View Full Version : NO one died people!
Wildcat!
14-08-2010, 06:25 PM
Of course they want the last real evction night ever of BB, to be a big eviction night!
Who cares who wins this series?  Does anyone really cares who wins this season?
Just the fact that someone who has been in the house for 2 weeks, is basically favorite to win, shows you how much these housemates suck.
I dont mind that they boot 4 of them out!  They deserve it, with their BS voting, and the stupid Save and replace craap!
This kind of saves it for me.     I only want to enjoy Ultimate BB, to eou nd the franchise!
Good call!
I feel the same way. People are completely overreacting.
ILoveTRW
14-08-2010, 06:28 PM
Well actually Allister died and its the producers fault.
Jack_
14-08-2010, 06:28 PM
Who cares who wins this series?  Does anyone really cares who wins this season?
Yes. Because the thought of yet another dull and pointless housemate winning £100,000 is awful. 
They don't deserve that much money for doing **** all.
Smithy
14-08-2010, 06:29 PM
People are over reacting soo much, if you think about it like this: Saturdays highlights will have the "big" characters in, sunday and monday will be the usual farewell parties etc and tuesday has like 5 mins of highlights, so really even if all the big characters go, you only have 2 days without them.
Jack_
14-08-2010, 06:31 PM
People are over reacting soo much, if you think about it like this: Saturdays highlights will have the "big" characters in, sunday and monday will be the usual farewell parties etc and tuesday has like 5 mins of highlights, so really even if all the big characters go, you only have 2 days without them.
Of course. But dull housemates shouldn't be let anywhere near the final week. They don't deserve it.
Smithy
14-08-2010, 06:32 PM
Of course. But dull housemates shouldn't be let anywhere near the final week. They don't deserve it.
:shrug: The only people you can blame are the public, tbh I'm not that fussed I'm looking forward to allstars :D
flamingGalah!
14-08-2010, 06:33 PM
Well actually Allister died and its the producers fault.
Oh shhh FFS... :sleep:
Wildcat!
14-08-2010, 06:34 PM
Yes. Because the thought of yet another dull and pointless housemate winning £100,000 is awful. 
They don't deserve that much money for doing **** all.
They are all either dull, or *****ks!!  Sorry!!
John James is a pricck!!
Corin, is a backstabber
Dave, Priick!!
Steve, is just there!
Josie all season, Jealous of all the girls, annoying etc!!
The there is Sam!  BIggest *****k of all time, favorite to win!!!  Cmon!!
 This is a perfect eviction for these guys!  :D
Tom4784
14-08-2010, 06:47 PM
I'm annoyed because it'll mean that most of the HMs in the final will be totally undeserving of it and it's gonna make for very flat viewing come the final.
As for the Save and Replace it's no different to the Power of Veto so I didn't mind it's conclusion.
stonedape
14-08-2010, 06:48 PM
The thing I like is I really don't think the HMs are going to expect a quadruple. For once we're going to see genuine shock from them, albeit a little late. However, the public could choke and evict all legends. It's risky.
Mr XcX
14-08-2010, 06:49 PM
I agree. I hope John James is out and gets a lame interview.
Wildcat!
14-08-2010, 06:53 PM
I'm annoyed because it'll mean that most of the HMs in the final will be totally undeserving of it and it's gonna make for very flat viewing come the final.
As for the Save and Replace it's no different to the Power of Veto so I didn't mind it's conclusion.
Its very dfferent than the Power of Veto!
Save and replace, gives only a chance to the people who are nominated.   The power of veto, gives the chance to 6 people to play for it.  So more than likely, it doesnt get used!  And its still the HoH who decides who gets replaced, so its a target that goes up anyways!  A lot of the times they use it to backdoor the real target.
But the save and replace, an innocent bystandard, who got maybe one vote in the nominations, can get put up by one person, who was nominated!  Thats not fair at all!    Look at Racheal in week one.  She received one nomination.  Yet she got replaced and was evicted.
Its not what BBUK is about, so its a stupid rule, at least the way they did it!
I wouldve been happy, if everyone got to play for it, or at least 6 or 8 people.  So it doesnt necessarily get used!
Not the same thing at all!
vesavius
14-08-2010, 06:55 PM
The thing I like is I really don't think the HMs are going to expect a quadruple. For once we're going to see genuine shock from them, albeit a little late. However, the public could choke and evict all legends. It's risky.
Risk is fun and makes great TV.
I love it :)
setanta
14-08-2010, 06:56 PM
Yes. Because the thought of yet another dull and pointless housemate winning £100,000 is awful. 
They don't deserve that much money for doing **** all.
Exactly.  It's a completely ridiculous decision to have made by the producers.  Seriously, I don't think they give a shi% anymore.  Well, they didn't last year or during this series, that's for sure.
Tom4784
14-08-2010, 06:58 PM
Its very dfferent than the Power of Veto!
Save and replace, gives only a chance to the people who are nominated.   The power of veto, gives the chance to 6 people to play for it.  So more than likely, it doesnt get used!  And its still the HoH who decides who gets replaced, so its a target that goes up anyways!  A lot of the times they use it to backdoor the real target.
But the save and replace, an innocent bystandard, who got maybe one vote in the nominations, can get put up by one person, who was nominated!  Thats not fair at all!    Look at Racheal in week one.  She received one nomination.  Yet she got replaced and was evicted.
Its not what BBUK is about, so its a stupid rule, at least the way they did it!
I wouldve been happy, if everyone got to play for it, or at least 6 or 8 people.  So it doesnt necessarily get used!
Not the same thing at all!
In essence it's the same thing though, they were even talking about backdooring Sam last week before the did the nominations.
stonedape
14-08-2010, 07:01 PM
Risk is fun and makes great TV.
I love it :)
I do too, but not gonna lie, if its a set like JJ1, Sam, Corin, and Andrew or something I will hate the twist for all time. If it knocks out a few sleepers, I'll be happy. Not fussed about my "favorites" going out now, Ben's already gone. :dance:
vesavius
14-08-2010, 07:01 PM
I feel the same way. People are completely overreacting.
For sure, it's crazy to watch.
vesavius
14-08-2010, 07:01 PM
I do too, but not gonna lie, if its a set like JJ1, Sam, Corin, and Andrew or something I will hate the twist for all time. If it knocks out a few sleepers, I'll be happy. Not fussed about my "favorites" going out now, Ben's already gone. :dance:
I actually miss Ben, didnt think i would say that lol
Wildcat!
14-08-2010, 07:01 PM
In essence it's the same thing though, they were even talking about backdooring Sam last week before the did the nominations.
Again, that doesnt go with the BBUK format!  BEcause you cant talk about nominations.  SO backdoring, is out of the question!"  You will be punished, and its not gonna happen!
So no matter how you look at  it, sorry, Save and replace, is Completely different than power of Veto, not even close.
Desnt make sense.  BBUK, is about the house putting people up, and the public evicting them.   Fair enough, if someone saves trhemselves, I would be OK, if the next highest vote getter gets put up, but not just someone who gets picked by the nominee.   That makes for false results, and thats what we have had all series.  Some people who never should have been evicted, got evicted because of it!  Dave sholdve been gone long time ago, shabby shouldve been gone like week 2.   Racheal shouldve never been evicted, Nathan sholdve never been evicted.  I can go on and on!!
Tom4784
14-08-2010, 07:07 PM
Again, that doesnt go with the BBUK format!  BEcause you cant talk about nominations.  SO backdoring, is out of the question!"
So no matter how you look at  it, sorry, Save and replace, is Completely different than power of Veto, not even close.
Desnt make sense.  BBUK, is about the house putting people up, and the public evicting them.   Fair enough, if someone saves trhemselves, I would be OK, if the next highest vote getter gets put up, but not just someone who gets picked by the nominee.   That makes for false results, and thats what we have had all series.  Some people who never should have been evicted, got evicted because of it!  Dave sholdve been gone long time ago, shabby shouldve been gone like week 2.   Racheal shouldve never been evicted, Nathan sholdve never been evicted.  I can go on and on!!
POV and the SAR both enable someone to save themselves right? At it's very core that's the basic gist of it. POV has a few differences due to the option of choosing to save someone or not but they both serve the same purpose at it's core. To save yourself.
Whether it fits in with BB is a while different barrel of fish and sometimes it's enabled a bore to go (IE Nathan) and sometimes it's blown up in their faces but I've quite liked it personally, it makes things less predictable.
Patrick
14-08-2010, 07:09 PM
Well actually Allister died and its the producers fault.
:joker::joker::joker:
I'm such a bellend for laughing at that.
Patrick
14-08-2010, 07:10 PM
It's the fact it isn't a vote to save.
This was CLEARLY a last minute thing that a producer thought of this morning!
And it's not on they SHOULD by right give money back if people want 50p Back :rolleyes: and re-open the lines with a V.T.S
Wildcat!
14-08-2010, 07:17 PM
POV and the SAR both enable someone to save themselves right? At it's very core that's the basic gist of it. POV has a few differences due to the option of choosing to save someone or not but they both serve the same purpose at it's core. To save yourself.
Whether it fits in with BB is a while different barrel of fish and sometimes it's enabled a bore to go (IE Nathan) and sometimes it's blown up in their faces but I've quite liked it personally, it makes things less predictable.
YOu said its basically the same thing as POV!  Well the fact is:  Its not!  I know you find it difficult to see reason when your theory is wrong, but its not, at all the same!!   None whatsoever.  ONe works for one series and makes sense, one doesnt!!!
The reasons, I have already explained in detail in my two previous posts, but if you still think its the same, then by all means, carry on in your thoughts!   :)
Mr XcX
14-08-2010, 07:17 PM
Wildcat is right. It is 4 going cause this is the FINAL EVER!! Big Brother eviction in a main series.
BigBrotherfan4ever
14-08-2010, 07:19 PM
TBH i really dont see what all the fuss is about, cause at the end of the day, the series is finishing in 10 days & they all have to go out some point.
Wildcat!
14-08-2010, 07:19 PM
It's the fact it isn't a vote to save.
This was CLEARLY a last minute thing that a producer thought of this morning!
And it's not on they SHOULD by right give money back if people want 50p Back :rolleyes: and re-open the lines with a V.T.S
Of course its last minute.  When have BB ever thoughts things through?   They did ban Sam for nominations for next week, which arent gona happen, so obviously its all improvised!!
My point is, who cares!!  All these housemates suck, they deserve it!   John James fans deserve it, they have been systematically voting out all the people who he was a dikchead to!!
At leas this is revenge for the girls.  As it seems, all 4 evicted will probably be guys!
Wildcat!
14-08-2010, 07:21 PM
Wildcat is right. It is 4 going cause this is the FINAL EVER!! Big Brother eviction in a main series.
Esactly!  Its their last eviction ever, and they want it to be big characters!!
#
Fair enoug, and since someone who has been in the house for 2 weeks was likely to win, then really, it shows you, no one really cares about this lot of housemates!
vesavius
14-08-2010, 07:33 PM
TBH i really dont see what all the fuss is about, cause at the end of the day, the series is finishing in 10 days & they all have to go out some point.
The fuss is pure and simple that hardcore fans are seeing their faves threatened.
It actually has nothing to do with anything else.
(see? I can project my opinions onto others motives as well)
billy123
14-08-2010, 08:26 PM
:shrug: The only people you can blame are the public, tbh I'm not that fussed I'm looking forward to allstars :D
common sense has left the building! but thankfully so have crabeyes chances of winning i think that has a lot to do with the silly reaction.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.