Log in

View Full Version : Why couldn't there have been a twist...


Angus
24-07-2010, 08:36 PM
so that BB sent in the three people the HMs didn't vote for? Then we would have had Megan, Sam and Joel who, being the rejects, might have brought a bit of payback to the house!

Harry!
24-07-2010, 08:37 PM
Because channel 4 dont think like that. Thats why.

eviled2010
24-07-2010, 08:39 PM
Looked like that "sexy" fat guy got a good few votes from the HMs, think he might have been unlucky 'cause the whole voting thing was so rushed.

This was a pretty exciting moment I'd say for viewers as far as this less than stimulating BB goes, why the hell did they have to rush it like that? It would have been fun to have heard the prospective new HMs give their little likes and dislikes speeches and then have the real HMs battle it out between themselves for say 15 minutes.
Would have been a lot more entertaining.

Angus
24-07-2010, 08:42 PM
Watching it again tonight it annoyed me how JJ1 immediately said "she's in" about Jo who had said he was her favourite. That's why I think he deliberately "got confused" and picked her instead of No.4:rolleyes:

eviled2010
24-07-2010, 08:45 PM
The BB team this year have lost the plot. They just never seem to miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.
The whole new HM introduction thing could have been handled so much better.

LiquidGold
24-07-2010, 09:40 PM
so that BB sent in the three people the HMs didn't vote for? Then we would have had Megan, Sam and Joel who, being the rejects, might have brought a bit of payback to the house!

exactly! i hate how they did it! most retarded way ever! :cloud:

Angus
24-07-2010, 09:49 PM
OR they could all 6 have gone in overnight and the HMs in the morning would have had to go the diary room and voted for the three they wanted to stay.

OR the HMs should have all had to stand up individually and stated which three they wanted in, so that ALL the HMs got a fair vote.

Patrick
24-07-2010, 09:50 PM
Because channel 4 dont think like that. Thats why.

This.