PDA

View Full Version : Politically speaking, what do you consider yourself to be?


Niall
05-05-2012, 09:25 PM
Like what kind of ideology/party would you align yourself with?

I pretty sure I'm a socialist or a market socialist. I can't really pick between the two.

I would add a poll, but there are so many political ideologies and groups that I'd miss out on so many. :laugh:

MTVN
05-05-2012, 09:31 PM
Umm left libertarian probably, I'm quite nihilistic with my politics really

arista
05-05-2012, 09:32 PM
Conservative - LibDem

Smithy
05-05-2012, 09:33 PM
Not bothered

arista
05-05-2012, 09:34 PM
Not bothered

Life Is Not That Simple

Novo
05-05-2012, 09:36 PM
Life Is Not That Simple

Well it is really when it comes to Politics

arista
05-05-2012, 09:37 PM
Well it is really when it comes to Politics


For You Sure.

Kizzy
05-05-2012, 09:37 PM
Why bother to post smithy if you have no opinion?.....
I am a liberal thinker and support the nurture of all back to work or training.

Novo
05-05-2012, 09:38 PM
And for Smithers as well

arista
05-05-2012, 09:39 PM
Why borther to post smithy if you have no opinion?.....
I am a liberal thinker and support the nurture of all back to work or training.


Yes
Wise Kizzy.

Novo
05-05-2012, 09:39 PM
Why borther to post smithy if you have no opinion?.....
I am a liberal thinker and support the nurture of all back to work or training.

His opinion is that he is not bothered..

Niall
05-05-2012, 09:40 PM
His opinion is that he is not bothered..

.

Shaun
05-05-2012, 09:42 PM
Difficult to define. Some kind of liberal. Not Lib-Dem or Labour. Or at least not in their current states. UK politics is too dominated by posturing and purchasing power.

I did vote conservative... but only because the only realistic choices in my home constituency were Lib Dem and Conservative. I voted green in the local election. I think the fact that there only appear to be three major parties is sad, since there's so many issues they all ignore. Perhaps I'm naive to believe that anything would change with the greens or other parties, but... meh.

joeysteele
05-05-2012, 09:43 PM
I would put myself at the centre of politics, I can see the worth in both left and right as to politics.

I am not into party machine politics,in the right circumstances I could see myself voting for both the 2 main parties.
I guess I leaned towards Lib Dems but have had my fingers well and truly burned there so they have lost my vote for decades at least.

My time is more for consensus politics and politicians and I just wish all those consensus politicians.(of whom there are lots in all parties), would speak out more and join forces more, politics and the UK would in my opinion be far better for that.
I also think the voters would appreciate that more too rather than, they did this,they didn't do this,backbiting,tennis type batting that makes Politics and politicians look childish and also really ridiculous,especially in this modern age.

King Gizzard
05-05-2012, 09:44 PM
Don't see what's so wrong about saying ''not bothered'' that's his opinion and he's entitled to think it, like the many others who don't really care for any of the parties/politics in general.

Smithy
05-05-2012, 09:44 PM
Why bother to post smithy if you have no opinion?.....
I am a liberal thinker and support the nurture of all back to work or training.

His opinion is that he is not bothered..

.

[3]

Shaun
05-05-2012, 09:45 PM
Out of interest joey did you vote in favour of PR? Since you appear to be in favour of consensus politics. I did. It's a shame how easily it was defeated in that referendum.

Boothy
05-05-2012, 09:46 PM
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/result/94567

Niall
05-05-2012, 09:48 PM
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/result/94567

This test looks good :amazed: -does-

Kizzy
05-05-2012, 09:49 PM
Don't see what's so wrong about saying ''not bothered'' that's his opinion and he's entitled to think it, like the many others who don't really care for any of the parties/politics in general.

I don't wish to argue nathan but when someone makes a thread designed for fm's to post their opinion on a subject then a response of 'not bothered' is not productive to the discussion. If he were to elaborate and explain why he was not bothered it may make some sense.

Brother Leon
05-05-2012, 09:53 PM
Used to back the Lib Dems as they actually understood Students and people my age as a whole. They can get stuffed now though.

They all can. Galloway for P.M :idc:

Kizzy
05-05-2012, 09:53 PM
I only got your result there boothy :)

GypsyGoth
05-05-2012, 10:06 PM
I don't support any party.

Some of my views can seem strict but others I have are pretty liberal, and it depends what mood I'm in.

I'd usually vote for a politician's personality rather than their party.

Shaun
05-05-2012, 10:08 PM
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/graphic2/118424_eng.jpg

You are a social democratic Cosmopolitan. 13 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 36 percent are more extremist than you.

http://www.politicaltest.net/test/graphic6/118424_eng.jpg

how wonderfully decisive

Niall
05-05-2012, 10:12 PM
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/result/118417/

I'm apparently a Social Democrat. I don't agree with that. :suspect:

arista
05-05-2012, 10:13 PM
Used to back the Lib Dems as they actually understood Students and people my age as a whole. They can get stuffed now though.

They all can. Galloway for P.M :idc:


That would be Fun.

LemonJam
05-05-2012, 10:15 PM
According to that quiz I'm a social democratic Cosmopolitan ... and I thought cosmopolitan was just a cocktail.

Cosmopolitan - 37% [as opposed to nationalistic]
Secular - 15% [as opposed to fundamentalist]
Visionary - 18% [as opposed to reactionary]
Anarchistic - 23% [as opposed to authoritarian]
Communistic - 25% [as opposed to capitalistic]
Pacifist - 24% [as opposed to militaristic]
Ecological - 18% [as opposed to anthropocentric]

-looks all these words up-

LemonJam
05-05-2012, 10:16 PM
osnap shu

thesheriff443
05-05-2012, 10:19 PM
I don't wish to argue nathan but when someone makes a thread designed for fm's to post their opinion on a subject then a response of 'not bothered' is not productive to the discussion. If he were to elaborate and explain why he was not bothered it may make some sense.

you just want to chew the fat a post is a post good bad or ugly!

Shaun
05-05-2012, 10:20 PM
they are cocktails james. -pours you one-

-laughs at ElProximo's right-wing bigotry Manhattan-

arista
05-05-2012, 10:34 PM
I don't wish to argue nathan but when someone makes a thread designed for fm's to post their opinion on a subject then a response of 'not bothered' is not productive to the discussion. If he were to elaborate and explain why he was not bothered it may make some sense.


It could be his Age.

Josy
05-05-2012, 10:36 PM
His response to the thread was he considers himself to be not bothered about politics, thats his opinion I really dont see what the big deal is? so can we stick to the topic now?

joeysteele
05-05-2012, 10:55 PM
Out of interest joey did you vote in favour of PR? Since you appear to be in favour of consensus politics. I did. It's a shame how easily it was defeated in that referendum.

I didn't support AV Shaun no, I am in favour of PR but I thought AV to be a poor step on the road to it.
I think the first past the post delivers stronger Govt but not much in the way of consensus Govt. I would support PR in a future referendum on the issue.

Also having said all that,I regret not supporting AV now, not that it would have come into effect anyway being so soundly beaten and I can see the point you are likely making that it would have been a step towards a better PR system and as you point out, likely would have created a better environment for censensus politics to thrive more.

Jack_
05-05-2012, 11:11 PM
A social liberal (i.e. do anything you want so long as it's not hurting anyone else) but definitely not a market one...I'm anti-capitalist.

I hate privatisation and I dislike how powerful the private sector is. I think capitalism only exploits the working class and is a system which will only continue to widen the gap between rich and poor. I also think the concept of meritocracy is an absolute myth. All spoken like a true Marxist I guess...and I've said it before on here but I'm fascinated by his works and theories so far from what I've learnt, so yeah. And I'll take the test in a bit.

Down with the bourgeois :p

arista
05-05-2012, 11:16 PM
A social liberal (i.e. do anything you want so long as it's not hurting anyone else) but definitely not a market one...I'm anti-capitalist.

I hate privatisation and I dislike how powerful the private sector is. I think capitalism only exploits the working class and is a system which will only continue to widen the gap between rich and poor. I also think the concept of meritocracy is an absolute myth. All spoken like a true Marxist I guess...and I've said it before on here but I'm fascinated by his works and theories so far from what I've learnt, so yeah. And I'll take the test in a bit.

Down with the bourgeois :p

No Jack
No Down With
to anyone.


There is No Nation that has Marxism Working.


Its a Rat Race
Climb The Ladder Jack.

Kizzy
05-05-2012, 11:23 PM
You are a cosmopolitan Social Democrat . 16 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 65 percent are more extremist than you.
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/result/118443/

This is my daughter...Who insisted on doing this before me...

This is me...

You are an authoritarian Socialist. 1 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 94 percent are more extremist than you.
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/result/118460/

Jack_
06-05-2012, 12:28 AM
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/graphic2/118476_eng.jpg

Bit more 'cosmopolitan' and pacifistic than that, and secular should be at 100%, but otherwise it seems pretty accurate.

Kizzy
06-05-2012, 12:44 AM
His response to the thread was he considers himself to be not bothered about politics, thats his opinion I really dont see what the big deal is? so can we stick to the topic now?

Then why post anything?
There are lots of threads I have no interest in, and I'm not bothered about.
It is not a big deal, just seems unusual josy :)

Novo
06-05-2012, 01:09 AM
Sailor

Bollo
06-05-2012, 02:12 AM
Conservative at the moment

arista
06-05-2012, 11:41 AM
Conservative at the moment

Nothing Wrong With That.



Feel The Force

Omah
06-05-2012, 04:14 PM
The test tells me "You are a Social Democrat"

Wiki says "Social democracy is officially a reformist democratic socialist political ideology. Social democracy supports legal entitlements in social rights for citizens. These are made up of universal access to public services such as: workers' compensation, universal health care and universal education, and other services such as child care and care for the elderly. Social democracy is connected with the trade union labour movement and supports collective bargaining rights for workers. Contemporary social democracy advocates freedom from discrimination based on differences of: ability/disability, age, class, ethnicity, gender, language, race, religion, and sexual orientation."

That's me, near enough ..... :idc:

Redway
06-05-2012, 04:43 PM
I don't care.

MTVN
06-05-2012, 05:08 PM
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/graphic2/118801_eng.jpg

Kizzy
06-05-2012, 05:23 PM
Wheres the top bit MTVN?

MTVN
06-05-2012, 05:30 PM
Oh it said I was a cosmopolitan Social Democrat, wouldn't have thought to describe myself as that but when I googled it I found a description from this guy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Held) saying it means "promoting the rule of law at the international level; greater transparency, accountability and democracy in global governance; a deeper commitment to social justice in the pursuit of a more equitable distribution of life chances; and the regulation of the global economy through the public management of global trade and financial flows", which I do sorta agree with

Kizzy
07-05-2012, 12:52 AM
Oh it said I was a cosmopolitan Social Democrat, wouldn't have thought to describe myself as that but when I googled it I found a description from this guy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Held) saying it means "promoting the rule of law at the international level; greater transparency, accountability and democracy in global governance; a deeper commitment to social justice in the pursuit of a more equitable distribution of life chances; and the regulation of the global economy through the public management of global trade and financial flows", which I do sorta agree with

Same as my daughter! you will ding dang do for me kid! :)