PDA

View Full Version : Can somebody please explain


Gstar
31-07-2012, 03:27 PM
All this "rigging" business.

Like, can someone properly explain it all because I'm kind of ... lost.

please

Mystic Mock
31-07-2012, 03:29 PM
It was suppose to be the Housemates with the last nominations all through the series that does the task, but in the last minute BB changed it to the ones that got the least nominations this week.

Vicky.
31-07-2012, 03:30 PM
BBs original story claimed it was the housemates with the fewest nominations overall that were going in the white room. This would be Sara Scott and Adam. But they picked Scott, Sara, Conor and LukeS who had to chose between them which would not compete. So not those with the fewest noms.

Then people on facebook started to click on that it would be Adam, Sara and Scott if the story was correct. So started questioning it

About 15 mins later the official story changed to 'housemates with the fewest nominations this week'.

--

Assuming the FB thing was just an erorr (and a huge one at that)

Now we kinda have an issue about why they felt the need to exclude ONE housemate from being picked for the white room. Everyone who is not up for eviction, except for adam had a chance of the pass to the final. Surely to make it fair, it should have been that they HMs pick between themselves out of everyone who isnt up for eviction. rather than BB chosing to exclude one particular housemate :)

Especially after staging an endurance task this week, which Adam won. All of a sudden, a bigger endurance task (which this is) he has been excluded from.

Niamh.
31-07-2012, 03:31 PM
Basically, BB put up on their news feed that the housemates that received the least nominations to date would qualify for the white room task and they were Sara, Scott, Conor and Luke S. Then people started going crazy on FB because the 3 people with the least votes to date are actually Sara, Scott and Adam. Then BB edited the news article to say the Housemates who received the least votes in the last set of nominations

robb
31-07-2012, 03:37 PM
All this "rigging" business.

Like, can someone properly explain it all because I'm kind of ... lost.

please

Me too, but like most people now I couldn't care less.

Vicky.
31-07-2012, 03:38 PM
http://www.bigbrotherxtra.co.uk/?p=7141

Gstar
31-07-2012, 03:39 PM
Thanks guys =]

Looks like it's already failing and the process hasn't even properly started yet

Australias white room task >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ours.

They should have put Anthony and Bhavesh in there *cries*

Sertius
31-07-2012, 03:47 PM
Channel 5 need to drop BB and allow a company that can operate it properly take over. They have ruined it and will certainly be losing viewers.

Anthony Hatface
31-07-2012, 06:39 PM
Thanks guys =]

Looks like it's already failing and the process hasn't even properly started yet

Australias white room task >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ours.

They should have put Anthony and Bhavesh in there *cries*

I had a feeling they wouldn't, but thanks for the kind thought. :blush:

Jords
31-07-2012, 06:48 PM
This whole "twist" stinks of ****e imo

Mrluvaluva
31-07-2012, 06:50 PM
Now we kinda have an issue about why they felt the need to exclude ONE housemate from being picked for the white room. Everyone who is not up for eviction, except for adam had a chance of the pass to the final. Surely to make it fair, it should have been that they HMs pick between themselves out of everyone who isnt up for eviction. rather than BB chosing to exclude one particular housemate :)



But they did decide between themselves and Scott opted out.

Vicky.
31-07-2012, 06:51 PM
But they did decide between themselves and Scott opted out.

I know this. But why make it between the 4 not up for eviction, instead of all 5 who arent up? Seems dodgy as hell to me

Yayita
31-07-2012, 06:52 PM
Fishy, fishy, its all very fishy!

Mrluvaluva
31-07-2012, 07:02 PM
I know this. But why make it between the 4 not up for eviction, instead of all 5 who arent up? Seems dodgy as hell to me

Oh I see what you mean. Sara and Luke S received no nominations though. Conor and Scott received one each, and were therefore the 4 housemates with the least votes, as opposed to this weeks potential evictees being the 4 housemates with the most votes. Adam received 2 nominations this week so missed out? :shrug:

Vicky.
31-07-2012, 07:03 PM
Oh I see what you mean. Sara and Luke S received no nominations though. Conor and Scott received one each, and were therefore the 4 housemates with the least votes, as opposed to this weeks potential evictees being the 4 housemates with the most votes. Adam received 2 nominations this week so missed out? :shrug:

Just seems very convenient, thats all ;)

Especially after he won the endurance task earlier in the week, which was pretty much a watered down version of the white room

Gstar
31-07-2012, 07:39 PM
Omg Anthony replied to me

Thank you!!!!

Gstar
31-07-2012, 07:39 PM
Omg Anthony replied to me

Thank you!!!!

Anthony Hatface
31-07-2012, 09:52 PM
Omg Anthony replied to me

Thank you!!!!

You're very welcome. :) I hope Bhavesh is on the forums as well, as I'm sure he would love to know of the support he has had.

Niamh.
01-08-2012, 09:46 AM
I know this. But why make it between the 4 not up for eviction, instead of all 5 who arent up? Seems dodgy as hell to me

I'd imagine because it was supposed to be the 3 with the least noms but because there were 2 and 2 tied then they had to decide between themselves which 3 did the task