bad scott

[Marcus.]

bad scott if ture

BBXtra ‏@BigBrotherXtra
'Big Brother' bosses have repriimandedScott Mason over his conduct after he threatened to slap Becky Hannon.

[Black Dagger]

LMAO.

Good ole Scott :pipe:

[Me. I Am Salman]

:joker:

[Marcus.]

that is bad scott poor becky

[smeagol]

thought he was on final warning. doubt meant it.

[chuff me dizzy]

LMAO.

Good ole Scott :pipe:

What if had said it about Deana? you are one of the people whos attacked Conor for WEEKS and now its funny because Scotts said it about Becky? double standards by any chance ? and I notice Salmans jumped in with a :joker: all noted !!

[Me. I Am Salman]

SCOTT Mason was given a roasting by Big Brother after threatening to slap Becky Hannon during a booze-fuelled bust-up.

The acid-tongued 21-year-old lashed out when Becky branded him an alcoholic for guzzling loads of booze during a pool party.

The history student reacted angrily to her claims that he was drunk and warned her: “I’d come over there and slap you if I was.”

He then launched into a major rant, storming: “I find people annoying. I’ve never heard so much sh*t in all my life. Just ******* off you tw*ts.”

When 19-year-old Becky told him he could be given a warning over his antics, he hit back: “It’s the truth, bitch. Just kick me out of the house.”

Scott was called to the Diary Room and reminded about the rules regarding behaviour in the house.

But while he escaped a formal warning, the lad is skating on thin ice.

He has already been reprimanded for alleged racist comments after he poked fun at Deana Uppal, 23, for eating with her hands, claiming she does it because she is Indian.

And he was told off for trying to get drunk by knocking back aftershave.

Meanwhile, Scott’s dreams came true as BB ordered the housemates to become party animals for the next three days.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/bigbrother/view/263918/Big-Brother-2012-Sozzled-bad-boy-Scott-Mason-rapped-after-bust-up-/

"it's the truth, bitch" LOL

[Me. I Am Salman]

What if had said it about Deana? you are one of the people whos attacked Conor for WEEKS and now its funny because Scotts said it about Becky? double standards by any chance ? and I notice Salmans jumped in with a :joker: all noted !!

:joker::laugh::laugh3::laugh2::joker::laugh:

[MTVN]

Well I do think Chuffs right that the reaction would be a bit different if Conor said it or if it was said to Deana..

[Vicky.]

Oh dear D:

[Marc]

:laugh2:

[Vicky.]

That said the star and bbxtra arent really the best sources of info :laugh:

[Marc]

That said the star and bbxtra arent really the best sources of info :laugh:

What are you on about? I learned all about Britney Spears' election as President and Jordan's Oscar nomination in the star. It's very informative

[reece(:]

BB bosses are desperate to keep them all in so will just give warning after warning:bored:

[optimisticcynic]

I think it's disgraceful that a bloke should threaten violence to a woman (yes, even Becky!). No ifs, and or buts. Fix up, Scott. Poor effort.

[Kazanne]

Well I do think Chuffs right that the reaction would be a bit different if Conor said it or if it was said to Deana..

Agreed.

[Jords]

Probably just another made-up story.

[smeagol]

shame he didn't do it but that would be cruelty to animals.

scott is a weazle i woudn't take anythign he says seriously. especially the word slap, lot different to punch

[optimisticcynic]

I think Scott would struggle to replicate Conor's menacing demeanour, and it probably sounded like some cliche scene from Ugly Betty between Mark and the good-looking receptionist, but if it frightened Becky in any way, it requires an apology and some acknowledgment of what his behaviour represents.
Still not a fan of either of them.

[MatthewS]

Damn. If he actually slapped Becky he would have been an instant legend. Instead, he's still the same irrelevant floater he's always been. so close.

[MrWong]

Scott's lucky he wasn't given the boot.

However, this is BBxtra/TheDailyStar so it might be a load of gash.

[Black Dagger]

What if had said it about Deana? you are one of the people whos attacked Conor for WEEKS and now its funny because Scotts said it about Becky? double standards by any chance ? and I notice Salmans jumped in with a :joker: all noted !!

Scott can't be taken seriously... and anyway she called him an alcoholic, Deana did nothing to Conor from what we saw. :pipe:

Are you really talking to me about double standards? Pot calling the kettle springs to mind.

[Doogle]

The difference between Conor and Scott is a lot. I think it's quite clear Conor would've hurt Deana, whereas Scott wouldn't be able to even poke Becky probably :joker:

[MatthewS]

Conor may be a lot of things, but we have no reason to think he'd actually beat a woman.....that's a massive stretch.

[Niamh.]

So basically final warnings mean **** all then?

[HBB1508]

I don't think it's double standards - if you put yourself in a girls shoes in the house - Scott threatening to slap you would make you wet yourself laughing as he is as ineffectual as a gnat, and he was drunk (not that it's an excuse just a fact),on the other hand if Conor threatened to punch you I think you would feel worried as the man looks menacing at the best of times and he wasn't drunk when he went off on the Deana rant.

[sampvt]

I am trying to rationalise this. On the one hand we have a jack the lad type who has no history of violence but in a rant he threatened to preform an act that was way past reality on all levels on someone well out of earshot and was at best a gobby and stupid thing to do but the girl was never in any danger based on the situation.

On the other hand we have a drunken gay man who who has a history who threatens to violate a girl TO HER FACE and BB decide to do nothing and the Deana deluded think Scotts actions were far worse. What planet are these people from. Both of them should be out here now no questions asked but to say Scott is naughty but conor is violent is way past logical.

[sampvt]

I don't think it's double standards - if you put yourself in a girls shoes in the house - Scott threatening to slap you would make you wet yourself laughing as he is as ineffectual as a gnat, and he was drunk (not that it's an excuse just a fact),on the other hand if Conor threatened to punch you I think you would feel worried as the man looks menacing at the best of times and he wasn't drunk when he went off on the Deana rant.

Being inefectual because of size and demeanor is a BS comparison, ask the victims of Peter sutcliffe or Myra Hindley. Neither of them came across as burly and outwardly nasty. You only need to look at laura, small pocket rocket with a black belt. SCOTT SHOULDNT BE THERE . he should be out here on his dads sofe speaking normal again.

[Vicky.]

I am trying to rationalise this. On the one hand we have a jack the lad type who has no history of violence but in a rant he threatened to preform an act that was way past reality on all levels on someone well out of earshot and was at best a gobby and stupid thing to do but the girl was never in any danger based on the situation.

On the other hand we have a drunken gay man who who has a history who threatens to violate a girl TO HER FACE and BB decide to do nothing and the Deana deluded think Scotts actions were far worse. What planet are these people from. Both of them should be out here now no questions asked but to say Scott is naughty but conor is violent is way past logical.

'Scott was called to the Diary Room and reminded about the rules regarding behaviour in the house.'

BB did exactly the same to him as they did to conor.


Anyway, IF this story is true, I wonder if we will see it. Have we seen any of scotts supposed other warnings? (besides the eating with her hands thing)

[sampvt]

'Scott was called to the Diary Room and reminded about the rules regarding behaviour in the house.'

BB did exactly the same to him as they did to conor.


Anyway, IF this story is true, I wonder if we will see it. Have we seen any of scotts supposed other warnings? (besides the eating with her hands thing)

Vicky I thought they called conor in and gave him a formal warning. They also called Scott in and gave him a formal for insulting Deana. Were they both not on final warnings, that was my perception anyway. If so BB did nothing other than warn him but if he was already on his last full and final formal warning, they effectivle did nothing. Am I wrong here, just checking. This q is based on what has been reported, we are not even sure Conor was on a final formal but we saw BB give Scott his on the BOTS show.

[Vicky.]

Being inefectual because of size and demeanor is a BS comparison, ask the victims of Peter sutcliffe or Myra Hindley. Neither of them came across as burly and outwardly nasty. You only need to look at laura, small pocket rocket with a black belt. SCOTT SHOULDNT BE THERE . he should be out here on his dads sofe speaking normal again.

Agree with this 100%

We had the same with Tom last year. he could threaten violence and act agressive (kicking things at people in a rage etc) but because he was small and scrawny noone cared. Whereas jay just had to look at someone the wrong way and people were screaming he was an agressive bully and should be thrown out...and I was by no means a fan of Jay either but it was unfair


I do think though, part of the reason people dont seem seem to be as wound up as with the conor thing is because they havent actually seen it like they saw that. There was pure venom in the way conor said it and he later admitted himself it was out of anger (not banter as some of his fans originally claimed). If this was shown (even just in a fb vid) and scott seemed very serious when he said these things, I would expect an uproar too. Its a bit hard to get upset at a story printed in the daily star, especially given their track record with BB. Obviously theres a few members who would only kick off if it was deana on the recieving end, but on the same note there are members who would play down anything that happened to deana while kicking off if te same thing happened to another housemate

[Vicky.]

Vicky I thought they called conor in and gave him a formal warning. They also called Scott in and gave him a formal for insulting Deana. Were they both not on final warnings, that was my perception anyway. If so BB did nothing other than warn him but if he was already on his last full and final formal warning, they effectivle did nothing. Am I wrong here, just checking. This q is based on what has been reported, we are not even sure Conor was on a final formal but we saw BB give Scott his on the BOTS show.
I have only seen it in daily star articles that scott was on his final warning...I dont know if its been confirmed elsewhere?

And what we saw of conor, he got a slight ticking off. yeah BOTS claimed (after the outrage about him just getting slightly told off) that he recieved a formal warning...however I still believe if that did happen, we would have seen it...the same as we saw the formal warnings for racism each time.

Assuming scott was indeed on his final warning, and this story is true and they have just told him off this time, then yes, final warnings are useless.

[smeagol]

did anyone see the warning when scott drank the aftershave? i didn't even see him do it or the warning unless i missed it. ??

[Vicky.]

did anyone see the warning when scott drank the aftershave? i didn't even see him do it or the warning unless i missed it. ??
As far as I know, that was just another daily star article too :S

[Beso]

I hope he's willing to face the backlash of the ripple.

[fitz2k2]

there bot booting anyone out meaning you can do whatever you want

[smeagol]

As far as I know, that was just another daily star article too :S

oh i didn't think i saw it. its true though as emma spoke to his dad on bots the other night. and mentioned it. wonder why it wasn't shown

[Vicky.]

oh i didn't think i saw it. its true though as emma spoke to his dad on bots the other night. and mentioned it. wonder why it wasn't shown

Hmm...its possible then that there is actually a bit of truth to these DS articles

As for it not being shown, maybe they thought it would attract a lot of complaints (people saying the hms arent looked after properly etc)

I dont know why I have so much faith in the producers to show us the full story after they completely covered up freezergate (and any convo relating to it) last year really :joker:

[dyfed]

When watching bots last night,Emma spoke to Scott's dad,they must be from different parts of the UK,as Scott and his Dad's accent was so different.....

[chuff me dizzy]

Well I do think Chuffs right that the reaction would be a bit different if Conor said it or if it was said to Deana..

EXACTLY, Bunch of hypocrits

[chuff me dizzy]

I don't think it's double standards - if you put yourself in a girls shoes in the house - Scott threatening to slap you would make you wet yourself laughing as he is as ineffectual as a gnat, and he was drunk (not that it's an excuse just a fact),on the other hand if Conor threatened to punch you I think you would feel worried as the man looks menacing at the best of times and he wasn't drunk when he went off on the Deana rant.

Of course its double standards Scott is a bloke the same as Luke ,S Adam etc and Becky is a woman the same as Sara,Deana ,double standards because its happened to Becky(disliked by majority,house laughing stock) instead of Deana(put on a pedestal)

[armand.kay]

How on earth can a thread about Scott and Becky turn into another Deana hate thread. :idc:

[coolface]

lol I don't blame him who wouldn't want to slap her

[Ramsay]

chuff is making some good points

[dyfed]

lol I don't blame him who wouldn't want to slap her
:joker::joker::joker:

[Saph]

he hit back: “It’s the truth, bitch. Just kick me out of the house.”


:laugh2: I love him more now

[optimisticcynic]

Being inefectual because of size and demeanor is a BS comparison, ask the victims of Peter sutcliffe or Myra Hindley. Neither of them came across as burly and outwardly nasty. You only need to look at laura, small pocket rocket with a black belt. SCOTT SHOULDNT BE THERE . he should be out here on his dads sofe speaking normal again.

There ARE times when reading your posts can make me nod in agreement and even chuckle. Love the last line!

[Beso]

I don't think it's double standards - if you put yourself in a girls shoes in the house - Scott threatening to slap you would make you wet yourself laughing as he is as ineffectual as a gnat, and he was drunk (not that it's an excuse just a fact),on the other hand if Conor threatened to punch you I think you would feel worried as the man looks menacing at the best of times and he wasn't drunk when he went off on the Deana rant.

This, even though I seriously doubt connor would harm anyone.

[chuff me dizzy]

chuff is making some good points

No man ,no matter who he is should be allowed ( never mind cheered on as some on here are doing ) to threaten to hit any woman in the face, the uproar when Conor made a threat was OTT,But this one because Becky is not liked is ok ? Oh no its not

[Censored]

.



Just because he's weak-looking and Connor's strong doesn't make it OK for one and not the other.

Personally, I don't think either one has done much wrong other than say something obnoxious in the heat of the moment. People are taking this stuff way too seriously. It's hardly fight night!

[smeagol]

no double standards at all .
he is friends with becky he can get away with saying stuff like that. as we all do with our friends. There is a massive difference between saying you want to slap someone i.e bitch slap and threating to punch and rape.
he wouldn't say it to deana as they arn't friends. if he did he would mean it. and therefore it becomes more serious. but its him and becky mr fluffy and miss blobby.
lets just see the video huh! and see how silly or serious it is.

[Censored]

Don't be daft. Nobody "threatened" to rape anybody. He was just chanting stupid comments, not making serious threats. Act your age.

[smeagol]

Don't be daft. Nobody "threatened" to rape anybody. He was just chanting stupid comments, not making serious threats. Act your age.

bb is not cocoon with a seperate law for thugs. a threat is a threat. and a disgusting one at that. only the mentally unhinged say stuff like that.

[chuff me dizzy]

no double standards at all .
he is friends with becky he can get away with saying stuff like that. as we all do with our friends. There is a massive difference between saying you want to slap someone i.e bitch slap and threating to punch and rape.
he wouldn't say it to deana as they arn't friends. if he did he would mean it. and therefore it becomes more serious. but its him and becky mr fluffy and miss blobby.
lets just see the video huh! and see how silly or serious it is.

He shouldnt "get away with it because its only Becky"YES it is double standards, you cannot pick and choose who can be threatened and who cannot ,one rule for all ,and BB warned him ,so it must have been serious

[chuff me dizzy]

Don't be daft. Nobody "threatened" to rape anybody. He was just chanting stupid comments, not making serious threats. Act your age.

Spot on !!!!!!!!! Glad to see you

[smeagol]

He shouldnt "get away with it because its only Becky"YES it is double standards, you cannot pick and choose who can be threatened and who cannot ,one rule for all ,and BB warned him ,so it must have been serious

lets see the video first huh then we can hang him with conor lol. bb are so scared they got warn now over anything anyway even if was a joke.

[armand.kay]

chuff didn't you say the other day you wanted to punch Scott in the face because his nominations. :joker:

I want to punch his lights out :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

[MrWong]

bb is not cocoon with a seperate law for thugs. a threat is a threat. and a disgusting one at that. only the mentally unhinged say stuff like that.

Spot on. He's got a sick mind.

[Munchkins]

Oh god, im not getting into this
But Scott is an idiot at times -.-

[sampvt]

As a controller of a high profile show, the rules and regs and application of those R and R should be cast in stone. It shouldnt matter who said it or to whom it was said, the core issue should be WHAT WAS SAID That way we dont get different signals and wont need to argue and speculate.

In saying that, statements made in jest like shove it up your jacksie or the like, shouldnt be taken as actual threats. However if a statement is said in anger and directed to someones face, Ie designed to make them feel uncomfortable, afraid or intimidated, the dealer of that rant should be shown the door. Red card end of story, tatty bye dipstick.

BB needs to have some respect in order to control the program, this year they have zero control and zero abitratory skills, ergo zero respect and the end result is the series is pre ordained with a blatant winner from any gender or race they see fit. They cant afford to run the show with tight controls and manufacture their own winner at the same time so they change the rules and play silly buggers with the public and expect to get the 2 million watchers, no chance.

[vortex]

I don't like Becky but that was awful coming from Scott and wasn't this his final warning? he should have been removed... what I don't understand is how Becky and Scott are friends, Scott always bitches about Becky and she seems so bossy around him, he should be careful with her, 'cos if he snaps at her comments that could be his end.

[jet]

Scott's lucky he wasn't given the boot.

However, this is BBxtra/TheDailyStar so it might be a load of gash.

BB couldn't give Scott the boot after Conor got away with far worse. Conor was the lucky one. Conor's persona is threatening and he used the word 'PUNCH' not slap - and he implied sexual violence as well. Scott's 'threat' (if it happened at all) seems like nothing but a schoolboy tantrum directed at a friend compared to the implicit aggression that the muscly and tattoed Conor displayed to someone he hates. :devil:

[sarakss]

I am trying to rationalise this. On the one hand we have a jack the lad type who has no history of violence but in a rant he threatened to preform an act that was way past reality on all levels on someone well out of earshot and was at best a gobby and stupid thing to do but the girl was never in any danger based on the situation.

On the other hand we have a drunken gay man who who has a history who threatens to violate a girl TO HER FACE and BB decide to do nothing and the Deana deluded think Scotts actions were far worse. What planet are these people from. Both of them should be out here now no questions asked but to say Scott is naughty but conor is violent is way past logical.

Thank you, a voice of reason. Just because a person looks a certain way does not make them more prone to violence.

Look at Jeffrey Dahmer, Son of Sam, Ted Bundy, and even Hitler. All these guys were skinny bitches who could easily be laughed at. It's stupid that people would think Conor's rant is worse when it was clearly stated in an idiotic song behind Deana's back, while Scott's words were said to her face.

Do people think that because he's a skinny, gay dimwit that's he's not capable of anything?

[sarakss]

Being inefectual because of size and demeanor is a BS comparison, ask the victims of Peter sutcliffe or Myra Hindley. Neither of them came across as burly and outwardly nasty. You only need to look at laura, small pocket rocket with a black belt. SCOTT SHOULDNT BE THERE . he should be out here on his dads sofe speaking normal again.

Haha - I did not read your post before my response. Exactly my point!

[sarakss]

When watching bots last night,Emma spoke to Scott's dad,they must be from different parts of the UK,as Scott and his Dad's accent was so different.....

Don't be surprised, but they're from the same place/town. Scott's accent is fake - he learnt that posh schtick from TV shows. I can't imagine how awkward it is at family dinners when everyone's speaking normally and this bottle-blond idiot is putting on an act.

Ever since the first night, I've had my reservations about him. It takes a special kind of weirdo to be fake 24/7.

He did slip up once though - albeit a tiny slip-up - when he talked about nominations and they lost the foosball table.

[jet]

Thank you, a voice of reason. Just because a person looks a certain way does not make them more prone to violence.

Look at Jeffrey Dahmer, Son of Sam, Ted Bundy, and even Hitler. All these guys were skinny bitches who could easily be laughed at. It's stupid that people would think Conor's rant is worse when it was clearly stated in an idiotic song behind Deana's back, while Scott's words were said to her face.

Do people think that because he's a skinny, gay dimwit that's he's not capable of anything?

But the words they say and the way they say them do - and yes, a person is more likely to come across as threatening if they have muscles and tattoo's and use words like PUNCH and 'I'LL STICK IT UP HER...., obviously. To say it was an 'idiotic song' while comparing Scott to mass murderer's is atrocious -and I don't get the comparison, frankly. Are you saying that all mass murderers are skinny bitches?