The Picture of Amy Childs over her bed

[Deep2]

What does it seriously say about a person's character if they have a picture of themselves, in a glamorous pose (ie unnatural)?

[Ryan.]

Nothing.

[Wildcat!]

Is that a surprise??
I mean, what is this girl famous for again??

[little.lilly]

get over it.

[armand.kay]

lol its a photo from the task she dint bring it in with her ! lol i have photos of my self in my house it does not mean annything

[chuff me dizzy]

Up her own arse !!

[Deep2]

You think it means nothing for someone to put a picture oh herself above where she sleeps? And as for the 'get over it' comment - is that the level of intelligence here? I just find it baffling. I clearly despise the girl and all she stands for, but am interested to know what people feel this shows of her character. Psychologically it is a strange thing to do.

[Marc]

She's hot

[Deep2]

lol its a photo from the task she dint bring it in with her ! lol i have photos of my self in my house it does not mean annything

You have a false picture of yourself posing OVER your bed? Ok....

Also it is ridiculous to compare photos of yourself (in your own abode) to being on TV and puting the picture of yourself for launch above your bed. Of course it means something. I'll let you fill in the gaps though. I can't be bothered to state the obvious.

[Deep2]

She's hot

Uuum, yes....so her being 'hot' (real intelligence there) is answering my original question how? Try going a bit further than skin deep (even though on a surface level she looks like Katie Price and has the same harsh, false features. Vaguely provocative, but purely from a sexual sense, not a good looking sense).

[The_Big_Send_Off]

nothing. leave her alone!

[Marc]

Uuum, yes....so her being 'hot' (real intelligence there) is answering my original question how? Try going a bit further than skin deep (even though on a surface level she looks like Katie Price and has the same harsh, false features. Vaguely provocative, but purely from a sexual sense, not a good looking sense).

Thanks :D

[cell]

If you live in a house with about 10 other people you just met and have just selected you beds, putting a photo of yourself at your bed is one way to claim a corner of "ownership" in a environment where nothing really gets to be yours. Really says nothing about character to me. Lot's of people put name tags on their things if they know they will be in a communal setting, etc.

[arista]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/08/20/article-2028379-0D7CAF0E00000578-425_196x250.jpg

[kat26]

It was from the task. Who cares? It isn't like she brought in a trunk full of photos of herself and put them all over the place.

[Deep2]

Thanks :D

Someone who pretends (I do hope you're pretending) they haven't recognised sarcasm, yet is unable to argue a differing viewpoint to their own comes off looking rather foolish.

[Beso]

Didn't Rachel Rice have a photo of herself as well?

[Deep2]

If you live in a house with about 10 other people you just met and have just selected you beds, putting a photo of yourself at your bed is one way to claim a corner of "ownership" in a environment where nothing really gets to be yours. Really says nothing about character to me. Lot's of people put name tags on their things if they know they will be in a communal setting, etc.

Comment 1: How many times have I spoken to children in my class about use of apostrophe - lot's? Where does that come from?

Comment 2: Agreed it is a way of claiming ownership. But one has to ask the WAY in which she has claimed ownership. A picture of herself. Is that the best she could come up with. A name tag is hardly comparable to a picture. One is understandable, one is self absorbed, materialistic and shallow. Of course it says much about character. She is further demonstarting how looks are everything to her and she is happy to show herself to others visually. I have noted she has no personality, except for being a shallow product of her society. The placing of the picture psychologically demonstartes her lack of depth and any introverted side of her character.

As for the comment 'leave her alone'....surely that is what a forum is for. I haven't damned her to hell or degraded anyone else here. I merely claim she is a materialistic, shallow product of her times, and it is pitiful that such an odious person can make so much money and feed off the artificial land we live in.

[Deep2]

Didn't Rachel Rice have a photo of herself as well?

Maybe - but to claim she was as shallow and awful as Amy is dependent on many variables.

1) Did she have other pictures as well?
2) Was it a picture taken by big brother of her posing, or was it from home?
3) Was it as large as the one Amy has?

etc...the list goes on.

Perhaps most vitally, Rachel wasn't the brightest spark, but I don't think she was as blatantly shallow and self absorbed as Amy, hence a picture on the wall could mean many other things, based on her slightly more complex personality.

[armand.kay]

You have a false picture of yourself posing OVER your bed? Ok....

Also it is ridiculous to compare photos of yourself (in your own abode) to being on TV and puting the picture of yourself for launch above your bed. Of course it means something. I'll let you fill in the gaps though. I can't be bothered to state the obvious.

She may want to keep the picture as a souvenir or some thing lol it means nothing why is it whenever a housemate does something its fore a evil purpose and yes I have a picture of my self in my room but I aint vain, your reading to much into things :nono:

[Beso]

lol its a photo from the task she dint bring it in with her ! lol i have photos of my self in my house it does not mean annything

I was ready to have a go at her until Im read this.:blush:

[armand.kay]

Maybe - but to claim she was as shallow and awful as Amy is dependent on many variables.

1) Did she have other pictures as well?
2) Was it a picture taken by big brother of her posing, or was it from home?
3) Was it as large as the one Amy has?

etc...the list goes on.

Perhaps most vitally, Rachel wasn't the brightest spark, but I don't think she was as blatantly shallow and self absorbed as Amy, hence a picture on the wall could mean many other things, based on her slightly more complex personality.

Amys one was not even large

[bbfan1991]

Nothing wrong with it? In fact some previous housemates have kept their official BB picture by their bed.

[Beso]

Maybe - but to claim she was as shallow and awful as Amy is dependent on many variables.

1) Did she have other pictures as well?
2) Was it a picture taken by big brother of her posing, or was it from home?
3) Was it as large as the one Amy has?

etc...the list goes on.

Perhaps most vitally, Rachel wasn't the brightest spark, but I don't think she was as blatantly shallow and self absorbed as Amy, hence a picture on the wall could mean many other things, based on her slightly more complex personality.

Rachel Rice had the depth of her most fantabuloustest thing in whole whole wide world.The simple grape.

[Deep2]

She may want to keep the picture as a souvenir or some thing lol it means nothing why is it whenever a housemate does something its fore a evil purpose and yes I have a picture of my self in my room but I aint vain, your reading to much into things :nono:

1) When analysing others, it is rare to read too much into things. I am looking at Amy's character and making some logical deductions from that. I am not going into depth about her deeper (if there is one) personality, just making judgements as to her shallow character. And I suggest you read my posts more carefully as to why you having a picture over your bed is not along the same lines as Amy.

2) Also why the use of 'evil'. I suggest you improve your vocab. I take it you mean - negative purpose.

I can answer the question. Of course it is not always for a negative reason. But with a rather shallow character like Amy, who is almost the polar opposite of myself, I am going to pick up on some of the things that annoy me about her. That is what the show is about. But hardly evil.

[bbfan1991]

Rachel Rice had the depth of her most fantabuloustest thing in whole whole wide world.The simple grape.

The only thing that was interesting about her, apart from being a teacher and being engaged to Richard;):p.

[Deep2]

Amys one was not even large

That's a ridiculous comment. What do you then define as large. 10cm by 10cm or 14.75 by 14.75? Suffice to say it was large enough for me to take notice of it. Further, it is not the size that is really the issue, but her shallow nature in puting this up in the first place, rather than something more sentimental or meaningful. It tells us she has little to go on except her physical attributes (which aren't fantastic anyway).

[Deep2]

The only thing that was interesting about her, apart from being a teacher and being engaged to Richard;):p.

I'm not going to argue about Rachel's depth. Can't really remember her. More focused on Amy at the moment. One thing is for sure, she is as shallow as they come.

[tpau21]

Amy Childs to Win!! Shuttttt upppppp

[Beso]

That's a ridiculous comment. What do you then define as large. 10cm by 10cm or 14.75 by 14.75? Suffice to say it was large enough for me to take notice of it. Further, it is not the size that is really the issue, but her shallow nature in puting this up in the first place, rather than something more sentimental or meaningful. It tells us she has little to go on except her physical attributes (which aren't fantastic anyway).

How does it tell us Sir?

[armand.kay]

It was from the task. Who cares? It isn't like she brought in a trunk full of photos of herself and put them all over the place.

Lol that would be funny :joker:

[Deep2]

How does it tell us Sir?

As I would say if I was in the classroom, read the post again.

[Beso]

As I would say if I was in the classroom, read the post again.

Maybe she doesn't feel the need to have family photo's around her while she works, and I don't recall her mentioning a dog or gerbil.

[Zippy]

is that the level of intelligence here?

You ask this after starting this stupid pointless thread?

Maybe she just likes that picture. Really no need for deep psychological analysing. And it certainly doesn't make her a bad person.

[Deep2]

Amy Childs to Win!! Shuttttt upppppp

The intellect here is baffling me. What is the age of most people I am conversing with here. I really would like to know.

[Beso]

The intellect here is baffling me. What is the age of most people I am conversing with here. I really would like to know.

Old enough to have teachers younger than myslef.:blush:

[Deep2]

Maybe she doesn't feel the need to have family photo's around her while she works, and I don't recall her mentioning a dog or gerbil.

Photo's ....real good English there. I suggest you re-read again my comments on what is says about her character. One doesn't need to have dogs and gerbils on the wall. You seem to need one on punctuation! She could have one in 'depth of character'

[Deep2]

Old enough to have teachers younger than myslef.:blush:

Tell me. I must know. I'm 32. Honest truth.

[Beso]

Tell me. I must know. I'm 32. Honest truth.

41, mental age of 33.

[Deep2]

You ask this after starting this stupid pointless thread?

Maybe she just likes that picture. Really no need for deep psychological analysing. And it certainly doesn't make her a bad person.

1) I never said she was a bad person. I only claim she isn't a particularly good person. There is a difference.

2) Maybe she just likes that picture.....do you not understand there are deeper meanings behind things people do. What a ridiculous thing to say. Why do you think she likes the picture. That is what this thread was about.

3) No need for deep psychological analysing? Well, judging from the bimbo you have in your avatar, I'm sure psychological analysing isn't on the top of your priority list. But surely that is what the show was originally about?

4) The only reason you found the thread 'stupid' was because you didn't read into the subtleties I was referring to. Your call. I consider your avatar stupid and boring. But, hey, it takes all sorts to make the world go round.

Predicted age for you: 17

[Beso]

Photo's ....real good English there. I suggest you re-read again my comments on what is says about her character. One doesn't need to have dogs and gerbils on the wall. You seem to need one on punctuation! She could have one in 'depth of character'

Christ sake's, you're a ranty bugger are ye no.

[Marc]

Someone who pretends (I do hope you're pretending) they haven't recognised sarcasm, yet is unable to argue a differing viewpoint to their own comes off looking rather foolish.

Somebody who starts a thread and quotes everybody who disagree's with them with angry & annoyed comments is rather foolish too. This is a forum full of differing opinions; allow people to have them.

[Deep2]

Amy Childs to Win!! Shuttttt upppppp

Predicted age: 15

[Zippy]

OK this **** is officially on my last nerve.

[Deep2]

Somebody who starts a thread and quotes everybody who disagree's with them with angry & annoyed comments is rather foolish too. This is a forum full of differing opinions; allow people to have them.

1) Disagree's ???? PUNCTUATION

2) I have never said anything whereby I haven't allowed others to express their opinions. All are allowed, as long as they back them up intelligently. To say 'Amy to win shuttttt uppppp' is completely moronic.

3) I admit sometimes my comments can come across as emotional and somewhat angry. Foolish? I don't really think so.

Predicted age: 16 (your use of semi colon was good, but the apostrophe is sickeningly innaccurate.)

[Beso]

amy..gr8 or grating?

[armand.kay]

1) When analysing others, it is rare to read too much into things. I am looking at Amy's character and making some logical deductions from that. I am not going into depth about her deeper (if there is one) personality, just making judgements as to her shallow character. And I suggest you read my posts more carefully as to why you having a picture over your bed is not along the same lines as Amy.

2) Also why the use of 'evil'. I suggest you improve your vocab. I take it you mean - negative purpose.

I can answer the question. Of course it is not always for a negative reason. But with a rather shallow character like Amy, who is almost the polar opposite of myself, I am going to pick up on some of the things that annoy me about her. That is what the show is about. But hardly evil.

Look this is not a argument about my vocab and i cba to read your paragraph but the photo means nothing your wrong I'm right bye :xyxwave:

[Deep2]

OK this **** is officially on my last nerve.

Well well well. To admit you are getting wound up? Always a bad move in a debate. Once one admits to being emotionally beaten, there can be no argument. I suggest you think about how to develop yourself intellectually, rather than become so wound up. I must admit, I am chuckling with jubilated exultations as I type this. (look up dictionary meaning).

[Zippy]

you are so heading for a ban

just a prediction

[Deep2]

Look this is not a argument about my vocab and i cba to read your paragraph but the photo means nothing your wrong I'm right bye :xyxwave:

Yeah, YOU'RE right and I'm wrong. And to claim you 'can't be assed' (I assume) to read my paragraph just shows you up unfortunately.

Predicted age: 15

[Deep2]

you are so heading for a ban

just a prediction

1) I have been banned before. I'll live with it.

2) I am debating and maybe throwing a few comments around, but I don't think I have been offensive in any way. Maybe you see it differently. Fine.

I can hold my head high and say I have done nothing I am ashamed of, just expressing myself.

Ban me, baby!!

[Marc]

1) Disagree's ???? PUNCTUATION

2) I have never said anything whereby I haven't allowed others to express their opinions. All are allowed, as long as they back them up intelligently. To say 'Amy to win shuttttt uppppp' is completely moronic.

3) I admit sometimes my comments can come across as emotional and somewhat angry. Foolish? I don't really think so.

Predicted age: 16 (your use of semi colon was good, but the apostrophe is sickeningly innaccurate.)

Oh god. How rude can one person be? You've got far too much hatred in your system. And you're miles off with your guess of my age. Feel free to reply to this with more belittling and well structured comments. I welcome them

[bbfan1991]

Oh god. How rude can one person be? You've got far too much hatred in your system. And you're miles off with your guess of my age. Feel free to reply to this with more belittling and well structured comments. I welcome them

Hard work isn't it;):D.

[Deep2]

Oh god. How rude can one person be? You've got far too much hatred in your system. And you're miles off with your guess of my age. Feel free to reply to this with more belittling and well structured comments. I welcome them

To be honest, I did have much hatred in my sytem, but most of it is gone, since my life has come around. But every so often, I get very easily irritated by the likes of people such as Amy Childs, and the nations' blinding support of her.

I apologise if my comments towards you come across as belittling, it is only meant as light hearted banter.

Fine. Predicted age: 32, but with SEN.

[Deep2]

Hard work isn't it;):D.

Yeah, hard work being in front of a computer, finally having a more intelligent discussion, rather than 'yeah, she's hot' and 'Amy to win innit'.

[Beso]

Which is how it was taken in this corner of life.

[Zippy]

1)

I can hold my head high and say I have done nothing I am ashamed of, just expressing myself.


No, you really can't. You are rude and obnoxious to an alarming degree.

At your age you really should have learnt how to behave on a forum by now. Your communication skills suck doggy dick.

[armand.kay]

Yeah, YOU'RE right and I'm wrong. And to claim you 'can't be assed' (I assume) to read my paragraph just shows you up unfortunately.

Predicted age: 15

LOL I don't care :joker: and actually I'm 14 but you were close now like I said before bye :xyxwave:

[bbfan1991]

Yeah, hard work being in front of a computer, finally having a more intelligent discussion, rather than 'yeah, she's hot' and 'Amy to win innit'.

It wasn't directed at you, it was directed at Marc as in moderating the forum;).

[Marc]

To be honest, I did have much hatred in my sytem, but most of it is gone, since my life has come around. But every so often, I get very easily irritated by the likes of people such as Amy Childs, and the nations' blinding support of her.

I apologise if my comments towards you come across as belittling, it is only meant as light hearted banter.

Fine. Predicted age: 32, but with SEN.

Are you suggesting that I have special needs?

[Deep2]

No, you really can't. You are rude and obnoxious to an alarming degree.

At your age you really should have learnt how to behave on a forum by now. Your communication skills suck doggy dick.

You call me rude and obnoxious, but then write the most uneducated nonsense afterwards? But, yes, I will hold my head high, because I have been true to myself. And I'm sure you can hold your head high, as you have been true to yourself, talking about dogs and private parts, even is an analogy shows your level of class. IS that you in the avatar?

[Zippy]

Are you suggesting that I have special needs?

we all have special needs :evilgrin:

[Deep2]

Are you suggesting that I have special needs?

Are you asking a rhetorical question?

[bbfan1991]

Are you suggesting that I have special needs?

Time for lockdown Marc:).

[bbfan1991]

we all have special needs :evilgrin:

*Makes a wish* :evilgrin:

[Deep2]

we all have special needs :evilgrin:

No we don't. Only a small proportion of people do. Unless you are referring to it in a non educational context.

[Marc]

Are you asking a rhetorical question?

Well you're certainly asking your last question on this forum for a very long time.
Goodbye.

[Deep2]

I'll come back, I have another username

[Beso]

I would have kept them.

[Deep2]

Goodbye for now. Fans
SEN SEN SEN SEN SEN

[armand.kay]

Well you're certainly asking your last question on this forum for a very long time.
Goodbye.

Did you block him :amazed:

[Zippy]

Well you're certainly asking your last question on this forum for a very long time.
Goodbye.

bout time

I was just about to unleash my insult repertoire.

[Deep2]

Try spotting me. I'll be inconspicuous, then POW!

Marc's got SEN HAHAHA

[Marc]

I'll come back, I have another username

And we'll have your IP address ready to block :) :xyxwave:

[Deep2]

I'm still heeeereeee

[Beso]

bout time

I was just about to unleash my insult repertoire.

Oh well, there's a plus side on everything.

[Zippy]

I'll come back, I have another username

Im sure your obnoxiousness will shine through whatever username you sneak back with

[Marc]

Closing this thread. Considering the OP is now banned.