is nasty nick right

[brian3]

Big Brother ending was just on the news. Nasty nick said it could continue if they got new producers and went back to basics with just 10 HMs.

Do you agree with him?

[Viper29]

In some ways yes.

There are far too many people in the house in recent series which forces the group divides etc. Plus HMs are being evicted after an hour, which isn't even entertaining. Keep it simple with numbers and focus on good challenging tasks.

[arista]

Originally posted by brian3
Big Brother ending was just on the news. Nasty nick said it could continue if they got new producers and went back to basics with just 10 HMs.

Do you agree with him?


No as he talking about the Old Format.
When it goes to a New Ch.
it will move up some gears
and be relocated.

[naranja]

that's the only way it could go back to being a socialexperiment, they should just cut the glitz! People would have less stress pressure and maybe more natural reactions- we'd get to see what people are like under more 'normal' circumstances rather than bringing out the worse at every turn.

[eggdavid]

Who?

[Blasphemer]

I do think he has a point, maybe BB has got too big, too many HM's, too long. BB has been WAY too tolerant this year. Its preconceived plan on who it wants to get to the final is far too transparent (Almost guarding Siavash and Lisa to the final).

Back to the good old days with good HM's, only 10 weeks long, and if anyone broke the rules (Yeah you nasty nick, would anyone be evicted now if someone tried to influence nominations?) they are thrown out, and that would be the only way for a new HM to go in.

I'm sick of the rule breaking, sick of the "Twists" It all seems so tired and drawn out now, back in the day it was sad when it finished, left you wanting more. Not anymore, I'm already bored now, and stopped watching the HL show a few days ago. Its too predictable now.

[misterdude]

they go on way too long maybe if it were 10 weeks. then again bb in other countries go on all year.

[Viper29]

Originally posted by Blasphemer
II'm sick of the rule breaking, sick of the "Twists" It all seems so tired and drawn out now, back in the day it was sad when it finished, left you wanting more.

I remember the feeling you used to get when they panned round the empty house at the end of the series, turning the lights off one by one and having the echoey HM voices playing, was really powerful and it was so sad it was over. Nowadays everyone's almost glad its over as it's on for so long.

[Jords]

Originally posted by Blasphemer
I do think he has a point, maybe BB has got too big, too many HM's, too long. BB has been WAY too tolerant this year. Its preconceived plan on who it wants to get to the final is far too transparent (Almost guarding Siavash and Lisa to the final).

Back to the good old days with good HM's, only 10 weeks long, and if anyone broke the rules (Yeah you nasty nick, would anyone be evicted now if someone tried to influence nominations?) they are thrown out, and that would be the only way for a new HM to go in.

I'm sick of the rule breaking, sick of the "Twists" It all seems so tired and drawn out now, back in the day it was sad when it finished, left you wanting more. Not anymore, I'm already bored now, and stopped watching the HL show a few days ago. Its too predictable now.

I disagree, twists make the show great, and there have been hardly any this year.

10 weeks sounds more reasonable, 13 weeks is dragging on, and i think introducing new HMs is a good idea, it refreshes the house.

[Harry!]

Originally posted by eggdavid
Who?

Nick Bateman from BB1, Dubbed Nasty Nick by the press.

http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00495/NickBigBruv_280x390_495079a.jpg