Log in

View Full Version : The Eviction Should Have Gone Ahead!


Jords
21-07-2010, 04:10 PM
Even if Keeley cannot return due to her injured foot, the eviction should have still been carried through with Corin v Rachel.

This would mean 3 housemates have gone via not being evicted and allows 3 new housemates to enter without trouble getting the numbers down as the there is no overall rise in number of housemates (efficient amount of evictions left), instead we are making up 1 loss by not having an eviction but not improving the series in any way, shape of form.

With the eviction cancelled, there is still an opportunity for 2 newcomers, but evictions are a big event which are at least interesting and with 3 housemates lost in 1 week the show would desperately be shouting for newbies which might encourage the producers to get off their ass and find some - there were 60 or so left on the shortlist who would happily go in!!!

Anybody would think channel 4 want the show to fail... ;)

oddballmisfitsFTW
21-07-2010, 04:14 PM
I dont like Corin and want to GT FO, but it wouldnt be fair

the website says reason for cancellation was due to Keeley injury AND Quaver's walkout

so I think BB had considered cancelling it BEFORE the task, but decided to persist and now its bit them in the arse

serves em right too :elephant:

hope Keeley PWNS em in court

Jords
21-07-2010, 04:16 PM
I LOVE Corin, but I think she would stay against Rachel whom Id happily see her off for a new housemate. Lovely girl but in a week she has done nothing interesting, just another disappointment - looked like she had potential to be epic but isnt.

wilful_woodpecker
21-07-2010, 04:25 PM
I honestly can't see what keeva's departure has to do with it - ok, a person has gone this week already, but eviction night is a big part of the BB expereince, and should go ahead either withh Rachel and Corin, or even the whole lot of 'em!!!!!

LaLaLand
21-07-2010, 04:27 PM
This is the perfect opportunity to put them all up, Vote to Save and kick two out and putting Caoimhe's replacement in.

But NO. :(

Kaaarenn!
21-07-2010, 05:49 PM
I agree. It shouldn't have been cancelled. Maybe they will bring some new housemates in instead or do a twist. They need to do something.

oddballmisfitsFTW
21-07-2010, 05:54 PM
This is the perfect opportunity to put them all up, Vote to Save and kick two out and putting Caoimhe's replacement in.

But NO. :(

they need to do a lot more than that

it should be whole house up vote to EVICT and 3 go in triple eviction

then 5-6 new HMs enter all of them under 25, fun, up for a laugh and real livewires

maximus says "are you not entertained"

i say in my rutger hauer voice

"I want more LIFE in that house, *******ers"

coolestrock
21-07-2010, 06:06 PM
nominations are null and void,,,,,,,so that means because keeley injured and cameltoe walked,,,all other hm's are being punished by not having there nominations sticking and having someone leave,,,,thats the object of the game,,,thats why bb have messed up the show over the last few years (changing the rules)

chuff me dizzy
21-07-2010, 06:06 PM
yes i think it should too ,one of the loud mouths will have gone

Patrick
21-07-2010, 06:07 PM
Wouldn't of been fair.

Beside's haven't they lost 2 Housemates already, Keeley goes then they get rid of Rachel or Corin that means 4 people have left and they don't replace any of them and by right they should of replaced Caoimhe and Shabby but cbf.

EzzaB
21-07-2010, 06:15 PM
they need to do a lot more than that

it should be whole house up vote to EVICT and 3 go in triple eviction

then 5-6 new HMs enter all of them under 25, fun, up for a laugh and real livewires

maximus says "are you not entertained"

i say in my rutger hauer voice

"I want more LIFE in that house, *******ers"

YE BABY I AGREE! :joker:
If bb want more viewers and the show to get better not duller by losing all the good hms 1st, they should seriously consider your offer.

eye sea
21-07-2010, 06:22 PM
Why can't they put two new housemates in and still evict Corin?

That's why BB is a real drag this year. The producers can't be @rsed any more...

Jackie
21-07-2010, 07:04 PM
No cause i wanted keeley evicted if she was up.

Angus
21-07-2010, 07:48 PM
The eviction should have gone ahead with all three of them up still - what difference does it make if Keeley has injured herself - it doesn't make any difference to the voting.

Jords
21-07-2010, 07:49 PM
^
I meant if Keeley couldnt return as a housemate at all, not just before the eviction.