Comparison

[Joe.]

Last year was better when we got Kenneth, Bea, David, Hira and Tom because-
1) We didn't know them.
2) Bea was one of the best new housemates ever.
3) There was a (small) twist involved.

This year-
1) We've seen them prior to launch + they'll be on tomorrow's BBLB.
2) None look intresting on first glance.
3) Unlikely there's a twist involved.

[Smithy]

David Hira and Tom were pretty pointless, everyone though Bea was gonna be some lovely hippie housemate and she turned out to be a huge bitch, so it proves you can't judge these people on what they look like.

[Joe.]

Exactly. Bea was entertaining though. Loved her. Tom and Ken were pointless walkers and David was a third placer. Liked Hira, she shone in the Alice in Wonderland task but was a bit quiet.

[Patrick]

BB10 FTW!

BB11 Sucks now.

[Shasown]

Pointless making comprisons as you dont know the new housemates or any twists etc just yet.

[Joe.]

Have to agree sadly that at the moment BB10 is better than BB11 :(

[Barbie]

Can't judge yet. But Bea was a big surprise, expecting a fun hippy and got well.. a bee!

[Stacey.]

Agreed.

[MeMyselfAndI]

agreed
atleast they put some goodlooking people in like tom who i hated
this year they like ugly people for some reason like andrew