Siavash is free to do whatever he wants to in nomination..

[masonbason]

I just don't get it, its all a game right, and there is something called free will. If Siavash doesn't want to nominate, than its his choice.

The way certain HM like Rodrigo, David, Charlie and Lisa are going on, it just shows how concerned they are about going out if being up for eviction and how they want to win big brother so badly.

Some people have been saying Siavash is playing a game but i honestly thinks he won't mind if he goes out. I think he doesnt care that much, even though he would like to win big brother, he unlike the four dimwits know ultimately its in the public hands.

Just like Marcus who knows its not the HM who decides, its channel 4 and the public.

Also one more point do they know that even if they reach the final, they will still be booted out? Theres no prize for staying till the final, there is only a prize for winning hence if they go this week or the next week, whats the difference? They are all so dumb that i think they should alll be up for eviction this week and we should have a double eviction.

[Jezzy]

Originally posted by masonbason
I just don't get it, its all a game right, and there is something called free will. If Siavash doesn't want to nominate, than its his choice.



Sure is. But it's a game that has rules that Siavash doesn't want to play by. IMO, that means he should be removed from it, much as I like him.

[masonbason]

Originally posted by Jezzy
Originally posted by masonbason
I just don't get it, its all a game right, and there is something called free will. If Siavash doesn't want to nominate, than its his choice.



Sure is. But it's a game that has rules that Siavash doesn't want to play by. IMO, that means he should be removed from it, much as I like him.


If thats the case, than there won't be any big brother show cause by your logic, Marcus, halfwit, Sophie, Siavash should have been booted out a long time ago.

I dont know why i have to explain this to you, but big brother is primarily a tv show for the audience and for endemol, for the people\bb housemates in it, its a game show.

Big difference.

Secondly HM breaking rules and Big brother punishing them its good tv viewing hence bigger ratings, and more money, so there is no point for channel 4 to boot him out.

[The_Long_Run]

Originally posted by masonbason
I just don't get it, its all a game right, and there is something called free will. If Siavash doesn't want to nominate, than its his choice.

The way certain HM like Rodrigo, David, Charlie and Lisa are going on, it just shows how concerned they are about going out if being up for eviction and how they want to win big brother so badly.

Some people have been saying Siavash is playing a game but i honestly thinks he won't mind if he goes out. I think he doesnt care that much, even though he would like to win big brother, he unlike the four dimwits know ultimately its in the public hands.

Just like Marcus who knows its not the HM who decides, its channel 4 and the public.

By exactly the same token, HMs are free to object to Siavash's action. If they wish to object it is their choice. It is something called free will! Of course Siavash is game playing as he himself made clear in the bath last night when talking to Sophie. No objection to that, they each play the BB Game their own way. They have a right to call each other out on that if they wish.

[Vicky.]

Well, according to some Charlie himself only nominated one person also...if this is true, he is a hypocrite. We shall see...

[masonbason]

Originally posted by The_Long_Run
Originally posted by masonbason
I just don't get it, its all a game right, and there is something called free will. If Siavash doesn't want to nominate, than its his choice.

The way certain HM like Rodrigo, David, Charlie and Lisa are going on, it just shows how concerned they are about going out if being up for eviction and how they want to win big brother so badly.

Some people have been saying Siavash is playing a game but i honestly thinks he won't mind if he goes out. I think he doesnt care that much, even though he would like to win big brother, he unlike the four dimwits know ultimately its in the public hands.

Just like Marcus who knows its not the HM who decides, its channel 4 and the public.

By exactly the same token, HMs are free to object to Siavash's action. If they wish to object it is their choice. It is something called free will! Of course Siavash is game playing as he himself made clear in the bath last night when talking to Sophie. No objection to that, they each play the BB Game their own way. They have a right to call each other out on that if they wish.

My point being
a) They are so concerned about it
b) They are afraid of being up for nomination.

I never said they are not free to discuss it. I am giving you an intrepretation of what i see.

[The_Long_Run]

Originally posted by masonbason
Originally posted by Jezzy
Originally posted by masonbason
I just don't get it, its all a game right, and there is something called free will. If Siavash doesn't want to nominate, than its his choice.



Sure is. But it's a game that has rules that Siavash doesn't want to play by. IMO, that means he should be removed from it, much as I like him.


If thats the case, than there won't be any big brother show cause by your logic, Marcus, halfwit, Sophie, Siavash should have been booted out a long time ago.

I dont know why i have to explain this to you, but big brother is primarily a tv show for the audience and for endemol, for the people\bb housemates in it, its a game show.

Big difference.

I don't know why I have to point this out to you but BB is a product designed to make money for Endemol. The producers will ALWAYS employ legitimate strategies to maximise their financial return. If kicking people out will make greatest return they will find a strategy to do so. If they see keeping people in as being most profitable, then THAT is what they will do.

Ofcom is in the background to ensure that only legitimate strategies are used, but they are VERY flexible as each HM has signed a contract giving the producers GREAT power.

[kisywisy]

siavash had no problem nominating every other week

he was well aware of how the nomination process worked before he applied for the show. it's not up to him to decide the who should be up for eviction, it's the hoouse as a whole. why should he get the power?? he should have been threatened with eviction when he first started pulling this non-nominating ****.

if he isn't bothered about winning he can leave through the back door. i don't want someone in there that doesn't want to win!! what a load of bull.

[trucker]

I like siavash more than most of the HMs' but have to question his motives for not nominating.

when he says he cant find a reason to nominate anyone baffles me especailly when certain HMs' blatantly do wrong in front of him such :

as the blonde dimwit who steals
the brazilian bore who acts like a child
the scouser gay with his annoying nana act
the bitching lesbian who smokes like a trooper
david for being ......david

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by trucker
I like siavash more than most of the HMs' but have to question his motives for not nominating.

when he says he cant find a reason to nominate anyone baffles me especailly when certain HMs' blatantly do wrong in front of him such :

as the blonde dimwit who steals
the brazilian bore who acts like a child
the scouser gay with his annoying nana act
the bitching lesbian who smokes like a trooper
david for being ......david

Charlie is a geordie :wink:

And what does his sexuality have to do with anything?

[6*Alives]

Originally posted by kisywisy
siavash had no problem nominating every other week

he was well aware of how the nomination process worked before he applied for the show. it's not up to him to decide the who should be up for eviction, it's the hoouse as a whole. why should he get the power?? he should have been threatened with eviction when he first started pulling this non-nominating ****.

if he isn't bothered about winning he can leave through the back door. i don't want someone in there that doesn't want to win!! what a load of bull.

How did you get out of the house Rodrigo?!!!!

[masonbason]

Originally posted by The_Long_Run
Originally posted by masonbason
Originally posted by Jezzy
Originally posted by masonbason
I just don't get it, its all a game right, and there is something called free will. If Siavash doesn't want to nominate, than its his choice.



Sure is. But it's a game that has rules that Siavash doesn't want to play by. IMO, that means he should be removed from it, much as I like him.


If thats the case, than there won't be any big brother show cause by your logic, Marcus, halfwit, Sophie, Siavash should have been booted out a long time ago.

I dont know why i have to explain this to you, but big brother is primarily a tv show for the audience and for endemol, for the people\bb housemates in it, its a game show.

Big difference.

I don't know why I have to point this out to you but BB is a product designed to make money for Endemol. The producers will ALWAYS employ legitimate strategies to maximise their financial return. If kicking people out will make greatest return they will find a strategy to do so. If they see keeping people in as being most profitable, then THAT is what they will do.

Ofcom is in the background to ensure that only legitimate strategies are used, but they are VERY flexible as each HM has signed a contract giving the producers GREAT power.

Did i just not say that.. there is no need to repeat what i am saying in further details and throw it back at me, this is getting tedious now... ok dokie,,

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by kisywisy
siavash had no problem nominating every other week

he was well aware of how the nomination process worked before he applied for the show. it's not up to him to decide the who should be up for eviction, it's the hoouse as a whole. why should he get the power?? he should have been threatened with eviction when he first started pulling this non-nominating ****.

if he isn't bothered about winning he can leave through the back door. i don't want someone in there that doesn't want to win!! what a load of bull.

For quite a while he has been interfering with nominations...from as far back as bunny-gate. He put himself up two weeks in a row and this is not the first time he has refused to nominate...so I really dont get how you figure that.

But I agree about they should of kicked him out at first refusal though, its their own fault it has ended up like this, if rulebreakers dont get punished, they will do it again.

[JTM45]

Charlie and Lisa are just both terrified that they might end up being up for eviction and Charlie is the kind of person that thinks if he shouts loud enough about what someone else is doing it will distract people from the fact that he's doing everything he can to avoid being judged in a proper eviction by the public because he knows that he's not a very nice person and there's a very good chance that he wouldn't survive an in a one on one eviction with most of the remaining housemates.

Charlie and Lisa are the biggest cowards in there! :laugh:

[The_Long_Run]

At the end of the day, the public will judge Siavash. There are no prizes for coming second or lower.

Of course, if the PUBLIC at large couldn't give a damn about whether he nominated or not, he may even win.

This eventuality is not one I anticipate. However, I don't think it will be for his abstentions that he is most negatively judged, there will be other reasons.

[Kate!]

Originally posted by trucker
I like siavash more than most of the HMs' but have to question his motives for not nominating.

when he says he cant find a reason to nominate anyone baffles me especailly when certain HMs' blatantly do wrong in front of him such :

as the blonde dimwit who steals
the brazilian bore who acts like a child
the scouser gay with his annoying nana act
the bitching lesbian who smokes like a trooper
david for being ......david

hang on a minute!!!:shrug::shrug:

i have watched bb from that launch night and i have never seen a scouser in the house......oh silly me........you must mean Charlie, FROM NEWCASTLE.

quick geography lesson, Liverpool and Newcastle...miles apart.God, and we all thought Sophie knew nowt on this topic!!:nono::nono::nono::nono::nono:

[The_Long_Run]

Originally posted by masonbason
Originally posted by The_Long_Run
Originally posted by masonbason
Originally posted by Jezzy
Originally posted by masonbason
I just don't get it, its all a game right, and there is something called free will. If Siavash doesn't want to nominate, than its his choice.



Sure is. But it's a game that has rules that Siavash doesn't want to play by. IMO, that means he should be removed from it, much as I like him.


If thats the case, than there won't be any big brother show cause by your logic, Marcus, halfwit, Sophie, Siavash should have been booted out a long time ago.

I dont know why i have to explain this to you, but big brother is primarily a tv show for the audience and for endemol, for the people\bb housemates in it, its a game show.

Big difference.

I don't know why I have to point this out to you but BB is a product designed to make money for Endemol. The producers will ALWAYS employ legitimate strategies to maximise their financial return. If kicking people out will make greatest return they will find a strategy to do so. If they see keeping people in as being most profitable, then THAT is what they will do.

Ofcom is in the background to ensure that only legitimate strategies are used, but they are VERY flexible as each HM has signed a contract giving the producers GREAT power.

Did i just not say that.. there is no need to repeat what i am saying in further details and throw it back at me, this is getting tedious now... ok dokie,,

NO, just to be clear, you didn't just say that.

[kisywisy]

Originally posted by 6*Alives
Originally posted by kisywisy
siavash had no problem nominating every other week

he was well aware of how the nomination process worked before he applied for the show. it's not up to him to decide the who should be up for eviction, it's the hoouse as a whole. why should he get the power?? he should have been threatened with eviction when he first started pulling this non-nominating ****.

if he isn't bothered about winning he can leave through the back door. i don't want someone in there that doesn't want to win!! what a load of bull.

How did you get out of the house Rodrigo?!!!!

do not deesssreeepect meeee!!! :laugh2:

it's what i feel. load of **** staying if he's not playing by the rules. noone like following rules, but it has to be done. people can argue 'free will', but if that were true we'd be free to do anything we want all the time and not think of the concequences. he's just thinking of himself

[The_Long_Run]

Originally posted by JTM45
Charlie and Lisa are just both terrified that they might end up being up for eviction and Charlie is the kind of person that thinks if he shouts loud enough about what someone else is doing it will distract people from the fact that he's doing everything he can to avoid being judged in a proper eviction by the public because he knows that he's not a very nice person and there's a very good chance that he wouldn't survive an in a one on one eviction with most of the remaining housemates.

Charlie and Lisa are the biggest cowards in there! :laugh:

Wow someone else that can live inside Charlie's head and see how he sees himself. Utter BS!

[bettiepage]

I just hate it when he says "I'm taking myself out of the game", Yet he's still in there playing the bloody game.

If he was to win, and was given the £100,000 would he reply "No, that's fine. I didn't play the game"? Of course he wouldn't :laugh3:

I do hope he's evicted come Friday so he gets his wish about not wanting to be in the game.

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by Rice_square
I just hate it when he says "I'm taking myself out of the game", Yet he's still in there playing the bloody game.

If he was to win, and was given the £100,000 would he reply "No, that's fine. I didn't play the game"? Of course he wouldn't :laugh3:

I do hope he's evicted come Friday so he gets his wish about not wanting to be in the game.

Dont think theres much chance of that...

Its going to be between David and Marcus i think. Probably with david going..if the speculation about noms is correct, of course...

[trucker]

Originally posted by sweetsophiefan
Originally posted by trucker
I like siavash more than most of the HMs' but have to question his motives for not nominating.

when he says he cant find a reason to nominate anyone baffles me especailly when certain HMs' blatantly do wrong in front of him such :

as the blonde dimwit who steals
the brazilian bore who acts like a child
the scouser gay with his annoying nana act
the bitching lesbian who smokes like a trooper
david for being ......david

hang on a minute!!!:shrug::shrug:

i have watched bb from that launch night and i have never seen a scouser in the house......oh silly me........you must mean Charlie, FROM NEWCASTLE.

quick geography lesson, Liverpool and Newcastle...miles apart.God, and we all thought Sophie knew nowt on this topic!!:nono::nono::nono::nono::nono:


LMAO...yeah i got that one wrong
sorry to all scousers for the insult.
he's still a prick wherever he comes from

[kisywisy]

Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by kisywisy
siavash had no problem nominating every other week

he was well aware of how the nomination process worked before he applied for the show. it's not up to him to decide the who should be up for eviction, it's the hoouse as a whole. why should he get the power?? he should have been threatened with eviction when he first started pulling this non-nominating ****.

if he isn't bothered about winning he can leave through the back door. i don't want someone in there that doesn't want to win!! what a load of bull.

For quite a while he has been interfering with nominations...from as far back as bunny-gate. He put himself up two weeks in a row and this is not the first time he has refused to nominate...so I really dont get how you figure that.

But I agree about they should of kicked him out at first refusal though, its their own fault it has ended up like this, if rulebreakers dont get punished, they will do it again.

apologies, i ment to put until recently on the end of that.

they will need to come down hard on rule breaking next series. it's become a farse. siavash kept saying "what can they do?? nothing" when talking about bb and refusing to nominate. bb is supposed to rule the house. the fact that hm don't care or fear bb now is a bad thing. i just hope that it doesn't attract a bunch of hm that want to rule break for story lines next year. i think i'd stop watching

[bettiepage]

Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by Rice_square
I just hate it when he says "I'm taking myself out of the game", Yet he's still in there playing the bloody game.

If he was to win, and was given the £100,000 would he reply "No, that's fine. I didn't play the game"? Of course he wouldn't :laugh3:

I do hope he's evicted come Friday so he gets his wish about not wanting to be in the game.

Dont think theres much chance of that...


You may be surprised :love:

He's gonna be a ball of misery this week; if he's up.

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by kisywisy
Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by kisywisy
siavash had no problem nominating every other week

he was well aware of how the nomination process worked before he applied for the show. it's not up to him to decide the who should be up for eviction, it's the hoouse as a whole. why should he get the power?? he should have been threatened with eviction when he first started pulling this non-nominating ****.

if he isn't bothered about winning he can leave through the back door. i don't want someone in there that doesn't want to win!! what a load of bull.

For quite a while he has been interfering with nominations...from as far back as bunny-gate. He put himself up two weeks in a row and this is not the first time he has refused to nominate...so I really dont get how you figure that.

But I agree about they should of kicked him out at first refusal though, its their own fault it has ended up like this, if rulebreakers dont get punished, they will do it again.

apologies, i ment to put until recently on the end of that.

they will need to come down hard on rule breaking next series. it's become a farse. siavash kept saying "what can they do?? nothing" when talking about bb and refusing to nominate. bb is supposed to rule the house. the fact that hm don't care or fear bb now is a bad thing. i just hope that it doesn't attract a bunch of hm that want to rule break for story lines next year. i think i'd stop watching

It has not been just Siavash though. most of them have broke rules at some point. Sophie has broken just as many, if not more rules regarding nominations. They are too soft...bring back evil BB

[bananarama]

The OP concludes Siavash can do what he wants with nominations.......What deluded logic.......If one entered a competition with RULES would you be allowed to change the rules to help yourself win.......That my friends would be fraud in the real world.......

[masonbason]

NO, just to be clear, you didn't just say that. [/quote]

I am tired now, ,, whatever you say... yawn...

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by Rice_square
Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by Rice_square
I just hate it when he says "I'm taking myself out of the game", Yet he's still in there playing the bloody game.

If he was to win, and was given the £100,000 would he reply "No, that's fine. I didn't play the game"? Of course he wouldn't :laugh3:

I do hope he's evicted come Friday so he gets his wish about not wanting to be in the game.

Dont think theres much chance of that...


You may be surprised :love:

He's gonna be a ball of misery this week; if he's up.

A LOT more people hate Marcus than Siavash.

Fans of Siavash and Marcus will vote David, as most people who are fans of one are fans of the other.

This leaves casual viewers, who in general tend to dislike Marcus..and the obsessive Marcus haters.

Siavash is safe this week...he is in the final.

Im still hoping they find a way of throwing Charlie into the mix, as I dont particularly want to vote Siavash Marcus OR David out...

[masonbason]

Originally posted by bananarama
The OP concludes Siavash can do what he wants with nominations.......What deluded logic.......If one entered a competition with RULES would you be allowed to change the rules to help yourself win.......That my friends would be fraud in the real world.......

Yawn, Siavash has done what he wants and got away with it,, so if you have someone to blame go to oxfom and complain about Channel 4....

[kisywisy]

Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by kisywisy
Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by kisywisy
siavash had no problem nominating every other week

he was well aware of how the nomination process worked before he applied for the show. it's not up to him to decide the who should be up for eviction, it's the hoouse as a whole. why should he get the power?? he should have been threatened with eviction when he first started pulling this non-nominating ****.

if he isn't bothered about winning he can leave through the back door. i don't want someone in there that doesn't want to win!! what a load of bull.

For quite a while he has been interfering with nominations...from as far back as bunny-gate. He put himself up two weeks in a row and this is not the first time he has refused to nominate...so I really dont get how you figure that.

But I agree about they should of kicked him out at first refusal though, its their own fault it has ended up like this, if rulebreakers dont get punished, they will do it again.

apologies, i ment to put until recently on the end of that.

they will need to come down hard on rule breaking next series. it's become a farse. siavash kept saying "what can they do?? nothing" when talking about bb and refusing to nominate. bb is supposed to rule the house. the fact that hm don't care or fear bb now is a bad thing. i just hope that it doesn't attract a bunch of hm that want to rule break for story lines next year. i think i'd stop watching

It has not been just Siavash though. most of them have broke rules at some point. Sophie has broken just as many, if not more rules regarding nominations. They are too soft...bring back evil BB

i mentioned siavash coz he was the one that said those words.

evil bb will need to make a return next year. i hate this softly softly approach to hm. rule breaks are a bit fun and different at the start, but ****ing boring when it happens all the time

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by bananarama
The OP concludes Siavash can do what he wants with nominations.......What deluded logic.......If one entered a competition with RULES would you be allowed to change the rules to help yourself win.......That my friends would be fraud in the real world.......

To be fair...he CAN do what he wants with nominations.

BB has made it like this.

He should of been chucked out on first refusal.

[bettiepage]

Originally posted by VickyJ


A LOT more people hate Marcus than Siavash.

Fans of Siavash and Marcus will vote David, as most people who are fans of one are fans of the other.

This leaves casual viewers, who in general tend to dislike Marcus..and the obsessive Marcus haters.

Siavash is safe this week...he is in the final.

Im still hoping they find a way of throwing Charlie into the mix, as I dont particularly want to vote Siavash Marcus OR David out...

Your probably right Vicky :|

Ah well, I can always hope.

[masonbason]

Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by bananarama
The OP concludes Siavash can do what he wants with nominations.......What deluded logic.......If one entered a competition with RULES would you be allowed to change the rules to help yourself win.......That my friends would be fraud in the real world.......

To be fair...he CAN do what he wants with nominations.

BB has made it like this.

He should of been chucked out on first refusal.

Well said vicky, i dont know why people are getting mad at Siavash, if you need to get mad, get mad at BB and Channel 4, they are the ones who make the rules and let people do what they want to.

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by Rice_square


Your probably right Vicky :|

Ah well, I can always hope.

You should know by now I am always right :wink::whistle::tongue:

Why do you hate him so much anyway? Its always puzzled me...

[bettiepage]

Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by Rice_square


Your probably right Vicky :|

Ah well, I can always hope.

You should know by now I am always right :wink::whistle::tongue:

Why do you hate him so much anyway? Its always puzzled me...

LMAO, ok Vicky :thumbs:

I don't hate him..... :|

as I've said a bit up on this thread, he pissed me off with his "I don't want to play the game" when he's still in there playing it.

[masonbason]

Originally posted by The_Long_Run
Originally posted by JTM45
Charlie and Lisa are just both terrified that they might end up being up for eviction and Charlie is the kind of person that thinks if he shouts loud enough about what someone else is doing it will distract people from the fact that he's doing everything he can to avoid being judged in a proper eviction by the public because he knows that he's not a very nice person and there's a very good chance that he wouldn't survive an in a one on one eviction with most of the remaining housemates.

Charlie and Lisa are the biggest cowards in there! :laugh:

Wow someone else that can live inside Charlie's head and see how he sees himself. Utter BS!

A little less sarcasm and more common sense might get your point across better..

[bananarama]

Originally posted by masonbason
Originally posted by bananarama
The OP concludes Siavash can do what he wants with nominations.......What deluded logic.......If one entered a competition with RULES would you be allowed to change the rules to help yourself win.......That my friends would be fraud in the real world.......

Yawn, Siavash has done what he wants and got away with it,, so if you have someone to blame go to oxfom and complain about Channel 4....

What a ridiculous counter reply......You can't even get Ofcom right.....(Oxfom indeed) :yuk: .You have lost the plot for sure......

[kisywisy]

Originally posted by masonbason
Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by bananarama
The OP concludes Siavash can do what he wants with nominations.......What deluded logic.......If one entered a competition with RULES would you be allowed to change the rules to help yourself win.......That my friends would be fraud in the real world.......

To be fair...he CAN do what he wants with nominations.

BB has made it like this.

He should of been chucked out on first refusal.

Well said vicky, i dont know why people are getting mad at Siavash, if you need to get mad, get mad at BB and Channel 4, they are the ones who make the rules and let people do what they want to.

eh?? that's like saying we shouldn't get mad at lisa for being horrible to freddie coz bb allowed it. or bea making freddie cry coz bb allowed it!!

i'm mad at siavash for claiming to want everything to be fair when he's just protecting himself.

by not nominating yesterday, he automatically gave sophie and charlie a nomination, so why didn't he just nominate them?? same result

[BB22]

The reactions of David, Lisa and Rodrigo (and indeed some people on this forum) amuse me in relation to failing to nominate. There is definitely an element of moral indignation in the way they react. Personally, I do not see any moral element to this at all and there is certainly no moral obligation to nominate. Big Brother has allowed this situation to develop due to its reluctance to come down hard on those failing to nominate.

Personally, I would much rather that people nominated as required as I like the basic structure of the game with nominations followed by an eviction. However, I do not think anyone has the right to get indignant over it all. Siavash is playing with fire and so far Big Brother has allowed him to get away with it pretty much unscathed, that's all there is to it, really.

[masonbason]

Originally posted by bananarama
Originally posted by masonbason
Originally posted by bananarama
The OP concludes Siavash can do what he wants with nominations.......What deluded logic.......If one entered a competition with RULES would you be allowed to change the rules to help yourself win.......That my friends would be fraud in the real world.......

Yawn, Siavash has done what he wants and got away with it,, so if you have someone to blame go to oxfom and complain about Channel 4....

What a ridiculous counter reply......You can't even get Ofcom right.....(Oxfom indeed) :yuk: .You have lost the plot for sure......

Ok i completely agree, seeing that you know the plot and your spell checking skills are better, could you do a spell check on my other posts and let me know where i have lost the "plot" and perhaps even correct them, i am sure i have made a few mistakes,,,...thanks in advance, i am looking to you to regain the plot..

[masonbason]

Originally posted by BB22
The reactions of David, Lisa and Rodrigo (and indeed some people on this forum) amuse me in relation to failing to nominate. There is definitely an element of moral indignation in the way they react. Personally, I do not see any moral element to this at all and there is certainly no moral obligation to nominate. Big Brother has allowed this situation to develop due to its reluctance to come down hard on those failing to nominate.

Personally, I would much rather that people nominated as required as I like the basic structure of the game with nominations followed by an eviction. However, I do not think anyone has the right to get indignant over it all. Siavash is playing with fire and so far Big Brother has allowed him to get away with it pretty much unscathed, that's all there is to it, really.

Well said BB2, that is exactly how it is, there is nothing else to say the least..

[masonbason]

Originally posted by kisywisy
Originally posted by masonbason
Originally posted by VickyJ
Originally posted by bananarama
The OP concludes Siavash can do what he wants with nominations.......What deluded logic.......If one entered a competition with RULES would you be allowed to change the rules to help yourself win.......That my friends would be fraud in the real world.......

To be fair...he CAN do what he wants with nominations.

BB has made it like this.

He should of been chucked out on first refusal.

Well said vicky, i dont know why people are getting mad at Siavash, if you need to get mad, get mad at BB and Channel 4, they are the ones who make the rules and let people do what they want to.

eh?? that's like saying we shouldn't get mad at lisa for being horrible to freddie coz bb allowed it. or bea making freddie cry coz bb allowed it!!

i'm mad at siavash for claiming to want everything to be fair when he's just protecting himself.

by not nominating yesterday, he automatically gave sophie and charlie a nomination, so why didn't he just nominate them?? same result

Ok i agree, i can see logic in your argument, i am not sure if hes protecting himself cause wasnt it going to be david vs Marcus this week if he had nominated? And hes also up for nomination,, if you are mad, vote him out...

[thelionspet]

It's a tactic.. he doesn't want to go one on one with anyone...

[masonbason]

Originally posted by thelionspet
It's a tactic.. he doesn't want to go one on one with anyone...

Hes a goner this week, my bet is on him to go this week..