Log in

View Full Version : Vash's eviction: Davina stooped lower than I thought


J-Rock
05-09-2009, 10:56 PM
I hadn't seen Vash's exit - so watched a re-run tonight, and Davina runs up the stairs to shortern his eviction and raise his hand with her usual 'ladies and gentlemen, I give you Siavash' (said in a much lower tone than ANYONE this series). Not even giving him a chance to get down the stairs first!

She must have really hated the guy. (unless there was a timing issue, which, if so, was also deliberate because it is all scripted and planned). Or the high-heels!!

Marcus broke many more BB rules, yet Davina s*cks him off.

I've always really liked Davina and have often defended her...but I just thought she could have shown a little bit more class and impartiality, even for BB!!

eggdavid
05-09-2009, 10:57 PM
i know, the vash didnt deserve that treatment from davina, she was just being a cow -- she wouldnt even let him speak during the interview

LaLaLand
05-09-2009, 10:57 PM
I think it was a timing issue tbh.

Enid
05-09-2009, 10:59 PM
The whole show felt very rushed I thought, especially Sophie's interview, but I'm thinking maybe her lack of vocabulary and Davina's general disinterest played a big part in that as well..

J-Rock
05-09-2009, 10:59 PM
I think it was a timing issue tbh.

Yeh, but it's all scripted and planned by highly paid producers - no excuse. Why cut it THAT short? I mean the guy was second FFS.

MissKittyFantastico
05-09-2009, 11:02 PM
Yes his interview was a complete shambles, maybe they let Rodrigo, Charlie and David's run too long (they all seemed to get FAR longer) but there's no excuse for it really bearing in mind the guy was the runner up.

BB and Davina need to sort their bias out, seriously.

He still didn't get as rough a ride as Rachel did last year though, and she bloody well won! Davina disgusted me so much that night.

HalfwitFTW
05-09-2009, 11:08 PM
She even cut his interview short in BBBM, not even giving him a chance to speak. David got a lot more time than him considering Vash was the runner up.

Vicky.
05-09-2009, 11:08 PM
I see you're back to your old habits Ahmedfan, dismissing anyone with a different opinon to you as weirdos, thickos, kids and spoilt teens. Any more messages like this and you will be warned. Sick of seeing it, and you have been warned for exactly the same thing at least twice before.

I have deleted your message. Dont bother posting anything else like this in future.

We get that you dont like him, but to call all his fans geeks etc. is not on. As well as describing all FMs as geeks.

ILoveTRW
05-09-2009, 11:08 PM
it was probably because he spent so long hugging sophie, or it could of been because he was wearing very high heels and she wanted to help him down the stairs :thumbs:

setanta
05-09-2009, 11:08 PM
[rquote=2547068&tid=146881&author=AhmedFan2004]Deleted/rquote]

Don't forget that there would have been a fair few Freddie and Marcus fans who may have voted for him through some misplaced loyalty.

MissKittyFantastico
05-09-2009, 11:09 PM
See you're back to your old habits Ahmedfan, dismissing anyone with a different opinon to you as weirdos, thickos, kids and spoilt teens.

Was just about to post the same, you beat me to it.

Arneldo
05-09-2009, 11:09 PM
She went up to get Siavash to help him down the stairs cause he had to wear high heels on his exit. And I thought Siavash interview was rubbish because he clearly didn't want to answer any questions about Noirin - despite it being his main storyline in the house. Plus he could barely speak, so I thought Davina handled him very well indeed.

ChrisCoutureUK
05-09-2009, 11:12 PM
God, nothing ever pleases you lot.lol.

Sophie's was the most rushed, because David, Rodrigo and Charlie's were very laid back and eventually very time-consuming. If Siavash had come 5th, 4th, or 3rd his interview would have no doubt been longer, but they didn't have the time.

Jords
05-09-2009, 11:14 PM
I do think BB, Davin aand George all tried hard not to let Siavash win, pure bias, but he managed 2nd so im happy.

J-Rock
05-09-2009, 11:15 PM
it was probably because he spent so long hugging sophie, or it could of been because he was wearing very high heels and she wanted to help him down the stairs :thumbs:

Haha, yeh, while she was shouting at him to 'come down come down!'.

She still could have waited until he got down before raising his hand - it's a small point, but she just wanted to get it out of the way and I felt it smacked of bias (I could be wrong, but given her benefit of the doubt many times).

Vicky.
05-09-2009, 11:17 PM
I think it was more likely a timing issue to be honest, but couple it with the obvious bias Davina and BB in general have had against him the past few weeks and I can see why you think this.

Plus it was obvious from the interview that she doesnt like him, love how he got a more negative interview than the likes of Lisa :rolleyes:

And BBBM aswell...was awful.

J-Rock
05-09-2009, 11:20 PM
She went up to get Siavash to help him down the stairs cause he had to wear high heels on his exit. And I thought Siavash interview was rubbish because he clearly didn't want to answer any questions about Noirin - despite it being his main storyline in the house. Plus he could barely speak, so I thought Davina handled him very well indeed.


That's not the point - it's the bit where they get their moment on the runway and hands raised on centre circle which was missing and a very negative interview. It goes along with all her bias against him in recent weeks.

J-Rock
05-09-2009, 11:24 PM
God, nothing ever pleases you lot.lol.

Sophie's was the most rushed, because David, Rodrigo and Charlie's were very laid back and eventually very time-consuming. If Siavash had come 5th, 4th, or 3rd his interview would have no doubt been longer, but they didn't have the time.

This timing issue is a red herring - it's all scripted, even allowing for delays. Plus my main point has been set out above. :sleep:

And I aint no 'you lot' mate, I am my own man. :wink:

BigBrotherfan4ever
05-09-2009, 11:26 PM
I hadn't seen Vash's exit - so watched a re-run tonight, and Davina runs up the stairs to shortern his eviction and raise his hand with her usual 'ladies and gentlemen, I give you Siavash' (said in a much lower tone than ANYONE this series). Not even giving him a chance to get down the stairs first!

She must have really hated the guy. (unless there was a timing issue, which, if so, was also deliberate because it is all scripted and planned). Or the high-heels!!

Marcus broke many more BB rules, yet Davina s*cks him off.

I've always really liked Davina and have often defended her...but I just thought she could have shown a little bit more class and impartiality, even for BB!! Totally agree with you, i thought the way she treated Siavash was just awful, she spent to much time with Rodrigo, Charlie & David... IMHO, i even thought that Sophie interview was really short considering she won the show:mad:

setanta
05-09-2009, 11:31 PM
I think you have to look at it from her perspective and that of the producers - with Siavash's constant twisting of the rules and play acting I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you. And in any case, they all were a little rushed in their interviews and he was given just as much time as the rest on the podium to discuss his time in the house, even if he was unwilling or incapable of talking about certain things in great depth.

J-Rock
05-09-2009, 11:36 PM
I think you have to look at it from her perspective and that of the producers - with Siavash's constant twisting of the rules and play acting I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you. And in any case, they all were a little rushed in their interviews and he was given just as much time as the rest on the podium to discuss his time in the house, even if he was unwilling or incapable of talking about certain things in great depth.

IDH broke far more rules...I just think Davina didn't like Vash and she has far more say than people think...

"I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you." - That's a view from a non-supporter (?), so you would say that perhaps. Vash wasn't my fave, but thought he could have been treated a little better -- he was part of the whole 14 weeks!!

Anyway, it's not the biggest deal in the world, just something I noticed when watching re-run tonight.

HalfwitFTW
05-09-2009, 11:40 PM
I think you have to look at it from her perspective and that of the producers - with Siavash's constant twisting of the rules and play acting I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you. And in any case, they all were a little rushed in their interviews and he was given just as much time as the rest on the podium to discuss his time in the house, even if he was unwilling or incapable of talking about certain things in great depth.

IDH broke far more rules...I just think Davina didn't like Vash and she has far more say than people think...

"I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you." - That's a view from a non-supporter (?), so you would say that perhaps. Vash wasn't my fave, but thought he could have been treated a little better -- he was part of the whole 14 weeks!!

Anyway, it's not the biggest deal in the world, just something I noticed when watching re-run tonight.

:thumbs:

Good point about IDH having broken way more rules than the Vash had... yet IDH had an excellent reception from both Davina and George Lamb... they were practically eating out of his hand and hanging on his every word.

Vicky.
05-09-2009, 11:41 PM
I think you have to look at it from her perspective and that of the producers - with Siavash's constant twisting of the rules and play acting I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you. And in any case, they all were a little rushed in their interviews and he was given just as much time as the rest on the podium to discuss his time in the house, even if he was unwilling or incapable of talking about certain things in great depth.

Obviously he wouldn t want to talk about the whole Noirin thing.

Plus Marcus broke way more rules that Siavash. And if it was the rulebreak thing that made them so biased against him and they were sooo annoyed about it, then why didnt they kick him out at first refusal?

They cant ignore it, and then be pissed off about it.

He SHOULD have been punished the first time, then it wouldnt have happened again, the fact that it went on is their own fault.

MissKittyFantastico
05-09-2009, 11:43 PM
I think you have to look at it from her perspective and that of the producers - with Siavash's constant twisting of the rules and play acting I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you. And in any case, they all were a little rushed in their interviews and he was given just as much time as the rest on the podium to discuss his time in the house, even if he was unwilling or incapable of talking about certain things in great depth.

IDH broke far more rules...I just think Davina didn't like Vash and she has far more say than people think...

"I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you." - That's a view from a non-supporter (?), so you would say that perhaps. Vash wasn't my fave, but thought he could have been treated a little better -- he was part of the whole 14 weeks!!

Anyway, it's not the biggest deal in the world, just something I noticed when watching re-run tonight.

:thumbs:

Good point about IDH having broken way more rules than the Vash had... yet IDH had an excellent reception from both Davina and George Lamb... they were practically eating out of his hand and hanging on his every word.



The not nominating thing can be the only reason, George and Davina kept banging on about it. But that's BB's own fault, they had the option to boot him out at the end of the day.

setanta
05-09-2009, 11:44 PM
I think you have to look at it from her perspective and that of the producers - with Siavash's constant twisting of the rules and play acting I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you. And in any case, they all were a little rushed in their interviews and he was given just as much time as the rest on the podium to discuss his time in the house, even if he was unwilling or incapable of talking about certain things in great depth.

IDH broke far more rules...I just think Davina didn't like Vash and she has far more say than people think...

"I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you." - That's a view from a non-supporter (?), so you would say that perhaps. Vash wasn't my fave, but thought he could have been treated a little better -- he was part of the whole 14 weeks!!

Anyway, it's not the biggest deal in the world, just something I noticed when watching re-run tonight.

Yeah, but Marcus' rule breaking never extended to not nominating and waffling in diary room about charity and walking. He always adhered to the fundamental rules of the show, but bent certain other ones because of the little rebellious streak that's present in him.

Vicky.
05-09-2009, 11:49 PM
setanta, if they were bothered about him not nominating, why not just kick him out the first time...or give him the option to nominate, or walk.

Sophie also didnt nominate a few times.

And 'waffling about charity and walkind' is not breaking the rules. It may be annoying to some, but its NOT against the rules, he is not the first, and wont be the last to do that.

J-Rock
05-09-2009, 11:51 PM
I think you have to look at it from her perspective and that of the producers - with Siavash's constant twisting of the rules and play acting I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you. And in any case, they all were a little rushed in their interviews and he was given just as much time as the rest on the podium to discuss his time in the house, even if he was unwilling or incapable of talking about certain things in great depth.

IDH broke far more rules...I just think Davina didn't like Vash and she has far more say than people think...

"I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you." - That's a view from a non-supporter (?), so you would say that perhaps. Vash wasn't my fave, but thought he could have been treated a little better -- he was part of the whole 14 weeks!!

Anyway, it's not the biggest deal in the world, just something I noticed when watching re-run tonight.

Yeah, but Marcus' rule breaking never extended to not nominating and waffling in diary room about charity and walking. He always adhered to the fundamental rules of the show, but bent certain other ones because of the little rebellious streak that's present in him.


Charlie didn't nominate. Sophie didn't nominate.
Hailed as kings and queens....:nono:

Actually, Vash had a lot of bottle to try on some of the antics he did: mixing it up and calling out some of the others with his 'charity cry' - thought that was genius (the look on their faces); stuck up for Freddie; stood up to Bea in a pretty cool way befofre IDH did; and walked out in a leotard and high heels for charity. Deserved better. :wink:

HalfwitFTW
05-09-2009, 11:54 PM
I think you have to look at it from her perspective and that of the producers - with Siavash's constant twisting of the rules and play acting I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you. And in any case, they all were a little rushed in their interviews and he was given just as much time as the rest on the podium to discuss his time in the house, even if he was unwilling or incapable of talking about certain things in great depth.

IDH broke far more rules...I just think Davina didn't like Vash and she has far more say than people think...

"I think it's perfectly reasonable of them to want to see the back of him to be honest with you." - That's a view from a non-supporter (?), so you would say that perhaps. Vash wasn't my fave, but thought he could have been treated a little better -- he was part of the whole 14 weeks!!

Anyway, it's not the biggest deal in the world, just something I noticed when watching re-run tonight.

Yeah, but Marcus' rule breaking never extended to not nominating and waffling in diary room about charity and walking. He always adhered to the fundamental rules of the show, but bent certain other ones because of the little rebellious streak that's present in him.

Marcus was always complaining that he wanted to go, even told the others to put him up for nomination, and tried to make himself look bad so the public would vote him out. He DID 'waffle' a lot about leaving and wanting to go. And he did break fundamental rules by talking about nominations, climbing up on the roof, etc.

setanta
05-09-2009, 11:57 PM
setanta, if they were bothered about him not nominating, why not just kick him out the first time...or give him the option to nominate, or walk.

Sophie also didnt nominate a few times.

And 'waffling about charity and walkind' is not breaking the rules. It may be annoying to some, but its NOT against the rules, he is not the first, and wont be the last to do that.

He's the first to ask to leave a night before the end and he's the first to mention giving the money away to charity on the day he finds out that he's up against Marcus for eviction. And this is after Big Brother had f£cked up with the not nominating fiasco by punishing the whole house rather than him alone. He just pushed far too many buttons on too many occassions and they'd had enough of him.

Anyway, straying off topic here. He was given just as much time in his interview and they had every right to question him over Noirin and nominations. She also called him a great housemate and drew his attention to the hordes of fans he now has. I don't think it was a completely biased interview at all.

J-Rock
06-09-2009, 12:04 AM
setanta, if they were bothered about him not nominating, why not just kick him out the first time...or give him the option to nominate, or walk.

Sophie also didnt nominate a few times.

And 'waffling about charity and walkind' is not breaking the rules. It may be annoying to some, but its NOT against the rules, he is not the first, and wont be the last to do that.

He's the first to do ask to leave a night before the end and he's the first to mention giving the money away to charity on the day he finds out that he's up against Marcus for eviction. And this is after Big Brother had f£cked up with the not nominating fiasco by punishing the whole house rather than him alone. He just pushed far too many buttons on too many occassions and they'd had enough of him.

Anyway, straying off topic here. He was given just as much time in his interview and they had every right to question him over Noirin and nominations. She also called him a great housemate and drew his attention to the hordes of fans he now has. I don't think it was a completely biased interview at all.

She hated him and it showed...

...and they punished the whole house due to Marcus's rule breaking aswell (remember the mirror!), wasn't just Vash. I really don't think Vash gave a toss about winning. It was more about not wanting to be disliked, which is what all HMs want to avoid (apart from John McCririck), esp after he was truly embarassed by the Noirin thing - yes his fault; but BB chose to pick on him and show that episode in the final week. They knew how he'd react. He was doing it again when they showed it in the interview - all the girly screeching and stuff. He wouldn't act like this unless it was genuine!

MissKittyFantastico
06-09-2009, 12:05 AM
I did actually like how Davina reassured him that his ex girlfriend wasn't there that night (strange that right?) and asked him if he wanted to say anything to her as well.

She was always going to bring up the Noirin thing to be fair, and the not nominating and asking to leave 2 days before the end. She gave him chance to say his piece as well.

For me it was mainly just that it felt so very rushed compared to the three previous interviews.

It was BBBM that pissed me off far more than his interview tbh.

sg160187
06-09-2009, 12:08 AM
I think big brother broke just as many rules as anyone else.

I found it funny how once Marcus and Freddie were gone they then decide to change the rules regarding nominations again.

Before they went if you didn't nominate they done what they pleased (first people you talk to etc) but as soon as they are gone big brother decides to start granting people not voting the right to automatically going up for eviction....

This years slogan shouldn't have been 'Who wins/goes you decide' it should of been 'who goes we decide' most engineered eviction process I've ever seen in the history of big brother.

Oh on topic Siavash was feed to the wolves whereas the whole Lisa bullying Freddie incident was nicely swept under the carpet'

Vicky.
06-09-2009, 12:09 AM
.

This years slogan shouldn't have been 'Who wins/goes you decide' it should of been 'who goes we decide' most engineered eviction process I've ever seen in the history of big brother.

Yes I agree. BB should be thankful to siavash for his no nominating crap, and everyone who broke rules regarding nominations...because it made it easier for them to engineer the evictions that they wanted.

Had he not done it, then they would have had to think more about how to get certain people up.

kisywisy
06-09-2009, 12:10 AM
I think it was a timing issue tbh.

Yeh, but it's all scripted and planned by highly paid producers - no excuse. Why cut it THAT short? I mean the guy was second FFS.

the stairs thing i think was timing. siavash took his time coming out the house and looked like he needed help coming down the stairs in those heels!!

sophie's interview was very short too

Dolphin-and-Whale
06-09-2009, 12:11 AM
KisyWisy, Still have the bump? ?

J-Rock
06-09-2009, 12:11 AM
I think big brother broke just as many rules as anyone else.

I found it funny how once Marcus and Freddie were gone they then decide to change the rules regarding nominations again.

Before they went if you didn't nominate they done what they pleased (first people you talk to etc) but as soon as they are gone big brother decides to start granting people not voting the right to automatically going up for eviction....

This years slogan shouldn't have been 'Who wins/goes you decide' it should of been 'who goes we decide' most engineered eviction process I've ever seen in the history of big brother.

Oh on topic Siavash was feed to the wolves whereas the whole Lisa bullying Freddie incident was nicely swept under the carpet'

setanta
06-09-2009, 12:15 AM
setanta, if they were bothered about him not nominating, why not just kick him out the first time...or give him the option to nominate, or walk.

Sophie also didnt nominate a few times.

And 'waffling about charity and walkind' is not breaking the rules. It may be annoying to some, but its NOT against the rules, he is not the first, and wont be the last to do that.

He's the first to do ask to leave a night before the end and he's the first to mention giving the money away to charity on the day he finds out that he's up against Marcus for eviction. And this is after Big Brother had f£cked up with the not nominating fiasco by punishing the whole house rather than him alone. He just pushed far too many buttons on too many occassions and they'd had enough of him.

Anyway, straying off topic here. He was given just as much time in his interview and they had every right to question him over Noirin and nominations. She also called him a great housemate and drew his attention to the hordes of fans he now has. I don't think it was a completely biased interview at all.

She hated him and it showed...

...and they punished the whole house due to Marcus's rule breaking aswell (remember the mirror!), wasn't just Vash. I really don't think Vash gave a toss about winning. It was more about not wanting to be disliked, which is what all HMs want to avoid (apart from John McCririck), esp after he was truly embarassed by the Noirin thing - yes his fault; but BB chose to pick on him and show that episode in the final week. They knew how he'd react. He was doing it again when they showed it in the interview - all the girly screeching and stuff. He wouldn't act like this unless it was genuine!


Yes, but Marcus was always willing to accept the repercussions of his behaviour, whereas Siavash was fully aware of what may happen with his no nominating nonsense but he still continued, you kno? Like Davina asked him, if you want to be up for eviction, why not ask them to nominate you? The guy couldn't answer that question. Marcus was asking them to vote for him knowing full well that he'd be in the sh£t, not the whole house.

The final straw was him wanting to leave and they were just very tired of him at that stage I think. Yes, they chose the wrong tactic in pursuing him so much during the final week but I can understand the reasoning behind it, even if it was extremely vindictive of them.

saraholeila
06-09-2009, 12:29 AM
BBBM was worse, very unfair. David got about 15 mins and Vash only got 2. Sad, Davina. Egomaniac.

muchadoaboutnothing
06-09-2009, 12:38 AM
They spent too much time showing Rodrigo his family from Brazil and Charlie (thick as two short planks) wouldn't let Davina get a word in edgeways, so I think Siavash's interview was cut short, however, Davina rediculed him knowing how bad he felt about the Norin saga and asking him what he would say to his g/f. Davina's interviews have gone from bad to worst.

UglyBaby
06-09-2009, 01:01 AM
The past few weeks his antics have been very tiresome. It's small wonder Davina can't be bothered with him. He disrespected BB and went back on what he signed up for.

Next year they need to kick out those who will not nominate. No chances, just out the door.

Patrick
06-09-2009, 01:20 AM
Bullshit
Siavash took forever leaving the house so she had to hurry things up

I hate how people on here have become so annoying lately trying to make issues out of nothing

J-Rock
06-09-2009, 01:34 AM
Bullshit
Siavash took forever leaving the house so she had to hurry things up

I hate how people on here have become so annoying lately trying to make issues out of nothing

Ok

MiuMiu
06-09-2009, 01:38 AM
Davina is Lovely.
Anyone who is part french is good in my books.

Go Davina!!!
:hello::dance::hello:

farhad
06-09-2009, 01:46 AM
Davina made an utter fool out of herself, she thought she could get to siavash, but vash took all her questions in a sarcastic manner.......she gave up in the end. lol

He also owned that chav in the audience. He took the pee out of him when he was talking, and cameback with a good reply.

CaraRawr
06-09-2009, 07:06 AM
I noticed that. :| I was like whaaaa?

Angus
06-09-2009, 07:07 AM
See you're back to your old habits Ahmedfan, dismissing anyone with a different opinon to you as weirdos, thickos, kids and spoilt teens.

Was just about to post the same, you beat me to it.

You should see some of ranting, pathetic posting he does on DS:nono:

staceyxxx
06-09-2009, 07:11 AM
i think it was because of the high heels!
and maybe they didnt have much time.

Lewis.
06-09-2009, 07:15 AM
It's because he took about an hour to get out of the house
<<I'm being very Melodramatic, but it did take a long time. He left about 40 seconds after the man told him his ten seconds were up>>

mother6
06-09-2009, 11:16 AM
Davina why did you want to leave the night before the final it was so annoying?

Siavash waffle waffle well I thought if I left Sophie would have a better chance of winning.

Davina whatever.

The arrogance of that man knows no bounds.