Log in

View Full Version : The most pointless nomination process ever?


setanta
09-08-2010, 02:31 PM
I think so. It was predictably dull, with everybody following one another like a group of cowardly sheep and the housemates voting last gaining a huge advantage. An absolute farce as far as I'm concerned.

Zippy
09-08-2010, 02:49 PM
I think so. It was predictably dull, with everybody following one another like a group of cowardly sheep and the housemates voting last gaining a huge advantage. An absolute farce as far as I'm concerned.

Totally agree. The producers spend about 2 minutes thinking things through it seems.

And yeah, the last ones to vote could vote tactically. Well they werent gonna waste their votes on those who hadnt got any yet were they? Plus what about revenge votes? did Jo nominate Corin because she did her?

The whole thing is flawed and dishonest. And at this stage of the game we need TRUTHFUL opinions. And the deadwood kicked out.

The whole house up with a vote to save would clear out the useless ones who shouldnt be in the final.

setanta
09-08-2010, 02:51 PM
Totally agree. The producers spend about 2 minutes thinking things through it seems.

And yeah, the last ones to vote could vote tactically. Well they werent gonna waste their votes on those who hadnt got any yet were they? Plus what about revenge votes? did Jo nominate Corin because she did her?

The whole thing is flawed and dishonest. And at this stage of the game we need TRUTHFUL opinions. And the deadwood kicked out.

The whole house up with a vote to save would clear out the useless ones who shouldnt be in the final.

Thank God I'm not the only one who thought it was a complete shambles. Like, who dreamt it up and when will they be fired? Or do you think they staged it this way in order to eliminate the possibility of John James and Josie being up for eviction?

Jords
09-08-2010, 02:52 PM
Agreed with what both of you have said, couldnt put it better.

Omah
09-08-2010, 02:53 PM
Totally agree. The producers spend about 2 minutes thinking things through it seems.

Yeah, the avaerage adolescent attention-span ..... :hugesmile:

And yeah, the last ones to vote could vote tactically. Well they werent gonna waste their votes on those who hadnt got any yet were they? Plus what about revenge votes? did Jo nominate Corin because she did her?

The whole thing is flawed and dishonest. And at this stage of the game we need TRUTHFUL opinions.

Yeah, private nominations but public "dunking" would have presented credible results ..... ;)

BB_Eye
09-08-2010, 02:55 PM
I think so. It was predictably dull, with everybody following one another like a group of cowardly sheep and the housemates voting last gaining a huge advantage. An absolute farce as far as I'm concerned.

It was enough of a disaster last time around. Everybody nominating Lisa and Sara for fear of offending their dear leader Rex. Pathetic.

I hope they never do this again.

troy4783
09-08-2010, 02:56 PM
but if u think about it jj mario jo and dave are deadwood and there up for eviction

troy4783
09-08-2010, 02:56 PM
but if u think about it jj mario jo and dave are deadwood and there up for eviction

BB_Eye
09-08-2010, 02:58 PM
but if u think about it jj mario jo and dave are deadwood and there up for eviction

Yes, there is always this dilemma. Is it better to evict an irrelevant nonentity or an active show ruiner?

HBB1508
09-08-2010, 03:00 PM
I was looking forward to this task but they all wimped out - boring and I feel cheated :(