Calling Sisqo a paedo [Archive] - ThisisBigBrother.com

masonbason

23-01-2010, 12:03 AM

On the basis that he got a fourteen year old pregnant.

Right or wrong?

Majority rules, a wrong vote and I'll only call him a 'Diet Gary Glitter' from here on.

What a pointless poll seeing hes just out..

MojoNixon

23-01-2010, 12:04 AM

On the basis that he got a fourteen year old pregnant.

Right or wrong?

Majority rules, a wrong vote and I'll only call him a 'Diet Gary Glitter' from here on.

:joker: Polanski Light

headaball

23-01-2010, 12:04 AM

What a pointless poll seeing hes just out..

Why did he dissappear?

headaball

23-01-2010, 12:05 AM

:joker: Polanski Light

I think another poll is on the horizon. Diet Gary Glitter or Polanski Light? :joker:

MojoNixon

23-01-2010, 12:07 AM

Just checked my mail. I did get warning again :

Dear MojoNixon,

You have received an infraction at ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums.

Reason: making personal comment attacking another poster / looking to start argument
-------

-------

This infraction is worth 3 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
2904333
You would know

BB_Eye, one of the biggest defender of Sisqo The Perv.

All the best,
ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

Oh well, Sisqo is out and my mission is completed anyway. Bye Sisqo The Perv!

Stu

23-01-2010, 12:08 AM

Mission.

lol

alchemists1

23-01-2010, 02:07 AM

Right or Wrong Vinnie is a wife beating bully?

King Gizzard

23-01-2010, 02:15 AM

Well I'm glad justice is prevailing, at the moment anyway.

Right 5 45.45%
Wrong 6 54.55%

Ghostinthehouse

23-01-2010, 02:18 AM

Right or Wrong Vinnie is a wife beating bully?

Question - has Vinnie been judged guilty in a court of law for that? (I haven't checked so if you have a link to a news item perhaps?) Because if he has then he is. Simples, as the meerkat says.

However, Sisqo HAS been JUDGED IN A COURT OF LAW AS GUILTY of having sex with a 14 year old child and getting her pregnant - so Sisqo IS a paedo.

Not that difficult to understand.

Ghostinthehouse

23-01-2010, 02:19 AM

Well I'm glad justice is prevailing, at the moment anyway.

Right 5 45.45%
Wrong 6 54.55%

You think it's justice that Sisqo ****ed a child and got away with it. WTF????

Stu

23-01-2010, 02:23 AM

Question - has Vinnie been judged guilty in a court of law for that? (I haven't checked so if you have a link to a news item perhaps?) Because if he has then he is. Simples, as the meerkat says.

However, Sisqo HAS been JUDGED IN A COURT OF LAW AS GUILTY of having sex with a 14 year old child and getting her pregnant - so Sisqo IS a paedo.

Not that difficult to understand.
Again, there is a big difference between being a young, drunk twat and making a mistake with a fourteen year old dressed up as an eighteen year old ... and being a full blown paedophile. The latter of which have a consistent, definate attraction to young childen.

Zippy

23-01-2010, 02:26 AM

King Gizzard

23-01-2010, 02:27 AM

I can't even be bothered to argue tbh, these fools are just ignorant to the point you try to make.

I'm in the ''it was a mistake'' camp.

MissKittyFantastico

23-01-2010, 02:29 AM

How the hell can you call him a paedophile? There's a HUGE difference between that and mistaking a girl for being older than she actually is ffs.

He made a stupid mistake and if the kid is his he needs to man up and serve the ramifications of his actions, but to call him a paedophile is just ignorant and unjustified.

Stu

23-01-2010, 02:31 AM

I think some cases are not cut n dry.

It's all about intent. If he knowingly slept with a 14year old then, yes, I would call him a paedo. You need to check what the word means. It's about state of mind. Sleeping with a 14 year old who looks over 18 does not mean you have a sexual interest in children generally. It means you were fooled once.
Good point. She was dressed up to look like she were in her late teens. Real paedo's I would imagine don't go for these kind of people because they are attracted to the actual, well, kids.

King Gizzard

23-01-2010, 02:38 AM

You guys seen the picture of her when she was pregnant? posted it yesterday, she could pass for an 18 year old, easily.

MissKittyFantastico

23-01-2010, 02:41 AM

Exactly, paedophiles aren't attracted to tits and ass ffs, and she was very well endowed in both departments as far as I could tell.

He ****ed up, simple. NOT a paedophile.

Ghostinthehouse

23-01-2010, 02:41 AM

RLMAO.

Carry on with that 'argument'.

Try it in court. Seems Sisqo doesn't want to - because he knows he is guilty.

UNDERAGE IS UNDERAGE.

Stop trying to justify your pervert attitude to underage girls.

It's disgusting that there are several users (in this thread) who are ACTUALLY saying they would think it is OK to have sex with a 14 year old child. Are you insane or just perverts?

King Gizzard

23-01-2010, 02:43 AM

Of course it isnt fcking ok, ignorant of the point, again. Its just he ISNT A PEDO.

I'm quite offended in you thinking that we're insane and perverts, really.

MissKittyFantastico

23-01-2010, 02:43 AM

Underage is one thing, calling someone a paedophile for making a mistake is quite another.

Get off your moral high horse and actually go learn what the word means ffs.

Stu

23-01-2010, 02:47 AM

Stu

23-01-2010, 02:48 AM

I don't normally support anything like this but I strongly suggest we report all posts making TiBB members out to be paedophiles.

Too far.

Ghostinthehouse

23-01-2010, 02:50 AM

Underage is one thing, calling someone a paedophile for making a mistake is quite another.

Get off your moral high horse and actually go learn what the word means ffs.

LOL. You really don't see it do you. What Sisqo has done is wrong and ILLEGAL. Duh. Sisqo was sexually attracted to a 14 year old child - paedo. Simple.

And 14 years old IS a child. Even if you pretend in your head it isn't. :nono:

You think it's a 'moral high horse' to think it is WRONG to have sex with a 14 year old child. WTF?????

Then you're going to find the court, the police, the social services, the public are all on their 'moral high horses' when it comes to underage sex. Duh.

MissKittyFantastico

23-01-2010, 02:52 AM

LOL. You really don't see it do you. What Sisqo has done is wrong and ILLEGAL. Duh. Sisqo was sexually attracted to a 14 year old child - paedo. Simple.

And 14 years old IS a child. Even if you pretend in your head it isn't. :nono:

You think it's a 'moral high horse' to think it is WRONG to have sex with a 14 year old child. WTF?????

Then you're going to find the court, the police, the social services, the public are all on their 'moral high horses' when it comes to underage sex. Duh.

When did I ever say it wasn't wrong?

But why can't you get it through your head that he thought she was OLDER ie he is not attracted to YOUNG children, therefore he is NOT a paedophile?

No argument from me that what he did was illegal, but the question was about him being a paedo or not and he blatantly isn't. DUH.

Stu

23-01-2010, 02:54 AM

LOL. You really don't see it do you. What Sisqo has done is wrong and ILLEGAL. Duh. Sisqo was sexually attracted to a 14 year old child - paedo. Simple.

And 14 years old IS a child. Even if you pretend in your head it isn't. :nono:

You think it's a 'moral high horse' to think it is WRONG to have sex with a 14 year old child. WTF?????

Then you're going to find the court, the police, the social services, the public are all on their 'moral high horses' when it comes to underage sex. Duh.
You still don't get it, do you? She is not saying what he did was right. Or legal. So from that stance then yes, you are taking a moral highground. Any debate that involves you calling people who disagree with you paedophiles is taking a moral highground.

You are brilliant at this whole putting words in peoples mouths business.

alchemists1

23-01-2010, 03:34 AM

Dude you protest to much and seem to have an unhealthy interest in 14 year old girls.
How many threads is that you've now made on the subject?
Give it a rest and take your perverted mindset somewhere else.

InOne

23-01-2010, 03:36 AM

So Sisqo shagged some 14 year old broad, it really does not affect my life in any way and I don't pretend to take a moral high group. None of you would give a **** if they both died tomorrow

Ghostinthehouse

23-01-2010, 04:04 AM

RLMAO.

What? You can't be serious?

Jessica.

23-01-2010, 04:04 AM

He was 20 he didn't know she was 14!

Zippy

23-01-2010, 04:28 AM

RLMAO.

What? You can't be serious?

Seems to me that this is going round n round in circles because of your stubborn inability to learn the meaning of certain words.

Change your wording and your arguement may make more sense.

Yes, he was wrong to bed a 14 year old. But does that mean he has a general sexual interest in young children? Not necessarily.

Especially if she DID NOT LOOK LIKE A CHILD AT THE TIME.

Now look, you've forced me to use capitals.

MojoNixon

23-01-2010, 07:06 AM

Again, there is a big difference between being a young, drunk twat and making a mistake with a fourteen year old dressed up as an eighteen year old ... and being a full blown paedophile. The latter of which have a consistent, definate attraction to young childen.

:nono: Judas Judas....you never learn....

MojoNixon

23-01-2010, 07:07 AM

He was 20 he didn't know she was 14!

How do you know that? Did Sisqo said that?

SocietyIsRuined

23-01-2010, 11:58 AM

I voted yes on the basis that I would say the same about Roman Polanski. But it is a bit harsh to call him it.

1000Usernames

23-01-2010, 12:03 PM

He should not better than to do anything with 14 year old girls but paedo is a harse one and he has never reoffended. Paedo's are always a paedo.

Jayson

23-01-2010, 12:20 PM

It's wrong.

She was dressed up to look like she was at least 18.

Plus, she was in an 18+ club, so Sisqo assumed that she was 18 solely based on the fact that she was inside the club.

Even if he had asked her how old she was, she would've most likely told a lie, so tbh Sisqo could never have known.

Shasown

23-01-2010, 12:41 PM

In the UK paedophile generally means offending with pre pubescent, In the US any sex offence with a minor would get the paedophile label.(this includes sex with an underage person - statutory rape, as a minor is deemed not to be able to give consent)

As Sisqo is a US citizen. and they know best, we often follow their lead, you know wars, obesity, etc I think its only fair we follow their lead on this as well.

Stu

23-01-2010, 01:13 PM

How do you know that? Did Sisqo said that?
That works both ways my friend. Think before you post.

Firewire

23-01-2010, 01:39 PM

Wrong.

Stu

23-01-2010, 01:44 PM

LOL @ this poll. No doubt sense has prevailed. And no doubt there is something wrong with all of us.

CaudleHalbard

23-01-2010, 01:47 PM

Why does anyone still care?

Sisqo has gone and will sink back into obscurity - along with his Thong Song! :D

bananarama

23-01-2010, 01:54 PM

LOL. You really don't see it do you. What Sisqo has done is wrong and ILLEGAL. Duh. Sisqo was sexually attracted to a 14 year old child - paedo. Simple.

And 14 years old IS a child. Even if you pretend in your head it isn't. :nono:

You think it's a 'moral high horse' to think it is WRONG to have sex with a 14 year old child. WTF?????

Then you're going to find the court, the police, the social services, the public are all on their 'moral high horses' when it comes to underage sex. Duh.

I am afraid it is thee that does not see........None so blind as those that do not want to see or those that are high on a morality goody goody tirade........

As other have pointed out it is so so simple..If he definitely thought she was an adult. Mother nature can do this you know along with make up. He was foolish to be fooled maybe but he is only a paedo if he knew her age and if he was attracted to her age........

A man attracted to who looks and behaves like an adult is not a paedo.