PDA

View Full Version : PROOF


lampy88
30-04-2006, 11:33 AM
http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=twistedeye.jpg

http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=bb2006eye.jpg

http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=BB7EYEDESIGN.jpg

http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=bb7.jpg

Corkie
30-04-2006, 11:34 AM
The file no longer exists

Arneldo
30-04-2006, 11:36 AM
There diffrent.

telefan
30-04-2006, 12:03 PM
they are slightly different. The width of the swirls in lampy's eye are random whereas the width of the swirls in the other one are all the same.
Still dont like either of them to be honest i think the concept is boring and unoriginal and most importantly probably a "FAKE"!!!!:nono:

bbfan2007
30-04-2006, 12:07 PM
i think u could sue

telefan
30-04-2006, 12:14 PM
Originally posted by bbfan2007
i think u could sue

it's not the same logo, but even if it was lampy wudnt have a leg to stand on as he/she used the bb "eye" template originally designed by Daniel Eatock. So, lampy wud potentially hav a case against him/her if it was printed as he/she used a copyrighted logo.

lampy88
30-04-2006, 12:16 PM
Originally posted by telefan2006
Originally posted by bbfan2007
i think u could sue

it's not the same logo, but even if it was lampy wudnt have a leg to stand on as he/she used the bb "eye" template originally designed by Daniel Eatock. So, lampy would potentially hav a case against him/her if it was printed as he/she used a copyrighted logo.

how do they know i used the template though? i could have made it from scratch. an image only has to be slightly different for it to be 'automatically' copyright to the designer. therefore when i designed the 'twisted' logo copyright for that image was automatically mine

telefan
30-04-2006, 12:18 PM
Originally posted by lampy88
Originally posted by telefan2006
Originally posted by bbfan2007
i think u could sue

it's not the same logo, but even if it was lampy wudnt have a leg to stand on as he/she used the bb "eye" template originally designed by Daniel Eatock. So, lampy would potentially hav a case against him/her if it was printed as he/she used a copyrighted logo.

how do they know i used the template though? i could have made it from scratch. an image only has to be slightly different for it to be 'automatically' copyright to the designer. therefore when i designed the 'twisted' logo copyright for that image was automatically mine

maybe so, but we all know u didnt make that from scratch!!:nono:

lampy88
30-04-2006, 12:19 PM
how do you know for sure. i am however very very flattered that you all prefered my 'cutting' logo to the real thing.

Corkie
30-04-2006, 12:22 PM
they are differnt lampy

telefan
30-04-2006, 12:24 PM
"cutting" logo was excellent, i hav to hand it to u, the reason i believed it to be real was that there wud have been so much to work with in regards of the advertising campaign, as i think i proved in some of my ads i made with that logo.
I have am a big fan of the bb designs and ad campaigns and to hav fooled me was an achievment in itself.
What did u have in mind when creating the "cutting" logo.

lampy88
30-04-2006, 12:25 PM
Originally posted by corkie
they are differnt lampy

yes they are. but the basic idea of the swirls is mine.

Arneldo
30-04-2006, 01:36 PM
There diffrent.
To diffrent. Just because it has bloddy swirls.

I made an eye that was like BB5 befor it came out that dosent mean it was my idea.

Plus - That might not be the Ful Logo. I think that logo might be a screencap of the Ad tat is hopefully goin to air tomorrow. And mybe the coulrs n the shape are a bit off. Remember wen Daily Star printed the BB5 - They took it exclusivly from the teaser and it look our of coulor and misshapen.

chesfan
30-04-2006, 03:51 PM
Originally posted by lampy88
http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=twistedeye.jpg

http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=bb2006eye.jpg

http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=BB7EYEDESIGN.jpg

http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=bb7.jpg

Are you the same Lampy that got banned from Digital spy forum for posting these?

Razmataz
30-04-2006, 04:02 PM
Originally posted by chesfan
Originally posted by lampy88
http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=twistedeye.jpg

http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=bb2006eye.jpg

http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=BB7EYEDESIGN.jpg

http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f388/LampyLiz/?action=view&current=bb7.jpg

Are you the same Lampy that got banned from Digital spy forum for posting these?

to be honest all them eyes are quite rubbish!

James
30-04-2006, 04:05 PM
Proof of what? There's hardly a resemblance.

chesfan
30-04-2006, 04:06 PM
My son could have made a better eye with his own eyes shut!:bouncy:

MarkWaldorf
30-04-2006, 04:07 PM
O, I remember TBazy attempt a better one!

Rory
30-04-2006, 04:48 PM
what program do you use, lampy?

Michael
01-05-2006, 12:59 PM
what the hell is that? theyre the worst eyes ever