A gull in distress, but going into pond too risky for 25 firemen...

[bbfan1991]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/wildlife/9199530/A-gull-in-distress-but-going-into-pond-too-risky-for-25-firemen.html

All that resources were needed?:joker:

[Mystic Mock]

RSPCA to the rescue.

[Patrick]

Reggie is becoming the new Omah with all these news stories, only they aren't about ******ing Katie Price, Alex Reid or Kerry Katona. So all's good.

[Vicky.]

what a waste of resources...

While these 5 crews of firemen tried to save a ****ing seagull...someone could have been burning to death :bored:

[Marc]

What? Is that really needed?

[Marc]

I love these silly little stories :hugesmile:

[Mrluvaluva]

"they refused to enter the waist-deep water because of potential safety risks."

Does a burning building not have potential safety risks? Mind you, I would not have called the fire brigade out for a herring gull caught in a plastic bag.

25 firefighters as standard protocol to emergency water rescues is a bit ridiculous though.

[Jords]

oh dear oh hear