PDA

View Full Version : Unpunished rule breaks - for some!


WOMBAI
28-07-2010, 10:07 AM
Josie and JJ still haven't been punished for removing their microphones, something they have done more than once, why! This is rule-breaking! Why does Dave get put up for eviction for his rule break - whilst they escape any form of punishment, nevermind being put up for eviction!

Last series or not - should bb be so arrogant as to think they can practice whatever double-standards they choose in the name of their brand of entertainment! The show should be allowed to go out with a bang - not all this boring showmance crap! Comments please!

HBB1508
28-07-2010, 10:09 AM
I agree and what really annoyed me was the chap on BBLB last night saying it was ok for them to have some private time as they had had a stressful day - BB's way of saying they are going to do absolutely nothing about it. Makes me mad.

WOMBAI
28-07-2010, 10:12 AM
I agree and what really annoyed me was the chap on BBLB last night saying it was ok for them to have some private time as they had had a stressful day - BB's way of saying they are going to do absolutely nothing about it. Makes me mad.

I didn't see that - who said that! Why should they be extended such priviledges - do it for one - you have to do it for all, otherwise is just favourism - pure and simple! Bloke is an idiot!

housemate
28-07-2010, 10:13 AM
I think its all wrong too. BB should impose a punishment on the house as a consequence for taking microphones off, I'd love to see JJ reconcile his high moral sensibilities (!!) if everyone had to eat slop for 3 days!! Bet he wouldn't do it again.

Zippy
28-07-2010, 10:13 AM
Its a disgrace.

I actually have a sneaky suspicion half their drama is staged for the show. What else could they be secretly discussing?

Kazanne
28-07-2010, 10:16 AM
This show is ruined by the unfairness and bias this year

Omah
28-07-2010, 10:18 AM
Yeah, JJJ seem to have broken many of the rules of of BB and gone unpunished, presumably because the producers don't want to interrupt the turgid flow of the "fauxmance in bed" plot .....

psychtracker
28-07-2010, 10:19 AM
Josie and JJ still haven't been punished for removing their microphones, something they have done more than once, why! This is rule-breaking! Why does Dave get put up for eviction for his rule break - whilst they escape any form of punishment, nevermind being put up for eviction!



Yep, you're preaching to converted here. It's obviously undetermined what they where talking about, for all we know they where discussing noms!

Niamh.
28-07-2010, 10:20 AM
Yes you're right, eventhough John James is my favourite, turning off their microphones (again) is worse than talking about nominations and should be punished severely

WOMBAI
28-07-2010, 10:20 AM
Its a disgrace.

I actually have a sneaky suspicion half their drama is staged for the show. What else could they be secretly discussing?

I agree! They could also be discussing nominations - something they punished Dave for! The point is - they could be discussing ANYTHING - and should not be allowed the opportunity to do so! It really is unacceptable behaviour on bb's part - it is tantamount to taking the piss out of the viewers!

terryrow
28-07-2010, 10:21 AM
if there is no punishment it shows bb's favouritism.

setanta
28-07-2010, 10:24 AM
Yep, you're dead right. It's absolute bull.

ibook4113
28-07-2010, 10:27 AM
i imagine (and hope) that the punishment will come after the eviction. I am not sure what the punishment should be though. Not to talk for a whole day? Not to swear for a whole day? To not touch each other for a whole day? They could come up with something interesting. I don't think putting them up for nomination would be a good punishment because i don't think they would care. Maybe only give them the ability to only vote for one person next week not two?

HBB1508
28-07-2010, 10:30 AM
I didn't see that - who said that! Why should they be extended such priviledges - do it for one - you have to do it for all, otherwise is just favourism - pure and simple! Bloke is an idiot!

Sorry can't find his name guess he wasn't that exciting it was an ex-SAS chap who was on to comment on Andrew's task. I couldn't believe he said it - just makes a mockery of the whole thing really.

WOMBAI
28-07-2010, 10:33 AM
i imagine (and hope) that the punishment will come after the eviction. I am not sure what the punishment should be though. Not to talk for a whole day? Not to swear for a whole day? To not touch each other for a whole day? They could come up with something interesting. I don't think putting them up for nomination would be a good punishment because i don't think they would care. Maybe only give them the ability to only vote for one person next week not two?

That still wouldn't be fair though! They should have been put up with Dave - anything less - is unfair! BB were obviously scared that Josie might go - and couldn't risk it! The same probably applied to JJ - but he got put up by the hms - not much they could do about that! Sickening favourtism! Just as well it is the last series - who could ever take them seriously now!

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 10:53 AM
I have to say that BB shpuld be applauded for applying some common sense to the situation. Did they break the rules yes they did, do different rules apply to them then other housemates, yes they do, and rightly so

At the end of the day John James and Josie are box office, and they are keeping the ratings up. Unfortunately watching Steve sleaze all over young women and Mario becoming more unstable by the day is not going to keep people interested. Their "will they, wont they" relationship has captured the publics imagination and it is in the inrerest of the show that they stay in.

Justice is a rare comodity in this "business of show" and people like Dave, Steve, and Mario are not entitled to it as they do not deserve it. They just dont have that "it" factor. Lets be honest here they are quite simply boring (and in Mario's case three sheets to the wind). When you think about it, Big Brother cracking down hard on them for rule breaks makes them interesting for a few seconds so in practical terms, Big Brother is doing them a favour.

MojoNixon
28-07-2010, 10:57 AM
This show is ruined by the unfairness and bias this year

True. Shabby was producers pet (and still is). Now when she is gone, they try to make JJ their next winner.

Omah
28-07-2010, 10:58 AM
Lets be honest here they are quite simply boring (and in Mario's case three sheets to the wind).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheet_%28sailing%29

The term "three sheets to the wind," meaning "staggering drunk," refers to a ship whose sheets have come loose, causing the sails to flap uncontrolled and the ship to meander at the mercy of the elements. Also, "Three sheets in the wind, unsteady from drink."

Surely not ?

Unless he has a secret stash of alcohol ?

:conf:

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 11:01 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheet_%28sailing%29



Surely not ?

Unless he has a secret stash of alcohol ?

:conf:

ok allow me to rephrase then - completely mental

WOMBAI
28-07-2010, 11:08 AM
I have to say that BB shpuld be applauded for applying some common sense to the situation. Did they break the rules yes they did, do different rules apply to them then other housemates, yes they do, and rightly so

At the end of the day John James and Josie are box office, and they are keeping the ratings up. Unfortunately watching Steve sleaze all over young women and Mario becoming more unstable by the day is not going to keep people interested. Their "will they, wont they" relationship has captured the publics imagination and it is in the inrerest of the show that they stay in.

Justice is a rare comodity in this "business of show" and people like Dave, Steve, and Mario are not entitled to it as they do not deserve it. They just dont have that "it" factor. Lets be honest here they are quite simply boring (and in Mario's case three sheets to the wind). When you think about it, Big Brother cracking down hard on them for rule breaks makes them interesting for a few seconds so in practical terms, Big Brother is doing them a favour.

Where do I start - what a load of good, old-fashioned bulls**te!

They are not keeping the ratings up - most people are sick of the JJ/Josie show - what the hell is entertaining about those two slobbering over each other - even if it is real - which is pretty obvious it isn't!

Maybe 'romance' is what rocks your boat (why not watch a romantic movie or read a Barbara Cartland) - but many of us don't feel the same way! On the whole people are not so much interested in 'will they' or 'won't they' - but simply annoyed at their attention-seeking antics and bb thrusting this drivel down our throats! Any many like some of the other hms!

And no favouritism of certain hms is not what the show is supposed to be about - it is supposed to be about the public's view and what they want - not what bb tell us we should want!

Tessier Ashpool
28-07-2010, 11:09 AM
I have to say that BB shpuld be applauded for applying some common sense to the situation. Did they break the rules yes they did, do different rules apply to them then other housemates, yes they do, and rightly so

At the end of the day John James and Josie are box office, and they are keeping the ratings up. Unfortunately watching Steve sleaze all over young women and Mario becoming more unstable by the day is not going to keep people interested. Their "will they, wont they" relationship has captured the publics imagination and it is in the inrerest of the show that they stay in.

Justice is a rare comodity in this "business of show" and people like Dave, Steve, and Mario are not entitled to it as they do not deserve it. They just dont have that "it" factor. Lets be honest here they are quite simply boring (and in Mario's case three sheets to the wind). When you think about it, Big Brother cracking down hard on them for rule breaks makes them interesting for a few seconds so in practical terms, Big Brother is doing them a favour.


I kind of agree, but - right or wrong - I think that kind of manipulation goes against the original spirit of the show.

If the producers always shape the outcome of situations and decide to focus on showmance too much we may aswell be watching Hollyoaks:shrug:.

Jords
28-07-2010, 11:11 AM
I have never noticed just how biased BB are until this year. :bored:

Zippy
28-07-2010, 11:14 AM
I have never noticed just how biased BB are until this year. :bored:

Well its the last one so they dont give a damn anymore. Now they can just be shameless about it.

WOMBAI
28-07-2010, 11:17 AM
I have never noticed just how biased BB are until this year. :bored:

Agreed - but as Zippy says - they have nothing to loose this year and can basically do what they like - which is spoiling the last series!

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 11:20 AM
They are not keeping the ratings up - most people are sick of the JJ/Josie show

Maybe 'romance' is what rocks your boat (why not watch a romantic movie or read a Barbara Cartland) - but many of us don't feel the same way!

And no favouritism of certain hms is not what the show is supposed to be about - it is supposed to be about the public's view and what they want

Firstly Yes they are keeping the ratings up. Figures are figures and they don't lie

Secondly Romance actually dosen't rock my boat, I'm a realist, and while many of you don't feel the same way, more of you do !

The show is "supposed to be about" whatever the production team decide it should be about. The old format had grown stale and needed to be revamped. Its taken the makers of the show along time to realise that the public are essentially stupid. They vote out the interesting characters and then complain that the show is boring

Thankfully this year the makers of the show are trying to ensure the public don't screw it up again and they will keep the likes of Ben JJ and Josie in the house for as long as possible.

People like Mario are expendable (and a future sex pest)

MargeryFan
28-07-2010, 11:21 AM
I have to say that BB shpuld be applauded for applying some common sense to the situation. Did they break the rules yes they did, do different rules apply to them then other housemates, yes they do, and rightly so

At the end of the day John James and Josie are box office, and they are keeping the ratings up. Unfortunately watching Steve sleaze all over young women and Mario becoming more unstable by the day is not going to keep people interested. Their "will they, wont they" relationship has captured the publics imagination and it is in the inrerest of the show that they stay in.

Justice is a rare comodity in this "business of show" and people like Dave, Steve, and Mario are not entitled to it as they do not deserve it. They just dont have that "it" factor. Lets be honest here they are quite simply boring (and in Mario's case three sheets to the wind). When you think about it, Big Brother cracking down hard on them for rule breaks makes them interesting for a few seconds so in practical terms, Big Brother is doing them a favour.

Dave has is 100 times more interesting and funny than JJ and in my opinion those two qualities are entertaining. What is so entertaining about this dead end relationship? what more is there to see? I like Josie but JJ does my head inside out!!

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 11:21 AM
I kind of agree, but - right or wrong - I think that kind of manipulation goes against the original spirit of the show.

:.

The spirit of the show wasn't working, thats why this is the last one. Like it or not characters such as Ben, JJ and Josie are box office, and money in the bank

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 11:23 AM
Dave has is 100 times more interesting and funny than JJ and in my opinion those two qualities are entertaining. What is so entertaining about this dead end relationship? what more is there to see? I like Josie but JJ does my head inside out!!

Dave is mental. He was put in the show for his whacky religous views. Because he is not preaching or doing strange things he is no longer of any use.

Shiner
28-07-2010, 11:26 AM
Dave's infraction (this time) was so borderline it was unbelievable - he didn't actually mention nominations, he actually mentioned non-nomination of 2 individuals. This could conceivably only be seen as influential if there were only a few people in the house left to nominate. JJJ told JJ they wouldn't nominate him which is far more influential than what Dave did.
What JJJ are doing with their mics is rule breaking 101. What do they have to hide? Switching off or incapacitating their mics means they are not participating in the show. They have already been punished for it - remember they had to draw cocks on each other in the DR - a savage punishment if ever I saw one. If they still do not wish to be part of the program then show them the door and give us back our fecking show.

Shiner
28-07-2010, 11:30 AM
I have to say that BB shpuld be applauded for applying some common sense to the situation. Did they break the rules yes they did, do different rules apply to them then other housemates, yes they do, and rightly so

At the end of the day John James and Josie are box office, and they are keeping the ratings up. Unfortunately watching Steve sleaze all over young women and Mario becoming more unstable by the day is not going to keep people interested. Their "will they, wont they" relationship has captured the publics imagination and it is in the inrerest of the show that they stay in.

Justice is a rare comodity in this "business of show" and people like Dave, Steve, and Mario are not entitled to it as they do not deserve it. They just dont have that "it" factor. Lets be honest here they are quite simply boring (and in Mario's case three sheets to the wind). When you think about it, Big Brother cracking down hard on them for rule breaks makes them interesting for a few seconds so in practical terms, Big Brother is doing them a favour.

You are BB's ideal demographic. Doesn't make you right though.

Tessier Ashpool
28-07-2010, 11:30 AM
The show is "supposed to be about" whatever the production team decide it should be about. The old format had grown stale and needed to be revamped. Its taken the makers of the show along time to realise that the public are essentially stupid. They vote out the interesting characters and then complain that the show is boring

Thankfully this year the makers of the show are trying to ensure the public don't screw it up again and they will keep the likes of Ben JJ and Josie in the house for as long as possible.

I think you give the producers too much credit. Sure, the show has inevitably evolved into what it is (possibly mutating a bit:bawling:), but the producers get it wrong too often - surely the crappy ratings is proof of this?

They miss obvious tricks:joker: (like actually having a celeb be the Uber Cougar), bad HM selection, a lot of the tasks are absolute dross and, as mentioned, being shamelessly biased toward things they think will boost ratings.

WOMBAI
28-07-2010, 11:34 AM
Firstly Yes they are keeping the ratings up. Figures are figures and they don't lie

Secondly Romance actually dosen't rock my boat, I'm a realist, and while many of you don't feel the same way, more of you do !

The show is "supposed to be about" whatever the production team decide it should be about. The old format had grown stale and needed to be revamped. Its taken the makers of the show along time to realise that the public are essentially stupid. They vote out the interesting characters and then complain that the show is boring

Thankfully this year the makers of the show are trying to ensure the public don't screw it up again and they will keep the likes of Ben JJ and Josie in the house for as long as possible.

People like Mario are expendable (and a future sex pest)

It isn't a drama series, it is supposed to be a reality show - about the public vote - and it is no longer that this year! A farce!

A lot of people are watching because they are frustrated at the 'showromance' and are eager to see one or both of those two removed by the public - not because they want to see them all over each other - they want the chance to watch their favourite hms for a change!

Why on earth do you watch a show when you believe the producers think we are all essentially stupid ? In my book - they are the stupid ones if they think the public are interested in such drivel and need them to tell us what we want to watch!

I do, however, agree on one point - Mario is potentially a future sex pest! :hugesmile:

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 11:35 AM
Dave's infraction (this time) was so borderline it was unbelievable

What JJJ are doing with their mics is rule breaking 101. .

In terms of Dave he clearly broke the rules, stupidity is not an excuse


In terms of JJJ, they were discussing their own relationship, not nominations. Also BB is not going to punish the stars of their show. They should maybe punish Mario instead

WOMBAI
28-07-2010, 11:38 AM
In terms of Dave he clearly broke the rules, stupidity is not an excuse


In terms of JJJ, they were discussing their own relationship, not nominations. Also BB is not going to punish the stars of their show. They should maybe punish Mario instead

How do you know what they were discussing - that is the whole point - they took their mics off and could have been talking about anything - including nominations! They would hardly admit to that though - would they! Naive comment!

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 11:40 AM
Why on earth do you watch a show when you believe the producers think we are all essentially stupid ? In my book - they are the stupid ones if they think the public are interested in such drivel and need them to tell us what we want to watch!
:

Individuals are intelligent, people are stupid

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 11:43 AM
How do you know what they were discussing - that is the whole point - they took their mics off and could have been talking about anything - including nominations! They would hardly admit to that though - would they! Naive comment!

If they're smart enough to break off an emotional conversation to discuss nominations then I say Bravo, they should get away with it. But coming back to the real world its abundently clear what they were discussing :xyxwave:

Shiner
28-07-2010, 11:49 AM
In terms of Dave he clearly broke the rules, stupidity is not an excuse


In terms of JJJ, they were discussing their own relationship, not nominations. Also BB is not going to punish the stars of their show. They should maybe punish Mario instead

My point was about disparity. You obviously agree.
Although from your standpoint it is justified because you like JJJ which proves my point further and discredits yours to the n'th degree.

Tessier Ashpool
28-07-2010, 11:54 AM
If they're smart enough to break off an emotional conversation to discuss nominations then I say Bravo, they should get away with it. But coming back to the real world its abundently clear what they were discussing :xyxwave:

But ,also in the real world, HMs have been punished for mentioning nominations when it has been obvious that they were not trying to influence votes. BB changes the rules at their whim.

Dave get put up for discussing nominations, where other HMs have got away with it more than once - because BB doen't favour Dave.

JJ gets to turn off his microphone, break-out into the camera runs and it goes unpunished - because BB favours him. Simples. May aswell hand him the crown now:joker:

hotleggs
28-07-2010, 11:58 AM
if john james is having a break down , put him in a mental hostpital

but he looks fine too me !

hotleggs
28-07-2010, 11:59 AM
give jj and josie the money now , they have won !!

WOMBAI
28-07-2010, 12:04 PM
If they're smart enough to break off an emotional conversation to discuss nominations then I say Bravo, they should get away with it. But coming back to the real world its abundently clear what they were discussing :xyxwave:

Alternatively - it could just be part of the act! And that is besides the point - they have no right to break the rules and should be punished accordingly! They could of been discussing anything - regardless of their 'apparent' emotional state - no exceptions for anyone! :xyxwave:

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 12:08 PM
You are BB's ideal demographic. Doesn't make you right though.

Actually it does

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 12:09 PM
But ,also in the real world, HMs have been punished for mentioning nominations when it has been obvious that they were not trying to influence votes. BB changes the rules at their whim.

Dave get put up for discussing nominations, where other HMs have got away with it more than once - because BB doen't favour Dave.

JJ gets to turn off his microphone, break-out into the camera runs and it goes unpunished - because BB favours him. Simples. May aswell hand him the crown now:joker:

agree 100% with everything you say - but you say it like its a bad thing

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 12:10 PM
[/B]

no exceptions for anyone! :xyxwave:

They're the stars of the show so their should be exceptions made for them. If Mario or Steve did it I would boot them out

WOMBAI
28-07-2010, 12:12 PM
They're the stars of the show so their should be exceptions made for them. If Mario or Steve did it I would boot them out

Stars in your eyes, not mine! Same goes for the public as a whole - some may like them - many don't! Definitely not stars - that is what bb want us to think - you sound like their puppet! :hugesmile:

Tessier Ashpool
28-07-2010, 12:19 PM
agree 100% with everything you say

Yay:dance::elephant: I will ignore the rest of that post:joker:

Showstopper
28-07-2010, 12:23 PM
Stars in your eyes, not mine! Same goes for the public as a whole - some may like them - many don't! Definitely not stars - that is what bb want us to think - you sound like their puppet! :hugesmile:

They are undoubtably the most popular characters in the house, both have been bookies favourites to win at different times. Think about it, who else is entertaining in the house ?

You shouldn't resent them because they are better then the other HM's

shaz20
28-07-2010, 12:33 PM
The spirit of the show wasn't working, thats why this is the last one. Like it or not characters such as Ben, JJ and Josie are box office, and money in the bank
Yes thats why Ben hasnt been punished for his hundreds of nomination talks.:dance:

Lex
28-07-2010, 12:35 PM
Josie and JJ still haven't been punished for removing their microphones, something they have done more than once, why! This is rule-breaking! Why does Dave get put up for eviction for his rule break - whilst they escape any form of punishment, nevermind being put up for eviction!

Last series or not - should bb be so arrogant as to think they can practice whatever double-standards they choose in the name of their brand of entertainment! The show should be allowed to go out with a bang - not all this boring showmance crap! Comments please!

The only comment I have is....that you are absolutely correct!
I've been 'jumped on' for stating this very fact , many times before!
e.g...The showmancers telling jj2 that they would never nominate him,whilst in the pool etc!.....But their fanbase seems to be too huge to risk annoying with little things like rules!!
It's pathetic!! :nono:

Shiner
28-07-2010, 12:42 PM
Actually it does

Ha ha ok I see where this is going. :xyxwave:

WOMBAI
28-07-2010, 01:03 PM
They are undoubtably the most popular characters in the house, both have been bookies favourites to win at different times. Think about it, who else is entertaining in the house ?

You shouldn't resent them because they are better then the other HM's

But they are not entertaining - how is laying about in bed all day talking about their feelings for each other entertaining? Maybe Josie picking JJ's nose, or him having his little tantrums does it for you, not for me or many others!

And I don't care what the bookies say - means nothing - I don't think they are anywhere near as popular as you would have us believe! And as time goes on - what popularity they have is going to wain if they continue the way they are! And bb showing their blatant favouritism for them is likely to work against them in the end - and end up biting them in the bum - and turning people against the gruesome twosome!

Twiggy
28-07-2010, 04:43 PM
Where do I start - what a load of good, old-fashioned bulls**te!

They are not keeping the ratings up - most people are sick of the JJ/Josie show - what the hell is entertaining about those two slobbering over each other - even if it is real - which is pretty obvious it isn't!

Maybe 'romance' is what rocks your boat (why not watch a romantic movie or read a Barbara Cartland) - but many of us don't feel the same way! On the whole people are not so much interested in 'will they' or 'won't they' - but simply annoyed at their attention-seeking antics and bb thrusting this drivel down our throats! Any many like some of the other hms!

And no favouritism of certain hms is not what the show is supposed to be about - it is supposed to be about the public's view and what they want - not what bb tell us we should want!I agree with you WOMBAI. If the ratings have been up then it is probably because people like myself have continued to watch in the desperate hope that they will show us something else other than these two. Every night I am bitterly disappointed at what I am being shown!

Omah
29-07-2010, 08:07 AM
Josie and JJ still haven't been punished for removing their microphones, something they have done more than once, why! This is rule-breaking! Why does Dave get put up for eviction for his rule break - whilst they escape any form of punishment, nevermind being put up for eviction!

Last series or not - should bb be so arrogant as to think they can practice whatever double-standards they choose in the name of their brand of entertainment! The show should be allowed to go out with a bang - not all this boring showmance crap! Comments please!

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/bigbrother/news/a252445/john-james-josie-warned-by-big-brother.html

John James and Josie have been reprimanded by Big Brother after they chatted in the garden without their microphones.

The pair, who have been punished previously for turning off their microphones, got out of bed to talk outside but intentionally left their recording devices in the bedroom. After an initial call to all housemates, which was ignored, Big Brother sounded out John James and Josie to visit the Diary Room "immediately".

Upon returning from the Diary Room, the duo told those in the living room that Big Brother would punish the whole house after constant rule-breaking.

It is unclear what punishment will be given to the group following the rule-break.


So JJJ just get a "knuckle-rap" ..... :rolleyes:

..... oh and another mention in the HLs .... :mad:

setanta
29-07-2010, 08:11 AM
And now we'll have the pleasure of seeing Davina bouncing around like a moron shouting, "they're in love, they're in love", this Friday. Lord, give me strength.

WOMBAI
29-07-2010, 08:21 AM
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/bigbrother/news/a252445/john-james-josie-warned-by-big-brother.html



So JJJ just get a "knuckle-rap" ..... :rolleyes:

..... oh and another mention in the HLs .... :mad:

They should be put up for eviction, same as Dave! Anything less is just a cop-out!

joeysteele
29-07-2010, 08:50 AM
Someone on here just sadi Josie and JJames were showstoppers,really,I cant say I've noticed that and talking to people who just watch the programme son and off, they are sick of the pair of them and this fake romance nonsense that hogs all the BB ptogramming.
I cant think of more than a few instances where I ahve actually laughed at or enjoyed much of what JJames has done,In the early weeks Josie was a bundle of energy and was really funny too, she was a great housemate, I was really enjoying her hammering JJames when he insulted her size etc and she turned on him and really put him down.
Now however,the BB content is chronic, it is taken up by the most boting and false of ALL the BB romances,and it is clear that BB do manipulate the content to ensure who looks good or bad and it is also clear they want JJames or Josie to win, maybe some of the production team have Australian connections.
This BB has descended into the worst ever now, yet had so much promise,tasks like the GLEE task were really great,JJames didn't feature much there despite his so called good looks,they all were good in that with their efforts.
I also laughed at the IFE dance comtent too, and Shabby's and Caimhe's reaction to it,I laugh at Corin a lot,with her I'm buzzin and lovin it sayings and the best moment for me and I know others who dont even like Ben or Corin much was the night he played Goldfinger on the piano and she sang the SHIRLEY BASSEY song.
That was like something from old time music hall with the bad diva singer and her stright faced partner at the piano, they would make a great double act.

John James and Josie though are totally boring,thye have made this and when it is looked back on, it will be seen how they destroyed this last series of BB rather than help make it the best one or even a good one.

BB have from the start had a whipping boy as they had Freddie last time,this time it is BEN, and if BEN leaves this week then the show dies massiveley,there will be no living with John James who will think he cannot do any wrong at all after that.

Finally. punishments,no argument, every one else gets hammered for disobediance and rule breaking except 2 people.JJames and Josie. In past BB when arguments have started, both involved have often been called to the diary room and told to calm down, JJames has got away with saying some truly nasty foul mouthed things to at least 2 female housemates,he ATTACKED Sunshine, you can joke with people but once you lay your hands on them that constitutes a technical assault, if you then keep hold of them when they tell you to stop then it is an assault, he dragged that girl along the ground while she yelled stop, he tightened his grip more even when Mario went to help her.... his punishment ,say sorry to her!!!!
Josie swtched his and her microphones off for a time ,they were told to write daft messages on each other,for goodness sake, yet with those microphones off she or he could have said next nominations nominate this one and that one,no one knows, they probably didnt ,but could have.
The we have the breaking our farce for attention by JJames. again all he gets is sympathy and of course its biased and its wrong of BB to be that way.
Whoever goes this week if its not JJames, will in time be seen to have been a far better housemate than he ever was and if Jjames ends up winning then he will be the most unworthy and worst winner there has ever been.

BB has fialed the viewers this time and it has been very discrimatory in the time it has give to some housemates while havins watch 2 idiotic adults playing at schoolkids, hiding under a duvet and talking so no one can make out what they are saying.IF thats called entertainment and is the lasting memories of this series of BB then what a very sad waste of a great opportunity for BB this time who have protected Jjames and Josie and Steve to the detriment of the other housemates, hence 3 walkouts plus an injury from a very badly planned task by BB again too.