The Apprentice - Should Alan have let the girls get away with using there sexuality ?

[Red Moon]

So the 1st show is over and my question is:

Should Alan have let the girls get away with using there sexuality to get the products for nothing?

[~Kizwiz~]

Nope..... not at all. One of them should have been fired!

[Pipergun]

Not meaning any offence to women as a whole, but it's quite unfair on the men who aren't able to do the same. :nono:

Did you see the emotionally unstable woman, named Jo I think? She nearly cried when saying women were typecast, and jumped slightly madly when they won! :rolleyes::hugesmile:

I can already see that Syed will get on my nerves! :joker:

As ever though, Sir Alan made the right decision Imo. :thumbs:

[James]

Earning £1100 from £41 seems a bit extreme, and not sustainable from a long-term point of view, but I guess Sir Alan's compromise was fair.

Jo looks to be a total nutter, almost unstable. I can't see her being hired, or even lasting that long.

And Syed's suggestion for the team name... The A Team! :hugesmile:

[Mark]

I agree with piper, that the boys weren't really able to duplicate what the girls were doing. It didn't really seem fair, but the main task objective was to make the most money and the girls did achieve that.

I thought it was pretty funny when Ben nominated Sayid, it was so obvious it was for personal reasons and not reflective in his work done for the task. From what we were shown it seemed Ben was trying to be a good manager, but all his objectives were being interuppted by Sayid and everyone wanting to do their own thing.

Should be a great series.

- Mark

ps. I think A-Team would have been an awesome name :spin: