View Full Version : A live show dedicated to nominations?
_Seth
30-06-2011, 12:20 PM
I would love this. :love:
rk3388
30-06-2011, 12:34 PM
i dont know like i never thought there was a point to them :/
Jords
30-06-2011, 12:38 PM
Theyd have to do something special with them.. not nominating infront because some say pick them and also a lot of follow-suit. And the quick DR noms is boring now..
Twist with them - actually voting to save or something
OR
Each have a booth where they cant communicate and write them down and say 1-by-1
Just have them do it on live TV in front of one another. Every single week. It's absurdly simplistic and would be engrossing viewing every single week that would cause hatred, tension and conflict.
TheManWhoLaughs
30-06-2011, 12:54 PM
Twist with them - actually voting to save or something
OR
Each have a booth where they cant communicate and write them down and say 1-by-1
The first one would be disappointing as it would be extreme nomination-fiddling (even by BB8-11 standards!); the second would be a bit weak as you wouldn't get the ranting diary rooms that come with the best noms. Agree that it's a better solution than doing it face-to-face, as people will always just follow the bandwagon.
I'd rather they record them as usual but had a longer Diary Room Uncut style show to show them; it was awful in BB10 when we didn't even get to see some people's nominations at all.
Jords
30-06-2011, 01:00 PM
Doing live noms has to be quick so they wouldnt have time to do massive rants anyway, but agree thats the best part of them :joker:
Jords
30-06-2011, 01:03 PM
Oh was this a suggestion on a weekly basis?
I wouldnt like that, just the odd 1 or 2 times.
alexonthewall
30-06-2011, 03:50 PM
I'd say do a weakest link type nomination in front of each other where you write them down on a whiteboard and show. Cause if you just say them you will yet a lot of 'I'm voting them because they voted me!'
Jordan.
30-06-2011, 03:54 PM
No they don't need to be live + they'd hold back and be very aware of what they're saying if they knew it was going out live.
They should put uncut nominations on the website.
Beastie
30-06-2011, 03:55 PM
Just have them do it on live TV in front of one another. Every single week. It's absurdly simplistic and would be engrossing viewing every single week that would cause hatred, tension and conflict.
I like your style mofo.
However I agree with Jords in that.. if they do face to face noms. The first person will nominate. It will probably be done in alphabetical order and then most people will nominate for the ones who were nominated from the first few people.
CharlieO
30-06-2011, 03:57 PM
No they don't need to be live + they'd hold back and be very aware of what they're saying if they knew it was going out live.
They should put uncut nominations on the website.
This.
joeysteele
30-06-2011, 04:06 PM
I don't like the idea of nominating in front of each other, you get a false view of the nominations then,also that daft buckets of rubbish nominations that was done last year was really awful.
Beastie
30-06-2011, 04:13 PM
I don't like the idea of nominating in front of each other, you get a false view of the nominations then,also that daft buckets of rubbish nominations that was done last year was really awful.
I agree. Josie and John James were the only ones who didn't get gunge on them when it was done like this!! But housemates were happy to nominate them in the DR. Bunch of cowards. They thought John James and Josie were popular on the outside but they really were not! BB11 was full of weak characters.
Jords
30-06-2011, 04:22 PM
No they don't need to be live + they'd hold back and be very aware of what they're saying if they knew it was going out live.
They should put uncut nominations on the website.
-likes this idea-
joeysteele
30-06-2011, 04:27 PM
I agree. Josie and John James were the only ones who didn't get gunge on them when it was done like this!! But housemates were happy to nominate them in the DR. Bunch of cowards. They thought John James and Josie were popular on the outside but they really were not! BB11 was full of weak characters.
You are absolutely right, so many had been moaning at JJames and Josie but left them totally clear as you say in that exercise.
georgehudson
30-06-2011, 07:47 PM
No... The live show is special for evictions and on a friday, if we chuck in another weekly live show then the prospect of it being live won't be as exciting. Just keep nominations in a normal episode and evictions in a live show.
georgehudson
30-06-2011, 07:48 PM
They thought John James and Josie were popular on the outside but they really were not!
Hahahaha!!!!!! :joker::joker::joker:
Erm, excuse me... Josie won the series if you have forgotten? :laugh3::laugh3::laugh3:
And against such massive fan favourites, too.
Beastie
30-06-2011, 11:04 PM
Hahahaha!!!!!! :joker::joker::joker:
Erm, excuse me... Josie won the series if you have forgotten? :laugh3::laugh3::laugh3:
Well it wasn't exactly hard to beat Dave, Mario, JJ and Andrew was it?
If they didn't have that stupid free pass thing. Then her highest position would have been 4th place. Corin and Sam would have beat her if they got to the final. Plus John James.. who I detested!
BBDodge
01-07-2011, 09:32 AM
Well it wasn't exactly hard to beat Dave, Mario, JJ and Andrew was it?
If they didn't have that stupid free pass thing. Then her highest position would have been 4th place. Corin and Sam would have beat her if they got to the final. Plus John James.. who I detested!
Corin never had the support Josie had. Sam vs Josie would have been much more exciting than the final we got, if John James was in the mix too then the JJJ vote would have split and Sam won.
BBDodge
01-07-2011, 09:34 AM
Leave the noms as they are but make sure we have uninterrupted live feed.
Then we can have the fun of nomcam.
_Seth
01-07-2011, 01:48 PM
^We never see the diary room in live feed.
Lostie!
01-07-2011, 03:47 PM
I'd love Australian-style nominations. Live, time limit, 2 points, 1 point, and valid reasons. Big Brother would give 1 nomination point to the housemate if they failed to give real reasons in the allocated time.
Australian Big Brother was actually a bit of a psycho in the Diary Room :D
bbfan1991
01-07-2011, 03:55 PM
Well it wasn't exactly hard to beat Dave, Mario, JJ and Andrew was it?
If they didn't have that stupid free pass thing. Then her highest position would have been 4th place. Corin and Sam would have beat her if they got to the final. Plus John James.. who I detested!
People forgot that the housemates were going to give it to Steve until Sam brought up Josie's name and convinced them to go for her;).
I agree it would have been more exciting if Josie didn't get it but the housemates made their choice and she would have been out with John James, Corin and Sam in the quadruple leaving a dull final whichever way. The producers were to blame for this not the housemates!
Back on topic nah I prefer the orginial format of DR nominations but the odd twist here and there is exciting. Vote to save should be in place!
_Seth
01-07-2011, 04:15 PM
I'd love Australian-style nominations. Live, time limit, 2 points, 1 point, and valid reasons. Big Brother would give 1 nomination point to the housemate if they failed to give real reasons in the allocated time.
Australian Big Brother was actually a bit of a psycho in the Diary Room :D
Absolutely. :thumbs:
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.