Thoughts on veto show

[starry]

It does seem a bit strange someone winning a veto task and not being automatically saved, and then someone else (the HoH) getting the right again to pick who gets nominated.

Does the HoH always get to take part in the veto competition as well? And what is the deal with the HoH and the next HoH competition, are they always excluded from it?

A couple of silly points from Jordan on the show: Her surprise it wasn't Jeff and Brendan who were put up initially, but why would Daniele want to upset both couples. And then Jordan telling Brendan that he and Rachel together would destroy the house, you don't say that to your ally lol.

Then Daniele says nobody would vote floaters out, but then saying Jordan isn't a threat. Jordan is sailing through this right now.

[Bluerang1]

Makes HoH look bad for the next week to the one who saves the eviction. Also, Jordan is sailing through, they should open their eyes.

[lostalex]

It would be interesting if a Noob won hoH next week. no Noobs have won yet, but i suspect they are throwing it.

[lostalex]

It's not strange for the HoH to have so much power, they are the HoH they are meant to CONTROL the house. Big Brother's concept is about dictatorship just like the george orwell novel 1984. So it makes sense.

[starry]

It would be interesting if a Noob won hoH next week. no Noobs have won yet, but i suspect they are throwing it.

Winning a HoH meaning you have to nominate someone publicly, and if someone wins the veto you have to do it again. So not good for floaters or potentially getting far in the game unless you have a strong alliance behind you.

[reece(:]

you have to think about end game as well, people who don't win competitions may not fare well in the final with the jury vote

[starry]

True but you have to get to the end first, and it's only the final 2 isn't it where the jury vote occurs?