Noms Talk

[Josy]

Do you want them to be allowed to talk about nominations this series?

[King Gizzard]

No.

[michael21]

miss read the Title :laugh:

[Niamh.]

No, definitely not and they should be properly punished for doing so, BBs gotten too soft even changing rules instead of punishing rule breaks

[Marsh.]

No, definitely not and they should be properly punished for doing so, BBs gotten too soft even changing rules instead of punishing rule breaks

This, this and this.

[Vanessa]

No! It shouldn't be allowed! :nono:

[MTVN]

No, they'll probably go do a "twist" in week one though where they're allowed to talk about them "until further notice" again and never stop them

[Jordan.]

miss read the Title :laugh:

:suspect:

Nope.

[Josy]

No, definitely not and they should be properly punished for doing so, BBs gotten too soft even changing rules instead of punishing rule breaks

Yeah I agree with this.

[Black Dagger]

The only time it's been good to talk about noms was when Aaron destroyed Anton.

[Kizzy]

no way, it adds to the paranoia if they can't which makes the day after noms day sooo funny....everyone looking at each other thinking ' did you nominate me biatch?'

[Niamh.]

The only time it's been good to talk about noms was when Aaron destroyed Anton.

Yeah, that was pretty amazing tbf :laugh:

[MTVN]

Seem to remember Anton surviving that eviction despite being odds on favourite to go, Aaron looked very silly indeed that day

[Black Dagger]

Meh, it was against Aden, it'd have been silly for him to have gone :tongue:

[Roy Mars III]

No.

When there are nom talks aloud, they never do it right

[Jack_]

Yes.

It encourages gameplay, which leads to more entertainment. What's not to like?

If not permanently then at least for a week or two during each series, as the bare minimum.

[BigBrotherfan4ever]

Yes.

It encourages gameplay, which leads to more entertainment. What's not to like?

If not permanently then at least for a week or two during each series, as the bare minimum.

This, but I wouldn't want them to be able to talk about noms the whole series, just a week or two.

[MTVN]

Meh I don't care about the "gameplay", it just encourages cliques who conspire to put the same people up each week. They should just be people nominating based on who has been annoying them recently or who they don't like, not as part of a "game" or because of other peoples influence

[joeysteele]

No, for me it spoils the series, also it means that more time is taken up in higlights programmes too where all they are doing is talking about who they may nominate themselves and who the others have or will nominate.

I really hope they don't do that this series.

[Maia]

Meh I don't care about the "gameplay", it just encourages cliques who conspire to put the same people up each week. They should just be people nominating based on who has been annoying them recently or who they don't like, not as part of a "game" or because of other peoples influence

This.

No way should it be allowed, completely ruins the series when it is. All this cliquey voting block gameplay rubbish isn't in the slightest bit entertaining.

[Shanna]

I've voted No.

I wouldn't mind seeing it on occasion, but not permanently no.

[Patrick]

Depends.

If the housemates are like the BB5 lot and embrace game playing, then yes. For sure.

But if they're all bitchy bastards like last year's lot who just gang up on certain housemates, then no.

[Marsh.]

Yes.

It encourages gameplay, which leads to more entertainment. What's not to like?

If not permanently then at least for a week or two during each series, as the bare minimum.

Nah, it doesn't really work with the BBUK format. Allowing them to talk about nominations doesn't automatically make it like BBUSA.
Don't like the idea of people just going along with the decisions of others. It's best that they're comfortable in making their own individual choices.

[Locke.]

No. It was only good for the one week last year when Anton destroyed Aaron.

[Gillian-73]

No. It spoils it!

[DrunkerThanMoses]

Yes, more game talk please

[mkdfan]

I like it when they can't talk about noms because when they are punished and BB recites the WHOLE conversation, it can really drop some HMs in the doo doo.

[Scotty07]

I like it when they can't talk about noms because when they are punished and BB recites the WHOLE conversation, it can really drop some HMs in the doo doo.

I prefer not for exactly this reason for a start:devil:, but the punishments for discussing them need to be far more interesting and imaginative than just simply taking hot water away for a few days.:sleep:

[DigitalSid]

Depends.

If the housemates are like the BB5 lot and embrace game playing, then yes. For sure.

But if they're all bitchy bastards like last year's lot who just gang up on certain housemates, then no.

This.

[rk3388]

well, housemates are always going to vote as a group - i just think its more entertaining when we see them gameplaying over them dropping suttle hints

[Jase.]

Ew, no.

[iRyan]

Yes.

It encourages gameplay, which leads to more entertainment. What's not to like?

If not permanently then at least for a week or two during each series, as the bare minimum.

This.

[swinearefine]

No, I don't find discussing nominations the least bit entertaining. And I like when housemates get punished for discussing them and the paranoia of not knowing who's nominated you.

[chuff me dizzy]

No, it spoilt last years show for me

[Marcus.]

an big fat no from me

[reece(:]

Depends on the circumstances, not if we'll end up with another BB12.

[Marcus.]

wow from us to big brother big fat no to nom talk