View Full Version : Stop kate middleton!
Fetch The Bolt Cutters
16-11-2010, 01:45 PM
NOWWWWW
iPusqdNvrS8
arista
16-11-2010, 01:58 PM
Yes The news is Stuck in a loop.
Great Digital Animation on that youTube Clip.
I will have to put CNN, France 24, Russia RT and
Fox News on.
I agree because I want to marry Kate Middleton
I can't wait until shes Queen, every other country is going to be jealous
Fetch The Bolt Cutters
16-11-2010, 02:13 PM
i want to marry harry
I agree because I want to marry Kate Middleton
I can't wait until shes Queen, every other country is going to be jealous
Except she'll probably be about 50 when William takes the throne :laugh:
arista
16-11-2010, 04:53 PM
There is now a Debate
about who pays for there Wedding.
The Public Should not pay for it.
arista
16-11-2010, 05:05 PM
Bloody Bollocks
Even Titchmarsh ITV1 has gone Live to the future Poxy Couple.
arista
16-11-2010, 05:06 PM
Paul Burrell
is Live on Fox USA News.
Fetch The Bolt Cutters
16-11-2010, 05:07 PM
arista ily
arista
16-11-2010, 05:09 PM
7TuBkkwDPx8&NR=1
They need to show this Worldwide
much better
Except she'll probably be about 50 when William takes the throne :laugh:
The Queen needs to get ordering her coffin and there are rumours that Charles doesn't want to be king anyway. Queen Camilla would be repulsive too, I hope that doesn't happen
Fetch The Bolt Cutters
16-11-2010, 05:13 PM
i saw this programme once where theres like this rumour that the royal family are lizards or something it wasnt a film it was a documentary
Niamh.
16-11-2010, 05:21 PM
I agree because I want to marry Kate Middleton
I can't wait until shes Queen, every other country is going to be jealous
is that a serious comment or are you taking the piss?:laugh2:
The Queen needs to get ordering her coffin and there are rumours that Charles doesn't want to be king anyway. Queen Camilla would be repulsive too, I hope that doesn't happen
I reckon she's got a few years left yet and then Charles should have 10-15 years or so. Haven't heard that rumour about him not wanting to be King before, always thought he couldnt wait, although I probably think that thanks to Mock the Week
i saw this programme once where theres like this rumour that the royal family are lizards or something it wasnt a film it was a documentary
Yeah, David Icke's theory (think he's the one), he thinks that loads of the worlds leaders are lizards, or part-lizard, it's scary how many people believe him
is that a serious comment or are you taking the piss?:laugh2:
the whole thing is a joke (not just the wedding coverage but the monarchy as a whole)
but Kate is fit
arista
16-11-2010, 06:22 PM
the whole thing is a joke (not just the wedding coverage but the monarchy as a whole)
but Kate is fit
yes Kate is fit
and now on the Terror Hit list with Evil Blair.
Sticks
16-11-2010, 06:24 PM
Why have they not sent Miss Middleton packing? :mad:
She is a commoner and therefore unsuitable for the prince.
They have tried bringing in commoners before and it has been an utter disaster.
Kate should be given the boot and Prince William instructed to marry a royal from one of the European royal families.
Prince William is a royal, and as such he has no right to marry for love, but must marry a fellow royal out of duty
Harry!
16-11-2010, 06:24 PM
Headcases :love:
arista
16-11-2010, 06:36 PM
Why have they not sent Miss Middleton packing? :mad:
She is a commoner and therefore unsuitable for the prince.
They have tried bringing in commoners before and it has been an utter disaster.
Kate should be given the boot and Prince William instructed to marry a royal from one of the European royal families.
Prince William is a royal, and as such he has no right to marry for love, but must marry a fellow royal out of duty
For sure
but she is Easy in bed
arista
16-11-2010, 06:37 PM
Headcases :love:
Yes ITV
need to bring it back.
Ithinkiloveyoutoo
16-11-2010, 07:07 PM
Bless her she already looks unstable and uncomfortable in the limelight. Girl you better be ready for this rough ride!! Your lordship, guard her well!!!
She reminds me of someone off dynasty 1980
Livia
16-11-2010, 07:53 PM
Except she'll probably be about 50 when William takes the throne :laugh:
So will you.
Fetch The Bolt Cutters
16-11-2010, 07:54 PM
So will you.
you'll be 100
Tom4784
16-11-2010, 07:56 PM
Why have they not sent Miss Middleton packing? :mad:
She is a commoner and therefore unsuitable for the prince.
They have tried bringing in commoners before and it has been an utter disaster.
Kate should be given the boot and Prince William instructed to marry a royal from one of the European royal families.
Prince William is a royal, and as such he has no right to marry for love, but must marry a fellow royal out of duty
I think that attitude went out with the plague :laugh:. The Royal Family are a tourist trap nowadays, They've got no power and marrying for diplomatic reasons wouldn't affect anyone. Most sovereign families matter very little in today's world.
So will you.
I'd be surprised if Charles lives till he's 95. And if he did then she'd be 60 or so
Malza
16-11-2010, 08:11 PM
I couldn't care less about that wedding
Why have they not sent Miss Middleton packing? :mad:
She is a commoner and therefore unsuitable for the prince.
They have tried bringing in commoners before and it has been an utter disaster.
Kate should be given the boot and Prince William instructed to marry a royal from one of the European royal families.
Prince William is a royal, and as such he has no right to marry for love, but must marry a fellow royal out of duty
Shes hardly a commoner, shes still from an upper class family, its not like this is Kerry Katona we're on about.
Sticks
16-11-2010, 11:04 PM
Shes hardly a commoner, shes still from an upper class family, its not like this is Kerry Katona we're on about.
She is not from a "Royal" family and so is classed as a commoner.
The track record has been that commoners are utter disasters for the monarchy, so why has nobody in the royal circle put a stop to this?
Harry!
16-11-2010, 11:09 PM
The last time we had a ''commoner'' marry a British king we almost could of been taken over by Nazi Germany and all be German today :shocked:
Patrick
16-11-2010, 11:11 PM
Thought this was the Dolmino advert.
*Leaves upset*
letmein
17-11-2010, 04:51 AM
I agree because I want to marry Kate Middleton
I can't wait until shes Queen, every other country is going to be jealous
Not America. They don't do monarchies. In fact, many countries are Republics, and for good reason. The monarchy should have been abolished a long time ago! ****ing inbred, Nazi lot!
letmein
17-11-2010, 04:52 AM
The last time we had a ''commoner'' marry a British king we almost could of been taken over by Nazi Germany and all be German today :shocked:
What ethnicity do you think the current Royals house? Swedes?
Kerry
17-11-2010, 04:56 AM
Oh shut up whinging. You'll all get a day off. All bloody Brits care about these days
Angus
17-11-2010, 07:46 AM
There is now a Debate
about who pays for there Wedding.
The Public Should not pay for it.
Yes we should - it will be more than repaid in terms of hugely increased tourism and sale of souvenirs and artefacts which will boost our economy.
Furthermore, we need a national celebration to look forward to in these times of doom and gloom.
It's odd that the rest of the world is so fascinated and enthralled with our Royal Family whilst here we have the curmudgeonly anti-monarchists in our midst who don't recognise a good thing when they see it.
The Royal Family provide us with a link throughout history to the earliest inhabitants of this island, they give us a sense of continuity and cohesion as a nation, especially in hard times; they keep our traditions and ceremonies alive and they work tirelessly as ambassadors for this country.
I note New Labour themselves were not averse to availing themselves of knighthoods and seats in the House of Lords.
Angus
17-11-2010, 07:49 AM
The last time we had a ''commoner'' marry a British king we almost could of been taken over by Nazi Germany and all be German today :shocked:
The Royal Family are of German descent:rolleyes: Does anyone on here know their history at all? In fact most of European Royalty is related, since that is how alliances were forged at one time, by marrying between themselves.
Angus
17-11-2010, 07:55 AM
Not America. They don't do monarchies. In fact, many countries are Republics, and for good reason. The monarchy should have been abolished a long time ago! ****ing inbred, Nazi lot!
America doesn't "do monarchies" because the population is comprised of immigrants from all over the world, who all arrived in a fairly short 200 year time span. Strangely enough its the Americans, in particular, who are dizzy with excitement and anticipation for the royal wedding next year, and will be coming here in droves to spend their money and boost our economy - so much for them not giving a toss - in fact they are envious of our shared history, tradition and ceremonies.
That is why the abolitionists will not succeed. Ask the "anti-monarchist" New Labour lot, many of them still happily squatting in the House of Lords, who distributed honours left right and centre in return for favours.
Angus
17-11-2010, 07:58 AM
She is not from a "Royal" family and so is classed as a commoner.
The track record has been that commoners are utter disasters for the monarchy, so why has nobody in the royal circle put a stop to this?
Perhaps because they HAVE learnt from the mistakes of before - Prince Charles did not love Diana - it was a marriage of convenience, whereas William and Kate have known each other for almost a decade and have waited a long time to be sure of their feelings before making the commitment - it is a love match.
Angus
17-11-2010, 08:01 AM
I couldn't care less about that wedding
I'm sure Will and Kate will be devastated to hear of your indifference:bored::laugh2:
arista
17-11-2010, 09:45 AM
"It's odd that the rest of the world is so fascinated and enthralled with our Royal Family whilst here we have the curmudgeonly anti-monarchists in our midst who don't recognise a good thing when they see it."
Yes the Yanks Love the images
as they do not have Royal.
Niamh.
17-11-2010, 01:34 PM
the whole thing is a joke (not just the wedding coverage but the monarchy as a whole)
but Kate is fit
they were on the news last night and my hubby thought she was rotten and that Will could have done better:joker: I think she's very pretty though
Niamh.
17-11-2010, 01:35 PM
"It's odd that the rest of the world is so fascinated and enthralled with our Royal Family whilst here we have the curmudgeonly anti-monarchists in our midst who don't recognise a good thing when they see it."
Yes the Yanks Love the images
as they do not have Royal.
Fascinated and enthralled??:joker: eh not in Ireland anyway!
Sticks
17-11-2010, 04:12 PM
Perhaps because they HAVE learnt from the mistakes of before - Prince Charles did not love Diana - it was a marriage of convenience, whereas William and Kate have known each other for almost a decade and have waited a long time to be sure of their feelings before making the commitment - it is a love match.
Andrew and Sarah?
Anne and Captain Mark Philips?
Edward and Mrs Simpson?
His Royal Highness Prince William is of royal blood, and as a Royal there are certain obligations.
Love matches have never been part of our monarchy, and if there was any love, it was incidental. Marriages amongst Royals are for political reasons only. Their position of royalty dictates that.
Harry!
17-11-2010, 04:19 PM
The Royal Family are of German descent:rolleyes: Does anyone on here know their history at all? In fact most of European Royalty is related, since that is how alliances were forged at one time, by marrying between themselves.
I am talking about Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson here....
She is not from a "Royal" family and so is classed as a commoner.
The track record has been that commoners are utter disasters for the monarchy, so why has nobody in the royal circle put a stop to this?
I grasp that, but shes still distinctly upper class and they're clearly a good match. Like it or not, these are just people too so deserve the same social rights as everyone. What would you have done if Prince Harry and TV presenter Caroline Flack ever came to be more than what they were?
What has gone before doesn't necessarily impact what will happen in the future and clearly the public have taken very well to Kate and the fact she will probably be our future Queen.
On the subject of what Kate looks like, shes like some weird kind of hybrid of Frankie from the Saturdays, Imogen from BB7 and even Mary from Corrie
The Royal Family are of German descent:rolleyes: Does anyone on here know their history at all? In fact most of European Royalty is related, since that is how alliances were forged at one time, by marrying between themselves.
Yeah it's fascinating really, just look at WWI. King George V, Tsar Nicholas II & Kaiser Wilhelm II; all cousins, and leading the 3 biggest powers in Europe into one of the deadliest wars of all time
Angus
17-11-2010, 04:34 PM
Andrew and Sarah?
Anne and Captain Mark Philips?
Edward and Mrs Simpson?
His Royal Highness Prince William is of royal blood, and as a Royal there are certain obligations.
Love matches have never been part of our monarchy, and if there was any love, it was incidental. Marriages amongst Royals are for political reasons only. Their position of royalty dictates that.
But that is precisely why it has moved on and adapted to modern times - it's called self preservation - if the monarchy wants to survive they have to be able to progress and adapt as they have done throughout the ages. After all the Monarch once had absolute sovereignty and control over the country but now is a mere figurehead. These are different times and the legacy of Princess Diana is that the Royal Family is far more accessible and less constrained by rigid protocols.
But that is precisely why it has moved on and adapted to modern times - it's called self preservation - if the monarchy wants to survive they have to be able to progress and adapt as they have done throughout the ages. After all the Monarch once had absolute sovereignty and control over the country but now is a mere figurehead. These are different times and the legacy of Princess Diana is that the Royal Family is far more accessible and less constrained by rigid protocols.
also just to add to that, the royal family have come under intense scrutiny in recent years and people are calling for abolition but this move reconnects the royal family with the public and somewhat blurs the boundary
Angus
18-11-2010, 07:34 AM
I couldn't care less about that wedding
You cared enough to come on a thread to tell us you couldn't care less:laugh2:
Ithinkiloveyoutoo
21-11-2010, 05:14 PM
wow their story is like a novel. i didn't know william was such a playa:joker:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1331545/Kate-Middleton-The-making-middle-class-Princess-PART-1.html
". As she walked in, William did a double-take. They danced and drank into the early hours, and when Arabella said goodnight to the guests, the Prince quietly slipped out of the room to follow her."
gwan prince!
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.