View Full Version : Who's side are you on?
_Seth
17-06-2010, 07:21 PM
Mostly I'm on John's.
chris1232
17-06-2010, 07:22 PM
Mostly I'm on John's.
:dance::dance:
chauncey
17-06-2010, 07:22 PM
Why?
MeMyselfAndI
17-06-2010, 07:22 PM
Johns
bettiepage
17-06-2010, 07:22 PM
I hate them both. triple eviction please for Rachel, JJ and the weed.
_Seth
17-06-2010, 07:22 PM
Why?
Just vote. :p
Stacey.
17-06-2010, 07:22 PM
Rachael's.
Twilight
17-06-2010, 07:22 PM
John side.
Jess_
17-06-2010, 07:23 PM
Johns.
Jordan.
17-06-2010, 07:24 PM
John's
BigBrotherfan4ever
17-06-2010, 07:24 PM
Mostly John's
Stacey.
17-06-2010, 07:24 PM
it actually amazes me how so many people could side with such a horrible little ****
MeMyselfAndI
17-06-2010, 07:26 PM
Looks like Rach is going tomorrow :\
Adamw92
17-06-2010, 07:30 PM
Rachael's
serensilver
17-06-2010, 07:31 PM
JOHNS! but i dont dislike rachael!
bettiepage
17-06-2010, 07:31 PM
I chose mostly john's btw.
SoFarSoGood282
17-06-2010, 07:34 PM
I don't like Rachael but I think John is taking it too far if he is resorting to shouting at her. Although I agree with everything he is saying but I don't condone the way he is dealing with it.
Kazanne
17-06-2010, 07:35 PM
Not really on any side,but it is very apparent that Rachel is a spoilt brat,who even admitted herself that she could not handle anyone not fancying her,that kind of vanity is ugly,I am glad JJ told he in no incertain words that she is NOT all that,but now he should let it go,and also Rachel needs to stop flaunting herself in front of him as imo it will make no difference,she needs to realise she is attractive to some but not ALL,fair play to JJ,most blokes are so shallow they would have gone along with it just to get a leg over,and he would have got called for that I guess he can't win,but it's nice to see a bloke use his head instead of his d--k.
_Seth
17-06-2010, 07:37 PM
Rachael is such an idiot... she says she wants to get on with John but she slyly said something about her being arrogant purposely loud so John would hear.
Jordan.
17-06-2010, 07:38 PM
it actually amazes me how so many people could side with such a horrible little ****
:conf: Theres only 8 people on Rachaels side?
chuff me dizzy
17-06-2010, 07:39 PM
Total Johns
Stacey.
17-06-2010, 07:39 PM
:conf: Theres only 8 people on Rachaels side?
:nono:
Mostly Rachael's, as I've said, they're both as bad as eachother, but JJ is just coming across as an ignorant, rude little prick at the minute.
Jordan.
17-06-2010, 07:43 PM
:nono:
:wink:
Rachaels side!! get that twat JJ out!!
chuff me dizzy
17-06-2010, 07:54 PM
Rachaels side!! get that twat JJ out!!
Hes not up for eviction
Firewire
17-06-2010, 07:57 PM
Whose*
Who's is the shortened version of 'Who is'.
Hes not up for eviction
i know but theres no reason i cant say that :dance:
skkc16
17-06-2010, 07:57 PM
TOtally rachael's
GypsyGoth
17-06-2010, 07:58 PM
Neither.
eye sea
17-06-2010, 07:58 PM
Split down the middle.
eye sea
17-06-2010, 07:59 PM
Whose*
Who's is the shortened version of 'Who is'.
And 'you're' is not spelt 'your'.:nono:
SmithT1992
17-06-2010, 08:50 PM
Rachel's 100%, JJ's just a bully
Neither. They are both utter cocks, and I would be happy if they reconciled and gave birth to a child that later grew up to kill them in their sleep.
Firewire
17-06-2010, 09:11 PM
And 'you're' is not spelt 'your'.:nono:
I know. I was referencing the thread's title, and 'you're/your' isn't in it.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.