what sexuality is Benedict ?

[waterhog]

what sexuality is Benedict ? 17.06.12

it could be all front,
examples of partners from Arne to Annie,
i don't believe it,
i think Benedict is driven by fanny.
he is a old man,
sex has taken its toll,
but he has got a fit body,
will it ultimately destroy his sole.
are the young viewers interested,
do the consequences dawn,
or is this a promotion,
for the world of porn.
big brother i thank,
a platform for a porn star,
i am totally fine with Benedict,
but in him there will be a mental scar.
have you decided,
please vote on his sexuality,
do you agree we are all sexual beings,
or is this a cop out to get on TV reality.

( i would love to no what you think of this Benedict ?
please choose from one of my 4 options or if you think
something else i would love to no ?)

1. i think Benedict enjoys all sexual acts and loves his job.
2.i think Benedict says all this to make himself look big to get lady's.
3.i don't care or want to hear about this as it is a private issue.
4. your poems are really the worse act anyone can do.

[Urban Cragou]

I don't give one. Sexuality doesn't mean anything to me.

[LemonJam]

Straight but trying to be ~edgy~

[lostalex]

I think he's str8, but "gay for pay".

He said he's done "escorting" before, so i'm sure that means he's had sex with men for money.

[Semtex]

It could be all front,
Where does he shunt?
For good money I'd say bum and *******

[fruit_cake]

he seems straight but would never rule anything out

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

i have seen him on a vid that was taken from like a gay cam site kind of thing and he was either acting stupid on purpose or was genuinely clueless

he said he didnt know the difference between a top and a bottom

[Samuel.]

He summed it up best himself.

[Livia]

It's his business. I don't understand all the speculation.

[Kizzy]

Conors reaction in the pool was classic, he looked like he wanted to jump out in case he caught 'gay' off him haha.
It was a bit rude to ask that question tbh, just as he works in the sex industry it shouldn't follow that his private life is open to discussion I guess...

[Marc]

Doesn't matter, but I guess he probably would have sex with men for his job

[Mrluvaluva]

He doesn't do labels....

[Black Dagger]

He summed it up best himself.

This, basically.

[Josy]

He doesnt like placing it in a box........



Um his sexuality that is.

[thesheriff443]

he will take straight votes and gay votes!

[erinp5]

Interesting article here
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/sep/01/johnny-anglais-sex-stripper-teacher

I think he is a pretencious fake .I don't care what his sexuality is ,I don't like him as a housemate.

[Kizzy]

The link is broken, and I don't like him either, it is simply for what he does for a living. I know that makes me judgemental and so on I don't really care.

[Visage]

I don't care...

[erinp5]

The link is broken, and I don't like him either, it is simply for what he does for a living. I know that makes me judgemental and so on I don't really care.

The link is working now.

[Cherry Christmas]

He doesnt like placing it in a box........



Um his sexuality that is.

:joker:

[Urban Cragou]

It's his business. I don't understand all the speculation.

Exactly. If somebody wants to tell the world what sexuality they are, that's fine. If they don't, that's fine and if Benedict doesn't want to say it's none of our business so there's no point speculating.

[Kizzy]

Well well well, Mr head of personal,social and health studies....
I would not have reinstated you in your post, your philosophy goes against everything that is taught within this subject.
The physical and mental dangers of a career in the sex industry are not to be advocated to anyone least of all children. The 'scraps' of evidence he refers to are well documented studies that are still ongoing relating to the effect porn has on the attitudes teens have towards sex and their perception of sex and intimacy.

I also found this quote a little contradictory...
''Anyone under the age of 18 viewing pornography in the UK is doing so illegally. I would not condone them doing so. However, I do not see that viewing sexual intercourse, or witnessing nudity, poses any threat or danger to that child. If anything, exposure to the realities of sex and nudity and living in a society where we are happy to discuss such issues openly makes for a safer and healthier environment for young people''

What a pathetic attempt to justify something that most parents actively try everyday to protect their children from?

[The_Big_Send_Off]

He's a 'Human Being' ffs!

[Donovan.]

Well well well, Mr head of personal,social and health studies....
I would not have reinstated you in your post, your philosophy goes against everything that is taught within this subject.
The physical and mental dangers of a career in the sex industry are not to be advocated to anyone least of all children. The 'scraps' of evidence he refers to are well documented studies that are still ongoing relating to the effect porn has on the attitudes teens have towards sex and their perception of sex and intimacy.

I also found this quote a little contradictory...
''Anyone under the age of 18 viewing pornography in the UK is doing so illegally. I would not condone them doing so. However, I do not see that viewing sexual intercourse, or witnessing nudity, poses any threat or danger to that child. If anything, exposure to the realities of sex and nudity and living in a society where we are happy to discuss such issues openly makes for a safer and healthier environment for young people''

What a pathetic attempt to justify something that most parents actively try everyday to protect their children from?

I don't really see that as contradictory. He's saying that he doesn't see the problem with teens getting exposure to this, but doesn't support them doing anything illegal. It's like if I said I like pork and think that there isn't anything wrong with eating it, but if it's against your religion I don't think you should eat it.

[Kizzy]

I don't really see that as contradictory. He's saying that he doesn't see the problem with teens getting exposure to this, but doesn't support them doing anything illegal. It's like if I said I like pork and think that there isn't anything wrong with eating it, but if it's against your religion I don't think you should eat it.

He is saying he does not condone it however he is in support of it in principle... Could we say that of any other illegal act?
Smoking cannabis is illegal many agree with that too in principle but as a teacher you would not be allowed to advocate the use of it to students would you?...
There are already many books, webpages and programmed education relating to all aspects of sex, sexuality and the reality of sexual health matters.
Porn should never be seen as some educational tool, it is not... it gives the wrong image of what real sexual encounters are, and how how in real relationships men and women (or your chosen mate) act, react and interact with each other.

[Jords]

Its simple, bi but prefers women.

Labels just make things simplier and hes trying to be quirky by giving a long-winded answer :laugh:

[alex_front2]

Its simple, bi but prefers women


Yep if a hot -non camp/effeminate - attractive smart bloke came along he may say yes. BBshould stop putting effeminate gay men (no offence) but if producers want a man on man love story they need a 'straight -acting' kind of gay.The likes of
Scot, and previous HMs Tom Mario Rodrigo Denis et al wont work. Having said this Benedict is more a vagitarian.