View Full Version : Could sophie be the worst bb winner ever?
canwefixit002
02-09-2009, 10:20 AM
She has already won the show, im clueless to why though.
What has she as an individual? NOTHING!
All she has done is the follow the growd. :rolleyes:
I think she is nice, but that is as far as it goes.
No way does she deserve to win the show
All she has done since entering the house ..
:getting drunk and then laughing
:getting it on with chris
:being nice
i really cant think of anything else
She has been pretty funny and more entertaining than the rest in there. Rodrigo has had a few fits then been boring for the rest, David has been glued to the bus stop, Siavash has been crying over nominations and Charlie has been faker than Sophie's boobs to make his way to the final. Best of a bad bunch, but still not as bad as Cameron, Anthony and Rachel.
***Karezza***
02-09-2009, 10:23 AM
Worst winner ever - Rachel Rice the antiChrist.
:devil:
canwefixit002
02-09-2009, 10:24 AM
She has been pretty funny and more entertaining than the rest in there. Rodrigo has had a few fits then been boring for the rest, David has been glued to the bus stop, Siavash has been crying over nominations and Charlie has been faker than Sophie's boobs to make his way to the final. Best of a bad bunch, but still not as bad as Cameron, Anthony and Rachel.
no way is she the best out of the bad bunch
Siavash should win 100%
Adamw92
02-09-2009, 10:27 AM
No of course not, how anyone could be a worse winner than Cameron is beyond me
alan1965
02-09-2009, 10:27 AM
she/ll not remember nothing as she always drunk.fat old hag.well prtends too be drunk.(FAKE).what she is.
She has been pretty funny and more entertaining than the rest in there. Rodrigo has had a few fits then been boring for the rest, David has been glued to the bus stop, Siavash has been crying over nominations and Charlie has been faker than Sophie's boobs to make his way to the final. Best of a bad bunch, but still not as bad as Cameron, Anthony and Rachel.
no way is she the best out of the bad bunch
Siavash should win 100%
Siavash was entertaining in the first few weeks but lately all he's done is pop up around nominations time and try to get everyone up to save himself. He's a stuck record and very boring/annoying.
Angus
02-09-2009, 10:28 AM
She has been pretty funny and more entertaining than the rest in there. Rodrigo has had a few fits then been boring for the rest, David has been glued to the bus stop, Siavash has been crying over nominations and Charlie has been faker than Sophie's boobs to make his way to the final. Best of a bad bunch, but still not as bad as Cameron, Anthony and Rachel.
no way is she the best out of the bad bunch
Siavash should win 100%
TOTALLY AGREE
IMO the worst winner ever was Anthony Hutton, closely followed by Brian Belo, both complete tw*ts so sadly, probably Sophie will win based on past form.
prkp12
02-09-2009, 10:28 AM
cameron, rachel & brian werefar worst!
poejoe
02-09-2009, 10:29 AM
Sophie will be a worthy winner:elephant::elephant:
canwefixit002
02-09-2009, 10:30 AM
[rquote=2517442&tid=145454&author=Tom]She has been pretty funny and more entertaining than the rest in there. Rodrigo has had a few fits then been boring for the rest, David has been glued to the bus stop, Siavash has been crying over nominations and Charlie has been faker than Sophie's boobs to make his way to the final. Best of a bad bunch, but still not as bad as Cameron, Anthony and Rachel.
no way is she the best out of the bad bunch
Siavash should win 100%
Siavash was entertaining in the first few weeks but lately all he's done is pop up around nominations time and try to get everyone up to save himself. He's a stuck record and very boring/annoying. [/rquote
if sophie went in say week 5
would you even care
NO
SIAVASH IS AN UNQUIRE CHARACTER AND SHOULD WIN
SOPHIE IS JUST A TYPICAL GIRL WHO GETS DRUNK
Spike
02-09-2009, 10:40 AM
She wouldn't be the worst winner, she would be one of my favourite winners actually
She hasn't been boring, I have found her quite entertaining with her have a few memorable moments and also she has remained nicer and herself throughout.
Surely Anthony, Pete, Cameron and Rachel are worse winners. And also Kate who seems to have won in the same way as Sophie possibly will
Ashaleen
02-09-2009, 11:09 AM
she/ll not remember nothing as she always drunk.fat old hag.well prtends too be drunk.(FAKE).what she is.
worse than belo even,totally boring fake.:nono:
and i suspect shes given every guy in there a handjob..what a mingy knickers.:bored:
why people would want a slag like her to win beggars belief.
her hamster cheeks on the LF last night looked like Kris had left something i there.:conf2:
shirl1
02-09-2009, 11:11 AM
i want siavash to win but sophies alright
she will be up there with Rachel Rice thats for sure
bananarama
02-09-2009, 11:57 AM
If she wins she will be one of the best and most deserving winners in the history of BB since BB2......
bananarama
02-09-2009, 11:59 AM
she will be up there with Rachel Rice thats for sure
There is no comparison with Rachel Rice and that is "For sure"........
Nobody could take that title away from Cameron:rolleyes:
Parmy
02-09-2009, 12:12 PM
**** no, rachel is and will be the worst for all eternity.
newspresenter
02-09-2009, 12:22 PM
She's the second best winner behind Pete bennet.
kathreyafan4ever
02-09-2009, 12:34 PM
please.....support our SOPHIE!!!!!
she's just like CHANTELLE if she wins!!!!!
what were your comments on CHANTELLE way back then when she was on her way to winning?
please, DONT BE BITCHES!!!!
SOPHIE to WIN!!!!!
blue-stairs-rock-x
02-09-2009, 12:35 PM
No, she would be better than rachel rice
Jackie
02-09-2009, 12:49 PM
Cameron was the worst.
marley_11
02-09-2009, 01:08 PM
sophie would be one of the best winners in my opinoin!
shes not boring, shes funny, entertaining, sweet, good looking.
out of all them left, charlie would be the least deserving and worst winner because hes being fake and just being mr. nice guy to get into the final. and its worked.
k1ck3m0n
02-09-2009, 01:42 PM
Cameron was way worse. But the glorification of Sophie's utter stupidity and complete lack of knowledge on almost any subject is more than I can stomach. Whether she's really that thick or faking it to be popular like Jade/Brian et al, who knows, but either way, I think it's a damning indictment of our society that someone that stupid, should be the best we can pick as a winner. She's just a daft wee lassie who thinks playing dumb, getting huge fake boobs, dying her hair and getting awful extensions is her best way forward in life. Sad on so many levels. I'm not saying she's not a nice girl, most of the time she is (tho she hasn't always been), and I don't hate her or anything like that. I just despair, that this year, big brother has held a mirror up to our society, and the reflection is all too accurate if Sophie is our winner. Already more and more young girls think that the way to fame and fortune is butchering their bodies and changing their appearance to that of a Barbie doll. No need for them to try hard at school, or stick in with their studies, no no, dumb is good! Sophie wining will only reinforce that idea. Too sad. :conf:
siavashsbigfan
02-09-2009, 02:10 PM
She has already won the show, im clueless to why though.
What has she as an individual? NOTHING!
All she has done is the follow the growd. :rolleyes:
I think she is nice, but that is as far as it goes.
No way does she deserve to win the show
All she has done since entering the house ..
:getting drunk and then laughing
:getting it on with chris
:being nice
i really cant think of anything else
emmm has she won already? news to me :puzzled:
NettoSuperstar!
02-09-2009, 02:52 PM
No Rachel was the worst winner ever!
Twiggy
02-09-2009, 02:55 PM
Sophie would be a great deserving winner.
MissKittyFantastico
02-09-2009, 02:56 PM
Cameron, Anthony, Belo, Rachel, all worse winners than Sophie would be.
BigBrotherfan4ever
02-09-2009, 03:04 PM
She has been pretty funny and more entertaining than the rest in there. Rodrigo has had a few fits then been boring for the rest, David has been glued to the bus stop, Siavash has been crying over nominations and Charlie has been faker than Sophie's boobs to make his way to the final. Best of a bad bunch, but still not as bad as Cameron, Anthony and Rachel.
no way is she the best out of the bad bunch
Siavash should win 100%
Totally agree with you canwefixit, but if he doesn't win, Sophie would be my second choice, as long as Rodrigo deosn't win, i dont like the guy at all anymore.
NettoSuperstar!
02-09-2009, 03:05 PM
Cameron, Anthony, Belo, Rachel, all worse winners than Sophie would be.
Agreed
munky
02-09-2009, 03:06 PM
No. Rachel wins the worst BB winner ever award no doubt about it.
munky
02-09-2009, 03:07 PM
Sophie would be a great deserving winner.
of a coconut at the fair
Jords
02-09-2009, 03:10 PM
Nah she would be a good winner, her, Siavash, and if not them Roddy, they would all be ok.
Worst winners for me:
Cameron
Anthony
Brian Belo
CaPPa
02-09-2009, 03:12 PM
Sophie wouldn't be the worst winner but she is far from the best.
My only reservations about her winning is that she has been a sheep all series and only seems to be really funny when drunk. As it is her fun side that people like then it seems like we are voting for a winner based on their alcohol consumption.
misterdude
02-09-2009, 03:14 PM
i wouldn't mind if she won but she doesn't deserve to win. She's already won because of all the lads mag deals coming her way. I don't care who wins, no one really stands out.
Rollerball-Rocco
02-09-2009, 03:19 PM
Cameron....what a drip.
Cameron, Anthony, Belo, Rachel, all worse winners than Sophie would be.
tis be true :flowers:
bigbrothermad123
02-09-2009, 03:33 PM
SOPHIE WOULD BE THE 2nd BEST WINNER EVER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
rsefitpro2009
02-09-2009, 03:38 PM
Well lets be honest, Sophies won because of 2 reasons, her looks and her stupidity?
But even though I don't want her to win, I don't really have any other favourite in their as all my faves were voted out!
Theirs no point me moaning about the voting its a waste of time, however it just shows that you can be a housemate and do nothing for months and you stand a great chance of winning!
rsefitpro2009
02-09-2009, 03:39 PM
SOPHIE WOULD BE THE 2nd BEST WINNER EVER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everyones entitled to their opinion, but how would she be the 2nd best winner?
siavashsbigfan
02-09-2009, 03:39 PM
i am disgusted at some of the comments aimed at sophie on this post quote "fat slag" "hamster cheeks" etc??? no wonder teenage girls have issues with weight.. sophie is neither fat nor a slag!
shocking!!
WAYNEEBRUM
02-09-2009, 03:45 PM
i dont get why people find her funny?Playing the dumb card and exaggerating being drunk after a spoonful of lager is boring,not funny.id say she will be 2nd maybe 3rd worst winner of all time.
Beastie
02-09-2009, 03:50 PM
the 2 key things I have noticed the previous 9 winners have in common is that they were GENUINE and generally NICE people..
so which finalists are them two character traits?
misterdude
02-09-2009, 03:52 PM
nah, Cameron, Rachel, Anthony, Brian they were worse winners. I like her better than them, she is very likeable, its just she's in a win win situation. She's gonna get the most magazine deals than any other housemate if she wins or not. just give it to rodrigo!
Becker
02-09-2009, 04:03 PM
In my opinion I think she would be up there as one of the worst winners. And I do think she is going to win it.
Lot's of people say she hasn't done anything wrong while others say she has. No point in going into the arguements as they are already well documented. Being a party to the bullying and humiliation of Freddie to being sweet, cute etc etc to name but a few. All of which have been debated to death.
What I say is IF she is either one or the other, Bad or good, Fat or thin, Nasty or cute then it's an easy choice. She should not win because
a) she has been bad - doesn't deserve to win anyway
b) she has been good - then what has she done good to deserve to win? Apart from barking like a dog on all fours, having a relationship with Kris and getting falling down drunk, wtf has she done to deserve victory? will someone please explain because I am not buying that she has actually DONE anything of any value.
The only argument I can think of is she has done less bad stuff than anyone else? Don't try and tell me any of her antics have been entertaining. She has been no more entertaining than an average housemate the likes of those already mentioned. Maybe it isn't such a bad thing that Big Brother is leaving our screens if this is the best the show has to offer as a winner.
Beastie
02-09-2009, 04:04 PM
David hasn't done owt wrong.. name me things which anyone thinks David has done wrong.. besides hang around with Lisa too much and have a loud voice? lol
Indierock&roll
02-09-2009, 04:07 PM
shed be a good winnier, entertaining and funny without being annoying
plus shes not really bitchy or boring!
i think she deserves to win
Becker
02-09-2009, 04:16 PM
David hasn't done owt wrong.. name me things which anyone thinks David has done wrong.. besides hang around with Lisa too much and have a loud voice? lol
This isn't a thread about David but in comparison to Sophie he has done less bad than her. Come to think of it I would laugh my head off if he snatched it away from the rest of them at the end. He just doesn't stand a chance imo. BB wanted a safe winner and they usually get what they want.
I think you answered your own question though in that his association with Lisa has branded him. A lot of people are not going to forgive him for throwing in his lot with her.
Beastie
02-09-2009, 04:17 PM
David did come halfway through.. and it took some of the finalists halfway through to actually be entertaining.. lol
Beastie
02-09-2009, 04:18 PM
and ALL of them have been in Lisas gang about from seewash really
misterdude
02-09-2009, 04:30 PM
I wouldn't vote for any of them! let the public decide!
but if I was forced, i would go for david. he's just a big dumb boy and he's been decent. his only crime is being lisas friend.
Becker
02-09-2009, 04:37 PM
and ALL of them have been in Lisas gang about from seewash really
And that is the issue. Siavash is the only one who never put his lot in with that crew and because of that he definitely ranks as someone with a bit of sense.
However ... his behaviour with regard to ' I want to be up for eviction' etc etc just drove a wedge between me and the phone.
I just cannot support someone who obviously wants it that bad. His performance in the diary room trying to work out how he would be up with both Marcus and David was so bad I had to turn the channel over. He really let himself down at the end. Fking disappointing.
HalfwitFTW
02-09-2009, 04:38 PM
Cameron was way worse. But the glorification of Sophie's utter stupidity and complete lack of knowledge on almost any subject is more than I can stomach. Whether she's really that thick or faking it to be popular like Jade/Brian et al, who knows, but either way, I think it's a damning indictment of our society that someone that stupid, should be the best we can pick as a winner. She's just a daft wee lassie who thinks playing dumb, getting huge fake boobs, dying her hair and getting awful extensions is her best way forward in life. Sad on so many levels. I'm not saying she's not a nice girl, most of the time she is (tho she hasn't always been), and I don't hate her or anything like that. I just despair, that this year, big brother has held a mirror up to our society, and the reflection is all too accurate if Sophie is our winner. Already more and more young girls think that the way to fame and fortune is butchering their bodies and changing their appearance to that of a Barbie doll. No need for them to try hard at school, or stick in with their studies, no no, dumb is good! Sophie wining will only reinforce that idea. Too sad. :conf:
Totally agree :thumbs:
HalfwitFTW
02-09-2009, 04:46 PM
David hasn't done owt wrong.. name me things which anyone thinks David has done wrong.. besides hang around with Lisa too much and have a loud voice? lol
David has been a sheep, has not thought for himself, has agreed with Lisa and encouraged her even when she was in the wrong, he ganged up on Siavash that time in the garden with Charlie and Rodrigo, also hes quite bitchy behind people's backs. I liked him at first but cant stand the guy now.
misterdude
02-09-2009, 05:17 PM
Cameron was way worse. But the glorification of Sophie's utter stupidity and complete lack of knowledge on almost any subject is more than I can stomach. Whether she's really that thick or faking it to be popular like Jade/Brian et al, who knows, but either way, I think it's a damning indictment of our society that someone that stupid, should be the best we can pick as a winner. She's just a daft wee lassie who thinks playing dumb, getting huge fake boobs, dying her hair and getting awful extensions is her best way forward in life. Sad on so many levels. I'm not saying she's not a nice girl, most of the time she is (tho she hasn't always been), and I don't hate her or anything like that. I just despair, that this year, big brother has held a mirror up to our society, and the reflection is all too accurate if Sophie is our winner. Already more and more young girls think that the way to fame and fortune is butchering their bodies and changing their appearance to that of a Barbie doll. No need for them to try hard at school, or stick in with their studies, no no, dumb is good! Sophie wining will only reinforce that idea. Too sad. :conf:
Totally agree :thumbs:
Big Brother has never been about rewarding the talented or the smart. Inside the BB house is probably going to be the most important moment of their lives but afterwards its pretty much downhill.
I would like sophie a lot better if she didn't have fake boobs because she does seem kind of innocent in a cute way..but I don't think theres anything innocent in having a boob job. she's nice and all but very ambitious.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.