arguement then because it really is. If you want to promote Sophie fine no worries go right ahead ... just don't think you will get away with being biased because you won't.

Be fair or be prepared to be fought at every turn.

I would prefer not to call this an arguement these are my veiws and you are free to express yours.

I do think they should both be punished for breaking rules I am explaining the difference in their reasons for doing so - looking deeper into it.

[Becker]

Just in case anyone missed your post in this other thread ...
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forum/topic-141069-why-they-slating-siavash_big-brother-10.htm

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sophie wasn't right not to nominate either. ( change of heart was it?)

Siavash makes me more angry because he doesn't want to play the game. I just don't understand why he is still there then?

-- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Stop contradicting yourself

[Slothy]

Lol, what she still cant get is no matter how deep you look into it, they both equate to the exact same thing. A rule break. That. Is. It. Plain. And. Simple (:

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Slothy
Lol, what she still cant get is no matter how deep you look into it, they both equate to the exact same thing. A rule break. That. Is. It. Plain. And. Simple (:

I KNOW THIS!

They both did not nominate.

They both should be punished (or not) equally.

I am explaining the difference in their reasons.

I like Sophie

I dislike Siavash

[Becker]

Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Lol, what she still cant get is no matter how deep you look into it, they both equate to the exact same thing. A rule break. That. Is. It. Plain. And. Simple (:

I KNOW THIS!

They both did not nominate.

They both should be punished (or not) equally.

I am explaining the difference in their reasons.

I like Sophie

I dislike Siavash

Answer the question. Why are you contradicting yourself?

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Becker
Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Lol, what she still cant get is no matter how deep you look into it, they both equate to the exact same thing. A rule break. That. Is. It. Plain. And. Simple (:

I KNOW THIS!

They both did not nominate.

They both should be punished (or not) equally.

I am explaining the difference in their reasons.

I like Sophie

I dislike Siavash

Answer the question. Why are you contradicting yourself?

HOW?!

[shams79]

yes but you have to remember even though Siavash is orignal in regards to what he wears he is a follower and not a leader, but it was Bea that put the idea in his head and he throught that evryone was going to follow suit but what he did'nt realise was that Bea was setting him up so that she would'nt get alot of nominations. Siavash and Sophie's action was breacking the rules but the reasoning behide is was that they throught all the HMs would be up as they throught that it would be fair, did you see them all getting angry as they were scare that because of their actions they all would be up especially, David, Charlie, Rods and Lisa

[Becker]

Here you post this

Sophie on the other hand couldn't think of anyone to nominate on this occasion. She is still playing she isn't refusing to be a part of everything.

While here
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forum/topic-141069-why-they-slating-siavash_big-brother-10.htm

you post this
Sophie wasn't right not to nominate either.

You clearly make an excuse for her in this thread yet tell us in the other thread she was wrong

You are contradicting yourself. Make sure you are consistent with your opinions, arguements or whatever you want to call them or someone will take issue and undermine you every time.

[squinky]

how is siavash a follower?

[Staceee]

Originally posted by Becker
Here you post this

Sophie on the other hand couldn't think of anyone to nominate on this occasion. She is still playing she isn't refusing to be a part of everything.

While here
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forum/topic-141069-why-they-slating-siavash_big-brother-10.htm

you post this
Sophie wasn't right not to nominate either.

You clearly make an excuse for her in this thread yet tell us in the other thread she was wrong

You are contradicting yourself. Make sure you are consistent with your opinions, arguements or whatever you want to call them or someone will take issue and undermine you every time.

Ok.

This is the LAST. TIME.

I am saying this.

This thread explains the differences between their reasons for not nominating.

[Becker]

Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Becker
Here you post this

Sophie on the other hand couldn't think of anyone to nominate on this occasion. She is still playing she isn't refusing to be a part of everything.

While here
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forum/topic-141069-why-they-slating-siavash_big-brother-10.htm

you post this
Sophie wasn't right not to nominate either.

You clearly make an excuse for her in this thread yet tell us in the other thread she was wrong

You are contradicting yourself. Make sure you are consistent with your opinions, arguements or whatever you want to call them or someone will take issue and undermine you every time.

Ok.

This is the LAST. TIME.

I am saying this.

This thread explains the differences between their reasons for not nominating.

Which having been ridiculed by the majority of posters here anyway is still in contrast to something you said in a different thread.

Not good enough. If your convictions were solid you wouldn't be changing your story from one thread to another.

[huggy1uk]

Insult Removed

[huggy1uk]

Originally posted by huggy1uk
Insult Removed
I am polish sorry:sad:

[Benjamin]

Just a reminder for everyone to keep things calm in here please. I can see some of you getting heated about this. Debate but please do not argue and insult. :thumbs:

[sophieyk2]

I like Siavash a lot but BB should threaten him with eviction with immediate effect if he refuses to play by BB rules. He knew the score when he went in, and if he doesn't want to play the game anymore then he doesn't deserve to win the money.

[NettoSuperstar!]

Originally posted by eezamana
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

What a load of cobblers,:nono::nono::nono:

Siavash didnt nominate.

Sophie didnt nominate.

What's the difference?:puzzled::puzzled::puzzled:

They both did exactly the same thing.

Agreed and Sophie says its fairer for all to be up too but noone jumps on her, in the house or on here! They all ******** themselves cos they might be up pahahaha

[BB22]

I fail to see any material difference between Siavash and Sophie in this case. Personally I like Siavash and don't mind Sophie at all but they should simply get their act together and nominate.

Attempts to excuse Sophie while condemning Siavash are feeble, as far as I am concerned.

As far as the reactions in the House are concerned, I would just tell Rodrigo to sod off. His arrogant lecturing about the rules is very, very irritating. And David and Charlie too.

[Barbie]

I think Sophie would have nominated if siavash hadn't said he didn't and BB said they would choose for him, she follows easily

[bbisfun]

Originally posted by eezamana
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

What a load of cobblers,:nono::nono::nono:

Siavash didnt nominate.

Sophie didnt nominate.

What's the difference?:puzzled::puzzled::puzzled:

They both did exactly the same thing.

Agreed both muppets dont deserve to win.

[camertone]

get siavash out! he is the biggest hypocrite!
siavash told david not to be mad about bea nominating him.
siavash told david that everybody has to nominate somebody and yet siavash did not nominate anyone!
i cannot believe he's favorite to win!
is british public that gullible?

[BJ]

Originally posted by Staceee
Originally posted by Slothy
Ok so he took himself out of the game. He said that. In that case everyone else can nominate him and get him put up. Thus far they haven't. His argument is; he doesn't want people getting a free ride by dodging nomination he wants the public to decide who they want to be in the final. What he said about Bea earlier was very true - she is the same person as last week, just last week 'that' group had decided it was freddie or Marcus' time. Siavash is very astute as it happens.

But he doesn't make the rules!!!!

Big Brother does! That is the game, who is he to change it?

You have to be liked in the house as well as on the outside to win!

YES:thumbs:

[greysky]

siavash refused to vote because he doesn't want to go up against marcus.. he perfer to put the whole house up to save himself.... it's as simple as that! ....sophie didn't want to nominate because she feel bad for voting david and bea ... those two would have been her nominations .....Siavash and sophie are wrong not to nominate but BB should have made an example of them .... they have not been punish at all so far ! If siavash refuse to nominate again for the 3rd time then BB should tell him he will not be eligable to win.