Bad Artwork is in this year

[Smithy]

First Rihanna, then Britney, GaGa and now...

http://cdn.idolator.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Katy-Perry-Last-Friday-Night-TGIF-Remixes-artwork.jpg

Katy Perry

[Niall]

Rihanna never had bad artwork! :nono:

[Ninastar]

oh. my. god.

[Patrick]

Will never get a boner over Katy Perry again. :bored:

[Callum]

That's horrible. :yuk:

I don't think Britney's is that bad though, when you look at the other artwork for singles/albums this year, it's just not a particuarly good shot of her and her hair looks greasy.

[Vicky.]

Lovely :laugh:

[Shaun]

at least it's not the album cover :nono:

[Smithy]

Rihanna never had bad artwork! :nono:

Well, she had incredibly boring/irrelevant artwork then

[Niall]

Well, she had incredibly boring/irrelevant artwork then

:bored:

[BB_Eye]

Looked around on Amazon for popular releases this year... found this.
http://musicdvd.next.co.uk/products/h/500/7/5/1/751378.jpg

[Stu]

All of Britney is greasy. She exudes the essence of grease. And not in the Olivia Newton John kind of way. More the John Travolta kind of way.

[Smithy]

:bored:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4c/Loud_-_Rihanna.jpg
^
Not Loud

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f0/California_King_Bed.jpg
^ Not on a bed

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bf/Rihanna_S%26M.jpg
^
Not sadomasochistic


Looked around on Amazon for popular releases this year... found this.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61fAzkpO5uL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

:laugh3:

[Niall]

All of Britney is greasy. She exudes the essence of grease. And not in the Olivia Newton John kind of way. More the John Travolta kind of way.

Ke$ha is much much much more greasy than Britney.

[Stu]

In a sexy way though. Britney looks like a soccer mom whose been reduced to slapping on a bit of paint and working the streets to feed her eight kids.

[Niall]

In a sexy way though. Britney looks like a soccer mom whose been reduced to slapping on a bit of paint and working the streets to feed her eight kids.

:joker::joker::joker::joker::joker:

[BB_Eye]

Jennifer Lopez teaches us the virtues of understatement.
http://blog.singersroom.com/celebs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Jennifer-Lopez-Love.jpg

[Callum]

In a sexy way though. Britney looks like a soccer mom whose been reduced to slapping on a bit of paint and working the streets to feed her eight kids.

Britney actually looks really good for her age, she's 30 in December but she doesn't look it. She looks nothing like a prostitute, there are much worse dressed celebs than her.

[Shaun]

Not Loud

^ Not on a bed

^
Not sadomasochistic

Revolver didn't have a gun, Hounds of Love had no dogs, (What's the Story) Morning Glory? didn't have an erection.

YOUR POINT? :nono:

[Smithy]

Revolver didn't have a gun, Hounds of Love had no dogs, (What's the Story) Morning Glory? didn't have an erection.

YOUR POINT? :nono:

I said released this year! :bored:
point out the fact LOUD was released last year and I will cut you

[Iceman]

Lous was released last year :laugh:

[Shaun]

:D

haven't seen many outstanding artworks this year to be fair. I liked the Strokes' and Radiohead's though.

[Smithy]

Lous was released last year :laugh:

clearly someone didn't read the white writing

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lkfbet4ZWj1qhzmz8.gif

[Stu]

Britney actually looks really good for her age, she's 30 in December but she doesn't look it. She looks nothing like a prostitute, there are much worse dressed celebs than her.
Remove the makeup and you get an incredibly ordinary looking white female American with undeniably trailer trash genetic features and eyes that have all the energy and lust of a wad of phlegm.

The male orgasm produces millions of sperm and I wouldn't waste a single one on her.

[Iceman]

Arctic Monkeys>>> ALL :( I wish.

[Iceman]

clearly someone didn't read the white writing

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lkfbet4ZWj1qhzmz8.gif

No i did it on purpose

[Marsh.]

Rihanna and Britney's isn't bad artwork because it aint artwork.

They get lazy nowadays, it's just an airbrushed close up with a fancy font.

[Marsh.]

Remove the makeup and you get an incredibly ordinary looking white female American with undeniably trailer trash genetic features and eyes that have all the energy and lust of a wad of phlegm.

The male orgasm produces millions of sperm and I wouldn't waste a single one on her.

But harsh, the girl is obviously still not mentally well. I wish she'd stop with the constant "comeback" performances and whatnot because she can't do it anymore. But obviously the circle of moneygrabbers is around her and won't let her go.

And that's the sad thing about Britney, for the last 4-5 years she's been like an animal thrown into performing in a circus and being made to do something she can't do.


Anyway, that's slightly off topic...

[BB_Eye]

http://mediaoutrage.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Jennifer-Hudson-cover.jpg

[BB_Eye]

Possible blandest, most cliche album cover of the year?
http://images.kerrang.com/content/ksite/other/the_blackout_hope_album_artwork.jpg

[Iceman]

Possible blandest, most cliche album cover of the year?
http://images.kerrang.com/content/ksite/other/the_blackout_hope_album_artwork.jpg

goes to Arctic Monkeys :laugh:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f9/Suckitandsee.jpg/600px-Suckitandsee.jpg

[Callum]

Remove the makeup and you get an incredibly ordinary looking white female American with undeniably trailer trash genetic features and eyes that have all the energy and lust of a wad of phlegm.

The male orgasm produces millions of sperm and I wouldn't waste a single one on her.

She doesn't look that bad without it.

http://www.wildaboutmakeup.com/images/celebrity-without-make-up-britney-spears.jpg

She may look ordinary without it but so would a whole load of other female popstars who use makeup. There are some, not to name and shame, but if you type in their name on Google plus "without makeup" on the end, the results are really shocking. She still looks good without it, she just feels more comfortable wearing it.

[Marsh.]

What's this about make-up?

ALL WOMEN would look drastically different without make-up. Good looking famous people are an illusion. It's all fake.

[BB_Eye]

LOL @ this
http://www.chartstats.com/images/artwork/42830.jpg

[Callum]

But harsh, the girl is obviously still not mentally well. I wish she'd stop with the constant "comeback" performances and whatnot because she can't do it anymore. But obviously the circle of moneygrabbers is around her and won't let her go.

And that's the sad thing about Britney, for the last 4-5 years she's been like an animal thrown into performing in a circus and being made to do something she can't do.


Anyway, that's slightly off topic...

She enjoys performing. It's what she wants to do. What evidence do you have to back up your claim that's she "obviously still not mentally well"?

She has a lot of input towards her career. She wouldn't still be doing it if she hated it, she likes making music. She doesn't need to do it, she's got loads of money and a stable family unit but she enjoys doing it.

[BB_Eye]

She enjoys performing. It's what she wants to do. What evidence do you have to back up your claim that's she "obviously still not mentally well"?I thought it was common knowledge she suffers from Bi-Polar Disorder.

[Stu]

She doesn't look that bad without it.

http://www.wildaboutmakeup.com/images/celebrity-without-make-up-britney-spears.jpg

She may look ordinary without it but so would a whole load of other female popstars who use makeup. There are some, not to name and shame, but if you type in their name on Google plus "without makeup" on the end, the results are really shocking. She still looks good without it, she just feels more comfortable wearing it.
Wow thanks for that. It never occured to me that other women also look different without makeup.

I'm just not attracted to the woman. Bottom line.

[Callum]

I thought it was common knowledge she suffers from Bi-Polar Disorder.

That was just rumours. Never confirmed

[Niall]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4c/Loud_-_Rihanna.jpg
^
Not Loud

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f0/California_King_Bed.jpg
^ Not on a bed

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bf/Rihanna_S%26M.jpg
^
Not sadomasochistic


1) The LOUD album cover (which was released in 2010) shows Rihanna with her then new bright red hair. The bright red hair is meant to be loud and in your face. So there.

2) For all we know she could actually be sitting on a bed there. Its just if there is a bed underneath Rihanna then its all covered up by the sheets she's sitting on.

3) Fair enough about the S&M cover but really, how many artists represent the song on their cover anymore? Look at Katy Perry's E.T cover art. It bears no reference to aliens at all yet thats what the song is all about.

http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af335/PhotoNiall/sdjbfkljbhsd.jpg

[Smithy]

1) The LOUD album cover (which was released in 2010) shows Rihanna with her then new bright red hair. The bright red hair is meant to be loud and in your face. So there.

2) For all we know she could actually be sitting on a bed there. Its just if there is a bed underneath Rihanna then its all covered up by the sheets she's sitting on.

3) Fair enough about the S&M cover but really, how many artists represent the song on their cover anymore? Look at Katy Perry's E.T cover art. It bears no reference to aliens at all yet thats what the song is all about.


It wasn't new though, OGITW was released ages before hand, everyone had already seen it :bored: She isn't on a bed, the full picture is in the album booklet. The song isn't about aliens it's about a foreign lover :tongue:

[Stu]

Wow this is the gayest argument ever.

[Niall]

It wasn't new though, OGITW was released ages before hand, everyone had already seen it :bored: She isn't on a bed, the full picture is in the album booklet. The song isn't about aliens it's about a foreign lover :tongue:

Well the first artwork quite clearly has a meaning which I have explained. Y'all are just splitting hairs kmt. :laugh:

And Katy doesn't look very foreign on the single's cover either. Hell even some of Gaga's single covers bear no connection to the song itself. Every artist does it. :/

[Niall]

Wow this is the gayest argument ever.

Well I am gay so thats my excuse. http://www.greendaycommunity.org/Forum/public/style_emoticons/Dark/hmph.png

[Marsh.]

She enjoys performing. It's what she wants to do. What evidence do you have to back up your claim that's she "obviously still not mentally well"?

She has a lot of input towards her career. She wouldn't still be doing it if she hated it, she likes making music. She doesn't need to do it, she's got loads of money and a stable family unit but she enjoys doing it.

1) She clearly still has issues. I'm not slagging her off saying this just that she obviously has problems. They realistically won't have vanished over night after her breakdown.

2) I didn't say she hated her career. But, when she went off the rails and shaved her head it was like a delayed teenage rebellion against the control freaks around her.

And she's lost the ability to dance too for some reason. Or she can't be arsed doing it. That's where I get the "performing monkey" analogy from. In that she's pushed in front of the lights and then starts doing something random.
Not that she's forced to do the career. lol

3) Of course half of Hollywood could retire comfortably. Where did I say she's piss poor? Of course the woman's loaded.

4) A lot of input into her career? Well, that's not surprising. The latest music mirrors the mental state. Just look at Hold it Against Me.

What evidence do you have to back up your claim that's she "obviously still not mentally well"?

http://lh4.ggpht.com/desmanthus/ReNHO6ppK4I/AAAAAAAAASQ/1t9kjR2LAFA/s800/satanbritney.jpg

[Callum]

1) She clearly still has issues. I'm not slagging her off saying this just that she obviously has problems. They realistically won't have vanished over night after her breakdown.

2) I didn't say she hated her career. But, when she went off the rails and shaved her head it was like a delayed teenage rebellion against the control freaks around her.

And she's lost the ability to dance too for some reason. Or she can't be arsed doing it. That's where I get the "performing monkey" analogy from. In that she's pushed in front of the lights and then starts doing something random.
Not that she's forced to do the career. lol

3) Of course half of Hollywood could retire comfortably. Where did I say she's piss poor? Of course the woman's loaded.

4) A lot of input into her career? Well, that's not surprising. The latest music mirrors the mental state. Just look at Hold it Against Me.



http://lh4.ggpht.com/desmanthus/ReNHO6ppK4I/AAAAAAAAASQ/1t9kjR2LAFA/s800/satanbritney.jpg

I know that they don't disappear overnight but Britney doesn't have bipolar disorder like someone suggested or any serious mental illness. It's just nasty rumours that the press create to try and make her look like a bad mother.

She had a knee operation in 2004 after she injured herself on the set of her Overprotected music video. Many say she hasn't danced like she used to in the BOMT/OOTP eras since then. It certainly knocked her confidence and she just isn't comfortable doing complex dance routines anymore which is fair enough. She's still a good dancer though.

You didn't and I never said you did but you said she's like a circus animal. She enjoys what she does, if she didn't she wouldn't do it and she'd still be secured financially.

[Jords]

What a tit :L

[Doogle]

I love this thread.