PDA

View Full Version : Siavash thought david was up


NONESHALLPASS
25-08-2009, 08:53 PM
Thats the only reason he refused to nom it wasnt for any fairness to others BS that he claims it was
He thought he had totted up the totals of noms correctly and had david up with marcus and himself thinking he would survive and david would go.
But he assumed incorrectly how people would vote and now has realised he has made a big mistake.

When he was sat there in the diary room he was thinking of every possible outcome, but forgetting one crucial thing, he was assuming david was already part of the vote on friday.
Big mistake and now he has messed up big time.
He should have nominated david to ensure he had one more vote just in case.
I bet he wished he had now
:wink:

pixee
25-08-2009, 08:54 PM
He said either way he was up actually..he thinks he's up

Vicky.
25-08-2009, 08:58 PM
Who else would he think would nominate david? Marcus, sophie at a guess...

NONESHALLPASS
25-08-2009, 08:59 PM
Originally posted by pixee
He said either way he was up actually..he thinks he's up Siavash misread the signs of who would nom who and now he has got it completely wrong.

WAYNEEBRUM
25-08-2009, 09:01 PM
ive been trying to tell people this but Vash lovers try to deny the actual facts despite it being said by Siavash himself on the HLs.

NONESHALLPASS
25-08-2009, 09:02 PM
Originally posted by VickyJ
Who else would he think would nominate david? Marcus, sophie at a guess... I think siavash thought the votes for david were coming from rodrigo, marcus & sophie giving david three votes
But siavash mistakenly thought he only had three votes, big mistake he actually had four
And so his refusal to nom saved david having a vote which would have tied both marcus and siavash
siavash has stopped us saving both marcus and siavash and now we have to lose one of them for siavash`s arrogance and crap counting skills

NONESHALLPASS
25-08-2009, 09:04 PM
Originally posted by WAYNEEBRUM
ive been trying to tell people this but Vash lovers try to deny the actual facts despite it being said by Siavash himself on the HLs. Yes it was clear to see what siavsh was trying to do.
And it wasnt to fall on his sword as he would have people believe

setanta
25-08-2009, 09:05 PM
I actually think that he realised that it was just himself and Marcus that were up and he didn't fancy his chances against him. Decided to not vote to cause a bit of a scene and to put himself in a more favourable light.

HalfwitFTW
25-08-2009, 09:13 PM
Whether he thought David was up or not, he put himself up regardless/

He could have voted Marcus and David and made a David V Marcus result.

Instead he chose to put himself up.

I dont understand why people have a problem with that :puzzled:

setanta
25-08-2009, 09:17 PM
Originally posted by HalfwitFTW
Whether he thought David was up or not, he put himself up regardless/

He could have voted Marcus and David and made a David V Marcus result.

Instead he chose to put himself up.

I dont understand why people have a problem with that :puzzled:

David was never going to be up and I think Siavash realised this. And Siavash didn't put himself up there...... he knew he was up anyway. WAs just giving a vote to Sophie and Charlie. What a trooper!

And then he decides to disclose this information to Rodrigo.... hmmmm, I wonder why?

santaa
25-08-2009, 09:20 PM
He checked first that Marcus had voted for David. He thinks it will be the three of them. H e didnt tell he did not nom till ater noms concluded. Cllever

NONESHALLPASS
25-08-2009, 09:20 PM
Originally posted by HalfwitFTW
Whether he thought David was up or not, he put himself up regardless/

He could have voted Marcus and David and made a David V Marcus result.

Instead he chose to put himself up.

I dont understand why people have a problem with that :puzzled: Cant you see why siavash did what he did, and it wasnt galantry lol
He was adding up the votes for david in the diary room and counted three
He assumed only there had nommed him aswell obviously thinking charlie, lisa and david
But didnt account for rodrigo nomming him and so siavash had one more vote than david and didnt realise this.
He wanted david up so david would go, he wasnt about putting himself up.
If he was he would do what marcus has done and asked to be put up :wink:

MaratSafinForever
25-08-2009, 09:21 PM
he thinks david is up too so that means he is basically guaranteed to stay, idiot.

setanta
25-08-2009, 09:23 PM
anyway, it's kinda irrelevent to what transpired there now..... he created that situation to put himself in a good light, both inside and outside the diary room. he's an utter plank.

BJ
25-08-2009, 09:30 PM
Originally posted by NONESHALLPASS
Originally posted by HalfwitFTW
Whether he thought David was up or not, he put himself up regardless/

He could have voted Marcus and David and made a David V Marcus result.

Instead he chose to put himself up.

I dont understand why people have a problem with that :puzzled: Cant you see why siavash did what he did, and it wasnt galantry lol
He was adding up the votes for david in the diary room and counted three
He assumed only there had nommed him aswell obviously thinking charlie, lisa and david
But didnt account for rodrigo nomming him and so siavash had one more vote than david and didnt realise this.
He wanted david up so david would go, he wasnt about putting himself up.
If he was he would do what marcus has done and asked to be put up :wink:

Your absolutely right. I didn't think Rodrigo would vote for Siavash and neither did he. He got his sums wrong. Lisa and David must be wetting themselves laughing tonight

nickc25
26-08-2009, 11:36 AM
i is ironic that if he DID actually vote then david would have been up with him and marcus and david would have gone easily. Because of his stupidity we have two favs up for eviction again.

The final has got to be the worst final week ever in BB.

Lisa - Aggressive, chain smoking bully

David - Totally fake drama queen

Charlie - Probably the most fake person in the house, very aggressive and has showed his true colours a number of times though.

Rodrigo - Is kind of honest but has one rule for him and his friends and one for others, tells others to shut up all the time yet goes mad if done to him.

Sophie - Fake tits, and playing the dumb one, she is not that dumb and everyone can see it.

I mean, out of those 5 people you think one of them deserves to win £100,000? They are all horrible in their own way.

Marcus has been true to himself all series and has always said things to people's faces (after the argument he said what he thought to siavash's face too)

The Vash - Has been very boring for a number of weeks now but deserves it a lot more than Lisa, David or Charlie.

mangasatsuma
26-08-2009, 12:04 PM
Rodrigo did get it right when he said that Siavash had lost the plot. (The rest of what he said can go whistle round a canyon.)

On one hand, Siavash thinks he has to suffer and transcend the suffering to reach redemption. He has compared himself to Jesus, apes his look on occasions. Jesus the ultimate masochist. He also lacks confidence in himself and has sat on various fences, and dresses like he wants people to think "hey cool guy!". He wants to go up for eviction because he needs the public to keep him in, he wants that lift, and he wants to prove something to his dad who thinks him "a weirdo". He keeps referring to "free rides", sounds like he has had that criticism thrown at him in the past. He has placed his ego heavily into the nomination/eviction basket. His obsession reminds me of Freddy back in his wolf/sheep/shepherd period. He has described himself as an "all-in type poker player" (to Freddy round the time of the Noirin argument). Unfortunately (for himself) Siavash never thinks his plans through very logically: he has underestimated other hms sneakiness (maybe he thinks himself the most cunning), and forgotten that people don't like obsessive one-track "gameplan" loons.

cleaner67
26-08-2009, 12:14 PM
Siavash just messed it up again, hope he goes on Friday and it`ll only be his own fault

nickc25
26-08-2009, 12:27 PM
Originally posted by mangasatsuma
Rodrigo did get it right when he said that Siavash had lost the plot. (The rest of what he said can go whistle round a canyon.)

On one hand, Siavash thinks he has to suffer and transcend the suffering to reach redemption. He has compared himself to Jesus, apes his look on occasions. Jesus the ultimate masochist. He also lacks confidence in himself and has sat on various fences, and dresses like he wants people to think "hey cool guy!". He wants to go up for eviction because he needs the public to keep him in, he wants that lift, and he wants to prove something to his dad who thinks him "a weirdo". He keeps referring to "free rides", sounds like he has had that criticism thrown at him in the past. He has placed his ego heavily into the nomination/eviction basket. His obsession reminds me of Freddy back in his wolf/sheep/shepherd period. He has described himself as an "all-in type poker player" (to Freddy round the time of the Noirin argument). Unfortunately (for himself) Siavash never thinks his plans through very logically: he has underestimated other hms sneakiness (maybe he thinks himself the most cunning), and forgotten that people don't like obsessive one-track "gameplan" loons.

Who is Jesus? When did he compare himself to some book character?

aremjay
26-08-2009, 12:27 PM
Originally posted by mangasatsuma
Rodrigo did get it right when he said that Siavash had lost the plot. (The rest of what he said can go whistle round a canyon.)

On one hand, Siavash thinks he has to suffer and transcend the suffering to reach redemption. He has compared himself to Jesus, apes his look on occasions. Jesus the ultimate masochist. He also lacks confidence in himself and has sat on various fences, and dresses like he wants people to think "hey cool guy!". He wants to go up for eviction because he needs the public to keep him in, he wants that lift, and he wants to prove something to his dad who thinks him "a weirdo". He keeps referring to "free rides", sounds like he has had that criticism thrown at him in the past. He has placed his ego heavily into the nomination/eviction basket. His obsession reminds me of Freddy back in his wolf/sheep/shepherd period. He has described himself as an "all-in type poker player" (to Freddy round the time of the Noirin argument). Unfortunately (for himself) Siavash never thinks his plans through very logically: he has underestimated other hms sneakiness (maybe he thinks himself the most cunning), and forgotten that people don't like obsessive one-track "gameplan" loons.

This reminds me that Siavah has made other glaringly bad judgements - when he said he knew who had stolen Lisa's drink and if they didnt confess he would expose them. That went completely tits up.

In the early days he suddenly went off on a tangent and didnt nominate Lisa - when it seemed certain he would - and she escaped being nominated. If he had nominated her she would have certainly been voted out that week.

I think Siavash is a clever guy but perhaps not as clever as he thinks.

nickc25
26-08-2009, 12:39 PM
Originally posted by aremjay
Originally posted by mangasatsuma
Rodrigo did get it right when he said that Siavash had lost the plot. (The rest of what he said can go whistle round a canyon.)

On one hand, Siavash thinks he has to suffer and transcend the suffering to reach redemption. He has compared himself to Jesus, apes his look on occasions. Jesus the ultimate masochist. He also lacks confidence in himself and has sat on various fences, and dresses like he wants people to think "hey cool guy!". He wants to go up for eviction because he needs the public to keep him in, he wants that lift, and he wants to prove something to his dad who thinks him "a weirdo". He keeps referring to "free rides", sounds like he has had that criticism thrown at him in the past. He has placed his ego heavily into the nomination/eviction basket. His obsession reminds me of Freddy back in his wolf/sheep/shepherd period. He has described himself as an "all-in type poker player" (to Freddy round the time of the Noirin argument). Unfortunately (for himself) Siavash never thinks his plans through very logically: he has underestimated other hms sneakiness (maybe he thinks himself the most cunning), and forgotten that people don't like obsessive one-track "gameplan" loons.

This reminds me that Siavah has made other glaringly bad judgements - when he said he knew who had stolen Lisa's drink and if they didnt confess he would expose them. That went completely tits up.

In the early days he suddenly went off on a tangent and didnt nominate Lisa - when it seemed certain he would - and she escaped being nominated. If he had nominated her she would have certainly been voted out that week.

I think Siavash is a clever guy but perhaps not as clever as he thinks.
That was the week Karly went, I was so wanting him to vote for lisa as he nearly did but he voted for Karly which made her go instead, lisa would have gone then.

It is all ifs buts and maybe's though, lisa has done well to avoid being nominated and the one time she is up, Channel 4 save her.

camaleon
26-08-2009, 12:45 PM
Originally posted by HalfwitFTW
Whether he thought David was up or not, he put himself up regardless/

He could have voted Marcus and David and made a David V Marcus result.

Instead he chose to put himself up.

I dont understand why people have a problem with that :puzzled:

There is not a problem with that, it just that he lost the plot of his game, and his constant lies to cover himself up made him loose many points....