JJ and Josie punishment...

[tpau21]

i heard their punishment for switching off their mics was that the HM's have to nominate in front of each other...is this true...i this is gonna be great...

[Mystic Mock]

i want a votes to save double eviction.

[Niamh.]

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, sounds good but I dont know will they nominate who they would have in private though. No one will nominate Steve in front of him so he'll probably escape again gggrrrrr

[Grimnir]

if that is true its a pathetic punishment

none of the house will vote for Josie in face to face as we know from Steve being gutless and not picking her to replace him after S&R

[watchinittoomuch]

Wahey! I'd love to see Mario's mush :devil:

[Grimnir]

for the combination of turning mics off and discussing nominations Josie should be put up for eviction automatic just as Dave was

[Mystic Mock]

for the combination of turning mics off and discussing nominations Josie should be put up for eviction automatic just as Dave was

and so should john james then.

[InOne]

Source?

[BJ]

Andrew and Jo would be the targets if this happens

[Jords]

I hope this is not true, I can see them all following suit with the first few nominations and not nominating who they really want to.

Oh and theres bound to be those who offer to be nominated to look good, boo!


Id rather them all nominate normally, then get shown it back on screen! :devil:

[Visage]

Rather than nominate in front of the housemates, let them do it the normal way. Then when they've finished, show the whole thing on the plasma.

That way no one would feel intimidated into not voting whoever.

Every-one's a winner babe ;)

[stoney]

did they switch off their mics again?

if its from the other week surely their "punishment" should have been during last week's noms?

and why should the rest be punished for their cheating?

[Patricia4]

It should be just them two so put them both up.

[Visage]

and why should the rest be punished for their cheating?

That's how Big Brother works.

[stoney]

That's how Big Brother works.

but only when it siuts them.

the punishment for keeley saying the same thing that jj(original) has said about Josie meant her noms did not count. If they had then JJ would have been up that week too

for dave talking about them it was him that was up and not allowed to nominate, saving a nomination for josie

[Livia]

Rather than nominate in front of the housemates, let them do it the normal way. Then when they've finished, show the whole thing on the plasma.

That way no one would feel intimidated into not voting whoever.

Every-one's a winner babe ;)

That's evil. I like it!

[Visage]

but only when it siuts them.

the punishment for keeley saying the same thing that jj(original) has said about Josie meant her noms did not count. If they had then JJ would have been up that week too

for dave talking about them it was him that was up and not allowed to nominate, saving a nomination for josie

I just think they try to be random, so many have been punished for breaking the rules over the years, that the punishment comes in all different ways.

Maybe you're right about this, they do things to suit how things are in the house at that time. It could be seen as manipulation i suppose.

[stoney]

If they do it in front of each other it also gives the ones with names later in the alphabet an advantage as they will know who has how many noms so can either just chose someone that is already up or safe

[WOMBAI]

i heard their punishment for switching off their mics was that the HM's have to nominate in front of each other...is this true...i this is gonna be great...

What sort of punishment is that - punishes everyone! The two of them should be put up for eviction - same as Dave! BB double-standards again!

[WOMBAI]

if that is true its a pathetic punishment

none of the house will vote for Josie in face to face as we know from Steve being gutless and not picking her to replace him after S&R

Just another BB attempt to save their favorites, Josie and JJ! :nono:

[wilful_woodpecker]

more recently when they have had face-to-face noms, they have had to write names down first so they can't change them by seeing who else has been nominated (or not)

but do agree that who they pick even that way, is not necessarily who they would pick in the DR

but - as somebody else said earlier - what's the source?
I haven't come across it yet (unless it's in one of the Sunday tabloids???)

[InOne]

This is fake. They'd never have something like that, they want to protect the golden couple too much.

[Josy]

There has been about 3 different rumours about the punishment now, I suppose we will find out tomorrow.

[ILoveTRW]

They should lock them in a cosy 2 person bedroom for a day, and make JJ1 jealous

[Rofl Copter]

I think that BB should have face-to-face noms and put JJJ up for eviction!

[fitz2k2]

i think that bb should have face-to-face noms and put jjj up for eviction!

book it!

[gio]

did they switch off their mics again?

if its from the other week surely their "punishment" should have been during last week's noms?

and why should the rest be punished for their cheating?

Does not matter to BB Keeleys 'punishment' was retrospective and after a nominations vote..there will be no punishment the producers wont have 'Ken and Dierdre' being punished:nono: