View Full Version : Did you like the 'nasty noms'?
InOne
09-08-2010, 02:35 PM
Good twist or not?
rosieb
09-08-2010, 02:41 PM
No - it was stupid - they would have all voted differently in the safety of the diary room - it would have been better for them to have voted in the diary room then shown it on the tv screen afterwards - that is always guaranteed to ruffle feathers more!!
It sucked :/ John should be up.
Jords
09-08-2010, 02:42 PM
Nope, stopped people doing the nominations they really wanted to.
Malza
09-08-2010, 02:43 PM
They should have first normally doing the noms unwatched in the diaryroom, then playing the noms to everyone on the scree, then carry on with the mess
So noms
watch the nomination, and use the nasty stuff... next watch nomination, and make it public... and so on
SocietyIsRuined
09-08-2010, 02:43 PM
No - it was stupid - they would have all voted differently in the safety of the diary room - it would have been better for them to have voted in the diary room then shown it on the tv screen afterwards - that is always guaranteed to ruffle feathers more!!
Exactly correct.
fingers
09-08-2010, 02:47 PM
No - it was stupid - they would have all voted differently in the safety of the diary room - it would have been better for them to have voted in the diary room then shown it on the tv screen afterwards - that is always guaranteed to ruffle feathers more!!
It was worse than stupid! where do they find these producers? do they trawl the streets looking for hopeless alcoholics (actually hopeless alcoholics could have come up with a better idea than this!)
Fuzzylogic
09-08-2010, 02:52 PM
I liked it, it was something different as a one off. And it meant JJ2 got nominated, which was a bonus.
They should do a surprise double eviction on wednesday, and then straight after get them to do normal nominations for a normal eviction on friday
InOne
09-08-2010, 05:35 PM
The concept was good, but they have too much time to think and plan it out. Plus nobody has guts.
Vicky.
09-08-2010, 05:36 PM
Who is up then?
IloveSophie<3
09-08-2010, 05:37 PM
not utterly predictable =0
Jordan.
09-08-2010, 05:37 PM
The concept was good, but they have too much time to think and plan it out. Plus nobody has guts.
Agreed!
Vicky.
09-08-2010, 05:38 PM
Maybe they just gave up on nominating JJ, since he has stayed so many times? Just a suggestion to those moaning that this task is the only reason noone nominated him...
Zippy
09-08-2010, 05:40 PM
to encourage dishonest voting at this stage was just STUPID.
They should have done it earlier when it couldve at least caused future friction and perked the series up.
Another badly devised MESS. Piss off producers you are inept.
Vicky.
09-08-2010, 05:41 PM
I really want to know who is up.
If sams up, I might vote for the first time this year. I really dont want to lose him :(
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.