View Full Version : I feel sorry for the Animals
Patrick
22-11-2009, 10:59 AM
Does anyone else feel bad to watch A Innocent Insect/Animall be ate ALIVE!
Kangaroos get murdered to have their Balls and Ass cut off!
Those Widegty Grubs get their Bodys Bit Off and are left with their heads!
And the Rat..
Was out enjoying a good Night in the Jungle when suddenly a Mad Itallian walks over and cuts the Rats throat open!
Am I the only one that feels bad for these Animals?
Im sure in the eating Trials they dont have a clue whats going on when someone picks them up and Eats them!
Harry!
22-11-2009, 11:07 AM
Its called survival of the fittest you eat food to survive. Thats human nature. We are top of the food chain so its our way to adapt to food shortages.
eye sea
22-11-2009, 12:59 PM
Agreed. I was thinking the same. They may be "just" insects, but still it is cruel.
Twilight
22-11-2009, 01:05 PM
Yeah it evil thats why i haven't ever watched it :(
Christina
22-11-2009, 01:09 PM
I hate what they do to them! Horrible! Would refuse to do that task completley if i was on the show.. forget the food for a day.
Christina
22-11-2009, 01:11 PM
Its called survival of the fittest you eat food to survive. Thats human nature. We are top of the food chain so its our way to adapt to food shortages.
Not really, they're on a TV show the people in charge won't let them die by having no food. The eating task is done for pure entertainment.
Firewire
22-11-2009, 01:12 PM
I'm sure they use already dead kangaroos. I don't think they kill them.
Its called survival of the fittest you eat food to survive. Thats human nature. We are top of the food chain so its our way to adapt to food shortages.
I'm sorry but your just completely talking out of your ass. There's so much wrong with that statement it's almost frightening that someone made it.
Harry!
22-11-2009, 01:18 PM
Not really, they're on a TV show the people in charge won't let them die by having no food. The eating task is done for pure entertainment.
But people can eat bugs if they wanted to for food. If you take it from that point of view you can see if it is natural or not.
Harry!
22-11-2009, 01:19 PM
I'm sorry but your just completely talking out of your ass. There's so much wrong with that statement it's almost frightening that someone made it.
I wouldnt eat bugs anyway I jsut used that as a example. I think it is cruel and sick and I personly wouldnt attempt to do it.
But people can eat bugs if they wanted to for food. If you take it from that point of view you can see if it is natural or not.
That makes no sense. Of course it's natural, the animals are not being synthesized by a machine, but it's not survival of the fittest. That's just absurd. It's a controlled TV environment where they don't have to eat these things, realistically, to survive. There's a world of difference.
Jords
22-11-2009, 01:20 PM
I dont think they would kill animals espicially for this show for their foot/balls whatever, I should think they use already dead ones.
But I dont like the idea that animals, be them only insects, are killed for this (although I cant talk, I get people to kill spiders in my room), and the distress the animals are in being locked up in the holes for various tasks, unless they are like pets and are used to it.
Harry!
22-11-2009, 01:21 PM
That makes no sense. Of course it's natural, the animals are not being synthesized by a machine, but it's not survival of the fittest. That's just absurd. It's a controlled TV environment where they don't have to eat these things, realistically, to survive. There's a world of difference.
The Exile camp ate a rat because they were starving. Is that the same thing?
Christina
22-11-2009, 01:24 PM
But people can eat bugs if they wanted to for food. If you take it from that point of view you can see if it is natural or not.
If there was no food supply and you were in need of food yes. But they're not, the producers wouldn't let them starve :thumbs:
Jords
22-11-2009, 01:25 PM
If there was no food supply and you were in need of food yes. But they're not, the producers wouldn't let them starve :thumbs:
They get some beans, might not stuff them but they wont starve in there!
Twilight
22-11-2009, 01:25 PM
The Exile camp ate a rat because they were starving. Is that the same thing?
The people that do the show wouldn't let them actually starve to death,
so there was no need to eat the poor rat
Harry!
22-11-2009, 01:25 PM
If there was no food supply and you were in need of food yes. But they're not, the producers wouldn't let them starve :thumbs:
ok I get your point. I was taking it into a real life situation. A bit extreme me thinks.
arista
22-11-2009, 01:26 PM
I'm sure they use already dead kangaroos. I don't think they kill them.
Bang On Right
It is a Production Line Factory
that cuts up the bits
used as Dog Food.
GypsyGoth
22-11-2009, 01:26 PM
I do and I don't feel for the creatures on the show.
Insects being eaten or squashed by one of Jordan's breasts doesn't bug me.
But when animals that are fretful about that human hand that burst into a hole groping for a star, it does bother me.
How many meat eaters are against this?
The Exile camp ate a rat because they were starving. Is that the same thing?
No because at the end of the day it's an artificial environment.
Jords
22-11-2009, 01:28 PM
The people that do the show wouldn't let them actually starve to death,
so there was no need to eat the poor rat
If your a vegetarian this doesnt apply to you,
but they were hungry so ate a rat,
abit like when your hungry and you go eat a piece of chicken,
accept that has been killed and prepared for you,
whereas the celebs had to do it themself.
Whilst I dont like the idea of animals being killed for us to eat,
it needs to be done, its all part of the food chain.
Im sure tigers and other animals dont think twice..
Harry!
22-11-2009, 01:28 PM
No because at the end of the day it's an artificial environment.
I know I was taking it from a real life situation point oif view which the show trys to pertray..
Christina
22-11-2009, 01:30 PM
ok I get your point. I was taking it into a real life situation. A bit extreme me thinks.
Yeah i would totally understand it if it were in a real life situation.. of course that's understandable, but in IAC it's not right at all.
If your a vegetarian this doesnt apply to you,
but they were hungry so ate a rat,
abit like when your hungry and you go eat a piece of chicken,
accept that has been killed and prepared for you,
whereas the celebs had to do it themself.
I agree with what you are saying. I don't have a bone to pick, pun intended, with meat eaters, but why they are complaining about things like this when they eat animals themselves is somewhat perplexing.
Whilst I dont like the idea of animals being killed for us to eat,
it needs to be done, its all part of the food chain.
Im sure tigers and other animals dont think twice..
Well, I have to call bullshit on that one. We are no longer predatory, instinctual beings. We have skills and we don't need to eat animals. It's simply our choice. And it's not the food chain or human nature. A factory of cheetah's don't work long shifts to crush, purify, treat and package Gazelles for sale at the local CheetahMart.
Harry!
22-11-2009, 01:33 PM
Yeah i would totally understand it if it were in a real life situation.. of course that's understandable, but in IAC it's not right at all.
I know I get your point now. Its only a TV show.
GypsyGoth
22-11-2009, 01:35 PM
A factory of cheetah's don't work long shifts to crush, purify, treat and package Gazelles for sale at the local CheetahMart.
:laugh2:
Jords
22-11-2009, 01:50 PM
A factory of cheetah's don't work long shifts to crush, purify, treat and package Gazelles for sale at the local CheetahMart.
Lmao!! :amazed:
Well I cant argue the fact thats not true :tongue:
It does give you a brilliant image in your mind of a cheetah in a white shirt scanning items at a checkout point, though :hugesmile:.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.