Would you like to see 'Vote to Evict' brought back?

[Razor]

If vote to evict was still in place would we be seeing different housemates in the house?

So with this in mind would you like to see 'Vote to Evict' brought back?

[Munchkins]

No, i'm glad its vote to save. - i like being able to put my favourite through each time they are up

[Flamingjoe]

I only like vote to save when they're are three or more nominees, otherwise it's just pointless.

With a vote to evict, the evictions probably would have gone like this:

Week 1 (Conor, Lydia and Victoria): Lydia
Week 2 (Arron and Chris): Chris
Week 3 (Benedict and Lauren): Benedict
Week 4 (Deana and Lydia): Lydia
Week 5 (Arron, Becky, Conor and Deana): Conor
Week 6 (Conor and Shievonne): Shievonne
Week 7 (Lauren and Luke A): Lauren
Week 8 (Adam, Ashleigh, Caroline, Conor, Deana, Luke A, Luke S and Sara): Caroline
Week 9 (Ashleigh, Becky, Deana and Luke A): Becky

So, it wouldn't have changed much.

Overall, I think I proffered vote to evict because I felt like I had more control over the evictions.

[Black Dagger]

Vote to save hasn't really worked this series anyway.

Caroline going over Ashleigh for start :bored:

But no... vote to evict is ****ing ridiculous... because morons who think watching paint dry is exhilerating and evict most of the decent house-mates.

[Marc]

Both have their disadvantages. Usually with the vote to evict you lose good, entertaining housemates early on. And with vote to save you might lose one of your favourites because you think they're save.

But overall vote to save is fairer because fans get a chance to save who they want rather than evict out of hatred.

[ChristmasNeeve]

Well, I would have said No until this task came up, atleast the nasty HMs would have been gone by now and wouldn't be getting the same as the winner

[billy123]

Yes! i always hated the idea of vote to save and it has proved to be a bad move it removes so much power from the viewers it is awful.

[joeysteele]

No,I don't want vote to evict back and in any case we have had 5 evictions out of 8 which only had 2 housemates up for eviction so in effect either vote to evict or save was in place for those anyway.

I would like to see in future series more housemates up week after week rather than just 2, in part this was encouraged far more by the talking about nominations in the first weeks of the series but definately not, no way do I want vote to evict to be brought back again.
That is one of the best things BB on Channel 5 brought in, the vote to save.

[Livia]

They're damned if they do and damned if they don't.

[chuff me dizzy]

Yes, vote to evict for me ,I think it is much fairer

[halfacrown]

Vote to evict was far better and usually resulted in the *rseholes being dealt with swiftly. I'd like to see all the housemates up a couple of times and some surprise evictions. Please also remove family nominations and screwing with the prize money.

[Jordan.]

Vote to save with atleast three up next series (hopefully).

[Marmalite]

If they're going to continue messing around and engineering with who they put in tasks to get a free ticket to the final and then basically handing over half of the prize money to someone who is an absolute twat, then yes they need to change it back to vote to evict and ensure they put the entire house up for eviction (and a double eviction at that) before they start messing.

[Withano]

Just ejections from the house when apt. I love vote to save. Can you imagine if they done that from the start? Jon Tikkle would have won, Rachel Rice would not have! Charley Uchea would have made the final, most of the disability-sob-story-characters would not have.

[smeagol]

The show would be a lot different right now if it was vote to evict and i would of voted more.
conor becky would of been gone by now

[mirak_eel]

How anyone prefers vote to evict, is beyond me.
If it wasn't for vote to save, Aaron wouldn't have won last year, he would have been evicted if it was vote to evict. Vote to save allows entertaining housemates to stay longer, and gets rid of bores (if theyre put up for eviction, which hasnt happened this year).
If vote to save had been introduced earlier on, Nikki Grahame, Victor, Derek, Makosi, and many others, would have made it to the final of their' respective series', and maybe even won.

Vote to save >>>>> Vote to evict.

[mirak_eel]

Oh yes, and Jon Tickle would have won too.

[AshesonMars]

I preferred vote to evict for pretty much the same reason others have already stated on here.

[Gillian-73]

Keep vote to save, with at least 3 people up each week.

[Marcus.]

keep changing it so it keep the on the toes

[Razor]

The show would be a lot different right now if it was vote to evict and i would of voted more.
conor becky would of been gone by now

Very true.

[glasstangerine]

I am sure they make more money on vote to save. I doubt it will ever change

[sampvt]

If the vote to evict was in this year, Deana would be popping zits at home eating cereal with her fingers week 2. Chuff, Vanessa and me alone would have put the bitch in her place. I would sell the car and the dog to get that twot out she make my teeth itch and hair hurt. I still have nightmares about her eating that carrot with open mouth and saliva dribbling off her botoxed bottom lip, ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[Jords]

Vote to Save is amazing cant believe people want evict back, thats the big characters gone with a click of a finger seriously.

[sampvt]

Vote to save is the producers fav as it protects the likes of Aaron, Becky, Conor and Deana. It also draws in more cash by a mile. BB is no longer a viewer participation program, its contrived by the producers and we are expected to fund it, hence the drop in numbers and votes over the years. Give us the program back and the vote to evict and it will get good again.

[Munchkins]

Vote to Save is amazing cant believe people want evict back, thats the big characters gone with a click of a finger seriously.

I completely agree :)

[Jords]

If the vote to evict was in this year, Deana would be popping zits at home eating cereal with her fingers week 2. Chuff, Vanessa and me alone would have put the bitch in her place. I would sell the car and the dog to get that twot out she make my teeth itch and hair hurt. I still have nightmares about her eating that carrot with open mouth and saliva dribbling off her botoxed bottom lip, ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Week 1 - Lydia v Conor v Victoria
Week 2 - Chris v Arron
Week 3 - Benedict v Lauren

Deana made week 4 on not getting nominated up for starts so thats a load of balls.

Week 4 - Lydia v Deana ... Lydia evicted still
Week 5 - Arron v Deana v Becky v Conor ... Conor would have been evicted
Week 6 - Conor v Shievonne
Week 7 - Lauren v Luke A
Week 8 - 8 HMs up inc. Deana ... Caroline still evicted
Week 9 - Becky v Ash v Deana v Luke A ... Becky guaranteed to be evicted


What do you feel the need to chat bollocks? :)

[Jords]

Also the zit-squeezing/food dribbling comments are absolutely disgusting of you sampvt. Wasnt it you who moaned that people took the micky out of your disability? Yet you think its perfectly fine to mock somebody's appearance whos actually good-looking just to get 1 over her fans.

Sad sad people and the constantly trolling and childish comments need rewarding with a couple of infractions, would definitely not stand for adults lowering theirself to this petty level.

[JTM45]

If the vote to evict was in this year, Deana would be popping zits at home eating cereal with her fingers week 2.

Deluded and racially stereotypical :rolleyes:

Also the zit-squeezing/food dribbling comments are absolutely disgusting of you sampvt.
Sad sad people and the constantly trolling and childish comments need rewarding with a couple of infractions, would definitely not stand for adults lowering theirself to this petty level.

Couldn't agree more Jords!
This 'man' is in his 60's i believe and he acts like a tweenie. Disgusting!

[sampvt]

Sorry I didnt realise I was the only one not allowed to slag contestants. Beg my pardon and I didnt complaign about my disability in the context you are showing it. I was relating it to a troll who had a go at me. I admit my post was a little on the rough side but read back and see who was poking me into doing it. Apologies if I offended.

[Sophiee]

no, the vote to save needs to stay. the vote to evict gets rid of big characters on every eviction, however the vote to save only becomes a vote to evict when it's one against one.

[rayheartbliss]

vote to save is fairer

but vote to evict was way more exciting definitely

viewers are more on the edge of their seat in the old days
and it made eviction nights very entertaining.

it hasn't felt like 100% big brother since it was changed to save
big brother was the only reality show that had voting to get rid of someone rather than to keep someone. and that was a unique element of the show

[Colbert-Bump]

No, vote to save gets rid of the deadwood.