Should they get rid of Head to Head Evictions?

[Craiggy]

I think they should get rid of head to head nominations for eviction. They should have a min of 3 housemates up. It would stop people from abusing a system and abusing a save for a housemate you dont want to save, when you want other housemates to go.

Thoughts?

[Jake.]

From a HM point of view, no. If two people are the least popular and therefore recieve the most noms, why should another HM be dragged down with them? But I do see your point.

[fruit_cake]

I agree, all evictions should be three way, it would make it much more interesting and give us more chance to get rid of the bores.

[starry]

Yes, but it's too obvious for the stupid people in charge now, it was said last year as well.

[joeysteele]

I'd prefer seeing more of them up than just 2 as well. However the talking about nominations helped create the 2 way battle this week in part. Maybe no talking and plotting noms would have resulted in more housemates up.

Maybe they should change it and have them all up every week with housmates nominating who doesn't go up rather than who does, that way ensuring likely that there will always be more housemates up week after week.

I still think just going with the nominations as they are is the best way though, without being able to talk at all about nominations and have much stronger punishments for doing so.

[Merry Mockmas]

Yes otherwise it's just a vote to evict, also if there was more up for eviction last night then Chris would have sailed through.

[Jarvio]

I agree, all evictions should be three way, it would make it much more interesting and give us more chance to get rid of the bores.

But the bores always stay, even in 3-way evictions

[SharkAttack]

What, no poll? http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/pp32/sharkattack_torrential/sFun_tease2.gif

[saz2011]

always better when more people are up