PDA

View Full Version : Gillian McKeith the truth about gillian mc keefe


Jamietwo
14-11-2010, 09:59 PM
She is a neurotic old quack with an eating disorder who was stripped of her fake american doctorate and earns a living projecting her eating disorders onto the gullible, oh and she sniffs poo.

bring on the humiliation:hugesmile:

Tom
14-11-2010, 10:01 PM
didn't she buy her PHD off the internet?

Fetch The Bolt Cutters
14-11-2010, 10:18 PM
jamie i love you but i will have to disagree :nono:

Pyramid*
14-11-2010, 10:54 PM
She is a neurotic old quack with an eating disorder who was stripped of her fake american doctorate and earns a living projecting her eating disorders onto the gullible, oh and she sniffs poo.

bring on the humiliation:hugesmile:


Yes you are correct. It was found that she effectively lied about her qualifications:

extract from the less than brilliant Wiki, but the info in it is correct:

The British Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/wiki/Medicines_and_Healthcare_Products_Regulatory_Agenc y) (MHRA) has found McKeith guilty of "selling goods without legal authorisation whilst making medicinal claims about their efficacy". In an article entitled "A menace to science", Dr Ben Goldacre (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/wiki/Ben_Goldacre) criticised McKeith for using a number of legal threats to silence critics of her work.[3] (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/#cite_note-GoldacreFeb12-2) His book Bad Science (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/wiki/Bad_Science_(book)) dedicates a chapter to a detailed rebuttal of McKeith's scientific credibility.[4] (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/#cite_note-GoldacreChapter2008-3)
Health professionals have criticised her nutritional advice and questioned the validity of her qualifications, specifically her PhD.[5] (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/#cite_note-observer-4) Another issue was "informally resolved" in 2007 by the ASA following a complaint that her use of the title 'Doctor' was misleading because her PhD was from a college not accredited by "any recognised educational authority".[6] (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/#cite_note-Gibson-5) She then agreed to stop using the title 'Doctor' on her products, claiming she understood the complaint to be about one leaflet's failure to note her PhD "without the usual disclaimer she was not a medical doctor".[7] (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/#cite_note-ASA1-6)

The woman is a nutcase - and a fraudster.

Jamietwo
15-11-2010, 01:08 AM
Yes you are correct. It was found that she effectively lied about her qualifications:

extract from the less than brilliant Wiki, but the info in it is correct:

The British Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/wiki/Medicines_and_Healthcare_Products_Regulatory_Agenc y) (MHRA) has found McKeith guilty of "selling goods without legal authorisation whilst making medicinal claims about their efficacy". In an article entitled "A menace to science", Dr Ben Goldacre (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/wiki/Ben_Goldacre) criticised McKeith for using a number of legal threats to silence critics of her work.[3] (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/#cite_note-GoldacreFeb12-2) His book Bad Science (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/wiki/Bad_Science_(book)) dedicates a chapter to a detailed rebuttal of McKeith's scientific credibility.[4] (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/#cite_note-GoldacreChapter2008-3)
Health professionals have criticised her nutritional advice and questioned the validity of her qualifications, specifically her PhD.[5] (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/#cite_note-observer-4) Another issue was "informally resolved" in 2007 by the ASA following a complaint that her use of the title 'Doctor' was misleading because her PhD was from a college not accredited by "any recognised educational authority".[6] (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/#cite_note-Gibson-5) She then agreed to stop using the title 'Doctor' on her products, claiming she understood the complaint to be about one leaflet's failure to note her PhD "without the usual disclaimer she was not a medical doctor".[7] (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/#cite_note-ASA1-6)

The woman is a nutcase - and a fraudster.

THANK YOU :p

Jamietwo
15-11-2010, 01:09 AM
jamie i love you but i will have to disagree :nono:

It is fine to disagree from time to time Simon, what kind of relationship would we be in if we agreed to everything! Anyway agree or not, I love you unconditionally. xxx

Jamietwo
15-11-2010, 01:12 AM
didn't she buy her PHD off the internet?

yes i believe so...from what i have seen of her so far, she seems to have some sort of eating disorder which is no crime, but not exactly the best person to offer advice on diet.

orthorexia nervosa

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/aug/16/orthorexia-mental-health-eating-disorder

Jackie
15-11-2010, 08:30 AM
Anyway what the hell is she doing in the jungle shes afraid of spiders and bugs she said she had a phobia of spiders..................well what are you doing in the jungle than lol.