PDA

View Full Version : Tactical choices.


Supermum
23-07-2010, 10:32 PM
Ok... so is John james a div or has he actually used his brain by picking the less 3 who aren't a threat??
Either way, for me, it was the worst moment yet. I couldn't believe my eyes. I'd rather watch England vs USA again.
What a waste of 3 housemates........

Ithinkiloveyoutoo
23-07-2010, 10:34 PM
I'm surprised he and josie both wanted Jo in because she said JJ is fit.
He seemed ok with picking JJ aswell which surprised me

Josielover
23-07-2010, 10:40 PM
I was surprised by the choices. I thought that Josie wouldn't like Jo because she said JJ was fit. Then again maybe Josie isn't threatened by an older woman that looks like jo :D

I didn't think they'd pick JJ2 even though he's attractive because the name thing would be confusing. He looks like he could spice things up abit in the house though so im glad he's there.

Tessier Ashpool
23-07-2010, 10:42 PM
Ok... so is John james a div or has he actually used his brain by picking the less 3 who aren't a threat??
Either way, for me, it was the worst moment yet. I couldn't believe my eyes. I'd rather watch England vs USA again.
What a waste of 3 housemates........

Totally agree:xyxwave:. I would like to hear the *ahem* logic behind not making it a public vote

Ithinkiloveyoutoo
23-07-2010, 10:45 PM
. Then again maybe Josie isn't threatened by an older woman that looks like jo :D
.

what you mean a fit older woman?:blush:

Ithinkiloveyoutoo
23-07-2010, 10:46 PM
Totally agree:xyxwave:. I would like to hear the *ahem* logic behind not making it a public vote

I think the logic might've been the housemates are bored out of their minds and that makes for bad viewing so let them chose who they think are their kind of people so they can be happy and give us some ****ing classics

Jordan.
23-07-2010, 10:50 PM
Definitely. The ones who came off least controversial were picked which is the opposite of what we needed :laugh:

Tessier Ashpool
23-07-2010, 10:51 PM
I think the logic might've been the housemates are bored out of their minds and that makes for bad viewing so let them chose who they think are their kind of people so they can be happy and give us some ****ing classics

Yeah, I can see what you mean, but we:cat:, the audience, are the guys that generate the ratings and cash - and we have a pretty good idea what we want to watch.

And the risk the HMs will choose the least threatening candidates.

I think the logical thing would have been ask us, but I'm no TV producer:hugesmile:

bbfan1991
23-07-2010, 10:52 PM
I was surprised by the choices. I thought that Josie wouldn't like Jo because she said JJ was fit. Then again maybe Josie isn't threatened by an older woman that looks like jo :D

I didn't think they'd pick JJ2 even though he's attractive because the name thing would be confusing. He looks like he could spice things up abit in the house though so im glad he's there.

LOL Josie knew Jo from the audition stages, Jo seems nice:D.

bansheewails
23-07-2010, 10:54 PM
I think Joel didn't stand a chance after saying that Steve should be knocked off his perch (or words to that effect). They all like steve in there and Joel made an error there.

rusticgal
23-07-2010, 10:56 PM
Whoever took the role of speaker actually put themselves in the frame of making their own choice.This will cause arguements HM's will despise/like JJ cos he made the ultimate decision....He has put himself in the frame... but I think he tried to be fair.Glad he picked JJ2 cos I hope he will be a bit more suitable company for him and have a bit of a laugh....time will tell.

Visage
23-07-2010, 11:02 PM
Ok... so is John james a div or has he actually used his brain by picking the less 3 who aren't a threat??
Either way, for me, it was the worst moment yet. I couldn't believe my eyes. I'd rather watch England vs USA again.
What a waste of 3 housemates........

It's not that bad, and it gives you a reason to moan about him, so not all is lost ;)

Tessier Ashpool
23-07-2010, 11:02 PM
I Think JJ2 was a fairly decent/brave choice by the HMs

I think Joel didn't stand a chance after saying that Steve should be knocked off his perch (or words to that effect). They all like steve in there and Joel made an error there.

I don't think it was necessary to get the new candidates to slag of the current HMs in their VTs. They should have been judged on personality alone.

Sabrewulf238
23-07-2010, 11:13 PM
Actually if he wanted to pick the ones that weren't a threat he probably should have picked Megan and Sam instead, they seemed like characters that would be bound to get themselves evicted quickly.