View Full Version : BBC reporter Ray Gosling told viewers how he killed his Ill Gay Lover
arista
16-02-2010, 02:39 PM
It first went out
on BBC Inside Out regional North West.
Then he went on BBC Breakfast National news.
He put a pillow over his lover who was in hospital in pain with Aids.
He is a fool
now talking Live on SkyNews,
from a Nottingham Pub , outside it.
Kay Burley told him
he has broken the law.
The BBC need to sack him.
The Police are now looking into this.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/02/16/article-0-004EC61900000258-323_233x423.jpg
He is 70years old now
this was in 2002.
No Idea if he killed that cat.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1251346/BBC-veteran-Ray-Gosling-admits-mercy-killing-gay-lover.html
The BBC Clip is on this link .
WOMBAI
16-02-2010, 02:44 PM
Sounds like something done out of compassion - not malice! Maybe he was begged by his partner to do so - although how anyone could ask a loved one to do that - knowing the potential consequences for them is beyond me!
arista
16-02-2010, 02:47 PM
Sounds like something done out of compassion - not malice! Maybe he was begged by his partner to do so - although how anyone could ask a loved one to do that - knowing the potential consequences for them is beyond me!
Yes sounds like it.
But the BBC bosses had no Idea he was going to leak this.
This reflects on the BBC
Stuff a Pillow on your lovers face -as told on BBC Inside Out.
Shown at 7:30PM.
He is not of a Sound Mind
talking on BBC Breakfast and SkyNews.
Crimson Dynamo
16-02-2010, 03:01 PM
killing is killing. he has No right to be God.
WOMBAI
16-02-2010, 03:11 PM
But someone has the right to decide if they want to end their own life - and if they ask someone to end it for them, because they can't - that is their choice! It could be argued that those that carry out such a request, do so at great risk to themselves - and therefore show enormous compassion and selflessness!
Iceman
16-02-2010, 03:14 PM
No Idea if he killed that cat.
:joker::joker::joker::joker: epic
on the serious note its the whole debate of Euthanasia again which im on the fence when it comes to it......
Crimson Dynamo
16-02-2010, 03:15 PM
...this is how it started with
abortion
divorce
and look where we are now
arista
16-02-2010, 03:15 PM
killing is killing. he has No right to be God.
He says in Heaven his Lover is looking down on him
on SkyNews.
He is Not of a Sound Mind.
Now in a Pub on BBC Public pay.
arista
16-02-2010, 03:16 PM
But someone has the right to decide if they want to end their own life - and if they ask someone to end it for them, because they can't - that is their choice! It could be argued that those that carry out such a request, do so at great risk to themselves - and therefore show enormous compassion and selflessness!
No it is against Our Laws.
WOMBAI
16-02-2010, 03:17 PM
No it is against Our Laws.
Laws aren't always right - and can be changed!
Crimson Dynamo
16-02-2010, 03:18 PM
He says in Heaven his Lover is looking down on him
on SkyNews.
He is Not of a Sound Mind.
Now in a Pub on BBC Public pay.
he is not looking down on anyone.
only in the last day, when Jesus returns to earth will the physical bodies of believers be raised to heaven according to the Bible
Its non-biblical nonsense
Crimson Dynamo
16-02-2010, 03:19 PM
Laws aren't always right - and can be changed!
best to avoid murder until that time
arista
16-02-2010, 03:20 PM
he is not looking down on anyone.
only in the last day, when Jesus returns to earth will the physical bodies of believers be raised to heaven according to the Bible
Its non-biblical nonsense
He is Funded with BBC Public Money.
The Bloated BBC has lost all its standards
this is proof.
No Executive at the BBC
was aware he was going to tell about this Murder he did.
They would have edited it out.
arista
16-02-2010, 03:21 PM
Laws aren't always right - and can be changed!
This one Law in the UK
will never change.
Stacey.
16-02-2010, 03:27 PM
:shocked:
rapunza1977
16-02-2010, 03:35 PM
Sweet jesus....
ElProximo
16-02-2010, 03:37 PM
Compassion 'mercy killing' they say?
Well I wonder what the murder victim has to say about that?
Oh right.. he killed him.
One of the reasons we have murder trials is to try and determine these things. You don't get to commit homicide and later tell people it doesn't need to be investigated.. after all you are a reporter so... just believe me.
My guess is.. he was getting older and really wanted to sodomize as many young men as possible. Get high and slutty in the gay clubs or whatever the scene.
This guy was holding him back.
Sure.. he was getting almost saint-like glorious status from 'helping his dying lover' and got a lot out of that,
but,
All that back patting, high status, praises was also why he could not do other guys.
He wanted his partner dead.
Collect on it.
Get it over with.
Then get to those drug parties and reckless sex.
Maybe?
Cops have these 'instincts' right off the top. a 'hunch'. the gut feeling.
WOMBAI
16-02-2010, 03:43 PM
Compassion 'mercy killing' they say?
Well I wonder what the murder victim has to say about that?
Oh right.. he killed him.
One of the reasons we have murder trials is to try and determine these things. You don't get to commit homicide and later tell people it doesn't need to be investigated.. after all you are a reporter so... just believe me.
My guess is.. he was getting older and really wanted to sodomize as many young men as possible. Get high and slutty in the gay clubs or whatever the scene.
This guy was holding him back.
Sure.. he was getting almost saint-like glorious status from 'helping his dying lover' and got a lot out of that,
but,
All that back patting, high status, praises was also why he could not do other guys.
He wanted his partner dead.
Collect on it.
Get it over with.
Then get to those drug parties and reckless sex.
Maybe?
Cops have these 'instincts' right off the top. a 'hunch'. the gut feeling.
Hope your not on the jury then - talk about preconceptions! :shocked:
Crimson Dynamo
16-02-2010, 03:44 PM
Hope your not on the jury then - talk about preconceptions! :shocked:
this is what the cops have to think however
arista
16-02-2010, 04:00 PM
Compassion 'mercy killing' they say?
Well I wonder what the murder victim has to say about that?
Oh right.. he killed him.
One of the reasons we have murder trials is to try and determine these things. You don't get to commit homicide and later tell people it doesn't need to be investigated.. after all you are a reporter so... just believe me.
My guess is.. he was getting older and really wanted to sodomize as many young men as possible. Get high and slutty in the gay clubs or whatever the scene.
This guy was holding him back.
Sure.. he was getting almost saint-like glorious status from 'helping his dying lover' and got a lot out of that,
but,
All that back patting, high status, praises was also why he could not do other guys.
He wanted his partner dead.
Collect on it.
Get it over with.
Then get to those drug parties and reckless sex.
Maybe?
Cops have these 'instincts' right off the top. a 'hunch'. the gut feeling.
Tell the Bloated BBC that
we are paying for this bloke
to get drunk in the Pub he is in.
arista
16-02-2010, 04:03 PM
This was the Fool Live on SkyNews
not long ago.
Click Play.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Ray-Gosling-Admits-Mercy-Killing-Veteran-Broadcaster-Smothered-His-Gay-Lover-Who-Had-Aids/Article/201002315550107?lpos=UK_News_Carousel_Region_1&lid=ARTICLE_15550107_Ray_Gosling_Admits_Mercy_Kill ing%3A_Veteran_Broadcaster_Smothered_His_Gay_Lover _Who_Had_Aids
He calls the lad he killed his Bit On The Side.
This edit is 45seconds long.
ElProximo
16-02-2010, 04:03 PM
Hope your not on the jury then - talk about preconceptions! :shocked:
You would hope I was on the jury if you were the murdered mans parents or family and friends,
but,
Actually police do have to investigate that possibility. They will also investigate his claim it was an act of desperate 'mercy killing' to.
I'd be worried about you investigating crimes and accepting his story because you feel he is gay and cannot be wrong.
Or would you?
WOMBAI
16-02-2010, 04:05 PM
You would hope I was on the jury if you were the murdered mans parents or family and friends,
but,
Actually police do have to investigate that possibility. They will also investigate his claim it was an act of desperate 'mercy killing' to.
I'd be worried about you investigating crimes and accepting his story because you feel he is gay and cannot be wrong.
Or would you?
I don't think that - but I think that everything points to it being a mercy killing. Of course it would have to be investigated - but I think my view is far more likely than yours!
Crimson Dynamo
16-02-2010, 04:07 PM
"he was not my partner he was my bit on the side"
wtf
"he was in terrible pain"
is this guy a doctor?
this beggars belief
arista
16-02-2010, 04:08 PM
I don't think that - but I think that everything points to it being a mercy killing. Of course it would have to be investigated - but I think my view is far more likely than yours!
But you are Not Permitted to Use the Bloated BBC
for this Death Platform.
This Reflects on the BBC.
arista
16-02-2010, 07:31 PM
He is Live on Ch4 News now
arista
16-02-2010, 07:39 PM
He is Not of a Sound Mind at all.
he just said we have Laws of The Heart up here in Nottingham.
He is a Nutter
just because he thinks he did the best thing
does not make This Legal.
He does not want the Law Changed,
he just wants to get away with his own Murder.
The BBC need to sack him fast.
ElProximo
17-02-2010, 08:59 AM
You have to look at it this way - he is seen as a real authentic advocate for gay rights and this 'young man' who he was with (and may have given AIDS?) is dying slowly.
Maybe TOO slowly for Goslings liking.
Gosling simply cannot leave him. It would ruin his reputation and career.
How long might this young man have lived?
Possibly another year or more?
This is a full year where Gosling is, in effect, not allowed any more young 'bottoms', absolutely no orgies or 'glory holes' as the gays say it.
MAYBE he can have anonymous gay sex in some public park toilets.. but even that is risky and would look worse if caught cheating that way.
So?
Snuff the life out of this young man, collect all the praises and get massive credibility for gay rights, AIDS orgs and of course for 'staying by his side to the end',
and,
a few weeks later its back to the coke-filled toilet sex with new non-infected young men.
The cops better get on this now and start asking some tough questions.
I assume that Gosling will immediately cry 'Gay-bashing' at being questioned and quickly try and turn this around as himself being 'victimized by homophobics',
but,
the cops simply have to ignore that and investigate and question him no differently than if he was a skinhead or upper class mother or uni student.. all the same and no different.
Crimson Dynamo
17-02-2010, 09:49 AM
You have to look at it this way - he is seen as a real authentic advocate for gay rights and this 'young man' who he was with (and may have given AIDS?) is dying slowly.
Maybe TOO slowly for Goslings liking.
Gosling simply cannot leave him. It would ruin his reputation and career.
How long might this young man have lived?
Possibly another year or more?
This is a full year where Gosling is, in effect, not allowed any more young 'bottoms', absolutely no orgies or 'glory holes' as the gays say it.
MAYBE he can have anonymous gay sex in some public park toilets.. but even that is risky and would look worse if caught cheating that way.
So?
Snuff the life out of this young man, collect all the praises and get massive credibility for gay rights, AIDS orgs and of course for 'staying by his side to the end',
and,
a few weeks later its back to the coke-filled toilet sex with new non-infected young men.
The cops better get on this now and start asking some tough questions.
I assume that Gosling will immediately cry 'Gay-bashing' at being questioned and quickly try and turn this around as himself being 'victimized by homophobics',
but,
the cops simply have to ignore that and investigate and question him no differently than if he was a skinhead or upper class mother or uni student.. all the same and no different.
This is the problem with this insidious new liberal craze
arista
17-02-2010, 10:57 AM
He has now Been Arrested by Police.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1251644/BBC-presenter-Ray-Gosling-arrested-admitting-mercy-killing-gay-lover-suffering-Aids.html
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/02/17/article-1251644-084FBB47000005DC-152_468x346.jpg
The BBC North Inside Out docu'
and he broke BBC rules.
WOMBAI
17-02-2010, 11:01 AM
He has now Been Arrested by Police.
Some have him hung, drawn and quatered without even knowing all the facts! Innocent until proven guilty - is that an expression that some on here are not at all familiar with!
arista
17-02-2010, 11:03 AM
Some have him hung, drawn and quatered without even knowing all the facts! Innocent until proven guilty - is that an expression that some on here are not at all familiar with!
The BBC need to Sack him now.
Crimson Dynamo
17-02-2010, 01:26 PM
this guy is a murderer.
bananarama
17-02-2010, 02:14 PM
This one Law in the UK
will never change.
Your probably right our MP's are more interested in passing laws to slaughter the unborn than passing laws to save from suffering.......
I have a lot of sympathy for those that might assist a willing person who has had enough and wants to end it.......
This radio guy however refers to him as a bit on the side.......No proof that the victim wanted his life ended........
Under such circumstances he has laid himself wide open to be charged with murder and to serve a long jail sentence........
Latest news this morning is that he has been arrested.........
arista
17-02-2010, 07:28 PM
Just Reported on Ch4 News Live
The Bloated BBC that made that Docu'
has not handed the Police the Video of him saying how he killed
his (Bit On The Side) younger lover.
The Poxy BBC say the Police must get a Court Order.
The BBC Executive of this show
should be removed
for not knowing what was going to be shown.
Shaun
17-02-2010, 11:52 PM
Wow. I agree with WOMBAI.
BB_Eye
18-02-2010, 10:18 AM
You would hope I was on the jury if you were the murdered mans parents or family and friends,
but,
Actually police do have to investigate that possibility. They will also investigate his claim it was an act of desperate 'mercy killing' to.
I'd be worried about you investigating crimes and accepting his story because you feel he is gay and cannot be wrong.
Or would you?
No, that is all in your head, because you are homophobic and feel the need to remind us that you are every time you post it seems. Wombai never even referred to the fact he was gay. You pulled that one out of your ass.
killing is killing. he has No right to be God.
So are you against healthcare as a whole? After all, isn't that playing God too?
ElProximo
18-02-2010, 11:01 AM
No, that is all in your head, because you are homophobic and feel the need to remind us that you are every time you post it seems. Wombai never even referred to the fact he was gay. You pulled that one out of your ass.
BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.
I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?
WOMBAI
18-02-2010, 11:05 AM
BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.
I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?
You can't put words in people's mouths - saying they supported someone because the person is gay, when they never mentioned about them being gay. That is simply an assumption - which rather invalidates your point!
Crimson Dynamo
18-02-2010, 11:07 AM
So are you against healthcare as a whole? After all, isn't that playing God too?
Only Boots and certain branches of Semi Chem
ElProximo
18-02-2010, 11:08 AM
You can't put words in people's mouths - saying they supported someone because the person is gay, when they never mentioned about them being gay. That is simply an assumption - which rather invalidates your point!
No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.
So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.
WOMBAI
18-02-2010, 11:12 AM
No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.
So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.
Sounds like you are every '...ist' going! Anti gay, anti women, anti anyone different from you!
WOMBAI
18-02-2010, 11:15 AM
No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.
So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.
Your comments were based on assumptions - not facts - simple as! And your assumptions were wrong, therefore so was your point! Who has it 'double-wrong' now then? Just your wee male brain pulling off another dumb moment!
ElProximo
18-02-2010, 11:20 AM
Your comments were based on assumptions - not facts - simple as! And your assumptions were wrong, therefore so was your point! Who has it 'double-wrong' now then? Just your wee male brain pulling off another dumb moment!
No, that is not correct.
The 'point' depended on my assumptions regardless of whether they were correct or not.
To try and simplify it for you - 'I would be afraid if...(proposal that might happen)... point.
I know.. I have absolutely no doubt your brain is just freaking out right now but can I just give you some advice:
- Don't try to think this through any further.
Just accept it or not but just move on.
Trust me.
ElProximo
18-02-2010, 11:26 AM
Sounds like you are every '...ist' going! Anti gay, anti women, anti anyone different from you!
It sounds like that?
Why should it 'sound' like that to you?
Because I am for equal rights and responsibilities and justice for people regardless of whether they are gay or not?
That 'sounds like' someone being 'antigay' to you?
Once again.. certain kind of brain can do that and oh well.
Women?
No no, I love women so much I often give them orgasms. That makes me feel happy too.
but here again.. suppose I was an 'ist' for one thing.
Why should I be an 'ist' for another?
Is that how simple and narrow-minded you have to see things or what?
Why can't I be racist against certain disappointing peoples and be in favour of others?
Maybe I dislike gays but I am all for lesbians?
You need to open your mind and stop thinking in this one small squirrely ball of confusion.
The world is more than just 'pink or blue' either/or.
WOMBAI
18-02-2010, 11:28 AM
No, that is not correct.
The 'point' depended on my assumptions regardless of whether they were correct or not.
To try and simplify it for you - 'I would be afraid if...(proposal that might happen)... point.
I know.. I have absolutely no doubt your brain is just freaking out right now but can I just give you some advice:
- Don't try to think this through any further.
Just accept it or not but just move on.
Trust me.
If you mean by 'freaking out' - laughing myself silly - then got it in one! No I don't think I will even try to unmangle your messed up thought processes - as I don't think the end result will be worth the effort somehow! Trust you - I think not! :hugesmile:
Beastie
18-02-2010, 11:30 AM
Part time Lover.
BB_Eye
18-02-2010, 12:43 PM
BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.
I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?
If you are, then I'm lost for words. Why do you resent the people who have changed the law to give us the same rights as everyone else?
ElProximo
18-02-2010, 12:51 PM
If you are, then I'm lost for words. Why do you resent the people who have changed the law to give us the same rights as everyone else?
We already had the exact same rights before and after (regardless of whether you talk UK or Canada or USA where some states tried this).
One adult man had every right to marry one adult woman (I know more conditions apply) and that was the same for you, me or anyone else. There was 100% equal standards for all.
NettoSuperstar!
18-02-2010, 01:48 PM
killing is killing. he has No right to be God.
So its ok if the state permits it?...seem to remember you bein all for capital punishment n that
arista
18-02-2010, 01:53 PM
So its ok if the state permits it?...seem to remember you bein all for capital punishment n that
No he has broken the Law
and Used the Bloated BBC to tell us of his Crime.
NettoSuperstar!
18-02-2010, 01:58 PM
It tells us something that the doctors must have known full well what had happened and never said another word about it, life aint simple black and white, good and bad... there but for the grace of god go I, is all I have to say. Proximo has a point though it does have to be fully investigated and of course it will be
arista
18-02-2010, 02:08 PM
It tells us something that the doctors must have known full well what had happened and never said another word about it, life aint simple black and white, good and bad... there but for the grace of god go I, is all I have to say. Proximo has a point though it does have to be fully investigated and of course it will be
Pathetic of the Bloated BBC
to tell police.
Get a Court Order for the Video.
No need for that
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.