PDA

View Full Version : The Situation Mike warned over Danica row?


Gillian-73
29-08-2012, 07:32 AM
DISCLAIMER.... Initially from the daily star!
Celebrity Big Brother 2012: The
Situation warned over Danica row
August 29, 2012 03:27 by Josh Darvill
Mike 'The Situation' Sorrentino
(Celebrity Big Brother 2012)
Celebrity Big Brother 2012 housemate
The Situation was warned yesterday
following his row with Danica.
We saw The Situation and Danica
rowing in the bedroom on last night’s
highlights show, but the Daily Star
report that some of the tense
argument was cut from the final edit.
The newspaper reports that the US
reality star “flipped” and threatened to
“*******ing kill someone” following his
argument with the model.
Danica had accused The Situation of
being jealous of her friendship with
Prince Lorenzo, telling him to “grow
some balls” and to stop “acting like a
16-year-old”.
The argument went on for TWO
HOURS, with The Situation hitting back
at Danica: “You are one of the fakest
people I’ve ever met.
“You jump from ship to ship to ship. I
don’t like you any more.”
But after The Situation was left wound
up, he was called to the Diary Room
to calm down and reminded about
the house rules.
While The Situation, real name Mike
Sorrentino, was away, Danica
confessed to the other housemates: “I
was actually a bit scared.”
Read more: http://tellymix.co.uk/
reality-tv/big...#ixzz24uwTIrPk

Withano
29-08-2012, 07:47 AM
He claimed to ****ing kill somebody?!

If he did Channel 5 officially ****ing sucks.
Why can't they understand that rape threat and death threats are not okay.
Can't wait to read how The Situation fans defend this one. What a ****.

Cherie
29-08-2012, 07:53 AM
in the HLs last night she did say "she felt a bit scared", which I thought was a bit odd and OTT as the argument wasnt actually that bad, but it makes sense now. Interesting.

Gillian-73
29-08-2012, 07:54 AM
After seeing how angry he was outside the diary room i can quite believe it

Gillian-73
29-08-2012, 07:55 AM
in the HLs last night she did say she was a bit scared, which I thought was a bit odd as the argument wasnt actually that bad. Interesting.

I thought nothing off it at the time but it's starting to make sense now

sampvt
29-08-2012, 08:01 AM
If indeed this is true then BB are to blame. They nurtured this argument and have allowed it to go on too long. If indeed it was a 2 hr fight. If a man screams and shouts at a woman, its sexual harrassment and bullying but if a feeble little female does the same, the man gets called out for death threats and all kinds of nasty ****. The cow started the argument and wouldnt let up. That argument came out of nothing and was contrived by Danica to make herself kook good. She actually turned everything inside out or as the trick cyclist said, she used a mirror to get her point accross.

She is an evil little ***** who is now doing the same thing to Lorenzo that she did to mike. She tweaked mikes nipples now she buries her head in Lorenzos crotch after jumping ship. If he dumps her, watch out Martin as he could be fair game as well.

What amazes me is that she still has people defending her, god only knows why because on a daily basis she shows her own flaws in living colour.

Gillian-73
29-08-2012, 08:08 AM
If indeed this is true then BB are to blame. They nurtured this argument and have allowed it to go on too long. If indeed it was a 2 hr fight. If a man screams and shouts at a woman, its sexual harrassment and bullying but if a feeble little female does the same, the man gets called out for death threats and all kinds of nasty ****. The cow started the argument and wouldnt let up. That argument came out of nothing and was contrived by Danica to make herself kook good. She actually turned everything inside out or as the trick cyclist said, she used a mirror to get her point accross.

She is an evil little ***** who is now doing the same thing to Lorenzo that she did to mike. She tweaked mikes nipples now she buries her head in Lorenzos crotch after jumping ship. If he dumps her, watch out Martin as he could be fair game as well.

What amazes me is that she still has people defending her, god only knows why because on a daily basis she shows her own flaws in living colour.

To be fair to Danica he insulted her hence why the row started

Trasadkel1
29-08-2012, 08:10 AM
This is the same Daily Star that used the headlines BB KNIFE TERROR and suicide watch and according to them Mike was evicted last week added to the fact that the timeframes do not fit in with the argument going in for two hours. All in all a load of made up piffle by the Star.

Withano
29-08-2012, 08:15 AM
If indeed this is true then BB are to blame. They nurtured this argument and have allowed it to go on too long. If indeed it was a 2 hr fight. If a man screams and shouts at a woman, its sexual harrassment and bullying but if a feeble little female does the same, the man gets called out for death threats and all kinds of nasty ****. The cow started the argument and wouldnt let up. That argument came out of nothing and was contrived by Danica to make herself kook good. She actually turned everything inside out or as the trick cyclist said, she used a mirror to get her point accross.

She is an evil little ***** who is now doing the same thing to Lorenzo that she did to mike. She tweaked mikes nipples now she buries her head in Lorenzos crotch after jumping ship. If he dumps her, watch out Martin as he could be fair game as well.

What amazes me is that she still has people defending her, god only knows why because on a daily basis she shows her own flaws in living colour.

Please tell me you're not being serious.
The argument came from Mike claiming that she probably doesn't care that big brother has a crotch shot of her, he then childishly went on to say I just don't think I like you anymore to which she replied "that's fine" not calling her innocent but if you think it escalated from nothing. Well. You're simply wrong.

Big brother are not to blame for his death threats. Its an argument that he lost. Nobody else in Big Brother history has dished out a ****ing death threat.

It amazes you that people are sticking up for Danica? Seriously? A guy threatens to kill somebody and you're surprised people are siding with the opposed. Holy ****.

Gillian-73
29-08-2012, 08:18 AM
This is the same Daily Star that used the headlines BB KNIFE TERROR and suicide watch and according to them Mike was evicted last week added to the fact that the timeframes do not fit in with the argument going in for two hours. All in all a load of made up piffle by the Star.

Hence why i put the disclaimer but this kind of rings true after seeing how mad and angry he was outside the diary room and Danica seemed a bit scared.

Trasadkel1
29-08-2012, 08:20 AM
Please tell me you're not being serious.
The argument came from Mike claiming that she probably doesn't care that big brother has a crotch shot of her, he then childishly went on to say I just don't think I like you anymore to which she replied "that's fine" not calling her innocent but if you think it escalated from nothing. Well. You're simply wrong.

Big brother are not to blame for his death threats. Its an argument that he lost. Nobody else in Big Brother history has dished out a ****ing death threat.

It amazes you that people are sticking up for Danica? Seriously? A guy threatens to kill somebody and you're surprised people are siding with the opposed. Holy ****.

Do you seriously believe the Daily Star. According to them Mike shouldn't be in the house as they reported he was evicted last week!. Also all the events they are referring to happened before the argument even started. It had nothing to do with it.

Withano
29-08-2012, 08:23 AM
Do you seriously believe the Daily Star. According to them Mike shouldn't be in the house as they reported he was evicted last week!. Also all the events they are referring to happened before the argument even started. It had nothing to do with it.

I don't seriously believe the daily star, yet...

But I do seriously believe that if it was true, that guy above would still carry the same opinion which really ****ing annoys me.

Trasadkel1
29-08-2012, 08:24 AM
Hence why i put the disclaimer but this kind of rings true after seeing how mad and angry he was outside the diary room and Danica seemed a bit scared.

He was angry outside the diary room with regard to the task..nothing to do with the argument that started later. Let's be honest did his demeanour during the argument suggest that he was that angry. People need to watch the show back and look at the timescales and it gives you your answer.

Gillian-73
29-08-2012, 08:29 AM
He was angry outside the diary room with regard to the task..nothing to do with the argument that started later. Let's be honest did his demeanour during the argument suggest that he was that angry. People need to watch the show back and look at the timescales and it gives you your answer.

He wasn't angry cos of Ashley no way, that was his excuse but see how quick he started in on Danica and Lorenzo? He was pissed they were chained together. For all we know there may have been another arguement outside the diary room. Wouldn't be the first time it has been edited to death. I'm not saying i believe it just that it could be possible.

Trasadkel1
29-08-2012, 08:32 AM
He wasn't angry cos of Ashley no way, that was his excuse but see how quick he started in on Danica and Lorenzo? He was pissed they were chained together. For all we know there may have been another arguement outside the diary room. Wouldn't be the first time it has been edited to death. I'm not saying i believe it just that it could be possible.

Anything could be possible but let's be honest when you start believing anything written in the Daily Star you are clutching at straws.

muchadoaboutnothing
29-08-2012, 08:33 AM
If indeed this is true then BB are to blame. They nurtured this argument and have allowed it to go on too long. If indeed it was a 2 hr fight. If a man screams and shouts at a woman, its sexual harrassment and bullying but if a feeble little female does the same, the man gets called out for death threats and all kinds of nasty ****. The cow started the argument and wouldnt let up. That argument came out of nothing and was contrived by Danica to make herself kook good. She actually turned everything inside out or as the trick cyclist said, she used a mirror to get her point accross.

She is an evil little ***** who is now doing the same thing to Lorenzo that she did to mike. She tweaked mikes nipples now she buries her head in Lorenzos crotch after jumping ship. If he dumps her, watch out Martin as he could be fair game as well.

What amazes me is that she still has people defending her, god only knows why because on a daily basis she shows her own flaws in living colour.

Totally agree with you samptv. It seems to me that Danica orchestrated that row to make herself look good for the Prince (and the other HMs) and to make Mike look bad. Pity she didn't have the same balls when Jasmine called her a prostitute. I thought that was harsh but now I'm beginning to think that Jasmine was right after all.

sampvt
29-08-2012, 08:35 AM
Please tell me you're not being serious.
The argument came from Mike claiming that she probably doesn't care that big brother has a crotch shot of her, he then childishly went on to say I just don't think I like you anymore to which she replied "that's fine" not calling her innocent but if you think it escalated from nothing. Well. You're simply wrong.

Big brother are not to blame for his death threats. Its an argument that he lost. Nobody else in Big Brother history has dished out a ****ing death threat.

It amazes you that people are sticking up for Danica? Seriously? A guy threatens to kill somebody and you're surprised people are siding with the opposed. Holy ****.

Your love of Danica and all she represents is quite disturbing.

Withano
29-08-2012, 08:38 AM
Totally agree with you samptv. It seems to me that Danica orchestrated that row to make herself look good for the Prince (and the other HMs) and to make Mike look bad. Pity she didn't have the same balls when Jasmine called her a prostitute. I thought that was harsh but now I'm beginning to think that Jasmine was right after all.

Do you agree that a death threat could be justified because of this explanation too? Just curious what kind of people I'm sharing an online forum with...

sampvt
29-08-2012, 08:39 AM
He wasn't angry cos of Ashley no way, that was his excuse but see how quick he started in on Danica and Lorenzo? He was pissed they were chained together. For all we know there may have been another arguement outside the diary room. Wouldn't be the first time it has been edited to death. I'm not saying i believe it just that it could be possible.

Here we go again, lob sided arguments. On the one hand you harp on about how we cant prove this and we cant prove that so we are all tossers yet you openly state here in your post that in no way was his anger atributed to ashley, how the hell do you know this for sure. Once again w are led to believe if we dont like |danica for any reason that we are all stupid or at worst wrong.

Knitting Nana
29-08-2012, 08:40 AM
Big brother are not to blame for his death threats. Its an argument that he lost. Nobody else in Big Brother history has dished out a ****ing death threat.


Yeah they have. That alexandra who threatened rex. She was thrown out straight away. However, she made a threat to a particular person and mike made a general threat that he felt like killing someone. Still no excuse. He was jealous and made himself look silly.

Withano
29-08-2012, 08:42 AM
Your love of Danica and all she represents is quite disturbing.

Whatever dude, the thread is about Mike giving a death threat and to be honest with you, I can't regard any of your opinions as anything but nonsense after reading how you just excused a ****ing death threat.

sampvt
29-08-2012, 08:44 AM
Do you agree that a death threat could be justified because of this explanation too? Just curious what kind of people I'm sharing an online forum with...


You are sharing the forum with people that have no problems separating reality and fantasy. How many times have you muttered Ill kill that twat, when someone upsets you. Loads I bet, yet have you ever been had up for a death threat. These people in there utter stupid things that some of us use to forward a point when we all now such utterances are nothing like real life issues. Its called cherry picking and we all know what kind of people cherry pick, those that dont have a solid point to base their findings on. :dance:

sampvt
29-08-2012, 08:47 AM
Whatever dude, the thread is about Mike giving a death threat and to be honest with you, I can't regard any of your opinions as anything but nonsense after reading how you just excused a ****ing death threat.

Firstly dont ever call me dude and secondly your patronising attitude is derived from your non sensical defence to something that has been explained in numerous other posts. If you feel like efending a ***** and want to slag of a seemingly normal housemate, do it the right way, with facts in evidence, dont start slagging of fellow posters, thats not cool.

Chuckyegg
29-08-2012, 08:47 AM
The Daily Star????

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Withano
29-08-2012, 08:49 AM
You are sharing the forum with people that have no problems separating reality and fantasy. How many times have you muttered Ill kill that twat, when someone upsets you. Loads I bet, yet have you ever been had up for a death threat. These people in there utter stupid things that some of us use to forward a point when we all now such utterances are nothing like real life issues. Its called cherry picking and we all know what kind of people cherry pick, those that dont have a solid point to base their findings on. :dance:

My point is simply
Anybody willing to excuse a death threat does not deserve to have their opinion taken seriously. I'm going to ignore anything further you have to say because you're boring me and repeating yourself.

AnnieK
29-08-2012, 09:10 AM
You are sharing the forum with people that have no problems separating reality and fantasy. How many times have you muttered Ill kill that twat, when someone upsets you. Loads I bet, yet have you ever been had up for a death threat. These people in there utter stupid things that some of us use to forward a point when we all now such utterances are nothing like real life issues. Its called cherry picking and we all know what kind of people cherry pick, those that dont have a solid point to base their findings on. :dance:

I used this very argument to defend Conor's rant during BB13 as I agree that people do say things - and was jumped on for saying it.....I guess a lot of people only agree with you if they like the HM in question. :conf:

I do believe Mike is a very hostile guy - if you have watched JS he is aggressive and argumentative and a bit of a loose cannon - on the HL show the other night after saying he had trained for 80 days he was bragging about getting up in people's faces. To me he has classic "Little Man" syndrome and I find him funny.

The whole Mike / Danica thing is really quite tedious now as well as all the baiting and sniping between opposing parties on here....:sleep:

Trasadkel1
29-08-2012, 09:16 AM
It never ceases to amaze me how some people seem to lose all touch with reality where BB is concerned. My god it makes me wonder how some people live their lives.

thesheriff443
29-08-2012, 09:26 AM
My point is simply
Anybody willing to excuse a death threat does not deserve to have their opinion taken seriously. I'm going to ignore anything further you have to say because you're boring me and repeating yourself.

you ask for members opinion on this issue!
you then throw your toys out of the pram when you get an opinion thats not the same as yours!
accept that other peoples opinion as they accept yours!.

daniel-lewis-1985
29-08-2012, 09:32 AM
He claimed to ****ing kill somebody?!

If he did Channel 5 officially ****ing sucks.
Why can't they understand that rape threat and death threats are not okay.
Can't wait to read how The Situation fans defend this one. What a ****.

Oh ffs.

Its a term of phrase, ive said it in anger. I doubt he actually meant he literally wanted to slit someones throat lol.

Hate it when people take things so seriously.

Wouldnt be suprised if you wrote to Ofcom.

Trasadkel1
29-08-2012, 09:35 AM
Oh ffs.

Its a term of phrase, ive said it in anger. I doubt he actually meant he literally wanted to slit someones throat lol.

Hate it when people take things so seriously.

Wouldnt be suprised if you wrote to Ofcom.

You are so right and it is people like this that are ruining the show. Do they actually live in the real world. It completely astounds me.

sampvt
29-08-2012, 09:35 AM
At last some prominent forum members speak up against these silly posts. well done and lets hope these pretentious comments are put where they belong, in the bin. They are utterances made under duress and are not a part of real life situations.

Withano
29-08-2012, 09:36 AM
you ask for members opinion on this issue!
you then throw your toys out of the pram when you get an opinion thats not the same as yours!
accept that other peoples opinion as they accept yours!.

I didn't ask for peoples opinions? Its not my thread?
But on a personal level anybody willing to excuse a death threat for whatever reason should not have any opinion they have regarded as anything but utter nonsense.

sampvt
29-08-2012, 09:37 AM
I didn't ask for peoples opinions? Its not my thread?
But on a personal level anybody willing to excuse a death threat for whatever reason should not have any opinion they have regarded as anything but utter nonsense.

Read the last 5 posts and concider yourself told.

Cherie
29-08-2012, 09:51 AM
At last some prominent forum members speak up against these silly posts. well done and lets hope these pretentious comments are put where they belong, in the bin. They are utterances made under duress and are not a part of real life situations.

Are prominent forum members views more valid than non prominent and what do you need to get a prominent badge? I want to apply.... :cheer::cheer:

Vanessa
29-08-2012, 09:56 AM
He did not threaten anyone in particular. He was just very angry. he did apologize to Danica the next day. That's good enough for me. :)

Gillian-73
29-08-2012, 09:58 AM
Here we go again, lob sided arguments. On the one hand you harp on about how we cant prove this and we cant prove that so we are all tossers yet you openly state here in your post that in no way was his anger atributed to ashley, how the hell do you know this for sure. Once again w are led to believe if we dont like |danica for any reason that we are all stupid or at worst wrong.

Excuse me when did i call you or anybody else for that matter a tosser?

Gillian-73
29-08-2012, 09:59 AM
Anything could be possible but let's be honest when you start believing anything written in the Daily Star you are clutching at straws.

I didn't say i believe it i said it was possible

MTVN
29-08-2012, 10:03 AM
Oh ffs.

Its a term of phrase, ive said it in anger. I doubt he actually meant he literally wanted to slit someones throat lol.

Hate it when people take things so seriously.

Wouldnt be suprised if you wrote to Ofcom.

This, enough about him making a "death threat" :rolleyes:

Kizzy
29-08-2012, 10:04 AM
Firstly dont ever call me dude and secondly your patronising attitude is derived from your non sensical defence to something that has been explained in numerous other posts. If you feel like efending a ***** and want to slag of a seemingly normal housemate, do it the right way, with facts in evidence, dont start slagging of fellow posters, thats not cool.

mike?...normal?...He calls himself 'the situation'..:joker::joker:
He was out of order last night making snide comments, I don't think we saw even half of what was said. Danica put her argument across well, all her points were valid and she very succinctly put what a lot of people have been thinking regarding 'the situation'

Gillian-73
29-08-2012, 10:05 AM
Once again w are led to believe if we dont like |danica for any reason that we are all stupid or at worst wrong.
As i don't like Danica myself your arguement falls flat!

Vanessa
29-08-2012, 10:05 AM
mike?...normal?...He calls himself 'the situation'..:joker::joker:
He was out of order last night making snide comments, I don't think we saw even half of what was said. Danica put her argument across well, all her points were valid and she very succinctly put what a lot of people have been thinking regarding 'the situation'

That's why he said sorry to her the next day. He's a good guy. :spin:

lostalex
29-08-2012, 10:06 AM
saying "i could kill someone right now" is not a death threat, it's a very common expression of frustration. Whoever doesn't know that needs to get out more. Just like saying "******* you" is not a rape threat.

Vanessa
29-08-2012, 10:08 AM
saying "i could kill someone right now" is not a death threat, it's a very common expression of frustration. Whoever doesn't know that needs to get out more.

I agree. Danica is milking this row for all it's worth. He said sorry to her, but she's still going on about it. Making him feel like he's 100% in the wrong. :bored:

Jordan.
29-08-2012, 10:11 AM
Shocking! I'm concerned for Danicas welfare now :(

Kazanne
29-08-2012, 10:11 AM
I'm not a fan of 'The Situation'(stupid name btw)anyway,we all do and say things we dont mean when we are angry,I doubt he meant it literally,if he has apologized then that should be enough,likewise I hope Danica has apologized for lying about him and leading him on.

Vanessa
29-08-2012, 10:13 AM
I'm not a fan of 'The Situation'(stupid name btw)anyway,we all do and say things we dont mean when we are angry,I doubt he meant it literally,if he has apologized then that should be enough,likewise I hope Danica has apologized for lying about him and leading him on.

She never apologized to him. She insisted Mike said he was 100% in the wrong. It wasn't all his fault! :nono:

joeysteele
29-08-2012, 10:17 AM
Oh ffs.

Its a term of phrase, ive said it in anger. I doubt he actually meant he literally wanted to slit someones throat lol.

Hate it when people take things so seriously.

Wouldnt be suprised if you wrote to Ofcom.

Again, a spot on comment from you,daniel-lewis-1985,well said.

daniel-lewis-1985
29-08-2012, 10:19 AM
Again, a spot on comment from you,daniel-lewis-1985,well said.

:)

chuff me dizzy
29-08-2012, 10:36 AM
SHE was the only one being aggresive, he was as cool as could be

Vanessa
29-08-2012, 10:38 AM
SHE was the only one being aggresive, he was as cool as could be

And yet he still said sorry to her the next day. He felt bad about the argument. Why is she insisting he takes all the blame? It's unfair! :bored:

Brother Leon
29-08-2012, 10:50 AM
What a load of B.S this is lol

Kizzy
29-08-2012, 10:51 AM
He was goading her, his sniping worked and she bit.. He apologised because he knew he was the one at fault.

reece(:
30-08-2012, 06:37 PM
http://www.mrpaparazzi.com/post/20461/Celebrity-Big-Brothers-The-Situation-warned-over-kill-comment-

Madmacs
30-08-2012, 07:14 PM
My point is simply
Anybody willing to excuse a death threat does not deserve to have their opinion taken seriously. I'm going to ignore anything further you have to say because you're boring me and repeating yourself.

...wise decision :dance2:

wendywillow
30-08-2012, 07:45 PM
this doesnt make sense. the argument seemed over i dont see it being a 2 hour agument with death threats? etc... mike wasnt foaming at the mouth or anything. the scared somment was a totally different thing