PDA

View Full Version : Are the Production Team Idiots?

Hunx1985
02-09-2010, 10:07 PM
UBB should have had a 6 week run (minimum) plus all previous winner's from each year AND should have included these HM's I listed earlier: http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=160536

There should have been NO evictions until the final 10-12 days also. The total number of HMs should have been nearer 20-25, not 10ish.

This show should have been done properly but, as usual, it hasn't.

What a waste of a potentially great show to find a legit ultimate housemate.
Big_Kahuna
02-09-2010, 10:10 PM
This subject is rather boring now. It is what it is. Get over it.
Legend killer
02-09-2010, 10:12 PM
Yep they are complete idoits
Hunx1985
02-09-2010, 10:12 PM
Your avatars are boring more like :joker:
Hunx1985
02-09-2010, 10:12 PM
Legend Killer, good post glad you agree
Harry!
02-09-2010, 10:14 PM
Your avatars are boring more like :joker:

And you dont have a avatar ... :conf:
Patrick
02-09-2010, 10:15 PM
No.

All the previous ******ing winners include Rachel Rice and on top of that most people despise the winners.

So no sh*t idea.
Legend killer
02-09-2010, 10:17 PM
Legend Killer, good post glad you agree

I am full of good posts Hunx
humourwins
02-09-2010, 10:17 PM
I agree with you. There are nowhere near enough housemates and hence not enough competition. Brian is the only decent male in there with a shot of winning and as we know it is always harder for female to win. It would have been much better ascacreal contest by putting pete Bennett it
Hunx1985
02-09-2010, 10:17 PM
Patrick, I listed 16 GOOD HM's if you bothered to read (which you clearly didn't) my linked thread in my OP.

If you have an ultimate BB you actually need good HMs BUT you also need every single previous winner there too. It makes sense that those who won the first time round should compete again.

Sheesh some people are such morons and don't even comprehend the basics.
Big_Kahuna
02-09-2010, 10:18 PM
Your avatars are boring more like :joker:

well, that's me told :laugh3:
Hunx1985
02-09-2010, 10:18 PM
Humourwins, the fact we've had MULTIPLE female winners over the years makes your post rather pointless.
guigy
02-09-2010, 10:23 PM
They can only put in HM's who agree to do it

Most of them refused or were contracted to do other things ( e.g. Ashleine & Alex Reid )
Big_Kahuna
02-09-2010, 10:24 PM
Patrick, I listed 16 GOOD HM's if you bothered to read (which you clearly didn't) my linked thread in my OP.

If you have an ultimate BB you actually need good HMs BUT you also need every single previous winner there too. It makes sense that those who won the first time round should compete again.

Sheesh some people are such morons and don't even comprehend the basics.

Try getting Kate Lawler in there....... Have you ever thought that some winners DON'T WANT TO BE IN IT ? idiot
Hunx1985
02-09-2010, 10:35 PM
Kahuna, even if some of them refused, BB should at least try. I bet they didn't approach all former winners in the first place.
billy123
02-09-2010, 10:37 PM
Damn armchair producers on the internet think they know everything when in reality they have no idea what is involved.
Hunx1985
02-09-2010, 10:48 PM
bobnot, actually, BB is being axed now, so are the producers doing a great job? no.

Have they revamped the show, i.e. replaced evictions with punishements? no.

Have they ensured entertaining HMs actually STAY (i.e. McCririck) instead of falling foul of the stupid morons who vote? no.

Perhaps if they would have listened to guys like me (who actually emailed numerous ideas many years ago) then BB would have been saved.

Sounds like YOU know nothing :joker: